W dniu 2013-05-08 03:52, Jeffery Swagger pisze:
A few months ago all of our 3480/3490 tapes were destroyed. Something
like over 30,000. Not to mention the REEL tapes that are still defined
but non-existent.
I would like to remove these from the RMM database.
Something is telling me in the back
Hi,
SDSF System Request panel started to display meaningless information after I
updated consol member in SYS1.PARMLIB.
I
changed MPF parameter from 00 to 01. And I added MPFLST01 member into
SYS1.PARMLIB. The content of the
member is suppress two commands from console:
SYS1.PARMLIB
Kayhan Tanriverir wrote:
SDSF System Request panel started to display meaningless information after I
updated consol member in SYS1.PARMLIB.
Please post that screen.
I changed MPF parameter from 00 to 01. And I added MPFLST01 member into
SYS1.PARMLIB. The content of the
member is suppress two
Nope, -mGOFF does not help, it gives me the same error.
But the NODECK,OBJECT suggestion does work. This works:
as -o bla.o --NODECK,OBJECT bla.s
Thanks,
Etienne
On Mon, 6 May 2013 06:01:04 -0700, Lloyd Fuller leful...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Or just specify the GOFF (-mGOFF) option which
Our DCC product gives you the ability to query the DLM.
Tso, batch, pc GUI, ispf interface.
It can clone tapes into the dlm.
Also can direct allocation so smstape does not need to be used.
Www.dtssoftware.com
Tom
--
For
On Sat, 4 May 2013 06:25:41 -0700, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
It is also possible it is one of their undocumented codes that means
something to IBM internally.
Even if it is, my opinion is that IBM ought to document these if only to say it
is an internal, reserved,
Jeff hello,
firstly just to clarify the situation with the tapes as the first part of your
mail states the tapes were destroyed, but the 2nd part implies they are still
extant in the silo's
If they still exist if you still have paths to the drives (not removed from
HCD) you may want to data
On Tue, 7 May 2013 06:45:13 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
If you want to keep more RMF data available through the RMF ISPF
application, you need to create more and larger RMF VSAM datasets. Do you
have the dasd available for that?
It is useful on occasion to be able to pull back RMF III data -
Hi,
Thank you, I saw the IEAVMXIT is inactive from the result of 'd mpf' comand
also IEA590I WTO USER EXIT IEAVMXIT NOT FOUND
I will use sample program CNZZVXT1 to link CNZZVMXT as IEAVMXIT
D MPF,M
IEE677I 10.42.17 MPF DISPLAY 056
So it's been a really long time since I set all this up, but I do remember
I had to have a couple of special volumes defined in the library. These
volumes were used to 'communicate' with the Bustech hardware. Below is
the display for the 2 volumes from ISMF.
VOLUME USE
These are also not defined to my TMM (CA1).
So it's been a really long time since I set all this up, but I do remember
I had to have a couple of special volumes defined in the library. These
volumes were used to 'communicate' with the Bustech hardware. Below is
the display for the 2
On Tue, 7 May 2013 12:49:32 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2013 13:34:07 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 5/7/2013 5:02 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
The only way I can think of restricting is an exit in JES2. Or if this is a
TSO User you may wish to look at
On Tue, 7 May 2013 19:15:55 -0500, Mike Wojtukiewicz mw...@attglobal.net
wrote:
I dont know why the client chose 2 different tape sizes. Seems illogical to
me. The NL tapes I referenced had to do with running DLMCMD JCL which for the
life of me I don't get. All I want to do is ask the machine
Gerhard said that his client, the US f ederal entity acronym ed LUGA (Large
Unnamed Government Agency), thought it was a security problem and eliminated
the possibility that it could happen again when Gerhard showed how easy it was
to do it.
