Re: Security Packages Percentages

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P Kalinich Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 8:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Security Packages Percentages Bill Johnson of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 3:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) I know of at least

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 7:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) SNIP Our problem is, the FLEX-ES system was

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) snip Everything old is new again. Didn't

Friday Rant

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 1:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) SNIP I love beer consumers. They drink my

Where would an EDIT MACRO get set?

I've had an interesting situation take place today across 3 user IDs (mine). Any file I have in a DSLIST if selected by E for edit or V for view gets the following message: Initial edit macro set And the PF1 just doesn't give me a sufficient clue. And since I don't use edit macros of the INITIAL

Re: Where would an EDIT MACRO get set?

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George, William (DHS-ITSD) Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Where would an EDIT MACRO get set? On the DSLIST command line enter DSLSET to get the setting

Re: Where would an EDIT MACRO get set?

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Kelly Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Where would an EDIT MACRO get set? the edit macro should come from your clist/rexx concatenation. if it isn't

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) SNIP But there have also been a lot

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Day Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 1:03 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) Go back and look at your pops manuals for

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Day Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 5:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) snip Where will IBM get the $$$ to fund the

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 12:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) Steve Thompson writes: Meanwhile,

Re: Question about SuperWylbur

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question about SuperWylbur On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:23 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: ACS

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Day Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) SNIP It is surely true that IBM has been

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcia Harelik Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 1:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) SNIP Getting back to Steve's point

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mullins Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) SNIP P.S. And to someone who mentioned

Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mullins Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling!!) Steve, About 3 years ago, when I worked

Re: Wylbur and Paging

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Lynn Wheeler Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 11:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Wylbur and Paging The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to

Re: What's a CPU second?

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What's a CPU second? Gee, thanks everybody for telling me about MP overhead and SRB time and

Re: Question about SuperWylbur

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John S. Giltner, Jr. Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 7:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question about SuperWylbur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP Not sure about the OSI to ACS, but EDS

Re: Question about SuperWylbur

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 8:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question about SuperWylbur snip I definitely worked for Optimum Systems, Inc. (OSI)

Re: Wylbur History

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-) Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 12:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Wylbur History Gerhard Postpischl is correct -- I had nothing to do with the

Re: Question about SuperWylbur

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory, Gary G Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Question about SuperWylbur When did Wylbur become SuperWylbur? I'm guessing that ACS sold it off. The

Re: A little good news for MF

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: A little good news for MF SNIP ISTM that all the security breaches that seem to make the printed rags

Re: Question about SuperWylbur

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question about SuperWylbur In a message dated 3/29/2007 3:07:20 P.M. Central

Re: Question about SuperWylbur

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question about SuperWylbur On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:40:14 EDT, IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote:

Re: What's a CPU second?

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: What's a CPU second? Okay, this is probably the dumbest question of the day, maybe of the month. I am in a

Re: Call for XEDIT freaks, submit ISPF requirements

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Call for XEDIT freaks, submit ISPF requirements I want DELTA deck support. Why are you (and others)

Re: Need for small machines was Re: Macro List/Execute Forms (Was: Need help with Assembler ...)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Leahy Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 11:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Need for small machines was Re: Macro List/Execute Forms (Was: Need help with Assembler ...) Also ISPF was

Re: William Smith is on Jury Duty... return date unknown.

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: William Smith is on Jury Duty... return date unknown. I will be out of the office starting 03/22/2007 and

Re: Macro List/Execute Forms (Was: Need help with Assembler ...)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Macro List/Execute Forms (Was: Need help with Assembler ...) snip One GREAT example is the IBM macros'

Re: History - Early Green Card

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Porowski Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: History - Early Green Card I just acquired what I believe to be an early 'green card'. It's actually a white

Re: Macro List/Execute Forms (Was: Need help with Assembler ...)

CHANGE THE BLOODY SUBJECT so those of us TRYING to discuss a MACRO issue can. SHARE GUIDE RANT CUT -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN

Re: Slightly OT Backups not Good on PC

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doc Farmer Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Slightly OT Backups not Good on PC This is why you TEST your backup tapes, folks... SNIP Some years ago

Re: Souce Control for z/OS

Thank you all for your replies. I'm provided our management with the info and then... Meanwhile, the group I work in has written processes to wrap around Endevor and extend it a bit. But different product groups here are using different systems, and someone thought that we could/should all use

Re: IBM's web Face

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan C. Field Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 1:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM's web Face SNIP Is there a place in IBM that cares that you can address a complaint to? SNIP

