Re: RDz (was: Re: editting testing COBOL code)

2009-12-04 Thread Joost van de Griek
2009/12/4 David Alcock mainframed...@sbcglobal.net: I'm unfamiliar with RDz.  I guess it is this product:   http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rdz/ Indeed it is. Does the editor run on the PC? Yes.  If so can it edit PC files? Yes. (Depending on file type, of course.)  Is the user

AUTO: Angelo Corridori is out of the office.

2009-12-04 Thread Angelo Corridori
I am out of the office until 12/07/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. Primarily working from home; limited access to e-mail/phonemail. Please send an e-mail if you need to get touch with me. Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Dec 2009 to 3

Ted Kotlowski is out of the office.

2009-12-04 Thread Ted Kotlowski
I will be out of the office starting 12/04/2009 and will not return until 12/09/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. If your request requires immediate attention, Please contact the MVS Technical Support Hotline at 1-866-866-4488 x12000 This e-mail message and all attachments

Re: Tool for identifying mount points?

2009-12-04 Thread Jim Holloway
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:36:36 -0600 Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: Are you running it from a shell? (hint: that is a requirement) Is that because it doesn't include RC=SYSCALLS('ON') to define the tail variables? Why else? Gil is correct. In order to run under, say TSO, as opposed

Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become non-dispatchable?

2009-12-04 Thread Peter Relson
It would have helped those of us who only follow IBM-MAIN to have some clue of what the question was. STORAGE is equivalent to GETMAIN in terms of serialization. For what it's worth, GETMAIN/FREEMAIN can be considered now a beast of the past. STORAGE LINKAGE=SVC is GETMAIN/FREEMAIN (for at

AUTO: Steven B Jones/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office until 08/07/2000. (returning 12/07/2009)

2009-12-04 Thread Steven B Jones
I am out of the office until 12/07/2009. Thanks, Steve Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Dec 2009 to 3 Dec 2009 (#2009-337) sent on 12/4/09 0:00:03. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become non-dispatchable?

2009-12-04 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Neil Duffee At 2009.12.03 07:57 concerning Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become non-dispatchable?, John Chase jch...@uss...com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [On

Re: RDz (was: Re: editting testing COBOL code)

2009-12-04 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Alcock Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL? I'm unfamiliar with RDz. I guess it is this product: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rdz/ Yep; that's the one. Does the editor run on the

Re: How to IPL from a Customized Offerings Driver Options

2009-12-04 Thread Dana Mitchell
We are planning to install z/OS 1.10 at the first time via ServerPac.Could you tell me how to IPL from a Customized Offerings Driver (5751-COD) and how to install a driving system. Which IBM manual could help me? Thanks a lot! Best Regards, Janson Janson, You will receive 'Customized

Re: RDz (was: Re: editting testing COBOL code)

2009-12-04 Thread McKown, John
$5,500 per programmer who uses it???!!! And ISPF costs how much for however many people need to use it? There is no way that we would do this. How does anybody justify it? And it's based off of Eclipse, so IBM hasn't even done all the work to create and maintain it. -- John McKown Systems

Re: RDz (was: Re: editting testing COBOL code)

2009-12-04 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of David Alcock Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: RDz (was: Re: editting testing COBOL code) Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL?

Re: IPL set dataset mapping using 3309-27

2009-12-04 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 12/01/2009 10:47 AM, duncan turner wrote: I am considering creating an IPL set for production and DR use using up to 8 volumes probably 3390-27. I was thinking of putting the IBM program libraries on one volume, using another volume for a work volume and then striping the other system

MicroFocus Server

2009-12-04 Thread Field, Alan C.
Anybody have any experience (good and bad) with Microfocus Server to offload mainframe workload? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET

Re: editting testing COBOL code

2009-12-04 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of wmklein Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Fwd: editting testing COBOL code If you send me (off-list) a name and contact information for the

