Note: divide by the value of the adjusted last point(s) after
subtracting the 1st point(s).
On 2024-04-13 11:41 a.m., Robert Gordon wrote:
No worries...data actually has 0.1 eV steps...a bit finer than I would
use for Fe, but not grossly oversampled.
For comparison between these data sets
edge XAS spectra from 7000 to 7350 eV. I
have not seen all the data from the session, but I believe the data
were only collected over the range 7100 to 7150 eV for all analyses. I
guess these are not useable?
Cheers,
Jesse
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 7:17 PM Robert Gordon
wrote:
Two things
Two things:
1. This is a volunteer community. Asking us to download a massive file
and parse through it to find a data file is not a reasonable request.
Pick an example and attach it as a txt file (energy, mu(E) or E, I0, IF
). In fact, since the graph looks like the data were grossly
Hi Chris,
Multiple scattering can be quite important, particularly in systems with
higher local symmetry
(i.e. focused multiple scattering - many equivalent paths). It occurs
along with back-scattering,
so you should include the Fe-N1 path. Conveniently, you can constrain
the MS path based on
Hi,
Average of 3 scans from APS-20BM, 2s/pt per scan...commercial powder
(ground, Alfa?) on tape.
Data were collected in 2009. I would have to dig to find out how many
layers...around 8...
Reference Fe foil measured simultaneously in transmission - no shift
between scans.
Si(111), 80%-ish
Hi Otal,
I ran a quick FEFF simulation just to see what is present under that
second peak in the FT.
There are many more shells than just TM and Na...e.g.
There is significant multiple scattering and another backscattering peak
(Fe-O) at
3.6Angstroms. All of these are going to spread
Hi,
You could try X-ray emission rather than EXAFS. It has shown some
success in showing changes
in phosphate environment with bonding environment.
e.g. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/sc/d1sc01266e
cheers,
-R.
On 2023-09-13 12:47 p.m., matthew marcus wrote:
Good points.
Hi Anatoly,
reflectivity of Pt over that energy range does not vary that much:
[image: image.png]
I guessed what angle you were set for, assuming Pd K-edge...
So something wrong with I0?
-R.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 5:28 PM Anatoly Frenkel <
anatoly.fren...@stonybrook.edu> wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
All data measured on APS 20BM, In K-edge
files attached:
in2o3 (avg of 3 scans)
in foil ref measured after sample (avg of 3 scans, no shift detected)
I can provide a foil scan without the sample in place, but the
transmission detectors were still
purging (changed gas for high energy)
).
Note that Cu+ is not stable in solution unless you give it a ligand
such as chloride; reduction to Cu+ in our solution most likely would
result in precipitation of Cu(0) via disproportionation. No evidence
for this at all.
On 22 Apr 2023, at 12:14 pm, Robert Gordon
wrote:
Hi Joel,
How
Hi Joel,
How much edge shift are you seeing between your foil and the solution?
Cu+2 is about 4.5 eV up from Cu metal...you seeing about that much?
Cu+2 can photoreduce...I know Cu+(aq) isn't stable, but maybe some
complex is forming?
Just a thought...CN=2 and I think linear Cu+
-R.
On
HI Ryan,
I have attached my test file...just an iron foil scan. It reads in without
any grievous issue on my pc running Win10
and version 0.9.26 of the Demeter package.
If you are running Win11, it is possible that an update has caused an
issue. Possibly your installation has become
corrupted
At a guess, I would say the atom list in the cif file is not suitable:
Mg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7
Al 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
O1 0.0 0.0 0.37710 1.0
H1 0.0 0.0 0.41440 1.0
C 0.0 0.0 0.16700 0.08333
O2 0.09200
iew.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS>
>
> On Thursday, February 16, 2023, 2:50 PM, Robert Gordon <
> ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> So your goal is to plot If/I0 versus time for a given energy in the XANES.
> Are you exporting normalised XANES or just If/I0?
