Hello,
I'm trying to use the TSSO (CBT file 404) uder z/OS 1.8. When I
started it I got :
S TSSO,SUB=MSTR
IRR813I NO PROFILE WAS FOUND IN THE STARTED CLASS FOR 898
TSSO WITH JOBNAME TSSO. RACF WILL USE ICHRIN03.
TSST055I TSSO IS USING TABLE NAME
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:25:19 +0100, Miran Cotic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works well on z/OS 1.7 without any changes.
Any suggestions ?
1) Check your console definitions.
2) When upgrading always pull the latest version of TSSO from the CBT site,
probably in Updates.
DC
snip
Thanks. They are __supposed__ to be ISO9660 filesystems that can be
burned. I say __supposed__ to be because they are somehow corrupt.
That's why my software (k3b to be exact) didn't like them.
snip
Have you tried to mount them as loop devices, something like
mount -t iso9660 -o loop
There is a good chance that we may stop using SAS on z/OS. At present,
only one mission-critical application uses it and we are looking at
replacing that. Our other main use is MXG. I know that many have run MXG
and SAS on a PC platform for cost savings. What I am wondering, not
being an MXG
Last week, when going all z/OS V1R8 on all LPARs in a SYSPLEX we stubbled
over a JES2 problem causing $BR4 abends when IBM added new function to
JES2 which showed up when all systems were running at that level. For
reference the APAR was OA20072 with now fixing PTF of B20072A. It only
showed
Gil,
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use of RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it was first introduced, we
expected to eventually see customer requests, but I've not seen any such
requests.
Ralph
The IEFUJV SMF exit distributed in SYS1.SAMPLIB for z/OS 1.7 does this
based on job class. Would be a simple change to base it on userid. It can
be found in SYS1.SAMPLIB member IEEUJV.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ralph_Robison
Gil,
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use
of RECEIVE FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it
was first introduced, we expected to eventually see customer
requests,
Thanks Adam. Does having only 256meg for the machine result in more
paging?
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Gerhard Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:31 PM
To:
In a recent note, Ralph_Robison said:
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:28:16 -0600
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use of RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it was first introduced, we
expected to eventually see customer requests, but I've not seen
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TISLER Zaromil
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 3:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CDIMG format?
snip
Thanks. They are __supposed__ to be ISO9660 filesystems that can be
Fro mBob Pellitier:
snip
Thanks Adam. Does having only 256meg for the machine result in more
paging?
/snip
Bob, the less real storage you have the more paging you do. Virtual
storage has to be backed somewhere. If there isn't enough real then the
least used pages will go out to aux. 256meg
From Ralph Robison:
snip
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use of RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it was first introduced, we
expected to eventually see customer requests, but I've not seen any such
requests.
/snip
It would be goodness to be able to do
Surprising comments coming from someone who has spent years in the
area of performance.
Mark,
Shirley you've come across people like Ted before? I'm surrounded by
them. Things are only problems if they perceive them first. It's both
frustrating and amusing when, a week or so later, they
I would and tried it with a vendor that said they could in their doc but
the function had been removed from the website (supposed to be back
sometime). For smaller packages such as maintenance the current options
are fine but I like FROMNETWORK for products.
Alan Schwartz
Assurant Shared
Alan,
Do you allow batch work to be run or TSO to be accessed while the
backups are running?
-Original Message-
From: Alan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 8:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDR question for Bruce Black
We have been using
David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 14:47 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:26:49 -0500, David Andrews
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh man. I had one user who every few months would ISPF-edit a
large
sequential dataset
Bob,
Have you taken a look at Chapter 2 in the z/OS Init and Tuning Guide?
It really does a good job of explaining the aux storage manager and the
size and usage of local page datasets.
If you have a system tool like Sysview (or MXI, RMF, Omegamon,
Mainview..etc etc), you can observe the aux
CAREFUL: reply-to is set to me; if you want to
reply to one of the lists above, please set that
first.
Well, we're still struggling along. Not much work,
but I'm forever the optimist.
Anyway, one area where we see some potential for
regular assignments, and still stay on the mainframe
There is no restriction on the execution of work. However, the backups are
taken while the system has no scheduled work. It is very likely that there
are some programmers working during this time however.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Kees said:
snip
More in general: your aux storage should be able to handle (almost) all
the virtual storage that your ASIDs can accumulate, in case most of real
storage must be emptied e.g. for a large dump.