LPR from multiple mainframe regions to single host

2009-12-04 Thread Gilbert Cardenas
Does anyone know if performing an LPR from multiple mainframe hosts to a single lpr host queue definition would cause contention issues? I have 3 VPS mainframe printers that are lpr'ing to the same remote host queue and there appears to be some contention going on. If lpr'ing from multiple

Re: LPR from multiple mainframe regions to single host

2009-12-04 Thread Pat Mihalec
I have VPS and I can print to any printer from both of my Lpars. Can you be clearer on how you have the definitions? Pat Mihalec Rush University Medical Center Senior System Programmer (312) 942-8386 pat_miha...@rush.edu P Please consider the environment before printing this email. From:

Re: Tool for identifying mount points?

2009-12-04 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:36:36 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:28:12 -0600, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote: 7 *-* j=s.stfs_avail * s.stfs_blocksize LS.STFS_AVAIL LS.STFS_BLOCKSIZE 7 +++ j=s.stfs_avail *

Re: editting testing COBOL code

2009-12-04 Thread Dave Salt
From: peter.far...@broadridge.com In any case, establishing an off-mainframe data repository for sequential and VSAM data and/or an NFS/SMB connection to the mainframe for sequential data (and all the associated CPU cycles that those products require on the mainframe) would still be the

Re: LPR from multiple mainframe regions to single host

2009-12-04 Thread Gilbert Cardenas
Sure, the problem (I think) is that I have 3 lpar regions that are lpr'ing to a common server (same IP address,port and queue). The catch is that the server lpr destination (HOUSTON) is not really a printer but software that is emulating a printer. So the mainframe VPS definition for each

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 4b17e85d.6f0f.008...@efirstbank.com, on 12/03/2009 at 04:33 PM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com said: So you are saying that there is no point doing the two step process I mention because it will have the file enqueued for the life of the job no matter what, if DISP=OLD is

Re: IEFU83 SDSSMF83 module

2009-12-04 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In listserv%200912030904178069.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 12/03/2009 at 09:04 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz maryanne4...@gmail.com said: I see that the module's entry point address is 96EDA300, and IBM QA told me to go in to IPCS browse to look at that and see if the eye catchers indicate whos module it is,

Re: IEFU83 SDSSMF83 module

2009-12-04 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In listserv%200912031152459201.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 12/03/2009 at 11:52 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz maryanne4...@gmail.com said: I was unaware that only vendor problems can be posted to the list. There is no such restriction. It helps if responses include an attribution line and quotes of enough

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In s84gh5derriun3ggjjsnmq3i5evkkm2...@4ax.com, on 12/03/2009 at 12:29 PM, Howard Brazee howard.bra...@cusys.edu said: Huh? The 1958 Chevy didn't have seatbelts, By the 1960's lots of cars had seat belts, at least as an option. And it is no longer though of as odd at all when a car goes a

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 4b1856e3.2050...@ync.net, on 12/03/2009 at 06:25 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said: I would prefer supplementing sturdy seat belts with dangerous air bags. I take it that you don't have children? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 4b1823a1.2030...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 12/03/2009 at 09:46 PM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl said: I really don't understand why do you insist on improper spelling of 'Andersen' name. When did *you* become concerned with correct nomenclature? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Thompson, Steve
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture SNIP And it is no

Re: Small Server Mob Advantage

2009-12-04 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin) writes: I often wonder whether a reason TCP/IP triumphed over SNA was that SNA didn't provide a facility with the

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread Gord Tomlin
Since Charles pointed out in his second post that he was new to C++, I'm going to jump to the conclusion that he intends to use C++ rather than C. In that case, the recommended approach for working with strings is to use a container class like std::string instead of the C str*() and strn*()

CF LPAR MIPS Utilisation

2009-12-04 Thread John Mitchelle
Hi, I have 936 MIPS processor Z02-2096 z9BC I have 4 LPARS and 2 CF LPARs SYSA (Prod) SYSB (Dev) SYSC (Test) SYSD (Maint) SYCF1 SYCF2 Both CPU Engines are online across all LPAR's. Wts are in such a way that MIPS Allocation are 650 for SYSA 50 for SYSB 50 for SYSC 50 for SYSD 100