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
- Original
On 5/8/2013 8:37 AM, Walt Farrell wrote:
I'm not sure why Gerhard thinks that is a security problem, gil. But
certainy if users push jobs through the INTRDR directly (as opposed
to via TSO/E SUBMIT or ISPF SUB) then you can't depend on any
restrictions imposed by IKJEFF10; you would have to use
On Wed, 8 May 2013 10:33:46 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 5/8/2013 8:37 AM, Walt Farrell wrote:
I'm not sure why Gerhard thinks that is a security problem, gil. But
certainy if users push jobs through the INTRDR directly (as opposed
to via TSO/E SUBMIT or ISPF SUB) then you can't depend
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Does ISPF SUBMIT invoke TSO SUBMIT in authorized state?
No. You can choose to exclude it in IKJPRMxx and the program SUBMIT (alias of
IKJEFF01) in SYS1.CMDLIB has this attribute AC=00.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote a ^%$# TYPO!
... IKJPRMxx ...
Must be IKJTSOxx
Groan... :-/
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 5/8/2013 7:33 AM, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 5/8/2013 8:37 AM, Walt Farrell wrote:
I'm not sure why Gerhard thinks that is a security problem, gil. But
certainy if users push jobs through the INTRDR directly (as opposed
to via TSO/E SUBMIT or ISPF SUB) then you can't depend on any
I do sometimes use a TSO/ISPF submit command in a development/testing
context. In production I instead use the device of directing output
to the INTRDR defined in a DD statement or the like.
In two places where I could do so conveniently I have this morning
checked the use of duplicate jobnames
On Wed, 8 May 2013 08:37:12 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
They might have simply put their 'control's in the wrong exits (TSO) and
were too lazy to refit them into the (JES and SMF) exits where they
belonged.
A plausible motivation is that they want all jobs submitted via their scheduler.
On Tue, 7
On Wed, 8 May 2013 10:55:37 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Does the class matter? If I allocate:
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(B,INTRDR)
... will the job not run? Will the punch writer contend with INTRDR?
(You mean they had a punch?)
It will run. The B is the MSGCLASS if
Back before OCO, SUBMIT issued SVC 100 (called FIB, for foreground initiated
background) and most of the code ran within that SVC. It probably still does. I
think the SVC was/is also used by STATUS, CANCEL, and OUTPUT to access the JES
subsystem interface.
Bill
On Wed, 8 May 2013 09:54:27
On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:08:36 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013 10:55:37 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Does the class matter? If I allocate:
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(B,INTRDR)
... will the job not run? Will the punch writer contend with INTRDR?
(You mean they had a punch?)
It will
Combine all these codes into one manual for an easy look up. With a
link to the proper manual to learn about what you need to change.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Jantje. jan.moeyers...@gfi.be wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2013 06:25:41 -0700, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
It is
On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:41:43 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
What class (if any) does TSO SUBMIT supply when it allocates INTRDR?
It depends. A default is specified in UADS (if used) or RACF / security
product.
If nothing is there, it takes the default for INTRDR specified
On Wed, 8 May 2013 12:10:36 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
What is this, MVS 101? :-)
There's an aphorism I haven't used here in a while. I'll let readers guess.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi ,
Can some one let me know why the return code generated is a mutilple of 4? e.g
4,8,12,16
Thanks,
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
On 5/8/2013 10:14 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013 12:10:36 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
What is this, MVS 101? :-)
There's an aphorism I haven't used here in a while. I'll let readers guess.
I'll assume no pun intended wrt use of the word readers. I'll further
assume the
While there's no hard and fast rule, i.e. nothing prevents you from generating
any return code from your programs, it's a tradition that return codes are a
multiple of 4.
0 - Normal
4- Warning
8 - Error
12 - Severe Error
16 - Terminal Error
Mark Jacobs
Can some one let me know why the return code generated is a mutilple of 4?
e.g 4,8,12,16
Back in the day when every byte counted, programmers would use the RC in R15 as
an index into a jump table, where each four byte entry was itself an
unconditional branch instruction, which was a four byte
On 5/8/2013 11:53 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
While there's no hard and fast rule, i.e. nothing prevents you from generating
any return code from your programs, it's a tradition that return codes are a
multiple of 4.