/snip
Kees do you have enough aux to allow for multiple 16exabyte users? There
isn't
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:50:32 -0500, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 14:47 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:26:49 -0500, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh man. I had one user who every few months would ISPF-edit a large
sequential dataset
If
Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com...
Kees said:
snip
More in general: your aux storage should be able to handle (almost)
all
the virtual storage that your ASIDs can accumulate, in case most of
real
storage must be emptied e.g. for a large dump.
Has anybody on this list experienced the symptoms in this apar ? The APAR was
raised as a result of a problem experienced by one of our customers whgen
upgrading to 1.7, and another customer wants to postpone their upgrade until a
permanent fix is available. Our feeling is that the risk is very
Shirley you've come across people like Ted before? I'm surrounded by them.
Things are only problems if they perceive them first.
Thanks for the ad hominem!
All I was trying to say was a single batch process doesn't drive your MIP(s).
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Does having only 256meg for the machine result in more
paging?
Well, it depends. The issue is saturation, so you need to see what the storage
values are.
Using SYSVIEW or RMF check the UIC value. In OS/390 the maximum value is 254
which indicates the oldest page in the system. High UIC
Does anyone know where I can find the words to some of the songs in the
SHARE sing-along book? I've Googled, but without any success...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Tom Harper wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find the words to some of the songs in the
SHARE sing-along book? I've Googled, but without any success...
I've got a copy of the book. What do you want?
--
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com
Steve,
I was just looking for a few of the songs that had references to JCL and
HASP in them.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 3/7/2007 9:47:28 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know where I can find the words to some of the songs in the
SHARE sing-along book? I've Googled, but without any success...
ITYM JES2 Song book. It's on file33 of _www.cbttape.org_
Bob, In answer to your question about having 256M real storage, and not to
take anything away from the very good answers you've already gotten, I
offer this as a comparison.
I have two z/OS 1.7 systems with 256M real each.
They are running no applications except GDPS.
There are no monitors,
First of all. Thank you all very much for the help with paging. Would
anyone know if I can change the memory allocated to my 2 lpars
dynamically (I want to take some from TEST and give it to PROD)? If I
can can someone briefly tell me how? Thanks all.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Tom Harper of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 03/07/2007 09:46:51 AM:
Does anyone know where I can find the words to some of the songs in the
SHARE sing-along book? I've Googled, but without any success...
File 033 on your CBT dial...
FILE 033 is from the
While the SMP/E RM describes GIMZIP, the utility used to
package for RECEIVE FROMNETWORK, I find no similar assistance
for packaging for RECEIVE ORDER. Have I simply overlooked it,
or has IBM made a business decision not to support ISVs in
supplying that format?
The format of the downloadable
Utilization and support of FTP are generally waning outside IBM.
Really? Why? If not FTP, then what is the desired method for
downloading products, PTFs, and HOLDDATA directly to a z/OS system from
an Internet server?
If there were a suitable HTTP(S) client on z/OS, or if SMP/E extended
Hello,
Does anyone (DFSORT team?) have an idea, why the PTF for APAR PK34654
takes so long? The problem was reported 4 months ago and no progress
seems to have been made since.
I understood from our IBM technicians, the problem was that DFSORT
decided to clean up working space on Dasd,
I'm looking for some ideas on how to handle the following situation and
wanted to know if anyone had an alterative or might be doing the same
thing, We plan on putting a system stand alone at a remote site shortly for
XRC/GDPS mirroring. We have ordered an ICC card for it and locally tested
with
Setting Reply-to: -- I'll summarize and attribute replies, if any.
In a recent note, Kurt Quackenbush said:
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:08:03 -0500
The format of the downloadable files is the same for RECEIVE FROMNET and
RECEIVE ORDER. That is, both expect to handle GIMZIP format
We're not going to that extent, but I see no reason why it wouldn't
work. The console attached to the ICC is nothing more than a PC running
an emulator. We have 2 ICCs on our z9 running 3 LPARs. Each of the ICC
PCs has 6 RUMBA sessions on it, 3 going to the consoles and the other 3
set up for
I believe Jan Jeagar(?) wrote a stand alone editor. Should be on the CBT
tape...
