What release of Attachmate? Have you tried to change your Attachmate
session to use ftp instead of IND$FILE? For example, click on Options,
then Session Type, then select FTP for File transfer protocol.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I solved the problem by turning on console autoinstall.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Westerman
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 1:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: TSSO issuing command to CICS
It
TSSO is defined to use 3 subsystem consoles. The subsystem consoles are
defined to CICS. Commands from JCL used to enter as console # 000 but
now enter as console name INSTREAM and this is defined to CICS.
OSCMD issued by TSSO works ok. OSCMD issued by me in my ISPF session
works ok. It's
by preset user
JSYSCXK in group OMVSSYS is complete.
DFHZC6935 I 12/05/2008 14:24:44 AJD1JDCC Autoinstall for console ¬AAA with
consolename using model or template @CONS successful.
Thanks to all who replied,
Craig
_
From: Kittendorf, Craig X.
Sent
I have defined consoles including Internal, subsystem, etc. Apparently
TSSO is using console number 000 and not a console name. With CICS 3.1
you can not define a console by number. Issuing commands thru TSSO to
CICS 3.1 worked fine until upgrading to z/OS 1.9.
Craig
-Original
Hi,
We are using TSSO with z/OS 1.9 and have the patches applied for v1.9.
Everything is working fine except trying to send a command to CICS/TS
3.1 from a batch job, for example:
// EXEC BATCHTMP
//SYSINDD *
OSCMD F CICS,tran
/*
The CICS log shows:
DFHAC2015 11/24/2008 11:28:24
Hi,
We are using TSSO with z/OS 1.9 and have the patches applied for v1.9.
Everything is working fine except trying to send a command to CICS/TS
3.1 from a batch job, for example:
// EXEC BATCHTMP
//SYSINDD *
OSCMD F CICS,tran
/*
The CICS log shows:
DFHAC2015 11/24/2008 11:28:24
Hi Len,
We replaced PKZIP with ZIP/390. I don't use it but our applications
folks do. They did not need to change their PKZIP control cards as
ZIP/390 will read them and convert to its own format. They only use it
to zip and unzip on the mainframe, not any of the advanced features or
the
I may have missed it if someone else has already posted it, but ABCs of
z/OS System Programming Volume 8: An introduction to z/OS problem
diagnosis is available with a 15 May 2007 publish date.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246988.html?Open
Craig
Getting money for ETR or STP!
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Synchronize Time Between Mainframe and Servers?
I can't believe
: Synchronize Time Between Mainframe and Servers?
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:30:26 -0400, Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
Getting money for ETR or STP!
Is the hardware to support STP likely to be standard on future models
of z/Series? If so, there's an opportunity for ISV STP lookalikes.
-Original Message
Do you want to include data sets not cataloged also?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Imbriale, Donald
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Extract listing of production datasets
From
Try looking in Appendix A of the COBOL Language Reference.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steven Shore
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: info on limits to lines of code, size,
I just googled COBOL Language Reference and the first hit is
IBM Software - Enterprise COBOL for z/OS - Library.
Clicking on that, I see:
Language Reference Manual SC27-1408-04
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shore,
Our agency blocks access to this site!
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kopischke, David G.
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Attractive Alternatives to Mainframes
I sure hope
I think the command recognition characters are defined by each product.
And some like IMS DB Control, do not show up in D OPDATA.
Craig
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Note that RDINUM is not supported at z/OS 1.7.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Hare
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Internal Reader Resources
This answer is based on
Subject: Re: Internal Reader Resources
In a recent note, Kittendorf, Craig said:
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:10:27 -0500
Note that RDINUM is not supported at z/OS 1.7.
??? Before or after? And does this mean that for the release(s)
for which it's not supported that there's no limit
IBM suggests that you have an IEASYSxx member that does not specify
CLPA.
I read this as having an IEASYSxx member without CLPA available if
needed. Not that you shouldn't do CLPA as normal procedure.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
You run an SMP job to list your features and then upload it.
Look at the right hand side of the web page for a box that says
Tip:
Learn how to create
installed software
reports.