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Tony B.
1972 Chevrolet Vega, 4 cylinder, aluminum block. At 50K miles a quart of oil per tank of gas (250 miles). At 60,000 miles blue smoke. At 75,000 miles I rebuilt it with iron sleeves. That rebuild lasted 100K miles till the rust issue made my feet cold. My brand new 1966 Mustang had factory

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread Charles Mills
Gosh, there is no question that can't be hijacked into something else. Thank you to all the people who suggested I use the C++ classes. Yes, yes, I am well aware of the string class. It does not do everything. There are times when char[] makes more sense and/or must be used. When doing so, it

Re: CF LPAR MIPS Utilisation

2009-12-04 Thread Field, Alan C.
John, The cpus defined as CF (specialty) engines ONLY run the CF code, so there is no gain to you SYSA/B/C/D lpars. Are you running a parallel sysplex? Also I think the GP engines are in one pool, and the CF engines in another so your weights aren't giving you the MIPs you think. Alan

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. and for something completely different As IBM sales suffer, now's the time to buy a new mainframe http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/120409-ibm-mainframe.html

Re: CF LPAR MIPS Utilisation

2009-12-04 Thread John Mitchelle
Yes. Parallel Sysplex. No ICF Engines. During As-is migration , Legacy system migrated from 2 z900 Processors (which were in sysplex) to z9BC. John On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Field, Alan C. alan.c.fi...@supervalu.comwrote: John, The cpus defined as CF (specialty) engines ONLY run the CF

IEFUSI and LSQA

2009-12-04 Thread ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
Hi all, I would like your advice when reserving 512Kb below 16Mb line. During years i've coded : L R7,LDASIZA Size of A.S. Region Below L R8,LDAESIZA Size of A.S. Region Above ASSIGN0 DS0H Region=0M ST

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread McKown, John
All threads here get hijacked eventually. Some sooner than others. From responses that __I__ have received from IBM in the past, they tend not to implement in flux stuff. And, they basically say give us a business case to implement ... and we will prioritize it with other requests. What they

Re: LPR from multiple mainframe regions to single host

2009-12-04 Thread Pat Mihalec
I have TCPPRTR=raw I am going to the memory on the real printer. I am not experiencing any bottleneck and I am also sharing the printers with windows servers. We just each take our turn. I hope that helps. Pat Mihalec Rush University Medical Center Senior System Programmer (312) 942-8386

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) In s84gh5derriun3ggjjsnmq3i5evkkm2...@4ax.com, on 12/03/2009 at 12:29 PM, Howard Brazee howard.bra...@cusys.edu said: And it is no longer though of as odd at all when a car goes a

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread Rich Smrcina
Yup... welcome to IBM-Main. The signal to noise ratio is quite high. Charles Mills wrote: Gosh, there is no question that can't be hijacked into something else. -- Rich Smrcina -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Yeah, our motto seems to be Why have an opinion if you can't inflict it on the rest of the world! .lol We're all guilty Jon L. Veilleux veilleu...@aetna.com (860) 636-2683 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Frank Swarbrick
I'm not the sysprog, so I may not have all of the details, but if I remember correctly these are the issues: We have PDSESHARING(NORMAL) in our IGDSMSxx member, rather than PDSESHARING(EXTENDED). From

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Thanks for clarifying. On 12/4/2009 at 8:14 AM, in message 20091204154243.c72fef58...@smtp.patriot.net, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: In 4b17e85d.6f0f.008...@efirstbank.com, on 12/03/2009 at 04:33 PM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com said: So you

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread Ted MacNEIL
ITYM low. Signal is the good part --Original Message-- From: Rich Smrcina Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Sent: Dec 4, 2009 13:23 Subject: Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Thompson, Steve
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Anne Lynn Wheeler Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture The following message is

