I wrote:
...if I were hiring a
z/OS system programmer, and during the interview that person said, I'm an
excellent z/OS system programmer, but I refuse to have anything to do with
z/OS UNIX System Services, I'd send that person back out the door very
quickly.
Radoslaw wrote:
If I were hiring I
Cross-Posted to IBM-Main and MVS-OE
Just for the records.
A while ago there once more was a discussion about how
UID(0) is being translated into a userid. The then born
idea had been fed into IBM's requirement process. I recently
got the following mail from IBM:
User Group Number - MR11250891
Brennan's Vista. At $30 a seat for a perpetual license, you can't get a
better TN3270 emulator. Not only is it cheap, it's way better than
PCOMM, Extra, RUMBA, etc. Check it out at www.tombrennansoftware.com.
I also recommand Vista tn3270 to everyone. But better than is not
right. It
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:24:14 -0800, Natarajan Mohan
nmo...@edfund.org wrote:
I am not sure whether I have found any emulation software cheaper than
mochasoft (not including x3270 on Linux or other flavors of Unix). Its $250
enterprise licence and maintenance is free of cost and includes
Dave
Does the new ID have an OMVS segment with a UID?
Regards, Bob
-
Robert S. Hansel | 2009 RACF Training (January - July)
Lead RACF Specialist | Intro Basic Admin - Boston - APR 28-30
RSH Consulting, Inc. | Audit
Barbara
Why did your using 62x162 require a mode table entry to be defined for you?
Didn't simply using D4A32XX3, D4C32XX3 or D4B32XX3 as appropriate from
ISTINCLM or a private mode table equivalent work for you? Since such mode
table entries cause the Read Partition-Query exchange to be used
Firstly, i would like to thank you all for the immediate assistance and
sugessions. Since i am not involved directly into this account i am unable
to answer your questions right now. I have posed my questions back to them
It appears to be a VSAM wait only.
We have CA directly involved and
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:43:06 -0800, Schwarz, Barry A
barry.a.schw...@boeing.com wrote:
As part of a replacement for a 12 year old system at a customer site in
Japan, we will be replacing PCs running Windows 95 and IBM's PCOMM 3270
emulator with new PCs running Vista (don't bother)
I will
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:53:16 -0500, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com
wrote:
I like the way Vista looks, but see nothing about SSL/TLS support.
It does that too.
Jantje.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I use the Hummingbird HostExplorer product, which I have set to 65x200, and it
works okay with TPX. Of course, when I connect to it, TPX thinks I'm a
MOD2. But for each session I have set up in TPX, I have the Modent name set
to D4C32XX3, which overrides what TPX thinks my screen size is.
If it's ASCII Armoured then it's a text file, you seem to have transmitted it
in binary (TYPE I) mode.
I transfer these things all the time without any problems. I think if you go
along the lines of setting to ASCII mode first, and pre-allocating some DCB
information with suitable SITE
Your 504 response is because your wsftp client is asking the mainframe server
to restart a previously-failed file transfer - does the file you're writing to
already exist on the mainframe?
The mainframe can support restartable file transfers *if* correctly set up (in
the server FTPDATA config
Chris,
given that I have no clue when it comes to network things - I asked my network
guy. That's his answer:
Yes, he's right. I tried. It works with Logmode=D4C32XX3. Then one wouldn't
need a specially defined one.
Having said that, I am now using 62x162 primarily because I don't have to
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I wrote:
...if I were hiring a
z/OS system programmer, and during the interview that person said, I'm an
excellent z/OS system programmer, but I refuse to have anything to do with
z/OS UNIX System Services, I'd send that person back out the door very
quickly.
