Google aside, 'ça' has two meanings:
o It is an abbreviation of 'cela', a demonstrative pronoun, as in
'C'est ça!', That's right! .
o It is also an adverb, 'here' or 'hither', as in 'ça et la', here and there.
As Paul Gilmartin all but said, it is always written/printed as 'ça'.
If it were
*d'accord*
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Google aside, 'ça' has two meanings:
o It is an abbreviation of 'cela', a demonstrative pronoun, as in
'C'est ça!', That's right! .
o It is also an adverb, 'here' or 'hither', as in 'ça et la', here and
Wayne
Yes sir right on the money
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 6, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
*d'accord*
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
In
caajsdjgw+t1cbvxsgtykddoxgqnu0re_bxyubgccg4mjewo...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/05/2013
at 11:04 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
Thanks. I am not any kind of expert, but the otelnetd UNIX
daemon that I mentioned in a previous post in this thread
_seems to me_ to implement
In
CAE1XxDF6a57+wPEJsLQesOTun3OFeq-ObR=zudw++gw9ceg...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/04/2013
at 10:09 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
We're not dealing with what Google wishes to honor,
Of course we are.
We're dealing with the problem of resolving semantic ambiguity,
No. We're dealing
In
b870629719727b4ba82a6c06a31c29124c5781e...@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com,
on 12/04/2013
at 07:46 AM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com said:
Well, common sense would suggest
www.google.comhttp://www.google.com.
Common sense is frequently wrong.
Try that.
BTDT,GTS
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
In
caajsdjg7hhfkk5jwq7u9xytddqzfrk9jak2mculh5oogztq...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/04/2013
at 11:09 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
NVT?
See TELNET PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION, RFC 854.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
caajsdjg7hhfkk5jwq7u9xytddqzfrk9jak2mculh5oogztq...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/04/2013
at 11:09 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
NVT?
See TELNET PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION, RFC 854.
Literal translation would be that goes, ca va is a shortened comment ca
va, ie how goes it(that)?. OK would be ca va bien. Without bien it's
meaningless in the context. Bien would be the OK piece, ie fine
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey zMan,
Yep..but on Switzerland French shall we say interesting like the Swiss German
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
Literal translation would be that goes, ca va is a
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:34:48 +1100, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
Literal translation would be that goes, ca va is a shortened comment ca
va, ie how goes it(that)?. OK would be ca va bien. Without bien it's
meaningless in the context. Bien would be the OK piece, ie fine
Think idiom. First
Tony Harminc wrote:
Unfortunately that takes me to https://www.google.ca, which doesn't
seem to have a search tools choice. I can force Google to go to the
.com (i.e. US) site, but it's still HTTPS, and it still has no search
tools that I can see. And merely quoting a phrase doesn't (contrary to
Gil,
Your correct it's an idiom..slang...more or less...in 3 yrs in Switzerland I
learned I needed a better accent to speak French and Swiss German and don't ask
for items in French in a Swiss German canton or State..it ain't pretty
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite
In
CAArMM9TchzPZCAeKDsSjVJWZ2JWkBHBQpsikzWYG2w=6u04...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/03/2013
at 07:00 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
But for that matter, even Google insists on searching for things
vaguely close to what I asked for, rather then the actual thing.
I don't recall google ever
In
CAJTOO58Xck4+UK5AnobEZ=kztcrte1azgmf86r77emdb0pj...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/03/2013
at 06:53 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
My thought. While you are typing a command with a partial Unix file
name, leave the cursor at the end of the file name and press a PF
key.
Various *ix
|| But for that matter, even Google insists on searching for things
|| vaguely close to what I asked for, rather then the actual thing.
| I don't recall google ever honoring a request for an exact match.
We're not dealing with what Google wishes to honor, We're dealing
with the problem of
In
b870629719727b4ba82a6c06a31c29124c5781e...@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com,
on 12/03/2013
at 04:48 PM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com said:
Re Google:
What URL? I normally use
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en. Or are you referring to
a google browser plugin rather than their web site?
use
Tony Harminc said:
But for that matter, even Google insists on searching for things vaguely close
to what I asked for, rather then the actual thing.
Indeed. I sometimes had to use advanced searches, but you need to search (sic)
for that picture of a gear (options), where you can then search
. . . previous post continued
[q]ueries and the placement of advertisements. Yesterday we had a
discussion of the LE HEAPCHECK facilitiy. Googling it this morning
yielded advertisements for cheap personalized bank checks.
Given the current state of the art exclusion oif notional irrelevance
is
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
What URL? I normally use
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en. Or are you referring to
a google browser plugin rather than their web site?
Well, common sense would suggest www.google.comhttp://www.google.com. Try
that.