> Are you do
So your goal is to plot If/I0 versus time for a given energy in the XANES.
Are you exporting normalised XANES or just If/I0?
Are you doing background removal from the pre-edge?
Is another feature underlying this targeted feature also disappearing or
changing? i.e. you are not watching a feature
Hi Danting,
I took a quick look at this. I like FDMNES, but I was not able to
improve much on the spectrum using it.
There might be more to tweak, but I also tried FEFF10, and I think that
has done quite well, particularly between
10 and 40 eV above the edge - exhibiting the finer structure on
Hi Gabriele,
To qualify Anatoly's cheerful, pre-morning coffee response, if your samples
are part of a sequence of measurements
of a material whose XANES has been measured at different temperatures, and
said XANES does have some changes
owing to changes in physical or electronic behavior with
Is this what you had in mind?
http://exafsmaterials.com/ReferenceSpectra.html
Not all elements (nor all forms of a given element), but a good
illustration.
-R.
On 2022-08-07 5:00 p.m., Kyle Draim wrote:
Hello!
I don't have any X-Ray data to analyze in your app, I'm just seeking a
visual
Matt's idea of an April Fool's joke no doubt...
The XAFS2022 website indicates that the abstract deadline is April 17.
Cheers,
-R.
On 2022-04-01 12:41 p.m., Matt Newville wrote:
Hi Folks,
... and some reminders:
Abstracts for XAFS 2022 are due April 19. Please submit a
presentation for
Hi Melike,
If the 'before doping' system is a known material - i.e. a bulk standard
- I would fix N's, let R's, sig^2's, dEo, and So^2 be variables to fit.
While sig^2 may be similar between doped and undoped, I would not assume
that no disorder has been introduced on doping. I would consider
Hi Iraida,
I am a little confused by your question.
GaAs structure has 8 atoms in unit cell with a = 5.653 Ang. If I had a
cluster 7 Ang in radius,
that won't give 900 atoms...that is a volume less than 3 x 3 x 3 unit
cells (216 atoms).
You can calculate for substitutional and interstitial
Hi Marco,
Yes, a s - d transition is dipole forbidden, but the quadrupole
transition can occur, as can a transition
s - mixed p/d. The edge position in XAFS for metals like Ni and Cu is
taken at the inflection point leading to
the first main absorption feature, but is considered to have s - d
If you can move between Nd L3 and Br K, why not stop at Nd L1 if you
want to see if a Nd s-type initial state
has any influence on the XEOL? You should not need to go up to Nd K.
Some references:
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.477320?journalCode=jcp
Try starting here:
https://www.esrf.fr/UsersAndScience/Experiments/CRG/BM20/Software/Wavelets
On 2021-11-10 6:48 p.m., 罗昕宇 wrote:
Dear IFEFFIT members,
I'm a fresh graduate student majoring in chemical engineering. I began
to learn XAFS by myself one month ago. I bought and read the book
I have Bi metal foil and Bi2O3 you are welcome to use. Data were published
in:
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp502996t|J. Phys. Chem. C2014, 118, 9696−9705
Some other standards are visible in here:
*Journal of Nuclear Materials 420* (*2012*) *116*–122 ... *D.A. McKeown et
al*.
-R.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at
When i look at the files you included, I see R-value in the first
column, then what I am assuming are
the (magnitude of) Fourier transforms of different data sets selected
for export, with vertical
displacements of 10 or 25 between each data set.
A histogram plot would involve extracting N and
In checking the literature, has anyone indicated what data collection
ranges they used, and what pre- and post-edge
regions were selected for normalisation?
Do you have more data below 2800eV that you are not showing?
Starting data collection only 50 eV or so below the edge can be
problematic
Data is just XANES at Ru L2...be better if it went to higher E for
normalisation purposes
Why are you trying to plot XANES data in k,q or R?