Radoslaw
Barbara
You asked so here's my best shot at the answer:
D - *D*efault because the mode table entry is in the default table ISTINCLM
and, since this is always present concatenated after any private mode tables
(MODETAB operand of the LU or LOCAL statement), it implies a mode table
entry name
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Brian Peterson wrote:
Thanks to Ed's encouragement, I've switched my sessions to 62x160
and am
very happy with the result. My screen size choices are limited to
those
supported by TPX, and 62x160
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barbara Nitz
I also use 62x162 (after 'my network guys' - that's how I call them)
defined that logmode for me. ...
Huh? The D4C32XX3 logmode entry is supplied by IBM in ISTINCLM, which
is the default logmode table
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 06:25 -0600, Chris Mason wrote:
Or - there's nothing so simple that network guys can't make it complicated!
Never a truer word ...
I quite often tune out when trying to follow Chris' novella that he
passes off as posts.
This one actually had enough info I could relate to
Tom,
I need to move some datasets from one storage group to another. These
were initially assigned to the current group incorrectly based on a
particular
DATACLAS. I have changed the ACS routines so that future datasets will
go
to the correct storage group. I was thinking that I
I have gone back to your original question.
What level of operating system are you running? z/OS
Do you have DFSMS along with DFSMShsm in your shop? If so, why not use SMS
to control how long a dataset stays. You can set it up so if a dataset is
on dasd for 2 days the third day it gets
Chris,
well, like Shane, I managed to read through all your post :-).I *know* why I
leave that to my network guys
Actually, your query made them start to play with that logmode *and* different
screen sizes. The biggest being 200x200. Results in an almost unreadable 15
display. ISPF in the
Hi,
for years now we use the ISPF configuration load module ISPCFIGU. But:
nobody knows what has been modified in the past and how it differs from
IBM's default load module ISPCFIG. The Keyword File Data Set which was input
when building the user module ISPCFIGU is no longer available. So I tried
Jochen Roehrig of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 02/25/2009 07:32:37 AM:
Hi,
for years now we use the ISPF configuration load module ISPCFIGU. But:
nobody knows what has been modified in the past and how it differs from
IBM's default load module ISPCFIG. The
Try using the ISPVCALL function in ISPF.
To use it you issue TSO ISPVCALL or if Option 6 ISPVCALL
Then issue it again.
This will pull of a Trace dataset and should show you most of your
configuration values.
The ISPF Config Application to generate the table I think can read the load
module. I
I do NOT understand how you do it. Even with a 17 wide screen monitor the
font is to small to read comfortably. Anymore than 43 lines is to hard on my
eyes.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:42:29 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Even if DISP=(SHR,DELETE) would allow the deletion of expired data sets,
it may not ALWAYS work. If another user has the file allocated (which is
possible due to the SHR disposition) the DELETE will fail.
(Or does the DELETE imply exclusive? I'm not logged on so I can't check
right now).
I am on z.OS 1.7 and am trying to run the RESTORE job of z/OS 1.9
installation. The restore of USS to the root failed due to an out of space
on the pack the root is on.
When I try to unmount the file I get the message
BPXF137E RETURN CODE 0072, REASON CODE 058800AA. THE UNMOUNT FAILED
FOR
You need to unmount any file systems that are mounted over this
filesystem/
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jerry Fuchs
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:15 AM
Thanks Jon.
I had unmounts of new VAR and ETC but these steps were after unmount of
root.
Must be brain dead today!
Jerry
Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/25/2009 09:20 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:25:13 -0600, Chris Mason wrote:
On a serious note, you may like to ask your network guys to look into setting
up D4C32XX3 - or a private equivalent - as the mode table entry to be used
universally, thereby allowing the emulator user total control of the rows and
columns
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:28:13 -0600, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:42:29 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Hmmm. I'm playing with it now and it looks pretty good (other than I
can't figure out how to get a 90x142 display like I'm accustomed to.)
Wow! Thanks, Ed.
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:10:12 -0500, Mark Pace wrote:
I do NOT understand how you do it. Even with a 17 wide screen monitor the
font is to small to read comfortably. Anymore than 43 lines is to hard on my
eyes.
