Mark IV had a ruler too...
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Anthony Babonas wrote:
> Rising to the defense of RPG, what other language had its own ruler? Talk
> about ease of coding! Ah the nostalgia.sigh.
>
> Sent from Tony's iPhone.
>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:50 PM, John McKown wrote:
>
>> I
Nor is there is any 65-bit support 'in' z/OS. I suspect that what we
have here is not a dubious, heterodox hardware notion but something
much more benign, a typo.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Barbara,
Is this in the ARCCMDxx member? Or is it being issued as a command?
If in the ARCCMDxx can you try doing a F dfhsmtaskname,SETSYS
TAPEMIGRATION(NONE) and let us know what happens?
If in the ARCCMDxx can you post a few lines above and below the
Tapemigration line?
DFHSM was not meant to
> Is this in the ARCCMDxx member? Or is it being issued as a command?
Doesn't matter. Doesn't work either way, gets the same error message.
> If in the ARCCMDxx can you post a few lines above and below the
> Tapemigration line?
SETSYS -
O
On 7/3/2013 10:26 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Assuming that IPCS is available to the application staff. In some shops it is
not generally available, but reserved for the systems staff. And there is the
issue of training in the product, which isn't always available either (outside
of read
There are a couple of Share presentations on DFHSM
Best Practises
Setting Up DFHSM
And so forth. If you like some of them, email me offlist
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net
Sent: Thursday, Ju
If things haven't been locked down too much, you might try ISPF command
DDLIST, then subcommand LI to display linklist.
Other tools such as PDSMAN also provide similar functions to display system
components such as linklist.
- Don Imbriale
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 <
David Crayford wrote:
>Perl is definately ugly. It has a very large and cryptic grammar which makes
>it difficult to learn. I find it unpleasant to
>program in but I also dislike most shell scripting languages. The best thing
>about perl is the command line hacks.
This is why I always say I have
S0C7 is the most simple cause of abend I can imagine.
The only problem is to find the position in the program (that is: the
source line)
where the error occured. If you have this, you know the name of the
variable causing
the error, and the rest is a piece of cake.
To get this, you need no to
B37s.
--- bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote:
From: Bernd Oppolzer
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on how to debug S0C7 (data exception) abend
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:01:29 +0200
S0C7 is the most simple cause of abend I can imagine.
The only proble
Ok. In this case you need no dump analysis;
the error message is sufficient (as is the case with
many system errors, for example S806 - system cannot
find module XYZ ...).
One of the first statements in my dump analysis handout:
we normally only cover S0Cx errors - for most other errors
we don't
Bernd has summarized this situation more than adequately.
Norma Mowry did not provide us with full information about the COBOL
compiler that produced the offending program, but if it is a fairly
recent Enterprise COBOL compiler it would, given the right compiler
options, almost certainly be possib
On 7/4/2013 9:21 AM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Ok. In this case you need no dump analysis;
the error message is sufficient (as is the case with
many system errors, for example S806 - system cannot
find module XYZ ...).
One of the first statements in my dump analysis handout:
we normally only cover S
I have run an IDCAMS diagnose on a volume to find non-existent catalog entries .
I tried DELETE VVR/NVR/TRUENAME to no avail. How can I get rid of the stranded
catalog references in the VVDS?
Respectfully,
Willie C. Rouse
Senior Mainframe Consultant
Prince George's County, Maryland
Office of Inf
Richard Pinion wrote:
>B37s.
222 is easier to handle ;-D
Ok, perhaps 322, 722, 822 or 878 are also easy. 622 is somewhat difficult to
explain to an angry TSO user, but manageable.
My users don't like 722 for obvious reasons. I wonder why, oh, why? ;-D
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
-
If you have an LE Dump (CEEDUMP, CEESNAP),
it's still easier, because LE gives you the traceback of the function
or procedure calls, where you find all the information including
the offsets I mentioned in my previous post, and you don't even
need to do any calculations. If you compiled your progra
Wow! Never heard of the language but I'm envious.
On 7/4/2013 5:59 AM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
Mark IV had a ruler too...
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Anthony Babonas wrote:
Rising to the defense of RPG, what other language had its own ruler? Talk about
ease of coding! Ah the nostalgia..
It's a bona fide US holiday, which trumps even Friday. I should not take
on someone with a bona fide Germanic name, but German happens to be the
closest thing I have to a (distant) second language.
"(Der) alter Kacker is the masculine singular."
Definite article 'der' changes adjective from ma
On 7/4/2013 1:43 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
Definite article 'der' changes adjective from marked masculine 'alter' to
'alte'. As opposed to indefinite article as in 'ein alter Mann'.
That's why I put the definite articles in parenthesis. In Kirk's
original post, he used the indefinite article, w
Working most of these..RPG was a bit of challenge ..easytrieve wasn't too , but
I have In SAS..now MarkIV, haven't heard of that one. I also learned Assembler,
Cobol and the PL/1 ...like several of the guys I liked PL/1 ...