On 2020-12-07 7:38 a.m., Ravel, Bruce wrote:
Likeliest reason:
Are you specifying arguments for datoms.bat?
datoms [--output format] [--rmax #] [--cif --rec=#] [--wx] mydata.inp
If no input or CIF file is specified at the command line, F
in the current working directory will be used, if available.
If the C<--wx> flag for running the GUI is given, all
You might also take a look at Steve Heald's article in JSR:
https://dx.doi.org/10.1107%2FS1600577515001320
"Strategies and limitations for fluorescence detection of XAFS at high
flux beamlines"
-R.
On 2020-02-09 8:00 a.m., Christian Wittee Lopes wrote:
Hi Chris and Matt,
Thank you for
Hi Brittaney,
I downloaded the installer (in case Bruce put out a new version) and
checked. It started up fine for me.
Possible reasons why you may be having issues:
1. You might need to run the installer as administrator
2. Your antivirus program is blocking installation
good luck!
-R.
On
Hi,
Welcome to XAFS and all the excitement, thrills and adventure that implies!
First, since you are new to the subject, I would strongly recommend you
take a course
on XAFS. Many synchrotron facilities offer such - e.g. The APS/IIT
Summer school was held
last July; the SSRL course was last
Hi,
I switched your data from keV to eV before importing, and that does not
have the same issue.
-R.
On 2019-01-09 6:35 a.m., Lukas Grote wrote:
Hello,
I am reporting an apparent bug in Athena (Demeter 0.9.26, Windows 10).
When I import high energy resolution XAS data from an ascii file,
Dear Prof. Gupta,
Could you provide more information, please? This is not a useful bug report.
https://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/documents/SinglePage/bugs.html
Many researchers use this software without issue.
I have attached a test file for you to try. When you import it, please
ensure the
Attached...foil measured simultaneously in transmission on 20BM at
APS..only to about 12 invAng though.
On 2018-12-17 9:08 a.m., Lorenzo Stievano wrote:
Hi everybody,
daes anybody have in his repository a Fe K-edge XAS spectrum of
maghemite (gamma-Fe2O3)? I would need it as a reference
CdS Mu(E) measured in FLY on 20BM in 2013...no simultaneous reference for
energy calibration through...sorry...
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 8:58 AM Anatoly Frenkel <
anatoly.fren...@stonybrook.edu> wrote:
> Dear all - if someone could share raw Cd K-edge data of CdS, it would be
> really helpful!
>
Hi Weronica,
I tested this using the same scan loaded 3 times and was able to switch
without issue.
I tested this with a different additional scan on the same element, and
was able to switch without issue.
Please provide more information.
Hi Edmund,
I installed on 16.04 LTS following this:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg05851.html
though this was 2 years ago. A more recent installation, I think, did not
involve manually installing giflib-5.1.4.
-R.
On 2018-08-08 7:07 AM, Edmund Welter wrote:
Or just swap...set N's to be the So^2 from a known coordination standard
and define an amp for each shell...
e.g. So^2 = 0.8 from standard so all N's set to 0.8, and shell 1 had
amp1 in the So^2 position defined as guess,
shell2 has amp2, etc
On 2018-08-01 8:15 AM, Anatoly Frenkel wrote:
,
Haifeng
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Robert Gordon <mailto:ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca>> wrote:
Hi Haifeng,
Here's my take on what you described:
Two sample to be studied at the same edge using the same
reference. Three scans on A and three on
B are done with sim
Hi Haifeng,
Here's my take on what you described:
Two sample to be studied at the same edge using the same reference.
Three scans on A and three on
B are done with simultaneous reference.
First: compare the three reference scans for A. If they agree, then
compare the data scans. If they
changing colour:
Preferences --> gnuplot --> col7 and Set a desired colour
then apply and savedisplayed "your value" might not update
until you restart Athena, but the plot should.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Stoll, Andreas (HIU)
wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
>
> first
Not personally, but there is a spectrum of it in these:
https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/66/15/4795/484381
http://aem.asm.org/content/71/5/2331
2nd one gives white line positions for ease of comparison
On 5/1/2018 3:41 AM, desmau wrote:
Hello everyone,
would anybody have a reference XANES
Large mono glitch around k ~ 13.8 A-1 (E~3200 eV) on 4-3 perhaps?