17 inches isn't very big, and wide screen doesn't help with this. When I
wrote that
On 24 Feb 2009 21:34:09 -0800, gad...@malam.com (??? ?? ???) wrote:
The user would like to use DISP=(SHR,DELETE) or in other words, have access to
the file, and if the step completes ok, delete the file.
If there is no solution that can emulate this behavior, then they will have to
add an
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:34:40 +0200, Rahim, A. (Ahmed)
ahm...@nedbank.co.za wrote:
The use of these titles sound more appropriate
System z Technical Specialist
Network Technical Specialist
Security Technical Specialist
In Operations, we're either engineers or analysts (situation analyst is
my
Stuart
Thanks for getting back to us. As well as missing that the LINK statement
name in the EZZ0331I message was IUTSAMEH rather than EZASAMEMVS,
also missed that the message arose from the entry of the START command
rather than being in a log as the messages in your second post. So that's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Pace
I do NOT understand how you do it. Even with a 17 wide screen
monitor the
font is to small to read comfortably. Anymore than 43 lines is to hard
on my
eyes.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom
On 24 Feb 2009 14:25:04 -0800, mp...@novell.com (Mark Post) wrote:
There's nothing in Federal law about this, but there is in some states.
Texas, for example.
Which, ironically, being the home of EDS meant that at some point, all the job
titles had
to change for people that weren't licensed
*TerminalTypeString=IBM-DYNAMIC*
Thank you for that!
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:25:13 -0600, Chris Mason wrote:
On a serious note, you may like to ask your network guys to look into
setting
up D4C32XX3 - or a private
Martin (and Ed Finnell)
Well, as you can see from Stuart Willis's latest post, this has been something
of a wild goose chase. There is still a mystery but it does not involve
Communications Server (CS) IP creating the IUTSAMEH interface definition
dynamically.
The mystery is why CS IP selects
I was stuck in 54x80 until I followed this thread. Thanks to it, I was
inspired
to discover the proper ISPF screen size setting to get around the screen size
flip going in and out of 80 character data. I always hated 27x133 because
of that (reverting back to 24x80 on the main menu - I like
On 25 Feb 2009 06:15:14 -0800, mpac...@gmail.com (Mark Pace) wrote:
I do NOT understand how you do it. Even with a 17 wide screen monitor the
font is to small to read comfortably. Anymore than 43 lines is to hard on my
eyes.
The standards seem to be changing - not quite as fast as my fogey eyes
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:56:41 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Barbara Nitz wrote:
Out of curiosity, Ed: Given that you're EJES, do you use SDSF?
Funny. As one would expect, we use (E)JES exclusively. It's been using
the whole display in all of the environments it supports
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:32:37 -0600, Jochen Roehrig
jochen.roeh...@baloise.ch wrote:
Hi,
for years now we use the ISPF configuration load module ISPCFIGU. But:
nobody knows what has been modified in the past and how it differs from
IBM's default load module ISPCFIG. The Keyword File Data Set
From which version was the limit of 62 rows
extended in ISPF ?
Is there some special setting that You have
to do for that ?
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:10:12 -0500, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
I do NOT understand how you do it. Even with a 17 wide screen monitor the
font is to small to read comfortably. Anymore than 43 lines is to hard on my
eyes.
Are you sure? I've had this discussion with many of my co-workers
It's funny that people want to own the word engineer for someone
with certified knowledge of fields which may have nothing to do with
engines.
Maybe it's the modern use of the word engine that's funny.
Look it up. Its etymology is similar to that of ingenuity.
Date: Wed,
It is still called PCOMM but you are correct it only comes with the
HACP.
We just ordered about 10 licenses but I don't believe it was anywhere
near $1250/seat
Main page
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/network/pcomm/
Upon reading it is only available with IBM Host Access Client Package
Tom and Mark
Using whatever means you have with your TN3270E emulator to specify the
RFC 2355 device-type character string to IBM-DYNAMIC assumes that you
have kept the TN3270E server mapping of device-types strings to mode
table entry names.