If not try www.planetmvs.com
snip
Is anyone doing this? We know there are products out there that for
example SEA makes one that allows us to get onto a 'dead' system with a
stand alone product but we wanted to
What kind of a box do you have? What level of z/OS? Then the big
question - in SYS1.PARMLIB member IEASYSxx do you have anything defined
in the RSU parameter? IIRC, if you either don't have an RSU parameter
defined (which defaults to 0) or have it defined as RSU=0, then no, you
can't
Andy,
Simple answer is yes.. Just think of the OSA-ICC as an internal 2074..
works ok for both MVS console and VTAM access (ie TSO). I would imagine
that the code base from a 2074 was used to build the ICC function - if
you've used 2074 before then you'll recognise the very similar config
In a message dated 3/7/2007 9:58:54 A.M. Central Standard Time, Tom.Harper @
NEONESOFT.COM writes:
I was just looking for a few of the songs that had references to JCL and
HASP in them.
The sing-along originated in the SHARE HASP project, so the overwhelming
majority of songs with
We are OS390 V2R10 with RSU=0. Is the allocation done on the HMC or can
it be done through HCD?
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Pommier, Rex R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007
C.P. Vernooy wrote on 03/07/2007 08:15:35 AM:
Does anyone (DFSORT team?) have an idea, why the PTF for APAR PK34654
takes so long? The problem was reported 4 months ago and no progress
seems to have been made since.
I understood from our IBM technicians, the problem was that DFSORT
decided
http://www.cbttape.org/~jjaeger/
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...
-Original
It's very popular with the Hercules set.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Wednesday March 07 2007 09:17
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Looking for ideas on remote system
I believe Jan Jeagar(?)
Hi Kees,
PK34654 is related to an IO error, related to the way that DFSORT was
building a CCW. This problem is pretty intermittent and so it took a while
to determine in exactly what scenarios the CCW was being built incorrectly.
As for the status of PK34654. PK34654 has had a ++APAR available
Survey question: What do you do?
1. Download directly to z/OS
a. FTP (what client?) Only APARs in very critical situations.
b. Other (specify)
2. Download to desktop, and then to z/OS: NO
a. FTP
b. Samba
c. IND$FILE
d. NFS
e. Other (specify)
3. RECEIVE FROMNETWORK - Yes
We would be interested in any of our current vendors providing a similar
service to RECEIVE ORDER. Currently we pull maintenance from IBM on an
almost nightly basis and would love to have the same capability with our
other vendors.
(Just cos we receive it doesn't mean it needs to be applied !)
It
SMF Record 30 is documented as being written via SMFEWTM BRANCH=YES and IEFU84
is called.
Installation exits states: An FRR is set up by the module that calls IEFU84.
Research shows that if the SMFEWTM BRANCH=YES is issued unlocked and in task
mode, as is done for some occupancies of type 30,
I am fairly positive that with RSU=0, you can not dynamically move
memory from one LPAR to the other one. Frankly, it's been so long since
I messed with it I don't remember if you have to configure something on
the hardware side (either HMC or HCD) to make this work or not. What I
do remember is
Tom
If you're looking for some additional mainframe humor (not quite JCL or
Jes...)
... then look at the following:
http://www.hlasm.com/english/humor.htm
I had bookmarked this quite some time ago...
Wayne
Wayne R. Brumback mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Developer
IAM
Wayne Brumback of the Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 03/07/2007 12:19:34 PM:
Tom
If you're looking for some additional mainframe humor (not quite JCL or
Jes...)
... then look at the following:
http://www.hlasm.com/english/humor.htm
I had bookmarked this quite
Bob,
Just modify the image profile for your test LPAR reducing it by the
amount you want, and find a convenient time to IPL it. Then you can
dynamically add the freed storage to your production lpar assuming you
have defined some reserved memory. If not, then it will be an IPL of
production
Survey question: What do you do?
1. Download directly to z/OS
a. FTP (what client?) - z/OS FTP for lots and lots of stuff
b. Other (specify)
2. Download to desktop, and then to z/OS: yes but only when there is no
choice - some vendors force you to download via HTTPS or HTTP and don't
You'll also find a slightly improved version of IEFSD095, the
block-letter builder, on the CBT site, under the name EALSD095. It
contains some of the special characters that might be needed, like # @
and $.
---snip
There is some information
George Dranes wrote:
I'm assuming the Server Pac install (z/os 1.7) used copymod to populate
the linklib originally. There has been updates and deletes from
maintenance being applied. I did compress the library before my copymod
test. Copymod must be cleaning up some things in the process.