On 4/9/2018 11:04 AM, Miller, Elizabeth Christine wrote:
Hi all,
I am analyzing some sulfur K-edge EXAFS data taken at 4-3 at SSRL.
When I use a k-weight of k^3 to plot, my oscillations at high k reach
over 100, which
Thank you, but we have measured an FeSe standard. We are seeing a small
component in one sample
that may be FeSe2-related and are looking for something to which to
compare and possibly include in
LCF.
best regards,
Robert
On 3/14/2018 10:34 AM, Yasin Deep wrote:
For Te doped FeSe we have this
Hi Folks,
Does anyone have a near-edge spectrum of FeSe2, Se K-edge, they could
share?
(Ideally with Se elemental reference measured simultaneous.)
Thanks,
-R.
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
t;
Not sure what that mean.
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Robert Gordon
<ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca <mailto:ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca>>
wrote:
When you reinstalled, did you delete the
Demeter-related di
, Robert Gordon <ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca
<mailto:ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca>> wrote:
Opens fine for me...
Have you tried the usual suspects? Accidentally minimised a
window...Restarting the computer (or log off/on)...
or sending the log file to see if there is an e
Opens fine for me...
Have you tried the usual suspects? Accidentally minimised a
window...Restarting the computer (or log off/on)...
or sending the log file to see if there is an error message...
not much to go on here...
On 2/3/2018 3:29 PM, Sheraz Gul wrote:
Can anyone please explain why
Hi,
In case you don't know where you can make this change, if you can't
start the program to edit
it via the preferences, it is in the [gnuplot] section of demeter.ini
which is in the same
directory as the log. For me, the relevant line reads:
program =
Hi Yuri,
You are probably running into the memory limit. This has been discussed
a number of times
on this mailing list, e.g.:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg03931.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg05673.html
Bruce's
Spreadsheet attached...Adobe did most of the work...
On 11/13/2017 11:13 AM, Matt Newville wrote:
Anyone up for scanning the PDF of Krause and Oliver and cleaning up
the data into machine readable values like a spreadsheet? If so, I'd
be happy to add them to the database.
--Matt
Another reference that might help:
https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.22.1615
Core-level lifetimes as determined by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
measurements
John C. Fuggle and Santos F. Alvarado
Phys. Rev. A 22, 1615 – Published 1 October 1980
X-ray photoelectron
Hi,
The documentation for Hephaestus lists the same paper as you indicated.
(Access by going to Help-Document in Heph.)
Another reference with values tabulated is:
http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.95
Natural widths of atomic K and L levels, Kα X‐ray lines and several KLL
Auger lines
Hi,
Encountered a difference on export of normalised data. Flattening does
not seem to be preserved when
saving current group as norm(E) but is when saving marked group.
Example in norm.prj attached.
original data set normalised and flattened...displaying "Normalized" as
current group or as
Hi,
I was trying to simulate Cu2O...cubic...O tetrahedrally coordinated by
Cu...Cu linearly coordinated by O.
There are two origin choices for space group 224 (Pn-3m).
If using origin choice 1, then atom positions would be
O 0,0,0
Cu 0.25,0.25,0.25
If using origin choice 2, translate by
Ramsauer-Townsend effect
Bruce gives some references at the end of this talk:
https://speakerdeck.com/bruceravel/the-ramsauer-townsend-effect-in-x-ray-absorption-spectroscopy
-R.
On 9/19/2017 2:06 AM, Shoaib Muhammad wrote:
Dear All,
I have a question that is not directly related to Athena
This already happens in Athena. It was requested back in 2014:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg04747.html
and Bruce did include energy as a column in the exported chi file in a
future release
(present in 0.9.26)...e.g.
