Hello group,
We have some dataset problems with USS processes and are looking for the
allocation messages.
I mean the
IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (DSNIWK02)
DSN (SYS14131.T210019.RA000.XI1DMS1A.R0141149)
STORCLAS (SCBATCH) MGMTCLAS () DATACLAS ()
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
In assembler, we usually do this by allocating the storage to a shared
subpool or allocating the storage to a TCB that we know is the last TCB to
terminate. This allows assembler programmers to choose the time that the
Hello Mike,
I registered several weeks ago. Can you confirm that you have my
registration?
Ken Barkhau with Hewlett Packard.
Thanks much.
Ken
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Mike Walter mike.wal...@aon.com wrote:
Cross-posted to the IBMVM, Linux-390, and IBM-MAIN discussion lists.
The
same-same (== looking for confirmation ) from tuco bonno (aka sonny) and Tim
Connor ; we're both from/with the South Carolina Budget and Control Board in
Columba, SC
thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kenneth
John,
Are you speaking of Sub Address Space storage ?
Regards,
Scott
From: john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:33 AM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
In assembler, we
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:32:20 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o .bin is customarily reserved for DOS executables, which confused me.
It is? MS-DOS won't run a .bin file, AFAIK. Are you confusing it with .exe?
--
Tom Marchant
--
On Tue, 13 May 2014 07:57:04 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:32:20 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o .bin is customarily reserved for DOS executables, which confused me.
It is? MS-DOS won't run a .bin file, AFAIK. Are you confusing it with .exe?
I stand corrected. If I were a
My Anaheim SHARE session 15043: zEC12 User Experiences, while ostensibly
a hardware discussion, focuses heavily on my first-ever experience of
moving production processing to a brand new data center. This project was
far more complicated and troublesome than any previous move I'd ever done,
often the answer is nowhere.
See this for a solution:
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.bpxb200%2Fjobpro.htm
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Vernooij, CP (SPLXM) - KLM
kees.verno...@klm.com
Having the job step TCB own the storage is the best default for shared storage
but it is not always correct. As I said before, shared storage really means
when do I free the storage if not specifically freed.
Lets use UNIX processes as an example. It is the UNIX equivalent of an MVS job
but
On Tue, 13 May 2014 10:38:41 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
often the answer is nowhere.
See this for a solution:
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.bpxb200%2Fjobpro.htm
Hmmm:
o NONE specifies that job log messages are not to be written. This is the
Perhaps because (at that link which Kirk posted) there is this note:
Messages that would normally go to the JESYSMSG data set are captured, but
messages that go to JESMSGLG are not captured.
Allocation messages go to JESMSGLG, and so it would seem are not captured. One
wonders which
Victor,
If I understand problem at the root of your questions, you are trying to speed
up DFSMSdss logical dumps, especially for compressed PS-E data sets.
From your questions you are focusing on the tape output rate as the gating
factor for the elapsed time of the dump, but have you looked at
Thanks, I'll look into it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gerhard Postpischil
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Loadlib compare utility
On 5/9/2014 12:47 PM, Lucas Rosalen
On 13 May 2014 12:08, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com wrote:
Perhaps because (at that link which Kirk posted) there is this note:
Messages that would normally go to the JESYSMSG data set are captured, but
messages that go to JESMSGLG are not captured.
Allocation messages go
Good Day Members,
I am trying to delete the VSAM components - data and index - from a disk
volume. The problem is that there is a CLUSTER along with the same DATA
INDEX component names which reside on another voume. Is there a way deleting
the errant components? Both volumes are SMS
Some comments.
The terms 'local' and 'global' have well-established definitions and
uses---They specify the scopes of set symbols at assembly time---in
the HLASM macro language, and their usurpation for other purposes is
ill-advised. '...that way madness lies; let me shun that; No more of
I have seen where an ALTER NAME was done but the user forgot the DATA and
INDEX components. So the CLUSTER was the new name but the DATA and INDEX
were still the old name.
If you have a product like FILEAID or VANTAGE, you might be able to see if
that was done.
Just some questions.
Is the
Willie,
Had the same problem this past weekend. The ones I wanted deleted were not
cataloged. Here is the job that worked for me. Hope it helps you as well.
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//DD1 DDVOL=SER=WSC001,UNIT=3390,DISP=OLD
//SYSPRINT DD
Why don't you tell us what you tried and what happened. Show the exact
commands and error messages.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of willie bunter
:: Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:24 AM
:: To:
W dniu 2014-05-13 19:24, willie bunter pisze:
Good Day Members,
I am trying to delete the VSAM components - data and index - from a disk volume.
The problem is that there is a CLUSTER along with the same DATA INDEX
component names which reside on another voume. Is there a way deleting the
Oops. You are absolutely correct, I got the names backwards.
So what it putatively says is that allocation and initiation/termination
messages are captured, but WTO's and other console messages are NOT captured?
Weird.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I'm delayed by the daily digest but did anyone mention the BpxMText suggested
Action? To me, it indicates the solution might rely on the other end.
TSO BPXMTEXT 77B17343
TCPIP JrTtlsClearTxtReceived: AT-TLS received clear text data when secure data
was expected.
Action: Enable the remote
John,
So what you call setting a token, IEANTCR ..then allocating storage based on
the return address ? A block of storage ? Curious ...
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
On May 13, 2014, at 1:32 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Some comments.
The terms 'local'
Redbooks and SHARE are good learning experiences.
I've got SG247392 penciled in for Redbooks and if you want more modern,
this Boston SHARE on SCLM to RDZ conversion is a good starting place.
https://share.confex.com/share/121/webprogram/Session13687.html
Both have 'further reading'
For those concerned with the sub-optimal code generated by the compiler in my
examples: FWIW, with OPT(2)
unsigned long long maxBit = 0x1ull (arraySize-3);
compiles to
LGHI r3,H'1'
...
LGR r14,r1
...
AHI r14,H'-3'
SLLG r14,r3,0(r14)
On 8 May 2014 19:34, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com wrote:
ST doesn't accept a 3-modifier expression, that is an artifact of the XL
C/C++ assembler listing format.
This is really really annoying, and has been for years. The compiler
is now quite capable of producing correct
As Tony said, they are all WTO messages. JES decides where it wants to put the
message (or not do anything with it).
I suspect that some WTO messages are never written in USS as opposed to not
being captured. I suspect that IBM disabled them for a reason.UNIX does so much
allocation that it
In the checkout process, it wants to know my Communication Language and my
Media Language. For the latter, choices include:
Australian English
British English
Eastern European English
English
International English
US English
I'd be hard-pressed to choose among several of those.or to even
This list is fascinating both for inclusions and for omissions. I will
defer humbly to Radoslaw for opinion on 'Eastern European English', but I
lived five years in West Africa. While Nigeria and Ghana, for example,
sound pretty similar, the English of Liberia is a horse of a very
different
On Tue, 13 May 2014 17:47:39 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 8 May 2014 19:34, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
ST doesn't accept a 3-modifier expression, that is an artifact of the XL
C/C++ assembler listing format.
This is really really annoying, and has been for years. The compiler
is now quite
On Tue, 13 May 2014 14:58:01 -0700, Jon Perryman wrote:
As Tony said, they are all WTO messages. JES decides where it wants to put the
message (or not do anything with it).
I suspect that some WTO messages are never written in USS as opposed to not
being captured. I suspect that IBM disabled
On Tue, 13 May 2014 15:50:02 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
This list is fascinating both for inclusions and for omissions. I will
defer humbly to Radoslaw for opinion on 'Eastern European English', but I
lived five years in West Africa. While Nigeria and Ghana, for example,
sound pretty similar,
We had some issues a while back with VSM performance. I did research and
experiments with various block sizes for tape data sets. Questions on
IBM-MAIN and doc reading yielded some answers--though not necessarily
solutions.
-- Tape output is generally faster with larger block sizes. That's
On 13 May 2014 17:58, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
As Tony said, they are all WTO messages. JES decides where it wants to put
the message (or not do anything with it).
Well I'm not so sure they're all WTOs. I think there's a PUT (likely
RPL-type) interface to the JESYSMSG dataset
You might see if the WRITE Statements in the ACS code might be helpful.
It can produce statements to SYSLOG in any format with the vars available to
SMS.
So you could have
IF JOBNAME = BPXAS Then
DO
WRITE
END
Or something similar. DSN, VOLUME, UNIT, USER, and a few other might be used
MRWT is expected to be available next month (June). In the meantime, it's
probably not worth speculating too much. As informed speculation, the MWRT
path isn't going to be much different from the SCRT path given that MWRT is
announced as a perfect superset. Thus I would predict it's pretty much
How odd that they didn't include the real one - Canadian English EH!!
John T. Abell
President
International Software Products
Tel: 800-295-7608 Ext: 224
International: 1-416-593-5578 Ext: 224
Fax: 800-295-7609
International: 1-416-593-5579
E-mail:
Skip:
Our IBM SE (30+ years ago) wrote an orange manual (how many remember
those?),
About blocksize and tape. It pretty much said that use of a 32K
blocksize as optimum for channel and tape utilization (this was 6250
BPI IIRC).
Jim (our SE has retired) after serving time at the WSC and
39 matches
Mail list logo