Re: CF LPAR MIPS Utilisation

2009-12-04 Thread Scott Rowe
Certainly, SYSA can take unused cycles, they are distributed according to weights. What you haven't said is what mode your CFs are running in, so I will assume the are dynamically dispatched. The thing you need to be very careful about here is that the CF partitions can get the cycles they

IDCAMS Delete via DD

2009-12-04 Thread George.William
I'm drawing a blank here; when deleting sequential files (non-vsam) is it possible to use a DD reference in the IDCAMS cards instead of coding the actual dataset name in the DELETE statement? The example below doesn't seem to work for me. Note: it's been awhile since I've had to use IDCAMS

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:01:29 -0700, Frank Swarbrick wrote: I'm not the sysprog, so I may not have all of the details, but if I remember correctly these are the issues: We have PDSESHARING(NORMAL) in our IGDSMSxx member, rather than PDSESHARING(EXTENDED). From

Re: IDCAMS Delete via DD

2009-12-04 Thread McKown, John
Why do you even want to do that??? Use IEFBR14 instead, with DISP=(MOD,DELETE). Or, as I do: //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01, // PARM='DEL DSN' //SYSTSIN DD DUMMY //SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=* If your reason is to pass the DSN via a PROC parm or a JCL SET symbol. Use IKJEFT1B if you want a return code from

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread Rich Smrcina
D'oh. I stand corrected. Ted MacNEIL wrote: ITYM low. Signal is the good part -- Rich Smrcina -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET

Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become non-dispatchable?

2009-12-04 Thread Jim Mulder
CICS itself exploits (some) above-the-bar addressing: Containers are stored there, but for application access to that data CICS copies it to 24- or 31-bit storage. Applications themselves cannot directly access the data in 64-bit storage (Assembler excepted, of course; but you're on your

Re: IDCAMS Delete via DD

2009-12-04 Thread George.William
Because I won't know if the dataset will be cataloged or not, hence the use of IDCAMS to avoid a JCL error. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Re: IDCAMS Delete via DD

2009-12-04 Thread McKown, John
Using DISP=(MOD,DELETE) will work if the dataset exists or not. It it exists, the existing copy is deleted. If it does not exist, then it is created at step start and then deleted at step end. The IKJEFT01 or IKJEFT1B will work regardless. And, as a plus, will not do an HSM recall if it is

Re: IDCAMS Delete via DD

2009-12-04 Thread George.William
OK, cool. I'll try it. Thanks -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IDCAMS Delete via DD Using DISP=(MOD,DELETE) will work if the

Re: LPR from multiple mainframe regions to single host

2009-12-04 Thread Linda Mooney
Hi Gilbert, .  We have VPS also.  IMHO the answer is it depends If you have multiple hosts sending to a virtual or real  printer, and if the mutliple hosts get busy sending at close to the same time, it can cause contention.  You can determine if either of these is happening by reviewing

Re: IDCAMS Delete via DD

2009-12-04 Thread Schumacher, Otto
If you use Iefbr14 and the dataset is a large dataset that was migrated to LM2 then your job may wait hours for it to be recalled and then deleted. The idcams with a a delete nonvsam and reset the return code if the dataset is not defined. Idcams will not wait on the recall it will issue an

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Frank Swarbrick
On 12/4/2009 at 12:34 PM, in message listserv%200912041334504828.0...@bama.ua.edu, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:01:29 -0700, Frank Swarbrick wrote: I'm not the sysprog, so I may not have all of the details, but if I remember correctly these are the

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 67991c5ad29f4e83926c6c00a8b5f...@tbabonas, on 12/04/2009 at 11:01 AM, Tony B. tbabo...@comcast.net said: 1972 Chevrolet Vega, 4 cylinder, aluminum block. Vega? Isn't that the English translation of Renault? My brand new 1966 Mustang had factory standard seat belts which I promptly

Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread Linda Mooney
Greetings! FDRDSF is not my forte,  I have looked at the very fine manual, but need to borrow a little expertise... I have some very old FDRDSF tapes that I need to restore and look at the contents. We had some old source that was thought lost, but maybe, might not be...  I do not

Re: Tool for identifying mount points?

