I cannot find any reference as to the source of the JCLim column on the
SDSF 'JC' Panel.
I have tried several searches, but, to no avail. The only reference is
the SDSF manual defining the column.
I could not find any reference to the source of the data.
The ISF.SISFSRC data set provided no
About 4 years ago, we replaced ABENDAID for MVS CICS, FILEAID
XPEDITER with SymDump Batch CICS, File Master Plus Intertest Batch.
We already had Intertest CICS.
We survived. Only the true application 'techies' complained mostly
about SymDump, both types. But, using the CA Products saved us
I stand corrected - I thought I had created Exit #53 when we migrated to
z/OS 1.4.
Anyway, I have used the similar code in Exit #3 since 1988.
Yes, I assembled Exit #53 with a USER Environment and it is loaded in
the LPA.
LOADMOD(JES2X003) STORAGE=PVT
LOADMOD(JES2X053) STORAGE=LPA
JES2X053
Yes, I am doing what is described in the exit sample. Further, I
strategically generated a S0C1 to view the contents of the XPL and the
area pointed to by X053JXWR. Everything looks fine. Basically, the
exit exits after this.
As I stated in my one of my previous posts, this code has been
/DJOBDEF
/HASP835 JOBDEF
/HASP835 JOBDEF ACCTFLD=OPTIONAL,BAD_JOBNAME_CHAR=?,CNVT_ENQ=FAIL,
/HASP835 JCLERR=YES,JNUMBASE=4487,JNUMFREE=4080,JNUMWARN=80,
/HASP835 JOBFREE=4081,JOBNUM=5000,JOBWARN=80,PRTYHIGH=10,
/HASP835 PRTYJECL=NO,PRTYJOB=NO,PRTYLOW=1,PRTYRATE=48,
Yes, upon entry R0 points to the XPL. However, I save it in
XPL_ADDRESS.
I should have also stated this is JES2 1.9. This code has been working
on a 1.7 system for 3 years. And, for another 3 years on a 1.4 system.
--
For
Maybe another set of eyes can show me the error of my ways. I have
written JES2 Exit #53 to validate the accounting field of the JOB
statement. The exit performs as designed except for a nagging problem.
I want to pass an error message to be added to the JCL data set.
According to the JES2 Exit
Replacing tape with disk?
Sounds like a great idea - if you have a large enough DASD farm.
DR would be simpler, too - if you have a large communication pipe to
your DR site.
However, once the powers-that-be see the cost, tape doesn't seem so bad.
Since CA is now going to distribute updates and releases via MSM, does
this mean that all of CA's products will follow the same methodology for
installation? For example, Telon would send out various releases and
service packs. None cumulative. Upgrading required applying each
release and
Of late, I am receiving some posts in this format:
TG9vayBmb3IgZmllbGRzIGluIHRoZSBFQ1ZULiANCg0KLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2Fn
ZSAt
LS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogSUJNIE1haW5mcmFtZSBEaXNjdXNzaW9uIExpc3QgPElCTS1NQUlOQGJh
bWEu
dWEuZWR1Pg0KVG86IElCTS1NQUlOQGJhbWEudWEuZWR1IDxJQk0tTUFJTkBiYW1hLnVhLmVk
dT4N
Have you considered using batch job executing IEBGENER with SYSUT2
assigned to an internal reader and make SYSUT1 a concatenation of 2
files - the first would contain only the JOB statement and the second
the file from the vendor? I have done this with some other very large
files.
While this discussion has evolved into a discourse on HLLs and library
support, I would like to make an observation.
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Accenture was Arthur Anderson
Consulting. My company contracted with them to assess the status of our
technology and its direction.
I have had a vendor send me such a deck. Not only did I have to insert
a JOB statement, I also had to modify the DSNs in the CLIST included in
the deck.
Further, this jobstream contained a few object decks, so the editing was
tricky due to having CAPS OFF. The vendor even crowed about how good
I have been working with some RSM areas specifically RAX. The RAX has 5
fields that I have been using, i.e. RAXFMCT RAXFBV1-4. RAXFMCT
contains the number of real storage frames used by the address space.
RAXFBV1 contains the number of frames in UIC interval 1. And, RAXFBV2
contains the number
I have been requested to write a real storage monitor. Nothing to
fancy. One of the items I would report would be the UIC and some
associated values. So, I follow the links to get to the PFTE and start
accumulating information. Only problem, the RIT pointer to the first
PFTE is zeros. I have
Thank you, gentlemen. I had read the INTRDR init statement
documentation. It does not mention SYSAFF. However, I issued the JES2
operator command to set SYSAFF on our test system and tested it. Thanks
again.