There are instructions and sample job.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
We have IGY.SIGYCOMP in lnklist and therefore its authorized.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: COBOL Compiler APF
-Original
SYS1.SAMPLIB(CUNSISM6) does not exist on our v1.4 system
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 11:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Unicode and DB2 and Enterprise COBOL
We found it relatively painless. I will mention to get the latest
maintenance applied before starting. And don't overlook firewall
changes.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Laine, Rogers
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006
Dell, HP, Apple laptops implicated in fires.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dell Laptop Battery Recall 2004-2006
Just saw this
Why do you need LU6.2? Can you use IP Sockets instead of LU6.2?
DPL = Distributed Program Link
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LU6.2 vs
We sysprogs maintain a web site for documentation, how-tos, etc. We
publish some reports to the site. Also a CGI program to show currently
active jobs in the system.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Kay Tubello
Sent:
Was the emulator configured for blinking?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of mike caughran
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS V1R4 SEND command to operator console
FYI
I used to be able
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Console Names
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think names are required
after v1.4.
Craig
I didn't think OS390 V2R10 supported FTP with SSl.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Bui
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Need Suggestions - Best Way To Ship Secure Reports
Can you use the REPORT parameter of NETSTAT and browse the resulting
dataset?
Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/06 8:37 AM
Is there command or a freeware utility that will allow me to scroll
forward and backward through the output of a NETSTAT command entered
via
TSO COMMAND panel. Thanks.
zAAPs are available on z890 and z990. I believe it is zIIPs that are
only available on z9.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ruegsegger, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: cost of a
-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0.1 Cost?
If you have CICS TS 3.1 - you get one WDfZ for free, even upgrade to it
for
free from preceeding WSED .
Shmuel Koller
- Original Message -
From: Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Hi,
Can anyone give me a idea of the cost of IBM WebSphere Developer for
zSeries V6.0.1?
Thanks,
Craig
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0.1 Cost?
Hi,
Can anyone give me a idea of the cost
System symbols are also allowed in started jobs which are similar to
started tasks.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Static Symbols in
Sounds like Finalist.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 8:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fw: A very basic question
One key point I forgot to mention.
It's a canned programme
I know for Top Secret, that if TSS has a TSO segment for a userid, it
will ignore UADS for that user.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
If you have an OSA-E, see OSA-Express Integrated Console Controller
Implementation Guide, SG24-6364.
You can still have non SNA VTAM sessions along with the Consoles.
Seriously consider security before connecting the ICC and/or HMC to
intranet or Internet.
Craig
-Original Message-
From:
Check for IOS076E message. Check if you have UA19298 applied.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z990 IP Consoles
If there's anyone
I'm confused. We have use ICC and on one OSA-E and currently we have 7
Consoles and 7 VTAM sessions defined on each of four LPARs for a total
of 56 sessions. We can have a max of 120 clients so will be adding some
more VTAM sessions. The consoles are defined as NIP consoles and are
available and
Yes to both. You need to change the config member then manually p smtp.
If tcp parms have autolog, it will restart, else you manually s smtp.
craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Larry Burch
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006
I can't be of much help, except to say I'm fairly certain APG is
obsolete and ILM refers to IBM License Manager which is obsolete also.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kathleen McLaughlin
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006
Shouldn't it be:
COND=M AUTH=MASTER
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CLEAR SUBCHANNEL INTERRUPT MISSING on OSA ICC
V
We've lost our console defined with ICC. I've tried vary devices
offline, vary path offline, and config chp offline. Even took the chp
offline thru the HMC, then put everything back. Still get ioer on
console. PTF UA19278 may be related.
Any way to get the console back?
IEF196I IOS076E
SUBCHANNEL INTERRUPT MISSING on OSA ICC
Craig,
When you do a D Consoles- is it there ? perhaps a V XXX,CONSOLE
Check the LU defined to see if it is active.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Wednesday
It is a PC network connected to an OSA-E defined as an ICC. The pc has
connections another LPAR thru the same shared OSA and thru a second OSA.
None of the sessions (console or VTAM) for the Prod LPAR on this OSA
work. Using a second pc does not work either.