2009-12-04 Thread kenneth . klein
I am getting the exact same results on 1.8. Kenneth Klein Systems Specialist 520-868-3644 859-750-5179 (Cell) 502-868-2298 (Fax) kenneth.kl...@tema.toyota.com John Mattson john_matt...@ea.epson.com Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu 12/03/2009 03:03 PM Please respond

Re: Tool for identifying mount points?

2009-12-04 Thread kenneth . klein
I am running it from the csh in omvs. Kenneth Klein Systems Specialist 520-868-3644 859-750-5179 (Cell) 502-868-2298 (Fax) kenneth.kl...@tema.toyota.com Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu 12/03/2009 03:30 PM Please respond to IBM

Re: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Linda, The following will print the contents of your FDR tapes: //PRINT1 EXEC PGM=FDRABRP //SYSPRINTDD SYSOUT=* //ABRMAP DD SYSOUT=* //VSAMPRT DD

Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture

2009-12-04 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip I would prefer supplementing sturdy seat belts with dangerous air bags. I take it that you don't have children? ---unsnip- None that I'll admit to. :-) Lifelong

FW: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread Stephen Mednick
-Original Message- FDRDSF is not my forte, I have looked at the very fine manual, but need to borrow a little expertise... I have some very old FDRDSF tapes that I need to restore and look at the contents. We had some old source that was thought lost, but maybe, might not be...

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Exactly my point. Someone asked me why I said we didn't want to use PDSE to solve my issue and I said because we can't share them well, because we're not in a Sysplex. You can't share regular PDS datasets either. - Too busy driving to stop for gas!

Re: FW: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread David Andrews
I have some very old FDRDSF tapes that I need to restore and look at the contents [...] I don't know what datasets might be on these tapes. The old TAPEMAP program from the CBT used to be able to interpret FDR dumpfiles. You could at least use that to see what's on the tapes. -- David

Re: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread Linda Mooney
Thanks Dave, but we don't have ABRS, just the FDR, FDRDSF. Linda - Original Message - From: David W. O'Brien (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Friday, December 4, 2009 1:04:23 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: Need some FDR help please

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Scott Rowe
Yes, Ted, I think he's figured that out. Frank, as I've mentioned before, I really think you guys need to re-visit the Sysplex question again. There is really no reason to not be running at least a base Sysplex, it should vastly improve things there. IIRC, you are running GRS in ring mode

Re: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread Scott Rowe
Linda, I believe you can do the same thing with FDRDSF, but I don't have it here. As someone else suggested, call Innovation, they are top notch support, and will be happy to help. Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net 12/4/2009 4:40 PM Thanks Dave, but we don't have ABRS, just the FDR,

Re: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread Linda Mooney
Thanks to all of you for the help.  I have a call into Innovation, waiting for a call back.  10 years ago, I used to install and support FDR, but I couldn't find what I needed and rust never sleeps, does it? I actually use it most often to FDR from disk to disk, but I can't remember the last

Safe C++ char array functions (Was Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?)

2009-12-04 Thread Charles Mills
Correct on strcpy_s versus strncpy. Strncpy has the possibility of making a new bad situation while preventing another. You can easily end up with a string that is guaranteed to run wild if you strcpy it. I *think* what I am going to do (with regard to the specifics of strcpy[_s]) is use either a

Faster path to edit in z/OS UNIX Directory List

2009-12-04 Thread Charles Mills
I'm using the z/OS UNIX directory list. When I put an E next to a file name, it always pops up a dialog to which I always hit Enter to accept all of the defaults. It's kind of like the 3.1 member delete confirmation. It's obvious how to turn the member delete confirmation off. Is there a way to