0 - Normal
4- Warning
8 - Error
12 - Severe Error
16 - Terminal Error
Which
I suspect they derive from assembler coding that looks like this (R15
needs to contain a value that is a multiple of 4):
B BRTABLE(R15)
BRTABLE B CODE00
B CODE04
B CODE08
B CODE0C
B CODE10
Alan Field
Technical
Ron:
To add to Mark's reply, that's because the return code (in register 15),
was traditionally used to index a table of branch instructions (each of
which were 4 bytes long), such as:
B RETTABLE(R15)
...
RETTABLE B OK
B FAIR
Mark Jacobs wrote:
While there's no hard and fast rule, i.e. nothing prevents you from generating
any return code from your programs, it's a tradition that return codes are a
multiple of 4.
0 - Normal
4- Warning
8 - Error
12 - Severe Error
16 - Terminal Error
IT version of Richter Scale? ;-)
On 5/8/2013 2:14 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Another possible reason is - same return codes standards are also
used for macros (system services) and system exits. So one set of
convention is used to pass info including RC from one module to
another.
While I prefer the branch table
There are also situations in which one wants to be able to set more
than one of the diagnostic bits in a return code additively and
unambiguously, and the alternative use of 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, . . . ,
i.e., the sequence 2^i, i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , powers of 2, permits this
to be done.
Still, the fact
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
05/08/2013 11:55:37 AM:
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
On Wed, 8 May 2013 08:37:12 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
A plausible motivation is that they want all jobs submitted via
their scheduler.
I agree that one should
For those shops that don't have this kind of capability and don't have the
resources to manage or control it, check out UpTown from RES (www.res-it.com).
It does all of the below and more.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Talman
In 1367845369.9745.yahoomai...@web181401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
05/06/2013
at 06:02 AM, Lloyd Fuller leful...@sbcglobal.net said:
Actually, Univac played with it back in the 1960s/1970s.
Any ternary logic or memory in the 1960's was probably implemented
with discrete transistors rather than
In
CAAJSdjgxxP=+cGfTAer6+wEHKQ=nivp1no78c_lysn3we7o...@mail.gmail.com,
on 05/06/2013
at 08:58 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
This is just a weird thought, feel free to call me an idiot. But
there are two classes of members in a PDS at present. There are
normal member and
John,
This is the first time I have had to take exception to a fact that you said and
that is on the comment that we need a 8i multiple.
Even with 64-bit addressing, it doesn't change the length of a branch or jump,
they are still 4 bytes. A jump long is 6 bytes, so maybe 6i is possible, but
In
cahtvvrww2c2_tq8uszm44p6pznvcbvgl6ffkkh68w8bogw4...@mail.gmail.com,
on 05/07/2013
at 02:35 PM, Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.com said:
The problem is that same Job is submitted multiple times and which
Leads to unavailability of Initiator to other Genuine Jobs.
If you are concerned
On Wed, 8 May 2013 14:41:28 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
While I prefer the branch table conjecture, I have a number of programs
that use a three-way branch (e.g., CH R15,=H'8') to save, what in the
good old days was expensive storage. As for range checking, my all-time
favorite is CL (e.g.,
Chris Blaicher,
Your sort of B/T has important uses, but one composed only of
addresses is useful too. Perhaps it shoul;d be called an address
table to avoid confusion. I will; send you an example privately.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On May 8, 2013, at 3:50 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Your sort of B/T has important uses, but one composed only of
addresses is useful too. Perhaps it shoul;d be called an address
table to avoid confusion. I will; send you an example privately.
If you have a table with 8 byte
In cee89.5cf94be0.3ebad...@aol.com, on 05/07/2013
at 05:50 PM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com said:
Yeah, we had a bright VMer said he could run circles around ISPF
with XEDIT macros.
Well, I'm a TSO bigot, but XEDIT has significant advantages over
ISPF/PDF EDIT. OTOH, ISPF/PDF EDIT also has
Space in the JESx checkpoint area is also a finite resource even if the job
never runs. Each job submitted requires a small amount of DASD space in the
checkpoint area. Perhaps you should also consider preventing any given user
from submitting an infinite number of valid, authorized,
But does not catch values that are not multiples of 4. I suppose it's
slightly more plausible that a future extension introduce RC=20 than that it
introduce RC=3.
ISPF functions do return RC=20.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From:
Perhaps we all should consider a better use of our time than worrying about
inconsequential things such as duplicate jobs being submitted? (8-{]}
I, for one, do not understand what the problem is. (8-{[}
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From:
On 8 May 2013 16:59, Pew, Curtis G curtis@austin.utexas.edu wrote:
On May 8, 2013, at 3:50 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Your sort of B/T has important uses, but one composed only of
addresses is useful too. Perhaps it shoul;d be called an address
table to avoid confusion.
Ahem... Did you mean to say zEnterprise? System z is so last year. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of zMan
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Crypto Facility
Touche. But zEnterprise is a superset of System z, not a distinct
architecture, isn't it?
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Dave Barry dba...@ups.com wrote:
Ahem... Did you mean to say zEnterprise? System z is so last year. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
John,
My comments were based on what the previous people had been discussing, namely
a branch table. An address table is a very viable alternative.
Item of note, unless you are working with all your own code, you have to
validate the value in R15 before just using it to branch into a branch
And then you have C / C++ that uses RC=1 as the good return code. Any other is
bad.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, May 8, 2013 2:41:51 PM
Subject: Re: Return codes
On 5/8/2013 2:14 PM, Elardus
Not sure. I was just talking one time to one of the military people that were
involved with Univac and the university (Oregon State, I think). He mentioned
that they had experimented with it. And from the time frame you are probably
correct that it was transistors rather than IC's.
Lloyd
Ted MacNeil's point is well taken.
In any well-managed shop duplicate jobnames are chiefly if not
exclusively a phenomenon of development LPARs, where they are neither
deleterious nor important.
We have here yet another instance of one or the other of the two least
productive preoccuptations of
Lloyd Fuller wrote
begin extract
And then you have C / C++ that uses RC=1 as the good return code. Any other is
bad.
/end extract
This practice reflects another C design defect. In the absence of an
explicit boolean data type, C uses the dubious but ineluctable
convention that a
On 05/08/2013 08:02 PM, Lloyd Fuller wrote:
Not sure. I was just talking one time to one of the military people that were
involved with Univac and the university (Oregon State, I think). He mentioned
that they had experimented with it. And from the time frame you are probably
correct that it
On Wed, 8 May 2013 22:40:13 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
... 2) interdict, or anyway attempt to
interdict, any practice that is judged to be anomalous.
In some cases when someone has espoused a practice or point of
view that you judge to be anomalous, you characterize him as
an intelligent
When returning from function main() to the operating system, returning the
macro value EXIT_SUCCESS is guaranteed to be equivalent to returning 0.
EXIT_FAILURE is system dependent. For IBM's XL C/C++ compilers,
EXIT_SUCCESS is defined as 0 and EXIT_FAILURE is defined as 8.
:: -Original
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org wrote:
On 05/08/2013 08:02 PM, Lloyd Fuller wrote:
Not sure. I was just talking one time to one of the military people that
were
involved with Univac and the university (Oregon State, I think). He
mentioned
that they had
Yeah, they even came up with flip-flap-flop nomenclature. Died pretty
quick, but it sounded cool.
In a message dated 5/8/2013 10:46:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes:
Ternary, with values of 0,1,2, could be useful in a binary addition logic.
You are only
At 20:34 -0400 on 05/08/2013, Blaicher, Christopher Y. wrote about
Re: Return codes:
What I normally do is check for zero, if that is what you expect
most often, then, if that fails, go through all the gyrations.
BALR r14,r15Call your routine
LTR R14,R15
64 matches
Mail list logo