--
For IBM-MAIN
We have 3 LPARs in our sysplex all in the same MAS. All running z/OS
1.7. We have an anomaly we can't explain.
When a job is submitted on System A, it is converted on system B. Due
to the scheduling environment, the job
executes and ABENDs on System A. Designating SYSAFF=A resolved the
Thanks for the input. I did not install MIM. My colleague, who did,
said this was a feature of the MIMPLEX.
I will refer him to your postings when he returns from vacation.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
We use MIM and a feature of the 'MIMPLEX' is that MIM disallows multiple
TSO sessions with the same User ID.
At this installation, the MIMPLEX crosses all Sysplex boundaries. We
have 3 monoplexes and 1 base sysplex and the MIMPLEX comprises all 4
plexes.
While z/OS JES2 will allow multiple
According to BPMTEXT, 5B1B0100:
Notice: unknown modid, reason text may be incorrect
JRTrunc: Vnode operation trunc is not supported by this file system
Action: Verify that the operation was performed on a physical file
system that
supports the operation.
For my 2 cents worth, I totally agree with Barbara. We don't have any
use for Unix at our installation. The only real reason we have to keep
up with and maintain UNIX is for TCP/IP. We don't have any substantial
use for UNIX. Okay, ServerPac, but, I could just as easily use the
tapes.
By
When I logon to TSO/ISPF, I initiate 10 split screens and bounce around
using commands in the user command tables, i.e. X1,X2, ... X9,XA (Yes,
Bob, like you I am a slow typist.) Each split screen initiates with a
different command: 1-Primary menu, 2 3 - Edit, 4 5 - View, 6 -
SDSF, 7 - DS
Thanks for the information. I have passed your comments and suggestions
to my communications colleague.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
We would like to configure the linkage between two LPARs and
Hipersockets. The LPARs are members of two different sysplexes.
However, these LPARs are utilizing the same OSA card.
If this configuration is feasible and/or possible, where is this
documented and are there examples?
TIA.
Steve,
Thanks for the offer. I hearken to the old adage - 'A prophet is
without honor in his own land.' Certain individuals would prefer not to
mention or have such a subject brought to their attention.
--
For IBM-MAIN
The reason why some shops (mine, in particular) are still using OS/VS
COBOL and VS COBOL II is that decisions were made according to
expediency and the fact that the mainframe was to be obsolete by the
year 2000. Ergo, no need to convert.
On January 1, 2009, we, the mainframers, will be
Has IBM announced what release of LE will not support old COBOL runtime
environments, specifically OS/VS COBOL and VS COBOL II?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I find that the new manual software offerings confusing and unusable.
When I installed z/OS 1.7, I copied the softcopy CD to my hard drive.
Identified those manuals (PDF form) that I would use by subject matter.
Copied them to an appropriate folder that were named according to
subject matter.
Actually, IBM recommends using both types of initiators depending on the
type of work. Specifically, production batch under JES2 and the rest
under WLM.
Anyway, Scheduling Environments will segregate the work. Define an
unique SE for each LPAR or member of the MAS, e.g. LPAR1, LPAR2 ...
Define
The reason I chose X1, X2, X3 ... X9, XA is that I am just lazy. Also,
I stack commands in the command area. Thus, the shorter the command
string, the more I can enter.
As for hitting ENTER to activate all the sessions, I have tried it and
it fails. The only way to activate all sessions is to
For my 2 cents worth, I modified the TSO LOGON REXX EXEC to establish 10
sessions for me. I also created a set of user commands X1, X2, X3 ...,
X9, XA in our user table. Each command swaps to the corresponding
session, e.g. X1 is SWAP 1, X2 is SWAP 2, etc.
Thus, swapping is just a matter of
Peter,
When are these statistics/events recorded? I executed the display
command against one of our LLA managed library and received information
about a subset of fetched modules in the library, but not all fetched
modules were reported.
This library contains JES2 Exits, Command Exit, SMF
Tell me how you got them to respond.
I had a subscription to z/OS Update. I had problems with delivering the
issues on time. Finally, I had to send emails requesting the issues.
I tried calling but the message box always was full.
Eventually in November of 2007, my subscription expired. I
I have been following this thread with some interest. The one aspect I
have not seen mentioned has been what constitutes too high of volume of
SMF data?
I'll admit my shop is small but our production LPAR was switching SMF in
the range of 95 to 105 times a day. The other LPARs were behaving
Thanks to the respondents.
At one time, I had RTFMd that stated the way to bring down OMVS/USS was
to issue the 'F BPXOINIT,SHUTDOWN=FILEOWNER' 'F
BPXOINIT,SHUTDOWN=FORKS' commands.
These two commands have worked until Saturday. I will use the new
command and monitor its success.