# XDI/1.0 Athena/0.9.26
# Element.edge:
Hi Bruce,
I am not experiencing this issue. I have Athena and Inkscape both open
right now.
My environment variables list does not have FONTCONFIG_FILE in it. I
have a vague
recollection of deleting that env var some time ago when changing
versions of Demeter.
Regardless, Demeter is working
https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg06059.html
-R.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:55 PM, 이국승(에너지환경소재연구팀)
wrote:
> Dear Ifeffit users,
>
>
> I remember that one of you have posted the method how we can use
> FEFF8/FEFF9 in Demeter program.
>
>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Error using Atoms (Robert Gordon)
>2. Re: question about sigma2 and atomic distance (Robert Gordon)
>
I imagine they could, yes. Motivation to do so is another question entirely.
Considering myself more of an experienced amateur, and a fan of the
Socratic Method, let me ask you a few questions:
What do you currently understand about the relationship between two atoms
in a material and the mean
Hi Adam,
I opened the cif file you provided and Artemis/Atoms immediately gave the
atoms.inp file attached.
Running Atoms gave the feff.inpI don't see a problem.
Could you provide more detail on how you achieved this erroneous result?
i.e. step by step...
e.g. I opened Artemis v0.9.25
I
Hi Fuxiang,
Further to Bruce's note, I looked at your file. Your model splits the
nearest oxygens by only 0.01A.
Is that the magnitude of splitting you anticipate?
Are you familiar with the resolution criteria for EXAFS?
(k-range [deltak]) * (R-resolution [deltaR]) ~ pi/2 for identical near
/4/2017 11:23 AM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
On 04/04/2017 11:58 AM, Robert Gordon wrote:
Seems to be looking for gnuplot in the wrong location. Gnuplot was
installed to:
C:\Users\ragordon\AppData\Roaming\DemeterPerl\c\bin\gnuplot
not
C:\Strawberry...
Drat! I thought I had that working correctly.
You
on
https://github.com/bruceravel/WebAtoms,
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/webatoms
I don't really see the value of sifting through all that work to
figure out what had an impact on Ashis' issue. If the newer code
works -- that seems good enough to me.
B
On 04/03/2017 06:08 PM, Robert
Hi Ashis,
I can reproduce what you are seeing.
I exported the atoms.inp's for your two structures.
If I import TAA first and run atoms, it looks ok. I then import TPA and
run - ok.
I re-run Atoms on TAA, it changes.
In fact, from a clean start of Artemis 0.9.25 on win10pro/AMD64, if I
B11b in an alternate form of space group #9 (Cc or C1c1)
Atoms does take Bb as the space group, but that could be Bb11
(which does not produce an error message) with unique x-axis instead
of the unique z-axis in B11b.
My suggestion: When I use a crystal structure in Atoms,
I prefer to check the
21, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Robert Gordon <ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca
<mailto:ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca>> wrote:
Hi Fuxiang,
I tried fitting just the first shell in your data:
kmin 3.5 kmax 11.775
Rmin 1.25 Rmax 2.56
I used just Pd-Ni and Pd-Pd single scatter pa
Hi Fuxiang,
I tried fitting just the first shell in your data:
kmin 3.5 kmax 11.775
Rmin 1.25 Rmax 2.56
I used just Pd-Ni and Pd-Pd single scatter paths with one amplitude, one
E, 2 delR's and 2 sigma-squareds
for a 6 parameter fit.
I didn't let Nni or Npd vary in a fit, but did change
Hi George,
Your paths are not listed. I don't know why you cannot rerun FEFF
directly, but
you can export the feff.inp, Add it back in as a new feff calculation,
and then run it.
Discard the old path from the path list and drag the new path over to
continue.
-R.