If you look at the default TELNETDEVICE
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:32:37 -0600, Jochen Roehrig wrote:
for years now we use the ISPF configuration load module ISPCFIGU. But:
nobody knows what has been modified in the past and how it differs from
IBM's default load module ISPCFIG. The Keyword File Data Set which was input
when building the
Mark Zelden wrote:
One thing I have found that has made it much easier for me, is to not use the
screen format - data ISPF support nor the alternate primary size that
Ed worked so hard to get implemented (BINPSZRC). I use screen size - max
all the time so I always see the small size instead of
Boy, titles, what about you dont have to be certified to be and Engineer.
Knowlege comes in many forms, like life experience.
Scott J Ford
www.identityforge.com
From: J R jayare...@hotmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Certification has little to do with how knowledge is acquired.
It's simply a formal acknowledgement that a person really does have the
knowledge.
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:57:03 -0800
From: scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: What do you call...
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Some People that I know Like LONG LONG Meaningless TITLES.
Senior Chief In charge of IEFBR14
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
Anyone have a clue how to work with Extra! outside of the standard Models
2,3,4,5?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Screen size
I am fond of Grand High Pobah
Fatemi, Reza reza_fat...@bmc.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/25/2009 11:37 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: What do you call...
Some People
BlueZone supports custom default and alternate sizes up to 90 x 162 and is
easily configured. It also supports multiple explicit partitions allowing
split and splitv in ISPF to display 4 sessions.
Steve Bireley
BlueZone Software
Bluezone Secure FTP is Free
Fatemi, Reza wrote:
Some People that I know Like LONG LONG Meaningless TITLES.
Senior Chief In charge of IEFBR14
-
Vice President in charge of Reviewing Apars, UserMods and PTF's prior to
their installation into any environment.
snip
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
Matt Dazzo wrote:
I am transferring a certificate that is in ascii armored format ...
[snip]
Maybe I'm the only one who doesn't know, but I'd still like
to find out: what the heck is ascii armored format?
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
In essence, Base64 encoding.. Turning binary data into graphic ASCII. For some
reason, in PGP circles particularly, they call it 'ASCII-Armored'.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Steve Comstock
Sent: 25 February
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:05 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I know about IDCAMS, but the user wants a pure JCL solution.
Then the user is out of luck.
The best that can happen is there's a WTOR, to ask if it's okay.
And, I believe that's only if there is write activity to the dataset.
I don't recall
This just popped up and I thought it might generate some discussion.
http://tinyurl.com/d49j69
Lizette
Making the case for the mainframe: Book author touts z/OS
By Erin Kelly
23 Feb 2009 | SearchDataCenter.com
Systems programmer David Stephens introduces mainframes in clear,
Steve Comstock wrote:
Matt Dazzo wrote:
I am transferring a certificate that is in ascii armored format ...
[snip]
Maybe I'm the only one who doesn't know, but I'd still like
to find out: what the heck is ascii armored format?
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
Is it possible that there may be come character encoding/translation issues
that would end up garbling the file as it passes from tinkertoyland to Big
Iron?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bri P
Sent: Wednesday,
On 25 Feb 2009 07:58:43 -0800, scott_j_f...@yahoo.com (Scott Ford)
wrote:
Boy, titles, what about you dont have to be certified to be and Engineer.
Knowlege comes in many forms, like life experience.
I got my Certificate in Data Processing back when. I doubt it helped
me any, but I don't know
On 25 Feb 2009 08:54:13 -0800, sbire...@bluezonesoftware.com (Steve
Bireley) wrote:
BlueZone supports custom default and alternate sizes up to 90 x 162 and is
easily configured.
It also supports multiple explicit partitions allowing split and splitv in
ISPF to display 4 sessions.
Yesterday I
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Howard Brazee
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What do you call...
