Hi,
Thanks for the responses.
The ACCEPT occurred by accident (I am assuming) in 2013.
Haven't fully scoped if I can recreate the whole DLIB zone from scratch, but my
expectation is low probability of success due missing MCS.
The "canned" dialog will not permit generation of ACCEPT code these
(CDC/OCOO/OCIO/ITSO) (CTR)
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
I was going to ask the same question :-).
We always had canned JCL we used for any accepts that did backups BEFORE
accepting anything. It's save me more than
Ed Jaffe wrote:
Would not NPRE apply equally to APPLY as it would to ACCEPT?
Well, yes.
But it occurs to me that one could construct and ACCEPT (or UCLIN
"ACCEPT") a ++USERMOD that adds a part so named as not to conflict with
IBM and other software vendors' part names, and NPRE that
a weekly restore should put things back nicely.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 8:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
Bruce, How long
: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
Hello,
Over the years small errors in processing occassionally happen, and now we have
some USERMODs that have been ACCEPTED.
I am looking for some guidance in setting up some UCLIN to convince SMPE
lation and other
location specific things.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
Ed Jaffe wro
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:56:21 -0500, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
But it occurs to me that one could construct and ACCEPT (or UCLIN "ACCEPT")
a ++USERMOD that adds a part so named as not to conflict with IBM and other
software vendors' part names, and NPRE that usermod in all
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:56:21 -0500, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>>But it occurs to me that one could construct and ACCEPT (or UCLIN "ACCEPT")
>>a ++USERMOD that adds a part so named as not to conflict with IBM and other
>>software vendors' part names, and NPRE that usermod in all one's "real"
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:56:21 -0500, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>>But it occurs to me that one could construct and ACCEPT (or UCLIN
>>"ACCEPT") a ++USERMOD that adds a part so named as not to conflict
>>with IBM and other
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
So, PRE a FUNCTION which is APPLYed only in the Target zone
which NPREs another function which is ACCEPTed in the DLIB
zone.
Not what I suggested.
--
John Eells
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
--
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:20:49 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>>
>> NPRE can only be specified within a function SYSMOD.
>>
>>
>> Or am I misunderstanding what is written? I read it as saying that you can't
>> use it
>> for ++USERMODs.
>
>No, I'm sure it's right. I hadn't looked it up. So it has to be
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:32:24 -0600, Bruce Hewson wrote:
>Over the years small errors in processing occassionally happen, and now we
>have some USERMODs that have been ACCEPTED.
>
>I am looking for some guidance in setting up some UCLIN to convince SMPE that
>this did not really occur.
>
>How to
: Thursday, February 11, 2016 6:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:32:24 -0600, Bruce Hewson wrote:
>Over the years small errors in processing occassionally happen, and now we
>have some USERMODs that have been ACCEPTED.
>
>
On 02/11/2016 07:43 AM, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>>> How to reverse an accidental ACCEPT of a USERMOD.
>>
>> I would take a different approach. Create a new distribution zone and
>> accept only what you want. Relate the new distribution zone to your
>> target zone. Before you delete the original
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>I seem to remember that in my distant past, I used a NPRE on every usermod
>that prevented accidental ACCEPTs.
Hmmm, interesting. Wonder where is that documented?
>Maybe Kurt will proffer a better solution? :-)
Indeed. But he is somewhat silent these days?
For
How to reverse an accidental ACCEPT of a USERMOD.
I would take a different approach. Create a new distribution zone and
accept only what you want. Relate the new distribution zone to your
target zone. Before you delete the original distribution zone, run
REPORT SYSMODS to compare the two
cause.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 7:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>I s
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:43:45 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>>> How to reverse an accidental ACCEPT of a USERMOD.
>>
>> I would take a different approach. Create a new distribution zone and
>> accept only what you want. Relate the new distribution zone to your
>> target zone. Before you delete
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:17:47 -0500, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>NPRE is in the manual.
>
>I do not remember exactly how it was coded, but I believe it was some
>combination of a condition that could never be satisfied coupled with a
>sysmod that was not itself accepted.
>
>If I can find an
On 2/11/2016 8:17 AM, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
NPRE is in the manual.
I do not remember exactly how it was coded, but I believe it was some
combination of a condition that could never be satisfied coupled with a sysmod
that was not itself accepted.
If I can find an example, I'll post it,
On 2/10/2016 11:32 PM, Bruce Hewson wrote:
... we have some USERMODs that have been ACCEPTED.
I am looking for some guidance in setting up some UCLIN to convince SMPE that
this did not really occur.
The problem is, even if you can somehow convince your CSI that the
USERMODs haven't been
Hello,
Over the years small errors in processing occassionally happen, and now we have
some USERMODs that have been ACCEPTED.
I am looking for some guidance in setting up some UCLIN to convince SMPE that
this did not really occur.
How to reverse an accidental ACCEPT of a USERMOD.
Any ideas?
22 matches
Mail list logo
