Hudson build is back to normal: Lucene-Nightly #126

2007-06-18 Thread hudson
See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/126/changes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Russian Tokenizing

2007-06-18 Thread Nick Menere
Hi guys, Nick from Atlassian here. We had a customer complain that they could not search on numbers when using Russian as there indexing language. I tracked this down to the RussianLetterTokenizer. This extends the CharTokenizer and basically tokenizes on anything that isn't a letter - Chara

Re: Lucene Compression

2007-06-18 Thread Chris Hostetter
:i removed that field.but cant able to compress 20% of the original : size.when i index some fields it took almost 2:10 of the size.how can i : compress please help me in this regards. Please reread the first two sentence of the message your replied to... : > First off: please don't send que

Re: Lucene Compression

2007-06-18 Thread Sebastin
Hi, i removed that field.but cant able to compress 20% of the original size.when i index some fields it took almost 2:10 of the size.how can i compress please help me in this regards. hossman_lucene wrote: > > > First off: please don't send questions about *using* the Lucene Java > library t

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
On 19/06/2007, at 9:58 AM, Michael Busch wrote: Paul Smith wrote: Any chance of adding source jars as artifacts too? Makes the Maven Eclipse plugin rather nice. I appreciate the effort in organizing the artifacts (particularly the older versions). cheers, Paul In German we have a

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
*sigh*, with attachment this time: lucene_pom.2.patch Description: Binary data On 19/06/2007, at 11:42 AM, Paul Smith wrote:Enhanced version of previous patch.  Now compiles and executes all unit tests (although some of them are failing for me)mvn -f lucene-core.pom.xml testyou can still do a pack

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
Enhanced version of previous patch. Now compiles and executes all unit tests (although some of them are failing for me) mvn -f lucene-core.pom.xml test you can still do a package (including source distro) and skip the tests mvn -f lucene-core-pom.xml -Dmaven.test.skip=true package assem

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch
Chris Hostetter wrote: hmm... i thought i suggested before (but it may have just been in my head and never made it into an email) that the template nature of those files might confuse people, and we may want to rename them "*-pom.xml.template" so people checking out of subversion don't get confus

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
lucene_pom.patch Description: Binary data Attached is a quick patch for the lucene-core pom so that it does compile and package successfully:mvn -f lucene-core.pom.xml packageEnds up with a binary jar in the target/ sub-foldermvn assembly:assemblyCreates a source distribution in the target folde

Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-Nightly #125

2007-06-18 Thread hudson
See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/125/changes -- [...truncated 4126 lines...] [junit] Writing files byte by byte [junit] 1110 total milliseconds to read, 6826 kb/s [junit] 96 total milliseconds to delete even files

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Chris Hostetter
: We actually build with ant and use the maven-ant-tasks to deploy the m2 : artifacts. The pom.xml files in trunk are templates. The ant target : "generate-maven-artifacts" takes those templates, replaces the @version@ : by the actual version number and creates a maven dist directory where it : de

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch
Paul Smith wrote: quick check, I haven't tried the maven build system for lucene yet, but getting a clean trunk, and doing this: mvn -f lucene-parent-pom.xml -Dversion=2.2 install It appears to be ignoring the version property: Installing /workspace/lucene-svn/lucene-parent-pom.xml to /User

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
quick check, I haven't tried the maven build system for lucene yet, but getting a clean trunk, and doing this: mvn -f lucene-parent-pom.xml -Dversion=2.2 install It appears to be ignoring the version property: Installing /workspace/lucene-svn/lucene-parent-pom.xml to /Users/ paulsmith/.m2/r

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch
Paul Smith wrote: I might try and grab the trunk and see if I can work out what's needed to do that.. Paul That'd be great! In particular we need to figure out which changes to the pom.xml files are necessary. - Michael ---

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
I'm just kidding, of course! I'll try to take a look at that. However, making these artifacts was already a lot of work and I'm not sure how soon I can work on the source artifacts. I might try and grab the trunk and see if I can work out what's needed to do that.. Paul --

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch
Paul Smith wrote: Any chance of adding source jars as artifacts too? Makes the Maven Eclipse plugin rather nice. I appreciate the effort in organizing the artifacts (particularly the older versions). cheers, Paul In German we have a saying, something like "Offer them your pinky, and

Re: Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
On 19/06/2007, at 6:14 AM, Michael Busch wrote: Hello, looking at JIRA and the email archives I find several people asking us to upload Lucene to the Maven2 repository. Currently there are only the artifacts from Lucene core 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 in the repository. 1.9.1 is even incomplete, as