I got my Certificate in Data Processing back when. I doubt it helped
me any, but I don't know for
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:02:25 -0500, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com wrote:
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What do you call...
I got my Certificate in
Senior Curmudgeon :)
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jerry Fuchs
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
I think we are all being a bit ANAL about these titles ... oh wait, we are
supposed to be ANAL, we are ANALysts .
Chris Hoelscher
Senior IDMS DB2 Database Administrator/ANALYST
Humana Inc
502-476-2538
choelsc...@humana.com
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
Check the settings in P.0 Screen Size 3.Max
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
netsfw-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
At my site we are getting ready to upgrade from z/OS v1.9 to v1.10. I
have noticed that 3270 customizable screen sizes (i.e. 65x200 or 60x132)
isn’t working
Currently our DR backup JCL streams are generated by REXX EXECs and sent
to the reader. We stack up to 15 volumes per 3590 in that process. Another
EXEC generates restore JCL for use at DR. Now the DR maven wants us to
look at FDRABR for incrementals and for the whole backup scenario in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Large 3270 screen size and TSO/ISPF 6.0 on z/OS v1.10
At my site we are getting ready
At my site we are getting ready to upgrade from z/OS v1.9 to v1.10. I
have noticed that 3270 customizable screen sizes (i.e. 65x200 or 60x132) isn’t
working with ISPF (ISPF 6.0) on z/OS v1.10. I get defaulted to a MOD2 screen
size. Native TSO picks up the large screen size and NetView v5.3 on
That setting was unchanged, so it is still at the following Terminal
Characteristics:
Thanks,
Screen format 3 1. Data 2. Std 3. Max 4. Part
Terminal Type 3 1. 3277 2. 3277A 3. 3278
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
From: Mark Pace
On 25 Feb 2009 10:03:59 -0800, bi...@mainstar.com (Bill Fairchild)
wrote:
I got my Certificate in Data Processing back when. I doubt it helped
me any, but I don't know for sure.Does that mean I could call
myself an engineer?
I got my certificate in mathematics in 1967 from North Carolina
We are looking at some other(more secure) product to move sensitive date
between agencies.What are some of you using?
thanks
Mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
A note for the achives - be aware that working with large screen sizes on z/OS
1.10+ can cause hang conditions in certain ISPF modules unless you increase
the HIBFREXT value in TSOKEY00.
We had to set our HIBFREXT to 96000 to overcome the problems.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
At my site we are getting ready to upgrade from z/OS v1.9 to v1.10. I
have noticed that 3270
customizable screen sizes (i.e. 65x200 or 60x132) isn’t working with ISPF
(ISPF 6.0) on z/OS
I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it, I had to
specify a queryable logmode in my VTAM command which connected to the
system. E.g.
tso logmode(sna3270q)
where we created a logmode called SNA3270Q which has the query bit on. When
I didn't do this, I got a mod5 screen.
--
What's not secure about FTP with TLS/SSL or sftp using SSH?
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of larry macioce
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009
We use both SSL and SSH, and every now and then PGP the file first, then FTP
Jim Wangler
214-502-6445
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of larry macioce
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:10 AM
To:
Cyber-Ark
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:09 PM, larry macioce mace1...@gmail.com wrote:
We are looking at some other(more secure) product to move sensitive date
between agencies.What are some of you using?
thanks
Mace
--
For
It's funny that people want to own the word engineer for someone with
certified knowledge of fields which may have nothing to do with
engines.
Engineering means much more than to do with just engines.
It is a discipline to do with the application of scientific and mathematical
principles to
On 25 Feb 2009 10:34:54 -0800, choelsc...@humana.com (Chris Hoelscher)
wrote:
I think we are all being a bit ANAL about these titles ... oh wait, we are
supposed to be ANAL, we are ANALysts .
Just hope our bosses are anal-retentive...
(Is anal-retentive spelled with a hyphen?)
Certification has little to do with how knowledge is acquired.
It's simply a formal acknowledgement that a person really does have the
knowledge.