...phsiii
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
CAJTOO58Xck4+UK5AnobEZ=kztcrte1azgmf86r77emdb0pj...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/03/2013
at 06:53 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
My thought. While you are typing a command with a
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:09:08 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
We're not dealing with what Google wishes to honor, We're dealing
with the problem of resolving semantic ambiguity, which humans are
extraordinarily good at and even ther best AI methods cannot reaslly
cope with.
Watson? But how would
I search for single words not in English almost every day, always with Google's
Advanced Search, and Google is very useful for me.
E.g., earlier today I searched for κρυπτός and found this url in the first
hit: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%BA%CF%81%CF%85%CF%80%CF%84%CF%8C%CF%82
This
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
deleted
My pet peeve is - when I search a word in a language, not English, then
Google is useless.
deleted
Try using http://www.google.fr for french words?
(use a country suffix where that lanquage is
Or go to Google Translate (translate.google.com). It even handles
transliterations quite well: put in spasebo and tell it's Russian; it
will say:
Did you mean: спасебо
and then you can translate *that*. I've even had it guess when the
transliteration wasn't quite right, and get it right (I
Hey zMan,
I entered 'ca va' in French comes bac as 'okay' which is correct, I lived in
Europe and spoke French. Very impressive converting languages
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 4, 2013, at 6:09 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com
On 4 December 2013 10:46, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Well, common sense would suggest www.google.comhttp://www.google.com. Try
that.
Unfortunately that takes me to https://www.google.ca, which doesn't
seem to have a search tools choice. I can force Google to go to the
.com (i.e. US)
On 4 December 2013 19:33, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
Well, common sense would suggest www.google.comhttp://www.google.com. Try
that.
Unfortunately that takes me to https://www.google.ca, which doesn't
seem to have a search tools choice. I can force Google to go to the
.com (i.e.
On 03.12.2013 07:13, David Crayford wrote:
On 3/12/2013 4:16 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
I would
guess that the tricky part would be replacing the interface to inotify
with w_ioctl / Iocc#regFileInt
I could be wrong but it looks like Iocc#regFileInt doesn't support
monitoring directories, which
In 529cd1c5.9030...@tulsagrammer.com, on 12/02/2013
at 12:30 PM, Eric Chevalier et...@tulsagrammer.com said:
I believe the issue some people are trying to address with a Unix
catalog is the case where you DON'T know the full path.
A central repository won't solve that problem.
I know it's
In
CAE1XxDF9CN8XdrzH4rBVgzkNTW0aD=rb9ue4v6odux-dbdq...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/02/2013
at 02:48 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
Worth noting, and not at all to clear from, indeed antiothetical
to, the title of this thread is that we are now addressing a
deficiency of UNIX, not one of
On 2 December 2013 14:02, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:30:29 -0600, Eric Chevalier wrote:
[...]
Now suppose I have some sort of index file where the key is the
unqualified file name and the data is the path to that file. I can
search the index for my file name
Tony,
Sloppy coding at google ?
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:00 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
On 2 December 2013 14:02, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:30:29 -0600,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Tony Harminc
t...@harminc.netmailto:t...@harminc.net wrote:
I don't know about OS X, but recent version of Windows have seriousl
dumbed down the search interface to the point that it's almost
impossible to distinguish between file names and approximate strings
My thought. While you are typing a command with a partial Unix file
name, leave the cursor at the end of the file name and press a PF key.
The routine would open a popup window with a list of possible
matches. You could select a option by tabbing to the line with the
desired match and pressing
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
My thought. While you are typing a command with a partial Unix file
name, leave the cursor at the end of the file name and press a PF key.
The routine would open a popup window with a list of possible
matches. You
Mike,
I like that solution, very nice . Love time savers ...especially when your up
to your ...in alligators
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:53 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
My thought. While
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:30:29 -0600, Eric Chevalier wrote:
I believe the issue some people are trying to address with a Unix
catalog is the case where you DON'T know the full path. ...
Now suppose I have some sort of index file where the key is the
unqualified file name and the data is the path to
Worth noting, and not at all to clear from, indeed antiothetical to,
the title of this thread is that we are now addressing a deficiency of
UNIX, not one of the MVS side of z/OS.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For
A list of desktop search engines (which actually have little to do with
desktops) -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines#Desktop_search_engines
Something like Recoil / Xapian could probably be ported to z/OS. I would
guess that the tricky part would be replacing the interface to
Kirk,
Absolutely, that would be a great , interesting conversion to z/OS
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 2, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
A list of desktop search engines (which actually have little to do
On 3/12/2013 4:16 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
I would
guess that the tricky part would be replacing the interface to inotify
with w_ioctl / Iocc#regFileInt
I could be wrong but it looks like Iocc#regFileInt doesn't support
monitoring directories, which diminishes it's value. A port of inotify
for
42 matches
Mail list logo