The following contains excerpts the SYSLOG from a shutdown from Saturday
night, 1/19:
F BPXOINIT,SHUTDOWN=FORKS
BPXF024I (OMVSKERN) Jan 19 18:39:06 inetd 65542 : FOMN0066 inetd 368
terminating
BPXI032E FORK SERVICE HAS BEEN SHUTDOWN SUCCESSFULLY. 370
ISSUE F BPXOINIT,RESTART=FORKS TO RESTART FORK
I apologize for the lack of completeness:
The only active address spaces were:
DLF
LLA
VLF
APPC
JES2
OPSMAIN (CA OPS/MVS)
I did cancel APPC but to no avail.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
My installation let the Operations staff write and maintain the shutdown
procedure using our automation tool. This was done a number of years
ago when the mainframe was the platform of choice. Since then, the
mainframe has become the 'platform non grata' and the automation tool
has become an
I have applied maintenance for a processor upgrade. Some of the
maintenance involved updating the OMVS ROOT HFS.
Today, I began the ACCEPT of this maintenance. When I checked the
output from the ACCEPT CHECK, I noticed that the OMVS ROOT HFS file was
not allocated. I found this strange, as
I just realized I could have examined the CSI to determine the DLIB.
The Alzheimer's must be kicking in.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Exit 53 operates in a different environment than Exit 3. Exit 3 is in
the JES2 Environment. Exit 53 is in the USER environment. The
different environments require different services, different LOAD parms,
register contents, and especially information passed in the exit list.
RTFM - JES2
I have been trying to download this level and cannot. I get to the
site, choose the FTP option, and, agree to the terms and conditions box.
I then get Not Found from IBM_HTTP_Server/6.0.2.13 Apache/2.0.47
(Unix) Server at ftp.software.ibm.com Port 21.
I contacted my colleague who supports our
I can't find any documentation concerning this command and the ensuing
display.
Do the statistics reflect the counts since the last IPL or the last
refresh of the LLA?
Thank you.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Assembler - EMCS. Documented in Chapter 7 of MVS Programming:
Authorized Assembler Services Guide SA22-7608-09.
REXX - Check the SHARE Proceedings from Long Beach. There was a session
detailing the REXX instructions.
--
For
The following messages were issued during the IPL for UNICODE:
IEE252I MEMBER CUNUNIRO FOUND IN RENO.PARMLIB
CUN2005I CONVERSION ENVIRONMENT SUCCESSFULLY INITIALIZED
CUN3007I REALSTORAGE IS NOW DEFINED AS 1000 PAGES1000 PAGES
IEE252I MEMBER CUNIMG04 FOUND IN RENO.PARMLIB
CUN4026I IMG
In response to SCR, I am so glad to discover that I am not alone in my
'unappreciation' of the product. I am installing 1.7 via ServerPac. I
was able to download the manuals and extract them. I had some extra
work to do, but, I am using the PDF versions and am quite happy just
'pointing
Thanks for response. I will move the start of Top Secret to somewhere
after the beginning of the IPL Procedure to satisfy the recommendation.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
We use Top Secret. A consultant made a recommendation late last year
that Top Secret should be the first task started during the IPL
procedure. The Security Administrator has requested this change.
Currently, we start Top Secret after JES2 completes its start procedure.
I really don't see the
Thanks, Peter, for the note about the ALIASd DSN. I believe that is the
crux of the problem. Secondly, Peter, I didn't have a dump to look at
the DEBAPFIN. But, thanks for the info. I can use this later.
Thanks for the other insights as well.
It has occurred to me that I had a similar problem a couple of months
ago. When I was building a new residence volume for z/OS 1.7 image, I
used the SYS1.LINKLIB from the z/OS 1.7 ServerPac image.
I used a SSA (System Specific Alias) to reference this library. I
authorized this library using
Response to Peter Relson's post:
I would guess that your steplib consists of multiple data sets
Nope. Only one library in the STEPLIB concatentation.
Then, assuming that A was linkedited with AC=3D1, A gets control
APF-authorized, and cannot load from an unauthorized steplib and thus
finds B
I have written a program A that issues a LINK for another module B.
Both modules are residing in libraries that are authorized and in the
linklist. All has been working well for the past couple of years.
Until now...
I have installed new version of B call it B'. B' resides in a library
that is
A few years ago, we replaced our Xerox Channel-attached printers with
the Xerox IP Printers and the SNA connected printers. This was done
locally and remotely with the remote sites choosing their model.
Previously, we had installed VPS from Levi, Ray Shoup to handle the
remote printing. Now we
Since the beginning of the year, I have not been receiving my iSource
e-mails. My colleague has not been receiving them either.
This week, I have been trying to access the site at
http://isource.ibm.com/. I receive an error saying the server is too
busy, try later.