Its apparently related to this one
No, but I can vary the console offline without problem.
However, trying the reset and then vary console still gets ioer.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan C. Field
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:52 PM
To:
Our network people and their hired consultant insist that we can not
have multiple IP address on one OSA. The also refer to VIPA as viper,
maybe because the consultant claimed we were creating poisoned routes.
Anyway we do have a VIPA and three OSA-E cards working perfectly.
I don't understand
What's the question? Why are we zipping on virual tape? Or why are we
using virtual tape?
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Speake
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
I forgot more then I knew, so please bare with me. For OSA-Express
FENET in non-QDIO mode, we have the following in the IODF:
RESOURCE PARTITION=((CSS(0),(I,4),(L,5),(P,1),(T,2),(Y,3))), *
MAXDEV=((CSS(0),10240))
CHPID
Well, I'm in FL but 30 deg F is a little chilly for a Floridian to bare
much. g
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kirk Talman
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Missing UCBs
Bare?
That looks like the problem.
Thanks
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Missing UCBs
Sounds like they are not defined in the
I can't help much, I work on it a few years ago and I am now doing it
again on our new box. It be helpful to the list to know what is your
cpu, OS level, type of crypto processors, and even HMC level.
Have you check with your IBM hardware person to make sure your crypto
processor(s) are enabled.
We started using Data21's ZIP/390 product and found the following
problem:
ZIP247W DSN OBTAIN Failed (87): (null)
ZIP100I Rel:4.9 Build:09/15/05 Return Code 0008
ZIP999E Terminate Step 0008
Any one else tried using ZIP/390 with virtual tapes?
Thanks,
Craig
with Virtual Tapes
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ZIP/390 with Virtual Tapes
We started using Data21's ZIP/390 product
Thanks, it further confirm our suspicions.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Norman Hollander
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
Well I compiled one of my complex
-0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kittendorf, Craig) wrote:
The only COBOL compiler we have is: PP 5655-G53 IBM Enterprise COBOL
for
z/OS 3.4.0.
Be aware that if the last time the program(s) in question were
compiled the OS/VS compiler was used, the programs may not compile or
work
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 SYSN 9:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: (fwd) RE: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
On 1 Feb 2006 05:32:58 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kittendorf
-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Integrated Console Controller Problem?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
02/01/2006
at 04:34 PM, Kittendorf, Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well I expected the sessions to just be disconnected as TN3270
sessions currently are when we IPL our 9672.
Do you do a POR when you IPL
This may solve a problem I have.
We have an old IBM product which uses eight character names, two character
version, and two character modification level. So we can have, for example,
JOBNAME 0101, JOBNAME 0102, JOBNAME 0201, where the members are not archives
but the same job with slight
scenario 1 and 2 close your sessions. When you IPL, I
assume that VTAM and TCP/IP was drop. You will not have a listener on
port 23. Your TN3270 sessions will have no one to talk to.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
The only COBOL compiler we have is: PP 5655-G53 IBM Enterprise COBOL for
z/OS 3.4.0.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Klein
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 3:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
See Chapter 13 in the installation manual. Some modules are required to
be in the MVS Link Pack Area, and in this case, always load the latest
version's modules. They are downward compatible.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Hi,
We have a test lpar running on our new z890 and I have configured the
ICC. We have Attachmate on the PC connected to the ICC. When the LPAR
was shutdown and POR the Attachmate emulator sessions for both Console
and VTAM closed completely. Not just disconnected, but closed. Of
course, when
. TN3270plus does not suffer
from this.
Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
Hi,
We have a test lpar running on our new z890 and I have configured the
ICC. We have Attachmate on the PC connected to the ICC. When the LPAR
was shutdown and POR the Attachmate emulator sessions for both Console
and VTAM closed
We have some old COBOL programs that CALL 'ILBOSPI0'. I think the call
may have been required by a debugging product at one time. I'm sure it
is safe to remove, but wondered if anyone remembers why it may have been
coded in the first place?
Thanks,
Craig
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Tuesday
I found that also but I want to get rid of the call completely, not just
replace it. In all of my own COBOL programs, I've never used the call.