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through
On 21 Jun 2013 11:26:53 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 15:18 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
>> And IBM thinks COBOL is the language of the future. Right and I sell
>> bridges.
>
>Well... that's what Tom Ross says anyway. You'd dispute Tom?
I realize that this is
In article
you write:
>In an alternate universe, Rexx had the equivalent of CPAN created by the
>community, and we all use it instead...and are much happier.
Hi Phil,
I have been following this thread wondering if someone would mention
Rexx. My favorite language. Thanks.
--
Rich Greenberg
In article <20130704194045.f3e3824...@panix5.panix.com> you write:
>In article
> you
>write:
>
>>In an alternate universe, Rexx had the equivalent of CPAN created by the
>>community, and we all use it instead...and are much happier.
>
>Hi Phil,
>I have been following this thread wondering if someon
>It's a bona fide US holiday, which trumps even Friday.
I disagree. Many on the list are not Americans.
You didn't hear any of we Canadians trumpeting our holiday on July 1st.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
---
Frank and Peter
Would you be so kind to share the JCL needed to compile it in any flavor please.
I do not mind whether somebody use PCRE or opting to use the Posix compliant
IBM supplied modules, both are fine for any simple (or even semi-complex) regex
(if you know what to expect from Posix vs.
As far as I can tell virtually all that is supported by Perl is supported by
PCRE, including all what Shmuel had mentioned.
ZA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.
Ted, that would be locality of reference. I suppose you'd complain if
someone in Australia said "It's Friday", because many on the list aren't
Australian?
Sheesh. Over-sensitive Canadians...
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
> >It's a bona fide US holiday, which trumps even Fr
There is a share presentation out there for PDSE best practices
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&ved=0CD8QFjAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.confex.com%2Fshare%2F120%2Fwebprogram%2FHandout%2FSession12981%2FSHARE%2520PDSE%2520Best%2520Practices.pdf&ei=YtzVUc2_N4j
[Replying again from my work account since my Google Groups reply did not make
it to the list - I forgot that is a one-way gateway]
Based on a brief review, this text of the pcre man pages says yes to all of
those:
http://www.pcre.org/pcre.txt
Though not, of course, the Perl-only pattern fea
Ze'ev,
I would if I could. I used our shop-standard SCLM system to store and compile
the test program, and most of that translate process is driven by a complex
series of Rexx exec's, not JCL.
I do have some compile-and-link-outside-the-SCLM JCL though, so when I get a
chance I will retest th
I don't like the Friday digressions!
Sheesh. Insensitive Americans...
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: zMan
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:30:43
To:
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discus
I was talking about SCEELKED at run time, no compile time. It's (or SCEELKEX
for lower-case entry points) definitely required at compile time for static
calls, and that works. But when I tried dynamic calls, even with SCEERUN in
the linklist, it said it couldn't find the REG* modules.
>___
In <2097080765646466.wa.zatlas1yahoo@listserv.ua.edu>, on
07/03/2013
at 08:36 PM, "Ze'ev Atlas" said:
>compatible with Perl
Which Perl?
>7. I contemplated interfacing with Rexx, but I cannot come with
>specific well defined API that would agree with that language.
The obvious way is to
In
,
on 07/04/2013
at 07:20 AM, John Gilmore said:
>Nor is there is any 65-bit support 'in' z/OS. I suspect that what
>we have here is not a dubious, heterodox hardware notion but
>something much more benign, a typo.
When did you start considering typos to be benign?
--
Shmuel (Seym
In
,
on 07/04/2013
at 05:54 AM, Phil Smith said:
>In an alternate universe, Rexx had the equivalent of CPAN created by
>the community, and we all use it instead...and are much happier.
In an alternate universe the standard REXX for CMS and TSO is OREXX
with full block structuring, ranges, reg
On 7/4/2013 2:07 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
When did you start considering typos to be benign?
Probably when it is obviously a typo. Now on the other hand, if someone
mentions 32-bit addressing in relation to MVS/XA, the statement is
ambiguous.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, Vermont
Ah. So it was really a comment on topic drift--I'm with ya there!
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
> I don't like the Friday digressions!
>
>
> Sheesh. Insensitive Americans...
>
> -
> Ted MacNEIL
> eamacn...@yahoo.ca
> Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
>Which Perl?
I am using v5.14.2
>7. I contemplated interfacing with Rexx, but I cannot come with
>specific well defined API that would agree with that language.
>The obvious way is to return, e.g., capture buffers, %+ and %- in REXX
>variables.
I will look into that when I get to it. Thank you.
If that's true in Another World I wonder what it'd take to make it true in
THIS one.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
39 matches
Mail list logo