Yes, what a wonderful idea! And, while we are at it, let's go back to
keypunching source and JCL decks and microfiche. I miss keeping object
decks at my desk.
Sarcasm aside, SMP/E is just not an installation tool. SMP/E performs a
myriad of functions that make my job easier. Yes, sometimes it
I attempted to mount a multivolume HFS (non-SMS) and received this
message:
Errno=98x Catalog Volume Access Facility error; Reason=9801
Any idea where this might be documented? I found a reference in an LE
manual saying the explanation is in the MVS/DFP Systems Programming
Guide which is not
Thanks for the suggestions.
However, like today, I was questioned about IEECB92S. I finally found
an APAR that describe what the module does.
I do not have the luxury of saying 'Because, IBM did it that way'. I
have to explain or we get another mark against us in the audit report.
I thought
I don't know how many releases ago, but, IBM published a manual called
Module Descriptions. The manual contained concise information about
modules and some of the attributes.
Does IBM have anything similar now?
We are going through a security audit and Sarbannes-Oxley compliance. I
keep
I apologize for the tardiness of my reply. I had other urgent matters
to attend to outside of work. I had to take about 7 days of vacation.
Anyway, the problem was fixed when I unloaded the PDS and then performed
the XMIT. I don't use it to often, and, I made an invalid assumption
that the
I had an entry on IBMLink's AST and received notification today. The
APAR was closed but the PTF is not available. However, the APAR item
stated 'Relief is available in the form of: SEEPTF'. I must confess I
don't know what SEEPTF means.
Further, the APAR item had this line at the end of the
I have read the manual and tried many options but I can't get the XMIT
command to write to a permanent data sets. The command uses the DSNAME
for input but uses a system temporary DSN for the output:
XMIT nwic.myuhas dsname('ij.source') outdsname('ij.xmit')
The corresponding messages are:
I don't know if or how your IPL procedure is automated. Mine is via
IEAVMXIT. When an HFS is not mounted during OMVS initialization either
BPXF002I or BPXF008I is issued complete with the DSN of the HFS that was
not mounted. The IPL procedure notes the exception and display a
message in
Thanks for the input.
I have no control over our firewalls and/or SPAM filter. Further, the
group that administers and maintains these e-mail filters does not send
any notification as to what is being filtered or what will be filtered.
No, I am not going to have IBM send these e-mails to my
Sam,
OPS/MVS can't help because the subsystem is not active when the message
is issued. However, the WTO exit - IEAVMXIT - does detect the message.
I have automated our IPLs using it. At the of the IPL procedure, the
exit examines an ECSA area where the IPL procedure sets flags and saves
I have subscribed to iSource for a number of years. However, a few
months ago the weekly
e-mails stopped. No message. Nothing. Three weeks ago, I reregistered
for iSource and received the usual e-mail acknowledgement. Still no
iSource missives. I then sent an e-mail to the iSource people via
I can display the policy and format information of the ARM couple data
sets via IXCMIAPU and the control statement of DATA TYPE(ARM)
REPORT(YES).
Is there any way to obtain similar information for USS couple data sets
- TYPE(BPXCMDS)?
I have been reading all of the speculations about the Isogon purchase.
We don't use SoftAudit. But we do use SPIFFY - Isogon's ISPF
enhancement. What is IBM's intention concerning SPIFFY?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
John Eels queried why we are still using UADS? I tried to convert to
using our security software, but, was outvoted.
You pick your battles, you win your wars. Or, in my case, you get to
survive.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
If one browses SYS1.UADS, one will notice that each member name/TSO User
ID has been suffixed with the character '0'. Since the maximum length
of the member name is 8 bytes and since ACCOUNT adds a '0' to TSO User
ID, the maximum length of a TSO User ID is 7.
At least, this is what I have
Due to the misalignment caused by the font, it's hard to read the
information. However, this is positions 1-29 of the JOB card:
//VM44K1C JOB (C,VM44,027),
66EDFFDFC444DDC44C6EDFF6FFF56
115 444 21 30001 6 20D3B5444 B027DB
Positions 30-72:
'COMP SEARCH PARMS',
Problem solved.
A colleague discovered that at the end of the jobstream was a '/*EOF'
statement. When this was removed from the jobstream, the JOB card was
recognized and executed as planned.
In the Assembler Services Guide concerning the Internal Reader, the
/*EOF statement causes the
An analyst wrote a COBOL program to run in the USS environment. The
program has a series of DISPLAY verbs. The program compiled
successfully, but, upon execution, he cannot find the output for the
DISPLAY verb.
I read the manual and discovered a reference to the SPECIAL-NAMES
paragraph and
72 matches
Mail list logo