LOAD parameter ERRET

2009-12-04 Thread Steve Comstock
Can anyone point me to the place where it's documented how to code an ERRET routine that gets control when a LOAD is unsucessful? The Assembler Services Reference (Vol. 2) simply supplies the contents of the registers on entry: Register Contents 0 Used as a work register by the system

Re: Faster path to edit in z/OS UNIX Directory List

2009-12-04 Thread Steve Comstock
Charles Mills wrote: I'm using the z/OS UNIX directory list. When I put an E next to a file name, it always pops up a dialog to which I always hit Enter to accept all of the defaults. It's kind of like the 3.1 member delete confirmation. It's obvious how to turn the member delete confirmation

Re: LOAD parameter ERRET

2009-12-04 Thread Edward Jaffe
Steve Comstock wrote: Can anyone point me to the place where it's documented how to code an ERRET routine that gets control when a LOAD is unsucessful? When you code ERRET= the LOAD macro inserts LTR 15,15 followed by JNZ ERRET after the LOAD SVC. So ERRET can be logically treated as just an

Re: LOAD parameter ERRET

2009-12-04 Thread Steve Comstock
Edward Jaffe wrote: Steve Comstock wrote: Can anyone point me to the place where it's documented how to code an ERRET routine that gets control when a LOAD is unsucessful? When you code ERRET= the LOAD macro inserts LTR 15,15 followed by JNZ ERRET after the LOAD SVC. So ERRET can be

Re: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread Larry Stout
Linda, This is from Innovation. As suggested by Dave O'Brien, program FDRABRP with the command PRINT TVTOC will show you the disk data sets that are backed up on any backup created by the FDR system (whether the backup was taken by FDR, FDRDSF, or FDRABR). Although program FDRABRP is part of

Re: Faster path to edit in z/OS UNIX Directory List

2009-12-04 Thread Charles Mills
Thanks! Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Faster path to edit in z/OS UNIX Directory List Charles Mills wrote: I'm using

file definition

2009-12-04 Thread Frank Swarbrick
This may or may not be a weird question, but... Is there a utility where I can give it a list of dataset names and it can give back some JCL that could have been used to define that file? Simply an IEFBR14 with a DD for each file where the DD has the DISP=(NEW,CATLG), the DSN, the full DCB,

Re: Is there a good mailing list or forum for mainframe C/C++ specifically?

2009-12-04 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:44:12 -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote: D'oh. I stand corrected. Ted MacNEIL wrote: ITYM low. Signal is the good part It's kinda like how people say steep learning curve (understanding increases rapidly) when they mean shallow learning curve (understanding increases slowly).

Re: Need some FDR help please

2009-12-04 Thread Linda Mooney
Thanks to all! I finally found the FDRABRP program and we got  it run.  Now I need to restore PS and PO (these tapes predate PDSE), excluding VSAM, no catalogue updates allowed, non-SMS DASD volume and new high level qualifier.  Most of our DASD is non-SMS.  I am excluding the VSAM because

Re: editting testing COBOL code

2009-12-04 Thread Clark Morris
On 2 Dec 2009 05:30:26 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Klein Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: editting testing COBOL code

Re: editting testing COBOL code

2009-12-04 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 6:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: editting testing COBOL code Snipped Do you have a url for the RDz reference that documents

Re: Java - yet again

2009-12-04 Thread Clark Morris
On 26 Nov 2009 10:49:40 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: I've seen plenty of awful Java. But by far, VB.NET takes the cake due to India's 3-week course .NET factories. I've found several *major* exploits in some core business software and the dynamics of it all... leaves an imprint of

Re: IEC143I 213-30

2009-12-04 Thread Frank Swarbrick
I think so to, but it is not my decision to make. Perhaps one of our sysprogs will read this and get that discussion restarted amongst themselves. I have tried to nudge them in that direction in the past, but nothing has come of it. -- Frank Swarbrick Applications Architect - Mainframe