On 12/22/2016 9:11 AM,
On 12/21/2016 12:58 PM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
On 12/21/2016 02:50 PM, Robert Gordon wrote:
So, for all but tetragonal, the orientation of the cluster can be
identified with the
orientation of the crystal axes. Does it not seem more logical to
preserve the
apparent orientation with respect to the cry
in clusters that were rotated relative to
one another. My answer, appropriate (I think) in that case, was to
shrug.
You seem to be commenting on something unrelated to the original
question, but I'm not understanding the point.
B
On 12/21/2016 01:13 PM, Robert Gordon wrote:
Hi Bruce
, Robert Gordon wrote:
What if one were to do this FEFF calculation using the POLARIZATION
card?
1 0 0 means something different if the atom positions have been rotated
by 45 degrees relative to the crystal axes along which the polarization
is defined.
Well ... you could rotate the polarization vector
Hi Bruce,
What if one were to do this FEFF calculation using the POLARIZATION card?
1 0 0 means something different if the atom positions have been rotated
by 45 degrees relative to the crystal axes along which the polarization
is defined.
-R.
On 12/16/2016 10:14 AM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
On
Hi,
I installed demeter recently under 16.04 lts. In response to Juan's
issues, I described what I did here:
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/2016-November/00.html
One additional deviation was that I had already installed gfortran and
gunplot (sudo apt install)
Hi Juan,
I can open your file. It displays without issue.
My system is amd64 with ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
The version of Demeter I cloned from git is 0.9.26 (using the git clone
instruction), mostly following the 'David Hughes' guide" from here
Hi Juan,
I just installed demeter and larch on an Ubuntu 16.04lts system today.
I can reproduce something like your error. I use the 10K Cu data in the
examples
folder.
If I import it and don't select the numerator on import, the plot window
has issues
(~10^307 axis limit), but the file
According to
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/2013-August/006762.html
limit is 8192
It is possible to rebin the data in Athena...in multiple steps...what it
first imports, then export, then
attach the missing higher E data, re-import, rebin...using a near edge
step size of
HI,
This was also reported earlier this month and Bruce has indicated it is
on his .todo list.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit%40millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg05587.html
You can use the stand alone version to prepare and save the atoms.inp file.
This file can then be imported (Add) in the
Has it occurred to you to upgrade your version (and your colleague too)?
Current version is 0.9.24.
-R.
On 6/6/2016 8:50 AM, dien...@srs.gov wrote:
Hi, All
I am using Demeter Artemis version 9.18, however, I could not open the
Artemis file that was generated from Artemis Version 9.21 from
The Sc atom does not go at 0,0,0 in hcp. That is site 2a and has another
atom at 0,0,0.5 which
is what the calculation gave. If you use position 2c (0., 0.6667,
0.2500), you get 6 nn
at 3.256A above and below the central atom.
regards,
Robert
On 5/3/2016 6:02 PM, Dimitar Popmintchev
Hi Bruce,
Sorry...should have suggested he back up the directory first. To that
end, how about adding a statement or two
to the faq along the lines of:
Make a copy of the files in the AppData\Roaming\Demeter directory for
help in diagnosing what
caused a file corruption.
-R.
On 4/11/2016
Files\DemeterPerl\perl\site\bin\dathena.bat line 47
eval {...} called at C:\Program
Files\DemeterPerl\perl\site\bin\dathena.bat line 47
--
Le 10/04/2016 07:53, Robert Gordon a écrit :
The data file?
On 4/9/2016 10:19 PM, Lorenzo Stievano wrote:
Here it is.
Le 09/04/2016 23:52, Robert
Hi Dien,
To perhaps forestall a scolding from Bruce, let me point out the
following advice on
error reporting:
https://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/pods/bugs.pod.html
RE:1. I am able to import multiple scans with reference data. My test
was to try 3 scans and
associated reference data. I am
Thanks Anatoly!
