Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Any one have experience to migrate all VTS tapes from one source to
other
VTS. The problems is that we need to obsolete one of our VTS B-18 but
we
don't have the VTS-IMPORT/EXPORT functions. We need to copy all tapes
Sorry, needed to repost because I only posted to the newsgroup.
Joel C. Ewing wrote:
At one time (a number of years ago) we had a RACF revoke limit 5. Got
similar argument from auditors who wanted 3. We analyzed RACF SMF
records to determine how much lowering the threshold would raise
unfortunately, we haven't CA-1 tape management system.. :(
On 1/15/07, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Any one have experience to migrate all VTS tapes from one source to
other
VTS. The problems is
Hello everyone!
I'm trying within IEFUTL Exit to stop the address space (all other TCBs)
from working; because in certain circumtances I'm asking the operators
(WTOR) to decide if the address space have the right to use more CPU.
To do this I use the status stop macro and it works fine... but
On 1/12/2007 2:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Sandy Stone said:
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:23:28 -0600
So, Gil, has your DSLIST ended yet?
:~)
I killed my terminal emulator. Even as in the Bad Old Days I used
to unplug the coax. But neither of those techniques, nor
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 16:01 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
I do live in Tokyo, and there aren't a super abundance of people on
IBM-MAIN who do, so I said what I could in response to the original
question(s).
Seems that it's been put sh1t on Timothy time of late.
No doubt plenty have been
Clark Morris writes:
My view of it is that the software charge per MIP/MSU/latest
measurement unit should follow the same trend as the Windows cost per
megahertz.
*IBM* software pricing per MIP keeps declining, taking all factors into
account and for the *typical* environment. (See a previous
Maybe your tapemanagement system has a similar utility?
Kees.
Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
unfortunately, we haven't CA-1 tape management system.. :(
On 1/15/07, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tommy, Have you looked at this redbook ? Section 5.8 covers migration from
B18 to B20? http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg242229.html?Open
Mike Wood RMM Development
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:55:09 +0800, Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any one have experience to migrate all VTS
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/08/2007
at 12:13 PM, Steve Comstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This course primarily deals with calling various
TSO and REXX services from programs written in
Assembler, COBOL, PL/I, and C:
No DAIRFAIL, GNRLFAIL, PARSE or SCAN?
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:00:58 -0400, Clark Morris wrote:
My view of it is that the software charge per MIP/MSU/latest
measurement unit should follow the same trend as the Windows cost per
megahertz. Software legitimately (added security and error checking)
takes more system resource for the same
We don't have any tape management system in our site. The tape management
system is written by SP and doesn't provide any data migration function.
The red book only describe the migration from B18 to B20 model.
Unfortenately, our two set of VTS are B18 and B10..therefore it cannot move
the
In a recent note, Charles Mills said:
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:21:42 -0800
You know, to return to an earlier thread, I would call this a user-hostile
approach on MVS's part. Why would not a designer interested in producing
user-accessible software, a system that would not have a
Anyone have a working example of this type of connection that they would be
willing to share? I'm particularly interested in the definitions on the
VTAM side of things.
Thanks,
Cal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Walt Farrell wrote:
On 1/12/2007 2:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Sandy Stone said:
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:23:28 -0600
So, Gil, has your DSLIST ended yet?
:~)
I killed my terminal emulator. Even as in the Bad Old Days I used
to unplug the coax. But neither of
Tom Longfellow wrote:
I originally wrote a REXX exec to perform this function, but I am hoping
that some combination of all of the new SORT verbs will help me improve
the
performance of my original solution. I have tried working out something
by reading the manuals, but I just can not put it
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/15/2007
at 06:37 AM, Steve Comstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As the Bob Seger song says, it's a question of deciding
what to leave in, what to leave out. My goal with
this course is to help applications programmers integrate their apps
with TSO and / or REXX with
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/14/2007
at 03:05 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't remember MVT option becoming available until release 12
There was at least one retraction and redesign prior to that. Search
for MPS and VMS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/09/2007
at 11:21 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Now, if it is your program, then simply check to see if the DD opened
and issue an ABEND macro if it did not. I'd likely do this by
checking R15 upon return from the OPEN macro. Another way is to check
some
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/09/2007
at 12:09 PM, Robert Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi all. Can anyone tell me how to cause an abend when the above
condition occurs?