Thanks,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ulrich Krueger
Sent: Tuesday,
I would like to remove the call from the COBOL program source. The
programs do not depend on getting control after abnormal situations and
do not use the IBM COBOL options such as SYMDUMP, TRACE, FLOW, TEST,
etc.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 3:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, January
Hi,
We have our z890 up and running one test LPAR. We noticed that the LPAR
numbers showing up in SMF and SHOWMVS are not the same as the MIF image
id or LPAR numbers we entered in the profiles through the HMC. Should
SMF report the MIF image id, or perhaps is this the order the profiles
were
TSSO from FILE 404 solved my problem. We have a routine which does
OSCMD D A,REGION. Then if CMDOUT 0 it checks the last line to
see if REGION was not found. On the previously installed version, we
got CMDOUT = 3. After installing the new version, we get CMDOUT=5
which is correct.
BTW, this
Hi all,
For z/OS 1.4 on z890, is TSSO on CBT file 404 the one I need? I assume
others have 'been there, done that, got the t-shirt.
Problems ? Gotchas?
Thanks
Craig
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi all,
I received the following message when trying to dump a PDSE:
ADR793E (ttt)-m(yy), DATA SET dsname ON VOLUME volume_serial_number
IS
AN INCONSISTENT PDSE AND CANNOT BE COPIED | DUMPED | RESTORED
Explanation: The data set's PDSE indicators in the VTOC and VVDS do not
match.
You didn't mention your processor. But offhand I can think of:
1) Integrated Console Controller (ICC) with OSA Express
2) IBM 2074
3) Visara SCON and ICON products
Number 1 can replace 2 and 3 if you have the hardware. I'm not sure if
a Cisco router with CIPs and running TN3270 server will
I ran a LISTCAT ALL for the dataset and the SMS DATA was missing. I did
CONVERTV SMS DYNAM(USMS01) REDETERMINE and now it can be dumped.
Thanks for all the replies,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matthew Stitt
Sent:
We are migrating from Amdahl DASD to a Shark (Model 800). No one here
has experience with this. A DBA asked the following questions:
What are the performance differences between volumes defined as MOD-3,
MOD-9,
MOD-27?
What are the implications of changing a volume to a PAV volume?
What type
Thanks Bruce. I believe FDRPAS is going to be used for the migration.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 2:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration to Shark
We are
We are migrating from 9672 with the Amdahl, to z/890 with FICON to the
shark. The z/890 will be brought up on the Amdahl and then using
FDRPAS to migrate to the Shark. We will still have some other bus and
tag and ESCON to convert.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
An additional consideration is do individual users have non-expiring
passwords on the remote system? If the password expires, then NETRC or
any other automatic procedure becomes more difficult.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Where can I find this doc: Hardware Management Console Operations Guide
(V1.8.2) SC28-6830?
I can't find it on IBM Library Server Library site.
Thanks,
Craig
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
for SC28-6830 and got this:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2d37db3ef98da032e85256e5
50073182caid=1
Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/03/2006 15:46
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 3:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Hardware Management Console Operations Guide
(V1.8.2) SC28-6830?
Where can I find this doc
://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2d37db3ef98da032e85256e5
50073182caid=1
- Original Message -
From: Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:46 PM
Subject: Hardware Management Console Operations
Hi,
We have a remote possibility of getting a z/890-104 next year. We are
currently z/OS v1.4, CICS/TS 2.3, Enterprize COBOL 3.2 (soon 3.4), IMS
8.1, DB/2 7.1. I noticed we do have some VS COBOL programs that have
not been compiled lately. Some assembler and even less C++.
What kind of things
the other. Off the top of my head, I don't remember. Group 1's
offering may be Mailstream.
HTH.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject
Anyone know of a replacement for the Pitney-Bowes Finalist product?
I've seen Intelligent Search Technologies has one in development.
Anyone have more info on it?
Thanks,
Craig
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
One way I know converts one character at a time so would not be good for
large numbers of characters, or high frequency. In these cases an
assembler routine would be better.
01 FILLER.
02 HEX-SUB PIC S9(4) COMP VALUE ZERO.
88 matches
Mail list logo