On 3/7/2016 10:14 AM, Anatoly I Frenkel wrote:
Here is the info about the upcoming XAFS short course at Brookhaven (Nov 2-4,
2016):
http://workshops.ps.bnl.gov/default.aspx?w=XAFS2016
Regards,
Anatoly
___
Ifeffit mailing list
often. I'd like to be
able to direct people to yours.
Cheers,
B
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2016, at 08:05, Robert Gordon <ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca>
wrote:
Hi All,
I have a couple of students who are novices. I was hoping that one
could go to a school
to learn and perhaps ge
Hi All,
I have a couple of students who are novices. I was hoping that one could
go to a school
to learn and perhaps get some hands-on experience before they get into
the meat of
their thesis work. I haven't seen any notices yet about schools taking
place in the late
spring or summer and was
Hi Riti,
A couple of caveats to Matt's answer:
The EXAFS equation is not simply a sum of sine functions. I can think of
two ways that the resolution criteria
can be worked around:
1. Consider the case of two close near neighbours in a single-crystal
environment whose close distances are
” and the plotting window “X11”. So I could be wrong but my
understanding is, even though X Quartz was the one installed, Athena
is utilising it as x11.
I thank you for your advice.
Wuhib
On 20 Dec 2015, at 21:01, Robert Gordon <ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca
<mailto:ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca>> wrote:
Hi
s but on Windows [Sathish on Dec, 2013 /
Shoaib May, 2015 / Martina or Robert Gordon Sep, 2015 / Eva October,
2015].
The problem that I am facing is the same as issues described before
but on Mac. So I will describe it below.
After moving to the "Deglitch and Truncate Data” window
Hi Marcelo,
How did you save the data file?
I can open Fe.060 without issue using 0.9.22 but in order to do so,
I clicked on the fe.060 link, then selected RAW and then saved as text.
If I just right-clicked and saved link as from the list page, I ended up
with
some html document.
regards,
lder" data files in the latest Athena version
(Marcelo Eduardo Alves)
2. Re: Opening "older" data files in the latest Athenaversion
(Robert Gordon)
3. Re: Opening "older" data files in the latest Athena version
(Guanghui Zhang
Hi Carolyn,
Do you see this behaviour even for standard samples, where the local
co-odination of the
zinc is known? If this is only happening for unknowns, then it could be
telling you
that you have heavier or more scatterers present than you have included
in your fitting model.
So^2, N and
spectra
already published in papers, should be the EXAFS the same or it
depends on the range for the fourier transform.
regards.
2015-11-05 18:50 GMT+01:00 Robert Gordon <ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca
<mailto:ragor...@alumni.sfu.ca>>:
Hi Carlos,
Please clarify somethings for me re
Hi Eva,
I suspect, when searching the mailing list, the recent discussion on
deglitching issues in 0.9.22
was overlooked.
e.g.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg05193.html
or
http://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg05232.html
or Bruce's
resets to qt when
restarting even though the ini file says wxt.
-R.
On 9/4/2015 11:06 AM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
On 09/04/2015 01:37 PM, Robert Gordon wrote:
I can confirm something funny is happening here. In 0.9.21, the deglitch
menu would not display
points. I upgraded to 0.9.22 today and degl
HI Nils,
My laptop has i5 (2.4GHz)/Intel/16GB running win7prox64 and I have no
issues, even with the first plot.
How many files are you trying to plot? I test with just one and
everything works fine.
-R.
On 6/25/2015 9:06 AM, Nils Skoglund wrote:
Hi,
I’m curious if anyone else is
Hi Navneet,
You have asked a rather open-ended question.
There are numerable resources available for learning about XAFS analysis
that are straightforward
to find. Setting the k-range is more specific and governed by several
factors.
The range chosen affects resolution and precision. In
Another possibility is that the L-edges of In and Sb are giving
considerable energy-dependence to
the beam in the EXAFS region...any non-linearity between detectors will
make extraction of the EXAFS
problematic. Looking at CAMD's XAS beamline mono specs
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo