All,
I have been thinking about this for awhile,, but cant seem to find the answer.
So asking my fellow listers if I am missing something. Workflows are a one
and done affair, and for repeatable processes you need to add it again.The
problem is that the filesystem location for the
All,
We are discussing zPCA - IBM Performance and Capacity Analytics, and I'd like
to trade some email or even a quick phone conversation with a shop that has had
some hands-on experience?
Thanks, Dave
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 13:10:19 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>various jobs for Db2 software maintenance, such as DSNTIJUZ DSNTIJUA DSNTIJRT.
>Bill
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:19:07 -0500, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 06:36:40 -0500, Bill Giannelli
>>wrote:
&g
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 06:36:40 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>Do many of you out there use SMP/E JCLIN processing to track and save job
>updates?
>Currently we do not make use of this and manually keep JCL up to date.
>It seems there is a value to have SMPe ke
>
Bill,
No one has asked yet,
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:01:21 -0700, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>List -
>
>
>
>I am being asked to take one of two actions on a USS file that is part of
>Server Pac
>
>the /etc/security seems to be part of Server pac
>
>
>
So, I don’t know about you, but the /etc that comes from serverpac is not
I seem to notice a trend here on IBM-MAIN. Ive been active for probably 25
years on it, and the benefits I have received, and presume at least some of the
advice/info I have provided has been helpful for some.
But what I notice, and I know none of these people personally, is that as folks
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:20:54 -0700, Tom Brennan
wrote:
>Good to see! Especially the not-going-away part.
>Also, this item is attractive - "SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES: None"
>
>On 3/30/2023 10:40 AM, Dave Jousma wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I have a new job
All,
I have a new job posting for Mainframe Storage Management/Sysprog position that
can be seen here:
https://fifththird.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/53careers/job/Cincinnati-OH/Lead-Technical-Engineer---Mainframe-Storage-Management_R40828
The job is primarily storage management, but with room for
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:42:41 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>Thanks, no I didn't think of the chmount command. I ran a test on my sandbox.
>the /u directory is showing that automove will exclude the system I specified,
>but the file systems mounted under it don't show that attribute, just
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:04:44 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>Thanks, but that's not helpful in my situation. The problematic file system is
>under /u which is under the sysplex root, That has to be automove.
>
>Mark Jacobs
>
Correct. Then the only way to "avoid" a lpar is to avoid it with the
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:03:28 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>I've been looking at that and testing somethings in our sandbox environment.
>The problematic file system that's already impacted us twice is being managed
>by automount and I can't see anyway to instruct OMVS not to automove
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:41:53 -0400, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>Thanks for the information Lionel. It’s good to share the efforts and let
>folks know. Ideally, from my perspective, IBM should seriously consider
>adding an OpenTools offering in z/OS so customers do not have to piece meal
>these
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 08:35:18 -0500, Dave Jousma wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:09:11 -0500, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
>
>>You no longer need to get the open tools for z/OS from Rocket Software -
>>there is a new player in town - the z/OS Open Tools project.
>>
>>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:09:11 -0500, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
>You no longer need to get the open tools for z/OS from Rocket Software -
>there is a new player in town - the z/OS Open Tools project.
>
>
>
Lionel, As others have pointed out, the backend support is really the issue,
not the quality
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:44:57 -0400, David Spiegel
wrote:
>I already included it:
>
>** ASMA044E Undefined symbol - SMF82ITE
>** ASMA435I Record 273 in SYS1.MACLIB(IHBOPLTX) on volume: A4RES1
>
>
>
You dont say what version of z/OS you are running this on.
Those may be two separate errors.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:34:03 -0600, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>thank you both!!
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 22:20:59 -0500, Rob Schramm wrote:
>Is CICS involved?
>
>Rob
>
>On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, 13:41 Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>
>> I see two possibilities:
>>
Hey there Rob.That's where it was detected first, however we've been able
to recreate outside of CICS. I now believe the
All,
We just learned that we have a problem with IAM (Innovation Access Method) the
high perf replacement for VSAM. No idea how long it has been going on, and I
have tickets open with both BMC and IBM on this. Seems to only affect IAM
files, and exists in both z/OS V2.4, and V2.5, and
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 00:04:16 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
>W dniu 28.02.2023 o 15:18, Dave Jousma pisze:
>>
>> There is no native z/OS support to limit who can use what job classes. We
>> had to RYO inserting SAF calls in IEFUJI, IKJEFF10, and ISFUSR.IEFUJI is
&g
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 14:12:03 +, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
>At this point we don't have a system limitation on who can use which job
>class. It's on my list of to-dos.
>
>We have security on some commands, limiting who can use them.
>
>Rex
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:00:52 -0600, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>Might be a SMPE doc problem? IBM is documenting a reason ID in the Class
>section. I see that here:
>https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=statements-hold-mcs which
>documents as your said:
>
>CLASS
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:37:28 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>"SECINT
> The reason ID SYSMOD identifies a fix for a security or integrity error.
> HOLDDATA for security
> or integrity fixes is available through the z Systems Security Portal.
> Information on registration
> and accessing the
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:13:06 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>We may be talking at cross purposes here; I'm concerned about the hold class
>SECINT, not the source with the same name. The SECINT hold is on the PTF with
>the exposure, not the PTF correcting it.
>
> LIST HOLDDATA HOLDERROR.
>
>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:30:07 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I'm concerned with the SMP side of things; as long as a PTF is correctly
>flagged as PE, I don't care about the APAR unless there is a reason to bypass.
>
>
>--
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
I cannot say for
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 14:30:38 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Doesn't the process for security/integrity violations include creating an
>APAR? If so, shouldn't any PTF with hold class SECINT also have an ERROR hold
>with the relevant APAR number?
>
>
>--
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:58:32 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>Has anyone setup their HMC to authenticate users to an ldap server? I'm not
>having much luck constructing the search filter that selects the user's entry
>in the directory.
>
>Mark Jacobs
>
Mark,
did you get an answer to this? we've
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:07:33 -0600, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>we do share zfs's but maybe my choice of SERVER options and the
>autostart group was flawed
>
>I really don't have a need to start multiple servers, for testing, I
>take the lazy route, shutdown the prod server for a while, and start the
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:03:46 -0600, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>Had me thinking of the IBM 1403 and possible the 3211 printers - there
>was a card deck IIRC and IEBGENER that was used to direct print, that
>deck when printed would play a song, I forget now whatr song - it was
>possibly something
I appreciate all the comments. What I need though is an external control,
like thruput manager. The developer that did this didnt even know they were
tape files. So to expect them to code something is nice, and this person is
now in the know on the subject, and will be going forward.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:46:11 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:24:21 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
>
>>We had that in production One step with a huge number of datasets, so
>>allocates all available tape drives even though only 1 in use at any
>>one time.
>>
>Does
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:42:24 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:13:49 -0600, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>>All,
>>
>>In many years, I haven’t seen this problem, really since the days pre-VTS, or
>>even in early VTS days where tape drives were physical devi
All,
In many years, I haven’t seen this problem, really since the days pre-VTS, or
even in early VTS days where tape drives were physical devices.Today we had
a user allocate all 500 tape drives pulling data in Prod for whatever reason.
It would sure be nice if there were some
Ive noticed for some time now that my uploaded software report no longer seems
to have any effect when I create an order for CBPDO products that have new
version/release. I typically upload a fresh report (binary), then create a
CBPDO order and typically filter by "my installed products with
All,
is there another method to monitor subpool usage for a specific address space
besides Omegamon? I realize I could take periodic console dumps and look, but
looking for other methods out of the box. We have a rogue address space with a
memory leak, and wanting to track storage growth
All,
I asked some IBM LDAP questions awhile back, and we have it configured, and
users are able to bind to it, a big thank-you to the folks that responded.
What I am looking for assistance now (or a real life example) is usage of the
ICTX plugin for remote authorizations. Server-side
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 20:19:08 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
>I wanted to get a dump of my server when the instruction at 001234 in module
>MOD1 gets executed, so I entered:
>
>
>
>SLIP SET,IF,J=SRV1,PVTMOD=(MOD1,001234),ID=SLP1,END
>
>
>
>I made a transaction that drove MOD1 but no dump was taken.
Any IBM mainframe LDAP users out there? Using SDBM (RACF backend)? I am
illiterate in LDAP protocols/configuration, etc. We are trying to configure
IBM LDAP so that our Beyond Trust password safe can communicate and manage its
accounts in the MF space. However, we are having a problem
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:32:53 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having
>trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I.
>
>The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the
>SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:30:49 +, Steely.Mark
wrote:
>There was a program that when executed would prevent the ENQ on a dataset.
>This was used for jobs which would FTP a file and then use that file in steps
>after the FTP.
>
>This was the JCL used:
>
>//JS010 EXEC PGM=FTPDEQ,
>//
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:21:31 +, Carl Edwards wrote:
>Anyone know anything about CA-DUO? Is it still available, supported?
>
Havent heard that product mentioned since mid-80's. Is there even a need for
it anymore. DOS under OS? We used it back then when converting off DOS to
MVS to be
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:26:10 -0500, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>On my systems, SYSLOGD is started out of /etc/rc
>
># Start the SYSLOGD daemon for logging and tracing
>/etc/syslogd.start
>
>
>manually starting SYSLOGD can be accompli
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:54:28 -0500, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Srinivas Aeturi
wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>We are running on z/OS 2.2. And we have configured SYSLOGD and it was running
>good.
>But now, The SYSLOGD ID is not existing and task SYSLOGD is not running. And
>we are getting below error when
looks like there are TWS variables for just what you need
Variable name Description
CDATE Current date
CTIME Current time
OCDATE Occurrence input arrival date
OCFRSTC First calendar day in month of the occurrence input arrival date
OCFRSTW First work day in the month of the occurrence
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:26:54 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
>I need to schedule some job under TWS vel IWS vel ZWS.
>
>The job contain full month concatenation of daily datasets.
>//INPUT DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.Y2022.D0101
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.Y2022.D0102
>// DD
All
We have 5 sysplex's in MGM4SITE configuration. We are about nearly fully
implemented and region swap tested through all environments. We are looking
at how to have our operations staff monitor GDPS for critical events.They
wouldnt be expected to take any action, other than to page
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:41:41 -0600, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>Since I would guess that a majority of ibm-mainers would agree that open
>source is confusing and dangerous, here's a question:
>
>Let's say that an organization wanted to prohibit open source. How would you
>go about it?
>
>Kirk Wolf
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:55:33 -0600, Scott Barry wrote:
>
>Consider with the IBM z15, there is no longer any "license requirement" for
>activation - no longer implemented with (z14, z13) hardware PCIe cards
>(recommended: at least 4 per CPC/CEC) involved, as the function is on-chip.
>And the
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:57:40 +, Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
wrote:
>Anyone have some good links to share that will state why zEDC is worth
>licensing and getting?
>
>For t e record, we already have the HW feature installed. Don’t ask.
>
Bob,
I don't have either handy, but IMO the
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:18:55 -0600, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>There might still be reason for a level of panic.
>
>COBOL V6 required PDS-E load libraries. If you are already PDSE everywhere,
>then no issue. Not hard to convert, but disruptive.
>CPU to compile COBOL V6 goe
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:00:35 -0600, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>good to know !
>
>seems there's been a lot of panic here for no reason, now that all the
>programmers know we're using 6.2 COBOL compilers, ever issue they see is
>related, seems about right, seen this reaction at more than one site.
>
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:02:22 -0400, Eric D Rossman wrote:
>"Dave Jousma" wrote:
>
>> You have to be careful though, because the MK for the domain is the
>> same on both adapters,
>
>That is true only if both adapters are on the same LPAR. If they are on
>dif
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:04:59 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
>
>Thank you for the clarification and excuse me for next question: are you
>sure one can have i.e. LPARX using Crypto01 in domain 10 (no other
>crypto cards) *and* LPARY using Crypto02 in domain 10 both activated?
>As I said my
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 21:48:23 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
>Another question about ICSF:
>
>I vaguely remember that crypto domains had to be unique.
>In other words every active LPAR can have unique domain number or
>several numbers (which is another story).
>
>Now I just read the domain
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 09:21:16 -0400, Eric D Rossman wrote:
>It sounds like a "SETICSF FLUSH" command or similar is what you are
>suggesting. ("don't turn off any options, but ensure that everything up to
>that point is flushed/handled").
>
>I would ask you to open an RFE and post back here so
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 16:10:48 -0400, Eric D Rossman wrote:
>
>That's a really good question (and a complicated one). While the
>recommendation is to terminate ICSF to allow for a clean shutdown of
>tasks, I think a STOP ICSF can be (mostly) safely avoided.
>
>There are a few asynchronous tasks
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 21:01:06 -0400, Eric D Rossman wrote:
>I think you have the right idea.
>
>You want ICSF started as early as possible and ended as late as possible.
>
>You likely want to use early ICSF which will run ICSF under the MASTER
>address space instead of JES (either via the
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:19:08 -0600, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>you bring up a good point. there are hits for this in base JAVA V8 both 31bit
>and 64bit, so consequently, any JAVA based app could be using, without
>actually including their own copy of log4j. That also means th
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:38:43 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>Making things even more confusing, there are lots of ways to use log4j, only
>some of which expose this vulnerability. For example, Splunk uses it, but
>says the exploit matters on "All supported non-Windows versions of 8.1.x and
>8.2.x
There is a IBM webinar spinning up for 12/15
IBM Security is hosting a client webinar about Log4Shell on Wednesday, December
15, 11 a.m. ET. Our X-Force team will review the implications of Log4Shell, who
may be impacted, and steps clients can take to protect themselves today and in
the
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 05:54:25 -0600, Dave Jousma wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:43:55 +, Neale Ferguson
>wrote:
>
>
>>It fails with:
>>
>>IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
>>IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 48 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLAT-80
>>
>>I
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:43:55 +, Neale Ferguson wrote:
>It fails with:
>
>IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
>IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 48 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLAT-80
>
>I am unable to work out what IGG0CLAT-80 is or why it’s failing. I am unsure
>why VOL is required anyway, wouldn’t the
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:06:32 +, Richbourg, Claude
wrote:
>Good afternoon everyone,
>
>Two things that I noticed with z/OS 2.5 so far and I have a couple of
>questions for the group.
>
>Q1:
>RMF would not start after the first IPL of z/OS 2.5.
>The program ERBMFMFC is not in the
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:59:13 +, Shaffer, Terri
wrote:
>Hi,
> Just recently upgraded my test lpar to z/OS 2.5 and Tn3270 is displaying an
> error. It still connects and I can logon but this?
>
>$HASP373 TN3270 STARTED
>IEF403I TN3270 - STARTED - TIME=09.13.27
>IEE252I MEMBER CTIEZBTN
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:22:33 -0600, Dave Jousma wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:06:36 -0600, James C. wrote:
>
>>Normally I edit the DDEFs via jcl to /Service instead of / for maintenance
>>but I was wondering if this is still the preferred/best method? The last time
>&
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:06:36 -0600, James C. wrote:
>Normally I edit the DDEFs via jcl to /Service instead of / for maintenance but
>I was wondering if this is still the preferred/best method? The last time
>doing this there were 118 paths to update so not entirely trivial.
>
No need to do it
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:04:56 -0600, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>Jake,
>
>Is that an APARfix for PH38318? I see the APAR is still open. Could be a
>packaging error by IBM too…..
>
>
>I look up the same module in my 2.4 environment
>
> Entry Type: HFS
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:09:38 +0400, Jake Anderson
wrote:
>Hello
>
>Cross posted
>
>I am applying a APAR related to CSSMTP to zOS 2.4 and it fails with below
>messge
>
>GIM42500W AN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN THE NAME OF THE PHYSICAL DATA SET CONTAINING
>A
>
> SYMBOLIC LINK FOR HFS EZAMLCAT
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:57:17 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
>I just re-read Configuring ISPF for Fun and Profit presentation and
>found the following link:
>http://home.roadrunner.com/~pinncons/TSO LOGON with the Same Userid on
>Multiple LPARs in a Sysplex.pdf
>
>However the link is dead.
>Does
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:22:11 -0700, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>Do you have Chicago Software Quick Ref tool?
>
>We actually have several part process
>
>The MIG setting on the Pool for auto migration when the pool reaches a certain
>Percentage
>
>We use QW to create a Storage listing, then run a
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:08:01 +, kekronbekron
wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>
>What you've mentioned will work.
>A cyclic automation rule that runs a REXX which does the following:
>1. D SMS,SG(ALL) and parse its output (or maybe individual commands for just
>the SGs you're interested in, to simplify
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:01:07 +, kekronbekron
wrote:
>Please do ignore this mail/thread if it seems derailing.
>
>It hurts to see that someone just gets to manage storage at a shop like this.
>While at the same time, there's unnecessary gatekeeping on the hiring side,
>asking stupid
>You may want to pose the question at the official unofficial SA user group
>found here: https://groups.io/g/SAUsers
Thanks Steve!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
>Dave,
>
>Do you have DFSMShsm? If so, turn on Interval Migration and it manage the %
>threshold of freespace for you.
>
>If you do not have DFSMShsm, what do you have?
>
>Bob
Thanks Bob, we do have HSM. Sorry, I'm not well-versed in this area. Are
there tools to know when you need to add
All,
I'm sure someone has solved this. I'm now managing DASD management at my
shop. One thing that bothers me is my guys getting off-shift calls because
some active storage pools fall below a % threshold of freespace. We arent
skimpy on provisioning, but dont want to over-provision
Richard,
I didnt read every single post on the topic, but did you say if this is the
SYSRES you are IPL'd from? Or an alternate that isnt supposed to be in use?
Also, saw your comments about the couple of hardcoded datasets in LINKLIST that
you fixed that were pointing at the volume. I
Oh, and in the custompac dialogs, there are exactly 4 jobs that I run after
resolving new datasets that came along with the new release.
- allocate and catalog the datasets (ALLOCDS)
- restore the datasets (RESTORE)
- update SMPE DDDEFS (UP)
- and a modified version of RECATALOG datasets to
>Hey Dave
> I ordered both, and you are right in 4 hours I had my z/OS loaded and IPLed
> at least the initial IPL in test. However
>
>I wanted to try z/OSMF and I actually like the dataset naming flexibility,
>much better than the dialogs and Alias's discovery.
>
>But all the background
I too ordered V2.5 in the "window" where you still have a choice on custompac
dialogs or z/OSMF. I opted to go custompac one more time.
I do echo Terri's sentiments that there should be a way to mostly seed a new
z/OSMF instance whether there is a utility that reads the last saved custompac
>Does the custom pac for 2.5 still provide the Installing your order doc? since
>if 2.5 requires z/osmf then there is an assumption on IBM's part that security
>had already been setup and you are already using z/osmf
>
>
>
>Carmen Vitullo
if you order V2.5 before January 1, you can have
>I used to download Patches from SHOPz using internet download. I have 35 of 35
>files 520 size. How can i merge to single file to become
>S0001.SHOPZ.S7114481.SMPMCS.pax.Z file for me to unzip and I can receive to
>SMP/E Global Zone. My SMP/E version 36.109 and OS Z/OS 2.2.
No need for
>Just curious about how often folks here IPL their systems as a scheduled event
>, once a month, once a quarter, once a year?