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
--snip
I'm looking for some ideas on how to handle the following situation and
wanted to know if anyone had an alterative or might be doing the same
thing, We plan on putting a system stand alone at a remote site shortly
for XRC/GDPS mirroring. We
On that box, you're limited to using the HMC for storage changes.
-snip--
We are OS390 V2R10 with RSU=0. Is the allocation done on the HMC or can
it be done through HCD?
-unsnip--
Is TYPE=XMEM set on one LPAR and not on the other?
Try D D,O and see if the SDUMP options are the same.
Brian
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:21:34 -0500, Gray, Larry - Larry A wrote:
I am trying to take an SVC dump of one of my address spaces on my
production lpar. It keeps including JES2, JES2AUX,
Thanks everyone.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Fochtman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 2:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on Changing Memory Allocations
An earlier post suggested changing the allocations in the HMC and
IPLing.
I believe you need to also deactivate the LPAR to get it to process the
image profile to pick up the changed memory allocations.
In Bob's case he might need to deactivate both LPARs to get the one to
give up the storage
It saved my butt earlier this year during a migration to a new DASD
array. I IPLed it from the CD Sam distributed at SHARE. Thank again Sam.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Mullins
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:40 AM
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:24:20 -0500, John Eells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe Mark and I can talk about whether COPYMOD is worth it in
San Diego...
Planning on being there and hope to see you there as well. BTW,
just to reiterate - I never said it wasn't worth it, I said I
wouldn't use it all
CD DEL,SDUMP,TYPE=XMEME
Brian
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:57:57 -0500, Gray, Larry - Larry A wrote:
TYPE=XMEME is on the production lpar. I changed it to that on the
second lpar, but it does not seem to be making a difference.
If TYPE=XMEME is the problem, how do you turn it off?
-Original
Hi There,
I'm running NFS server on z/OS 1.4, and exporting legacy sequential files to
a redhat linux system. When I create a file of a specific size (just around
4k), the file is truncated when it's looked at on linux. It looks ok on the
mainframe, but it's not all there when I look at it on
-snip--
An earlier post suggested changing the allocations in the HMC and IPLing.
I believe you need to also deactivate the LPAR to get it to process the
image profile to pick up the changed memory allocations.
In Bob's case he might need to deactivate both
In a message dated 3/7/2007 1:42:19 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks everyone.
IIRC, the IBM recommendation for CSTOR to ESTOR is 3:1 for that class machine
and that level of OS. That's what was used on LSPR numbers for many moons.
Until you can get an
Thanks Ed.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 3:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on Changing Memory Allocations (was RE:
Have you actually looked at the files via the NVS mount, sometimes ls
lies for NFS.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joanne Nicolazzo
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 1:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: NFS exported
Perhaps OA07298? (Problem number 7 of 20 listed in the APAR).
Brian
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:55:55 -0600, Joanne Nicolazzo wrote:
Hi There,
I'm running NFS server on z/OS 1.4, and exporting legacy sequential files
to
a redhat linux system. When I create a file of a specific size (just around
All,
Just playing on my z/OS 1.8 tech lpar, and noticed that commands issued
on the dataset line in option 3.4, and then repeated with the '=' get
truncated after 9 characters and fails. For example a LISTC ENT(/)
ALL, repeated (after the failure) shows on the display as LISTC ENT.
Anyone else
We've got 1.8 on our test system, and I tested this out, and I do not
see the same problem. It seems to work fine on our 1.8 test LPAR.
C. Todd Burrell
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
ITSO
(404) 498-3299
(404) 723-2017 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
From: Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just playing on my z/OS 1.8 tech lpar, and noticed that commands issued
on the dataset line in option 3.4, and then repeated with the '=' get
truncated after 9 characters and fails. For example a LISTC ENT(/)
ALL, repeated (after the failure) shows on the
Interesting. I even started with a fresh ISPPROF dataset.
Here is the before partial screen shot:
Menu Options View Utilities Compilers Help
ΒΆΒΆ
DSLIST - Data Sets Matching SYS1
- Original Message -
From: Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 3:39 PM
Subject: z/OS 1.8 ISPF 3.4 repeat command
All,
Just playing on my z/OS 1.8 tech lpar, and noticed that commands issued
on the dataset line in option
Tom,
Nope, same problem happened with a UMOUNT FILESYS(/) command. I went to
one of my 1.6 systems - no problems.