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch
Grant Ingersoll wrote: +1 Thanks for taking the lead on this Michael. I hate to ask you to do more when you already have done so much, but, If you have the time, can you do a post-mortem to make sure the release checklist is up to date on the Wiki with all the things you did, esp. the Maven st

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-934) Uploade Lucene 2.1 to ibiblio

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-934: - Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Uploade Lucene 2.1 to ibiblio > - > >

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-934) Uploade Lucene 2.1 to ibiblio

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch reassigned LUCENE-934: Assignee: Michael Busch > Uploade Lucene 2.1 to ibiblio > - > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Doug Cutting
Looks good to me. +1 Doug Michael Busch wrote: I just finished building the release candidate from the current 2.2 branch (rev. 548010) Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene-2.2.0/ as Lucene 2.2. A minimum of

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Grant Ingersoll
+1 Thanks for taking the lead on this Michael. I hate to ask you to do more when you already have done so much, but, If you have the time, can you do a post-mortem to make sure the release checklist is up to date on the Wiki with all the things you did, esp. the Maven stuff. Let me know

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-934) Uploade Lucene 2.1 to ibiblio

2007-06-18 Thread Brian Curnow (JIRA)
Uploade Lucene 2.1 to ibiblio - Key: LUCENE-934 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-934 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Components: Other Affects Versions: 2.1 Environm

RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-930) fail build if contrib tests fail to compile

2007-06-18 Thread Steven Parkes
Alright, I think this patch looks good. Maybe Steven could take a look as well? Then I think you can go ahead and also commit it to the 2.2 branch. Sorry; I was on vacation last week. Thanks for picking up the slack, Chris. -

Lucene upload to Maven 2 repository

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch
Hello, looking at JIRA and the email archives I find several people asking us to upload Lucene to the Maven2 repository. Currently there are only the artifacts from Lucene core 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 in the repository. 1.9.1 is even incomplete, as LUCENE-867 indicates. Therefore I ported the maven p

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 6/17/07, Michael Busch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene-2.2.0/ as Lucene 2.2. +1 Great job guys! -Yonik -

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Doron Cohen
Michael Busch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/06/2007 11:34:35: > > (3) Empty lucene-similarity jar in the bin distribution. > > > > The similarity package is still in the trunk for future contributions in > this area. > IMO this should be ok, i. e. not worth building another RC? I think it is ok

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Doron Cohen
"Michael McCandless" wrote: > OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) on Win XP Pro and was able to > unzip both src & binary without any errors. I also tested Stuffit on > Mac OS X, WinRAR on Windows 2003 Server and the "unzip" command-line > Linux utility without any issues. That's good.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Michael Busch
Doron Cohen wrote: (2) No meta-inf/license in some external jars. Well I'm not a lawyer either, but since these are 3rd party jars we can't change that, right? (3) Empty lucene-similarity jar in the bin distribution. The similarity package is still in the trunk for future contributio

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Michael McCandless
Wps! Yes, a typo. Mike "Steven Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael McCandless wrote: > > OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) ... > > Typo? Latest Winzip version is 11.1. > > > "Doron Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Found three issues: > >> (1) Zip files fail to open

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Steven Rowe
Michael McCandless wrote: > OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) ... Typo? Latest Winzip version is 11.1. > "Doron Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Found three issues: >> (1) Zip files fail to open with "my" WinZip. >> (2) No meta-inf/license in some external jars. >> (3) Empty lucene-

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Michael McCandless
OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) on Win XP Pro and was able to unzip both src & binary without any errors. I also tested Stuffit on Mac OS X, WinRAR on Windows 2003 Server and the "unzip" command-line Linux utility without any issues. Mike "Doron Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > F

Hudson build is back to normal: Lucene-Nightly #124

2007-06-18 Thread hudson
See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/124/changes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-843) improve how IndexWriter uses RAM to buffer added documents

2007-06-18 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-843: -- Attachment: LUCENE-843.take9.patch OK, I attached a new version (take9) of the patch th

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.2

2007-06-18 Thread Doron Cohen
Found three issues: (1) Zip files fail to open with "my" WinZip. (2) No meta-inf/license in some external jars. (3) Empty lucene-similarity jar in the bin distribution. More details below, but bottom line, (1) might be just my problem (?), for (2) it might be ok for those external jars not to have