Re: Outsourcing perils was Re: sysprog demand in USA

. so what we and our do you mean in your public to the world post. On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:15:28 -0700, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1 Mar 2007 12:59:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thompson, Steve) wrote: I'm baffled at outsourcing to countries that are a security risk to the USofA

Re: Outsourcing perils was Re: sysprog demand in USA

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 1:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Outsourcing perils was Re: sysprog demand in USA snip The thing that has baffled me about outsourcing is how

Re: still hunting zOS opportunities PA-MD

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Plasha Michael E Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: still hunting zOS opportunities PA-MD Check www.USAJOBS.com We have a couple of IT jobs right now

Re: KSDS immedial write

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:16 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: KSDS immedial write snip Would ESDS with AIX not be the ticket? There will be no CI or CA splits (with

Re: info on limits to lines of code, size, memory, etc

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Shore Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 9:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: info on limits to lines of code, size, memory, etc I'm looking for information ( manuals, other resources)

Re: Attractive Alternatives to Mainframes

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Kopischke Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 1:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Attractive Alternatives to Mainframes SNIP This is a common problem with these kinds of stories.

Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are there?)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are there?) At 2/25/2007 01:15 PM, TMacNeil wrote: Why?

Re: The Spanish Computer

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:01 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: The Spanish Computer snip They didn't consider MP issues? snip Uh, wouldn't that have been

Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 1:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:03:10 -0700, Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:

Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history snip As I recall, some of the registers actually had

Re: z/OS developer jobs (was: Literacy)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Smith Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS developer jobs (was: Literacy) SNIP You might try SPCI (WWW.SPCI.NET). I know that they do

Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 5:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history SNIP TOS was a piece of work! Every time you linkedited a

Re: TSO TRANSMIT of PDS member

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: TSO TRANSMIT of PDS member SNIP I also believe COBOL is in a maintenance mode with no vision for the

Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are there?)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 6:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are there?) SNIP I have lived the pain, to the point of

Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Brick Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history You have also missed some small relatively insignificant OS's.

Re: Mixed Case Password on z/OS 1.7 and ACF 2 Version 8

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 11:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mixed Case Password on z/OS 1.7 and ACF 2 Version 8 SNIP But just as security isn't my job -

Re: Mixed Case Password on z/OS 1.7 and ACF 2 Version 8

Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 12:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mixed Case Password on z/OS 1.7 and ACF 2 Version 8 snip We are becoming unsecure by trying to be so secure. Not everyone has photographic

Re: License keys for ISV products

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products SNIP ...The poor salesman would not know what to do, and the free trial

Re: SLIP on GETMAIN

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Koller Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:01 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SLIP on GETMAIN We incur a situation of an address space storage ever increasing - yet its production so

Re: Mixed Case Password on z/OS 1.7 and ACF 2 Version 8

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mixed Case Password on z/OS 1.7 and ACF 2 Version 8 On 13 Feb 2007 10:49:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Running OS/390 on z9 BC

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Running OS/390 on z9 BC Can anyone tell me, or point me to a site where I can find out for myself, if

Re: Running OS/390 on z9 BC

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 1:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Running OS/390 on z9 BC SNIP OS/390 V2R10 was the first operating system release to support the

Re: Running OS/390 on z9 BC

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 3:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Running OS/390 on z9 BC SNIP FWIW, I tried IPLing a totally *unmaintained* z/OS V1R1 system under a

Re: Basic SMP/E question

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Basic SMP/E question Individual PTFs, APARs, USERMODs, etc. can be selectively applied. That's what I

Re: Omegamon - How to

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Hewson Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Omegamon - How to Hello Steve, We protect the OMEGAMON commands via the security exit in the Omegamon

Omegamon - How to

Is there a way to define in RACF and have Omegamon recognize, that a user is authorized for the special features? The idea is to avoid having each authorized user from having to enter the special password. And we'd like to do it w/o having to put an exit in Omegamon. And I've looked at the

Re: Omegamon - How to

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Rice Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:09 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Omegamon - How to Steve, You can set up profiles in RACF. Look in the manual for Initial 1 intial 2

Re: SIO in SDSF vs read/write speed

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SIO in SDSF vs read/write speed I made the following observation: 1. WRITE. I put some data to tape (3592J). The

Re: LPAR Org Security

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Deaver Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 5:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: LPAR Org Security SNIP We systems engineers are, of course, arguing that we need that access as a matter

Re: IBM changed its mainframe URLs once more

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walter Farrell Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 8:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM changed its mainframe URLs once more SNIP I'm told that site has been there for awhile already,

Re: GDG question

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hare Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: GDG question I'm pretty sure I can do this, but I'm looking for a second opinion (and you're ugly, too as my

Re: M$ Vista Experiences?