Dave
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
Dave,
I'll bet you have a LISTC exec
Works fine here. Do you have any exists (I'm not if one applies
here without looking at the FM). What about typing SHOW from
the DSLIST command line to see what is getting expanded.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance
Thank you Sam and others that replied if this works im all set this sounds
like what I wanted. This doesn't need VTAM I assume just start it up and
is it line commands or a full screen application?
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:34:53 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works fine here. Do you have any exits (I'm not if one applies
here without looking at the FM). What about typing SHOW from
the DSLIST command line to see what is getting expanded.
(fixed exits typo above)
One other
In a message dated 3/7/2007 3:20:21 P.M. Central Standard Time, Larry.A.Gray
@ LOWES.COM writes:
I tried the CD command below. It stopped dumping master, but it is still
dumping JES2, JES2AUX and JES2MON.
I haven't seen your exact DUMP command, and I assume you are using the
operand
Thanks! I think OA07298 might be the answer. The files were VB, so it looks
like a good bet. We're going to apply it and see if it does the trick.
Joanne
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Does anyone have an answer to the question what does IBM mean by 'withdrawn
from marketing'?
Lots of long-withdrawn from marketing products are still in widespread use
-- OS/VS COBOL is a great example -- and I am sure IBM is happily cashing
the license checks every month. So withdrawn from
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Survey question: What do you do?
1. Download directly to z/OS
a. FTP (what client?)
b. Other (specify)
a) - almost always (z/OS FTP).
2. Download to desktop, and then to z/OS:
a. FTP
b. Samba
c. IND$FILE
d. NFS
e. Other (specify)
a) - only when 1 a) not
No. IBM won't sell a product that has been withdrawn from marketing. If
you copy OS/VS COBOL to another system you are obliged to inform IBM.
IBM will charge for the use of the product, but you cannot order another
copy from IBM.
Bob Shannon (who has tried)
I can change the memory allocated to my 2 lpars
dynamically (I want to take some from TEST and give it to PROD)?
We tried it a few years ago, and found that the hassle wasn't worth the cost of
memory.
Because the reserved memory comes up offline.
We tried to re-allocate in our automation, but
to: IBM-MAIN and Assembler List-Servers
I just thought that I would post this to IBM-MAIN and ASSEMBLER-LIST
indicating that there are currently 4 LNGC requirements out for voting
(that will close next week). If you are already on the LNGC requirements
distribution list, then you have heard
IIRC 'Withdrawn from Marketing' means the product is no longer orderable
but may still be supported.
'Withdrawn from Service' means no new service will be created for the
product and no APARs will be taken for it.
AFAIK if a product has been withdrawn from marketing and service you
could still
I don't know what IBM would do with a PRPQ type request for a NEW order
for the OS/VS COBOL compiler, but I don't think it would receive a warm
welcome. (Do you remember how to install a product with SMP4? OS/VS COBOL
was never delivered with SMP/E support)
As far as a shop getting a new
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/05/2007
at 01:19 PM, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IFB086I LOGREC DATA SET IS SYS1.CPAC.LOGREC
IFB097I LOGREC RECORDING MEDIUM CHANGED FROM DATASET TO LOGSTREAM
Did you read the second line?
So I used SYS1.CPAC.LOGREC. I don't seem to be getting all the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/03/2007
at 01:16 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
speed matching attempted to retrofit 3880/3380 to 168 and 303x
machines with channel running at 1.5mbyte max
Not quite; the 370/168 had two type of block multiplexor channel,
single byte and 2 byte.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/03/2007
at 08:27 AM, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And yep, we'd probably all like FBA support to have been taken up.
I asked for it three decades ago. I thought that it was a no brainer,
but IBM didn't agree.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/05/2007
at 10:47 AM, Andreas F. Geissbuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The venerable IBM 2321 A.K.A the strip picker,
ITYM noodle picker.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/01/2007
at 08:47 AM, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We would like to move these records from SMF to GTF
Why? Wouldn't that make things worse?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/01/2007
at 07:27 AM, Wallace, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
That's what I suspected, but I guess the problem was that from my
novice point of view, this part of Netview's functionality seemed a
bit deceiving: It can do all this other stuff to MVS messages (edit,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/02/2007
at 11:35 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DOS/360 started with the name BOS-16k and was renamed as DOS at some
release level.
My recollection is that DOS/360 was intended as an interim system
until BOS-16K was stable, but that interim worked
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