>and same question for POR's.
>I understand there are times when you HAVE to have unscheduled or hot fix
>IPL's, I'm just asking in general terms.
We have 2 maintenance
All,
Fifth Third Bank is looking to fill a position in the Mainframe space for a
Storage Management professional. Home base can be Cincinnati, OH or Grand
Rapids, MI. Fully remote would be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Interested individuals can apply directly here:
I looked at the video, and looks like he is running for 5 seconds, but cannot
tell how many prime numbers he calculated on the platforms he was testing. I
had an old COBOL program laying around from years ago that calculates prime
numbers. This morning I cranked it up to a limit of
>No, "cloud" and "outsourcing" are two distinct concepts. While it is
>very likely these days that all "outsourcing" would involve cloud-based
>services, it is not true that "cloud-based" services must be "outsourced".
>A corporation can easily choose to run its own distributed, in-house
>cloud
>Of course I'm missing something...
>If I'm getting contention on the USER.HFS (because it's shared in the sysplex)
>why does it matter what directory it's in?
>/u or /home it's still the same file
I think you said you have /u as part of your IBM root file system. You also
said you have one
Elaine,
you cannot have the same filesystem mounted twice(or more) in different spots
in the directory tree in sysplex filesystem. As mentioned before, you really
dont want to define user home directories in the root filesystem supplied by
IBM. What we have done is created a automount
>This was confirmed by an individual that supports the server. The
>ciphers mentioned on the IBM Support page are a subset of the ciphers
>actually enabled.
>https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6417233
>I hope this helps. Is anyone still having trouble connecting?
>Kurt Quackenbush --
>Date and time are correct, the timestamp on the log shows it. Just the dataset
>name for the dump has the wrong date/time.
Mark,
Is it possible that they could be running some tool like HourGlass fooling
around with date/time?
>Dave,
Here you go:
>##
># #
>
># Secure FTP Application #
>
>#
> Well, for what it's worth, I just tried it and my job was successful,
> however, I also received the SSLv23/TLSv1 messages. So I used the standard
> job that IBM provided (RFNJOBS) and I turned on Debug SEC. Here is what I got
(snip)
Hey Tony, Thanks for this. For some reason we are
I should have commented that the HTTPS method is working fine. And my last
successful FTPs download was last week Monday April 26th.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Anyone ordering maintenance post May 1st using FTPs to download? Here was the
announcement:
As of May 1, 2021, to download files from IBM's secure delivery server using
FTPS, it is necessary to enable TLS 1.2 in the z/OS Communications Server FTP
client program.
So, we've enabled ATTLS via
Here is the JCL.
//job
//*
//*
//* List Sysmods/Ptfs in the global zone.
I had 5 PTF's that fell into that receive window. at least there were 3 were
not applied, so easy. The other two were in my base GDPS code. One of those I
was able to apply - redo, the other was in separate FMID for GDPS and I had no
choice but to delete the entire FMID and re-install it.
Yea, its not a freebie either. charged just like fault analyzer, File manager,
debug.as Jerry mentioned it is bundled, which is what we have done.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
So, this question got me thinking.
We have a few ZD instances running here. I was not fully involved with the
group bringing it in, other than setting some ground rules regarding
customization, and "who" would be supporting.
My recollection though, is that the Terms & Conditions of ZD
As Carmen suggested, display the user's OMVS segment. Must have UID, GID
minimally, probably requires home directory, and start program, usually /bin/sh
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Glenn,
that seems odd to have RC and RSN 00.are you able to cut/paste
current wait state string in its entirety?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
only a guess. But couldnt find an encryption cipher in common? You might
need to enable less secure ciphers in your linux system?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
>Does Rocket (formerly BlueWave) support Programmed Symbol Sets (PSS)? Have
>they announced plans for a Linux version? Thanks.
Do you mean formerly Bluezone? I cannot answer your question about PSS, but
they only support Windows in the desktop version. All other platforms are
supported by
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