But, in Canada, you have to be certified to call yourself, an Engineer, a
Doctor, a Lawyer, and even a Professional.
Regardless of how you
John McKown wrote:
I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it, I had to
specify a queryable logmode in my VTAM command which connected to the
system. E.g.
tso logmode(sna3270q)
where we created a logmode called SNA3270Q which has the query bit on. When
I didn't do this, I
We are using D4C32XX3, which is the recommended one for tn3270 customized
screen sizes. As previously stated, this all worked before on these systems
using ISPF on z/OS v1.9. Now that we have z/OS v1.10 on these same systems,
ISPF is not accepting the customized screen sizes anymore.
Mark T.
As far as I know, TLS/SSL FTP or SSH FTP is current state of the art for data
movement over untrusted networks.
If that's not acceptable, then I suppose your next step is a trusted network.
FTP is not a product; it is a protocol. You'll need to acquire software for non
Z/os platforms.
HTH
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:58:35 -0600, Chris Mason
chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
The mystery is why CS IP selects an attempt to activate presumably -
if I
dare to assume anything after this episode! - any interface as an
excuse to
complain about the IUTSAMEH interface definition lacking an
Hi Daniel,
TYPE=AUTO is not a necessity. The majority of sites control when the
full-volume vs. incremental backups are done by having two sets of control
statements. One specifying TYPE=FDR to get the full-volume backups and the
other specifying TYPE=ABR to get the incremental backups. This
On 25 Feb 2009 11:49:18 -0800, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
It's simply a formal acknowledgement that a person really does have the
knowledge.
But, in Canada, you have to be certified to call yourself, an Engineer, a
Doctor, a Lawyer, and even a Professional.
Regardless of how you
So does pro hockey player need to be certified (or certifiable?)
Facetious, or not, I did not make the rules.
It is what it is.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:19:33 -0800, Gibney, Dave
gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
What's not secure about FTP with TLS/SSL or sftp using SSH?
If you don't like those solutions ...
and all involved have shelled out big bucks for the base product,
and all involved have shelled out big bucks for the
I the US you just have to be certifiable (crazy).
Regards
Otto Schumacher
Technical Support, CICS
EDS, an HP Company
Ahold Account
2000 Wade Hampton Blvd.
LC1-302
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Tel: 864 987-1417
Fax: 864 987-4500
E-mail: otto.schumac...@eds.com
We deliver on our
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it, I had
to
specify a queryable logmode in my VTAM command which connected to
the
system. E.g.
tso logmode(sna3270q)
where we created a
I came across this in a z/Journal E-Mail article today:
http://www.zjournal.com/index.cfm?section=news
February 18, 2009 :: Important Announcement for UNICOM, Macro 4,
SoftLanding and Eden Customers
From Corry Hong, Founder, President and CEO of UNICOM Group:
I am delighted to formally
Running z/OS1.9 .. trying to bring up SMTP on a new lpar...
starts and stops with return code 16 and no other msg's other than
EZY1980E MVPMAIN terminating due to previous error(s)
This new lpar is sharing JES2 spool ... so not sure if this may have
something to do with it..something I'm
I need to compress 16-byte STCKE format TOD into a 12 byte field without
losing the sysplex-wide uniqueness.
So, I thought I'd keep the first 10 bytes and the last 2 bytes [Programmable
Field].
To my surprise STCKE returns non-zeroes in the bytes #13 and #14 -
Victor
I believe that 13 bytes is the current lowest number that you can use to
preserve uniqueness - (bits 8-111 which can be treated at 104-bit unsigned
binary).
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
rsc...@rs.com
-Original Message-
From:
John
I assume we're talking about accessing z/OS 3270 applications using a TN3270
emulator client to a z/OS Communications Server (CS) IP TN3270 server.
When the TN3270 server was first provided in the early '90s in TCP/IP for VM
or MVS (as an internal server - although client to the main
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