GET.
Wouldn't it be better to modify your program to put out an error
message that SLFVDDIL is a mandatory DD
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/09/2007
at 07:33 PM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If it did not, it would have gotten an 0C1 when trying to read or
write a record (Q/BSAM).
I've seen S0C4 more often than I've seen S0C1. It depends on what
flags are set and on what's in the PSA.
--
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/08/2007
at 03:21 PM, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is this just me, or did anyone else get this scrambled this bad?
The Devil is in the details. What you are seeing is the infamous
kewpie[1] doll. My provider autoconverted it, so I don't see the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/09/2007
at 10:56 AM, willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A batch job was executed successfully. The job was creating a gdg
dsn. I noticed that the jcl did not contain the PATTERN DSCB RECORD.
A new generation data set does not require the DCB parameter if SMS
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/09/2007
at 01:18 PM, John Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone have any ideas no how to fix this?
Yes: use PARSE PULL instead of PULL, or use the stem form of EXECIO.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/09/2007
at 10:00 AM, Steve Comstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At the same time, I understand and respect the tradition of usenets
and listservs being mostly promotion-free
forums for the exchanging of ideas.
The actual tradition is that on Usenet you abide by the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/10/2007
at 11:20 AM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am against just plain advertisements
Agreed. But a boilerplate announcement is on topic, and IMHO it would
be welcome as long as Darren blesses it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/08/2007
at 07:17 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A perfect poker player can't be bluffed. But neither is he capable
of bluffing.
What you mean by perfect is something quite different from what the
people in the Theory of Games mean by it. A winning
Steve Comstock wrote:
Walt Farrell wrote:
Also, to get RECONNECT working again, have your network system
programmers look at the TN3270 parms. There's one in there (sorry, I
don't know which one) that affects detection of disconnected
terminals that should allow faster detection of your
Please disregard. I opened up my search a bit and found a previous example
in the archives.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
Walt Farrell wrote:
Also, to get RECONNECT working again, have your network system
programmers look at the TN3270 parms. There's one in there (sorry, I
don't know which one) that affects detection of disconnected
terminals that should allow faster
Shmuel Metz wrote:
Tony Harminc said:
When we say ATTN, it can mean either the SNA 3270 ATTN function, or
the TSO ATTN function.
No, the 3270 simulator doesn't know from TSO. ATTN could mean ATTN or
PA1, but if it means PA1 then it will still mean PA1 if you're logged
on to, e.g., CICS.
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:58:13 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Anyone have any ideas no how to fix this?
Yes: use PARSE PULL instead of PULL, or use the stem form of EXECIO.
I'm curious as to why the preponderance of Rexx examples posted to these lists
prefer [PARSE] PULL over STEM (I
My job put out the following error:
IEC331I 042-006(04280039),JS3BATCH,SOFVMA05,SCRT,IGG0CLH0
IEC331I VOL,INST49,NAME,DATAALL.REND.PC5.PROD.VMAXTD.G0553V00
IEC331I 050-092(0484,INST49),SOFVMA05,XTRACT,VALO,IGG0CLE3
IGD07001I GDG ROLL IN ERROR - RETURN CODE 50 REASON
The TN3270 reconnect failure is one of THE most annoying things about remote
mainframe work.
Reconnect worked so well in the good old SNA days, I keep thinking that
the TSO/Comm Server/whatever folks have not really accepted that TN3270 is
here to stay, and ought to be made to work well, not
Shmuel Metz wrote:
at 04:06 PM, Tony Harminc said:
Assuming that everyone on the planet has exactly one middle initial.
No; read what I wrote. He knows how to spell his *own* name; he may or
may not know how to spell someone else's name that sounds similar.
That doesn't depend on the
My job put out the following error:
IEC331I 042-006(04280039),JS3BATCH,SOFVMA05,SCRT,IGG0CLH0
IEC331I VOL,INST49,NAME,DATAALL.REND.PC5.PROD.VMAXTD.G0553V00
IEC331I 050-092(0484,INST49),SOFVMA05,XTRACT,VALO,IGG0CLE3
IGD07001I GDG ROLL IN ERROR - RETURN CODE 50 REASON CODE 0 MODULE
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:14 AM, Ulrich Boche wrote:
Sorry, needed to repost because I only posted to the newsgroup.
--
SNIP
The magic reason for nearly everyone using a RACF revoke limit of 3 is
baseball
When I went to Z/OS 1.7, I started timing out. The vendor I have recommended
changing the VISTA.INI file to add KeepAliveTime=60. This will simulate some
activity to keep it active. Otherwise reconnect doesn't work and you'll need
another ID to cancel yourself.
Bill
From: Charles Mills
Hi,
Gilbert's IKJEFLN2 - TSO Reconnect Exit for the TN3270 Environment will
make it much more useful.
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0009L=ibm-main-archivesP=R15338
http://gsf-soft.com/Products/IKJEFLN2.shtml
Still I would like to see this level of functionality incorporated
into the
In a recent note, Bill Wilkie said:
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:40:36 +
When I went to Z/OS 1.7, I started timing out. The vendor I have recommended
changing the VISTA.INI file to add KeepAliveTime=60. This will simulate some
activity to keep it active. Otherwise reconnect doesn't
Of course, this is just one of many problems that would be alleviated if
multiple concurrent TSO sessions weren't prohibited.
They aren't. Not since OS/390 2.4 (ish).
I sign on with the same I'd on five different systems.
The problem is the ISPPROF dataset.
See (written by yours truly):
10)
In a recent note, Ted MacNEIL said:
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:15:34 +
Of course, this is just one of many problems that would be alleviated if mu
ltiple concurrent TSO sessions weren't prohibited.
They aren't. Not since OS/390 2.4 (ish).
I sign on with the same I'd on five
snip
You set a worthy challenge, but I'm not allowed to use real names unless
I have explicit permission. However, since you asked, I believe one of
the two largest Linux installations is Nomura Securities, and I can say
that because Nomura
I never said it was perfect.
And, you can sign onto the same system more than once.
All notification messages go to the first system you sign on to.
When you log on to system 5, can you cancel your comatose TSO session on
system 5?
Yes.
Sorry; I omitted to say concurrent on_the_same_system_.
Shane wrote:
--snip---
Seems that it's been put sh1t on Timothy time of late.
No doubt plenty have been rubbed the wrong way by Timothy spouting the
company line. Especially those of us that have customers deserting the
platform.
But he does offer a
But The Company Line is probably the last thing we
want to hear, whether it's right or wrong
I agree.
Especially when it doesn't match reality.
We are NOT paying less!
We are NOT exploiting JAVA/WebSphere on the mainframe.
We do NOT have any workloads that can exploit NAlc, as I understand the
--snip
I used that but in a different way in the hospital early this year. I
am en extremely difficult person to draw blood from and I am not a
morning person (without coffee) .
At the god unearthly hour of 6AM a nurse tried to take blood
- Original Message -
From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: Is anyone still running..
But The Company Line is probably the last thing we
want to hear,
I'm trying within IEFUTL Exit to stop the address space (all other
TCBs)
from working; because in certain circumtances I'm asking the operators
(WTOR) to decide if the address space have the right to use more CPU.
To do this I use the status stop macro and it works fine... but not
with a
Robert Justice wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: Is anyone still running..
But The Company Line is probably the last
On 15 Jan 2007 10:20:32 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
Anyone have any ideas no how to fix this?
Yes: use PARSE PULL instead of PULL, or use the stem form
of EXECIO.
I'm curious as to why the preponderance of Rexx
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/10/2007
at 01:16 PM, Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Isn't C the language that grades itself?
Then why isn't it called F?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/10/2007
at 01:26 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Java! Java! Java! No, wait. Perl! Perl! Perl! Uh, make that Ruby!
Ruby! Ruby! OK, old-timers repeat after me COBOL! COBOL! COBOL!
COMMTRAN! COMMTRAN! COMMTRAN! FACT! FACT! FACT!
--
Shmuel (Seymour
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/09/2007
at 08:01 AM, Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Given a system configuration that will lock out (revoke) a user ID if
someone guesses passwords incorrectly, say after 5 tries, the
chances of anyone guessing a password before getting the ID revoked
should
Walt
If you are using TN3270E support for the SYSREQ function (SysRq key), you
just don't get a chance to enter the TYPE operand. See section 2.9.4.4,
USSPARM macroinstruction of z/OS Communications Server IP Configuration
Reference:
quote
...
Usage Notes
...
Parameters used by Telnet are:
Steve
So what you have got so excited about is the simple old VTAM Unformatted
System Services LOGOFF command - dating from the late '70s - totally
unpolluted by TN3270E.[1]
You may even like to experiment with TYPE(COND) in order to see what effect
that has in TSO - and maybe other
Charles
Read RFC 2355. You'll see that the full implementation of Unformatted System
Services (USS) LOGOFF is not permitted when the LOGOFF command has to be
processed by the TN3270E server. In fact, since two modes of behaviour for
USS commands, passthrough or non-passthrough, are defined in RFC
Radoslaw
My intention here was merely to point out that SNA and Ethernet are not
equivalent.
In fact, Lee has sent me a private note in which he explains that it was
indeed an SNA to IP conversion. The 6400 used to be attached through coax -
presumably to a 3270 control unit such as a 3174 I
Chris Mason wrote:
Steve
So what you have got so excited about is the simple old VTAM Unformatted
System Services LOGOFF command - dating from the late '70s - totally
unpolluted by TN3270E.[1]
Right. Sometimes I'm a little slw.
You may even like to experiment with TYPE(COND) in
Ditto here, Robert!
We have only z9s
We have zIIPs
We have zAAPs
We are at z/OS 1.7
I have NALC that will go to zNALC and save my company money
I am investigating ZNALC for a new qualifying workload
My company is proof that *your company is not the ONLY one in this
situation!
*All* pricing
Chris Mason wrote:
I'm not sure at all about your comparison of IP and SNA with regard to ease
of routing. When I see the mess that Cisco types get up to in their forum
to which I subscribe,[1] IP doesn't look so easy after all. If you are
comparing IP and *subarea* SNA, you might have a -
Rick
Sorry to be a bit late with this - an inbox scrub is in progress.
I think it's time to give these young upstarts a When I Was Your Age
tirade...
Add: When I was your age, we debugged our programs from the CPU front
panel.
Which reminds me of those tactile switches on the panel of the
At 12:56 -0500 on 01/15/2007, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: Special characters in passwords was Re: RACF - Password:
Isn't C the language that grades itself?
Then why isn't it called F?
Because after they got C going that did not want to risk creating a D
to replace it (but
At 16:12 -0500 on 01/15/2007, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: Special characters in passwords was Re: RACF - Password:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/09/2007
at 08:01 AM, Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Given a system configuration that will lock out (revoke) a user ID if
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007b.html#48 6400 impact printer
... and remember the sna organization non-concurred with announcing appn/awp164
(until after the announcement letter was carefully rewritten so that
there was no relationship between appn and sna).
for more trivia ... email from
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. writes:
There was at least one retraction and redesign prior to that. Search
for MPS and VMS.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007b.html#45 Is anyone still running
you mean from this prior/similar exchange nearly a year ago
http:/www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006h.html#57
Chris Mason wrote:
Radoslaw
My intention here was merely to point out that SNA and Ethernet are not
equivalent.
And I wanted to give some example to confirm your words.
[...]
You talk about print servers. I'm very vaguely familiar with the
principles of print and file servers [...]
I
You do know that C was proceeded by a B (which never made it out of the
planning stage).
Yes it did.
I programmed in B for four years at the University of Waterloo.
Any new subsystems/commands written for a GCOS8 systen, running on a Honeywell
Level 66 were written in it.
This included the
- Original Message -
From: Richards.Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: Is anyone still running..
Ditto here, Robert!
We have only z9s
We have zIIPs
We have zAAPs
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
But The Company Line is probably the last thing we
want to hear, whether it's right or wrong
I agree.
Especially when it doesn't match reality.
We are NOT paying less!
We are NOT exploiting JAVA/WebSphere on the mainframe.
We do NOT have any workloads that can exploit NAlc,
70 matches
Mail list logo