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: M$ Vista Experiences? The update is way too expensive. Too many versions (Home Basic, Home

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Who intercepted SVC 26? Are they in Perth? Yep - it was transferred down there a few years back. SNIP

Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.) Steve I'm afraid I have this bad

Re: Long Live the Mainframe

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lionel B Dyck Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Long Live the Mainframe This is a multipart message in MIME format. SNIP This just showed up as

Re: Condition code checking for FTP

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucy Arnold Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 5:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Condition code checking for FTP Hello, I have a series of GET commands in a batch FTP job and when one of

Re: SVCs

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SVCs SNIP Later when S/370 came along the designers had recognized the deficiencies of SVC and they

Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.) SNIP It depends on the

Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.) SNIP At SHARE I can remember distinctly

Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 7:23 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of mainframe costs.) On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:10:11

ABEND U999 in ISPF

Can anyone give me any reason why a REXX routine would cause ISPF to die with a U0999 and dump you off to TSO READY? OK, background to this: ISPF IPCS REXX. All the REXX exec does is look at a dump to find a certain type of control block and list it, note some comments, and exit. The

Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF Steve, From the ISPF Msgs and Codes book : Abend code 999 (or X'3E7') This abend is

Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF Have you checked the DCB attributes for the ISPF DD allocations? - if you have a logon

Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF Steve, A couple of ideas to help debug : (1) Run the exec under dialog test and

Re: Rolled Off GDG's

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Steely Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 2:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Rolled Off GDG's What does it mean when when a GDG status is ROLLED-OFF. SNIP It means that the generation

Re: Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 10:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink In a message dated 1/8/2007 9:51:22 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL

Re: Just another example of mainframe costs.

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike S Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Just another example of mainframe costs. Take a look

Re: Just another example of mainframe costs.

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Just another example of mainframe costs. It wasn't that bad for me. Just so you can get to it, this URL

Re: Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink (apology)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 3:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink [The Peterson Principle is still in effect.] If you mean the one where

Re: V2X2 vs. Shark (SnapShot v. FlashCopy)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pinnacle Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: V2X2 vs. Shark (SnapShot v. FlashCopy) SNIP Steve, Over what period of time were the volumes

Re: Just another example of mainframe costs.

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Just another example of mainframe costs. I bought an external 500GB USB2 backup disk for a home

Re: V2X2 vs. Shark (SnapShot v. FlashCopy)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pinnacle Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: V2X2 vs. Shark (SnapShot v. FlashCopy) My current client has a V2X2 and is thinking about replacing it with a

Re: RACF - Password rules.

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RACF - Password rules. SNIP Hopefully password reset will include a provision for resetting (or

Re: Data replication at a remote site - elementary doubt

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mautalen Juan Guillermo Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 7:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Data replication at a remote site - elementary doubt Hi, Sorry for this very basic question, but

Re: Max Allocation w/ Space= DD

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Montevago Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 11:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Max Allocation w/ Space= DD Hi, What's the max number of cyl's you can specify for primary/secondary

Re: Max Allocation w/ Space= DD

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Montevago Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 1:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Max Allocation w/ Space= DD Can anybody comment on this: I specify 4000/4000cyl and z/OS allocates

REXX Question - Variable Control Passing (IPCS/ISPF)

I have a problem where I would like to pass some number of variables between different REXX sources (in this case 200). I have placed the variables into a single REXX source. And I know that this can't be called and then have those variables available in the calling REXX exec (if I can, that

Re: REXX Question - Variable Control Passing (IPCS/ISPF)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur T. Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: REXX Question - Variable Control Passing (IPCS/ISPF) SNIP Create a single string with all of the

Re: Question about SVC 109

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question about SVC 109 So type-3 or type-4 is the same nowdays? SNIP As I recall, TYPE 3 are

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mullins Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 4:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones You make the presumption (sorry) that this doctrine

Re: REXX Question - Variable Control Passing (IPCS/ISPF)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: REXX Question - Variable Control Passing (IPCS/ISPF) Assuming you want to stick to REXX

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark H. Young Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 8:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones snip Haven't their lawyers heard of Stare Decicis

Re: IPCS ASID

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 4:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IPCS ASID I'm working on a little problem. I have an SVCDUMP that contains more than one

Re: HCD EDT's Generics

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: HCD EDT's Generics Hello, I've create a new EDT 01 from the 00 menber. I have the following listed for

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >