On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Yohans Mendoza wrote:
> here's the piece, plese help
>
> public STable(Vector fieldsv, Vector rowsv)
> {
> originalRows = (Vector)rowsv.clone();
> rows = (Vector)rowsv.clone();
> ...
> }
> now, the problem is that when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here's the URL. Seems pretty busy, I'll try to download it tonight.
>
> http://www.sun.com/dot-com/staroffice.html
>
Thanks
Now I am going to roll with killustrator-0.6.tar.gz (standalone version)
Peter P
---
Here's the URL. Seems pretty busy, I'll try to download it tonight.
http://www.sun.com/dot-com/staroffice.html
-Jerry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> peter pilgrim wrote:
> >
> > The GIMP is great for photo image editing.
> >
> > But does anybody where I can find a decent drawing illustrator package
> > for Linux?
>
> What do you want from "decent"? StarOffice includes a drawing tool. It's
> not anywhere near the lev
peter pilgrim wrote:
>
> The GIMP is great for photo image editing.
>
> But does anybody where I can find a decent drawing illustrator package
> for Linux?
What do you want from "decent"? StarOffice includes a drawing tool. It's
not anywhere near the level of CorelDraw and such, but it's got
ca
Hi,
I'll just answer my own post in case anyone else is interested. I wrote a
little Drag-n-drop handler for JDK1.1. It just does intra-jvm dnd, but
that's all I need anyways, and as far as I can see doing anything would
require native code. I made an interface for components that want to do
Netscape's IFC (Internet Foundation Classes) support D&D. This is AKO pre-swing
library, and lacks the support enjoyed by the swing / bean market.
Mike
Robb Shecter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IBM has a set of Java Beans that enable drag and drop for Java 1.1. I'm
> checking it out right now to see if i
Hi,
IBM has a set of Java Beans that enable drag and drop for Java 1.1. I'm
checking it out right now to see if it'll work in an applet:
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/ab.nsf/jbName/E4F2891D1D606E208525674C00682447
- Robb
Hmmm seems like you try to overload a C function ;-)
printf will print a string for you, but not the object you provide it
gr. Eric
> ...
> JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_MyFunction
> (JNI Env *env, jobject my_object,jobjectArray my_array)
> {
> jobject value1 = (*env)->GetObjectArrayElem
Hi
Hope this code answers your question ..
Best of luck.
--Jools
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_MyFunction
(JNI Env *env, jobject my_object,jobjectArray my_array)
{
// It's always a good Idea to get the length of the array first.
jint len = (*env)->GetArrayLength( my_array );
// Check th
First of all this is not the proper list to ask these extremly off-topic
questions.
Secondly this list is about Java on the linux platform please keep the questions
on that topic.
By the way have you tried www.redhat.com ?
cheers
Chris
"Nagaraj S.B" wrote:
> Hi all,
> I loaded Linux RedHat6.0
"Nagaraj S.B" wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have downloaded JDK1.2pre-v2.tar.bz2 from glibc2.1.But in my linux
> system which is RH6.0 donot have bzip2 tool for unzipping the JDK1.2
> file but I have gzip.Pls tell me where I can get gzip version of JDK1.2
> or else how can I load bzip2 on my RH6.0.
> Than
Hi,
At 10:00 PM 02/07/99 , Nagaraj S.B wrote:
>Hi all,
>I have downloaded JDK1.2pre-v2.tar.bz2 from glibc2.1.But in my linux
>system which is RH6.0 donot have bzip2 tool for unzipping the JDK1.2
>file but I have gzip.Pls tell me where I can get gzip version of JDK1.2
>or else how can I load bzip2
> I think u are a little outta date. Compaq appears to be on the way of
dropping
> Alpha/NT. I also got tired of asking various vendors what other packages
are avail
> that can run on the alpha . u just cant imagine how hard it is to get
'nt' device
> drivers that will work on the alpha. Its exce
I'm sorry, but u appear to be angry
Calvin Austin wrote:
> Well you have totally missed that point, I was talking about choice of OS
> NT/Solaris/Linux for users, eg
I am aware of what I call "intel centrism". When some one says we ported to NT,
the intel part is always silent. When someone s
Uncle George wrote:
>
> u really r stupid.
No, actually, I'm not.
> The topic was porting issues, and ur notion that the .java jdk/source code cannot be
>altered to fit the port. Do i really need to say more.
> gat
I only said the platform-independent portions of the jdk source code
cannot
The original statement I made was 1) source for free, 2) JCK not so free, and 3)
distribution not so free.
the issue with the majority of ur correspondence, was ur inability to understand
that u cannot do a port if ur not allowed to modify the '.java' source code. U
apparently misled some folks
Calvin Austin wrote:
> I would just like to set some facts straight.
>
> 1. Anyone can get the full java 2 source for research, evaluation and
> internal use (which roughly equates to the previous non-commerical license
> before). You couldn't get the full source without this license before
> Jav
I have also unziped/untared it in /usr/local and then chown -R user where user
is the user you want to run it under, then move the vajide script to ~user/bin
and edit that script to give the full path to /usr/local/dir_where_you_put_vaj.
Here is my edited script:
#
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 10:19:13 -0700 (PDT), Calvin Austin wrote:
>
>I would just like to set some facts straight.
>
>1. Anyone can get the full java 2 source for research, evaluation and
>internal use (which roughly equates to the previous non-commerical license
>before). You couldn't get the full
TED]>
> CC: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please return a long/64 bits Window address. Lemme know what gets stored in in the
java int valiable "lets_store_a_32_bit_address", which has the capacity to store 32
bits. I'm sorry, I thought a fairly simply program sample would demonstrate it best.
While ur pondering this porting delima, may
I'd much perfer that you private porting club become public. Ur hiding behind
the NDA, just makes u appear to be in the marketeering pockets os SUN. This
can be exemplified by the way that the JDK 1.2 release announcement was made
by SUN before any announcements on the normal channels at blackdow
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 07:01:05 -0400, Uncle George wrote:
>1) I am not a member of java-linux-porting@blackdown. They are a private
> porting club.
You have been invited to be part of the effort. The "private" part
comes from the fact that we had to sign NDA/Contracts so that we could
start wor
Jeff Galyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And your point is...?
That you're an asshole with a long signature
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Uncle George wrote:
>
> 1) I am not a member of java-linux-porting@blackdown. They are a private porting
>club.
Then you should be talking to Sun, not java-linux.
> 2) I have been porting the Javasoft's non-commercial JDK source for a number of
>years.. But just for for alpha/linux.
And your
1) I am not a member of java-linux-porting@blackdown. They are a private porting club.
2) I have been porting the Javasoft's non-commercial JDK source for a number of
years.. But just for for alpha/linux.
3) I have also been a member of java-linux@blackdown for a number of years.
4) the change o
Uncle George wrote:
>
>
> Tell me, did Microsoft alter the published core API to suit their own
> sensibilities? I dont know, as I didnt pay much attention. Or did they just
> manipulate the back-end services.
>
As a matter of fact, they did. This is why Sun sued them - they created
something
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> But eventually someone is gonna want to try to build a >4gig file ( >
> 32bit seeks ) on the alpha/linux box.
As file offsets/lengths are specified as 64bits in
java.io.{File,RandomAccessFile}, that shouldn't be a problem. Downloading a
200Gig file to a DOS filesyste
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:39:43 -0500,
Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bola=F1os?= Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Javier> Sorry guys I know this is an off topic but the visual age site
Javier> doesn't work and I got it (the va for linux) but I need the
Javier> instalation instructions
It's pretty simple:
The distance between the core published API and the actual layer at which
system services requests are made, is very far. The is a set of .java routines
that just dont get changed, and are common between win&solaris machines. Then
there is a set of '.java' routines, that are particular to windoz,
Actually i pay attention quite well, and observe quite well. The example(s) that i
have presented to u dont seem to impress u at all. I am very sorry for u.
Can I presume that u havent looked at the diffs provided by the java-linux-porting
folks. I guess u'd be perplexed with the modest '.ja
> Cees de Groot writes:
Cees> Uncle George:
>> Actually u do have to change the '.java' files ( simply for
>> practicable convience ). Having extensive experience in porting
>> sun's JDK, I find it rather difficult to store 64bits into a
>> 32bit java int. Maybe u can rev
Uncle George:
>Actually u do have to change the '.java' files ( simply for practicable
>convience ). Having extensive experience in porting sun's JDK, I find
>it rather difficult to store 64bits into a 32bit java int. Maybe u can
>review the java-linux-porting diffs of their 1.2 port. I'd like
Jeff Galyan wrote:
> Actually, you don't need to modify the .java files, and in fact, modifying the .java
>files is strictly prohibited in the license (as such modifications could potentially
>be misconstrued by the licensee as permission to change the apis). The license does
>permit personal
Actually, you don't need to modify the .java files, and in fact, modifying the .java
files is strictly prohibited in the license (as such modifications could potentially
be misconstrued by the licensee as permission to change the apis). The license does
permit personal use of your own port. If
Thanks,
I Think that u will find that 'any' distribution, and completed port now is
considered commercial, therefor not for free ( i believe this extends even to
yourself, for personel uses ). The Non-Commercial licenses appears to have bitten the
dust when this OPENNESS was made.
A proper p
No, I think you're the one who's confused. The license *you* are
referring to is the SCSL - the source license for the VM. I'm referring
to the license agreement which accompanies the *add-on* libraries -
Java3D, Swing, etc.
--Jeff
Uncle George wrote:
>
> I think u need to reread the "open so
You mentioned earlier that you had jdk 1.1.8 non-commercial port. We will
check out what is happening with the Java 2 version. (myself or Anand)
although with Javaone here it make take a week or so to get an answer
regards
calvin
>Therefor for the Alpha/Linux platform I would like:
>1) The JCK
Therefor for the Alpha/Linux platform I would like:
1) The JCK for free for this port
2) distributions for free for this port.
gat
Calvin Austin wrote:
> For all other platforms you are correct. For Linux and the Blackdown port.
>
> 1) source is free
> 2) JCK is free for that port
> 3) distribu
I think u need to reread the "open source" licensing requirements. They appear to be
"commercial" in nature, and monetary in fact. Please extract the particular places
from the licenses which states quite clearly that "non-commercial", if there is such a
thing anymore, distribution & use is still
Your comments assume a desire to distribute the JDK itself. There are no
restrictions or fees for distributing the software you develop, nor are
you restricted from distributing the *binaries* of add-on libraries you
get from Sun (there may be some exceptions on redistributing binary jars
of class
--- Calvin Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Louis-David I will show you the code! Hop on over to
>
>
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/products/java2cs
>
> you can get all the Java 2 source code for no fee.
Ah, but what is your definition of free? Here is my
example. I was doing a litt
For all other platforms you are correct. For Linux and the Blackdown port.
1) source is free
2) JCK is free for that port
3) distribution is free for that port.
This is a stepping stone to where Linux can go with Java. I personally
want mozilla with a Java 2 VM on Linux. We can get there with th
Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 01:13:04PM +1000, Chris Kakris wrote:
> > Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > >
> > > That's because it isn't implemented in pre1 & pre2. It will work with
> > > the next release.
> >
> > Excellent. Thanks.
> >
> > Chris (kill -9 Microsoft) Kakris
I think ur notion is somewhat short sighted:
1) The source -> free,
2) The Jck -> No so free ( exceeding bogus claim that ur not smart enough to run
the tests, but ur smart enough to port it, which porting, u seem to admit it , is
a difficult task )
3) Distribution -> Not so free.
4) so wheres t
Charles Forsythe wrote:
>
> > If MS were so powerful
> > and monopolistic they would have killed Linux somehow.
>
> How? It has no parent company to drive out of business...
Yeah, I also found this claim to be suspicious. To say:
L: Linux Exists
Therefore:
M: MS is not powerful and monopo
Hi,
I find this hard to understand.
Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> MS is dominant on the desktop and consumer OS for now simply because its
> competition has been so lame and disorganized.
Sure, I think that MS has some decent software. Encarta is great. BUT,
you just can't ignore MS's pre
> If MS were so powerful
> and monopolistic they would have killed Linux somehow.
How? It has no parent company to drive out of business. Every single
user is empowered to be a develop, so they can't hire away the project
team.
Maybe they can just start killing people who use Linux.
-- Charle
Louis-David I will show you the code! Hop on over to
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/products/java2cs
you can get all the Java 2 source code for no fee. Then make a trip
to blackdown.org, you can get Java 2 releases. blackdown has the diffs
that I will be linking to make a Java 2 linux s
your O/S even
when you don't need it) don't count.
-Original Message-
From: Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, June 13, 1999 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [off-topic] stop MS bashing please (was:
Re: -Xrunhprof:cpu=times)
Louis-Davis Mitterand wrote:
>This alone defeats any argument as MS being an "evil empire". Hell, even
>MS uses Linux's success to defend themselves in their antitrust trial!
>
If one company is speaking with two tongues, it is Microsoft. To the judge
they say Linux is a threat, to their customers
>[...] OS we all love on this list, but give MS-Office 2000 a test run some day
>and you will experience one polished and really well done set of
>applications.
>
Yeah, but my dual P400 is already running Linux, so I don't have the
minimum configuration available to test O2K.
Cees (kill -HUP Bil
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 11:45:19AM +0200, Andre van Dijk wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 01:13:04PM +1000, Chris Kakris wrote:
> > > Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's because it isn't implemented in pre1 & pre2. It will work w
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 01:13:04PM +1000, Chris Kakris wrote:
> > Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > >
> > > That's because it isn't implemented in pre1 & pre2. It will work with
> > > the next release.
> >
> > Excellent. Thanks.
> >
> > Chris (kill
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Ron Resnick wrote:
[...]
> Now, none of that has any bearing on the original question
> of course, ie - would they use blackdown as their point
> of departure for Linux-based Java efforts. My own guess,
> like Nathan's, is that they would. After all, why on
> earth not?? It is
Justin Knotzke wrote:
> so maybe their attitudes have really changed. I suspect that BEA has not ported
> Weblogic to Linux because of it's reluctance to use Blackdown's VM.
Ported? Why port? I used Weblogic's JDBC drivers for MS SQL on Linux Blackdown
1.1.7 with no problems whatsoever. Worked
Ron Resnick wrote:
>
> Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> Now, none of that has any bearing on the original question
> of course, ie - would they use blackdown as their point
> of departure for Linux-based Java efforts. My own guess,
> like Nathan's, is that they would. After all, why on
> earth not?? It
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> Justin Knotzke wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see that IBM is porting Websphere to Linux. Are they going to use
> > your VM? If not, do you think they are going to port their VM to Linux?
>
> A look at their site doesn't suggest the existence of a "their VM
Justin Knotzke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see that IBM is porting Websphere to Linux. Are they going to use
> your VM? If not, do you think they are going to port their VM to Linux?
A look at their site doesn't suggest the existence of a "their VM",
other than a port of Sun's code to
Wayne wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I been trying to give a button two lines to display. How is this done?
> Things I tryed.Button mybutton = new Button ( "my\nbutton) ;
> Button mybutton = new Button ( "my" +
> "\nbutton") ;
> Button mybutton = new Butto
> Wayne writes:
Wayne> Hello,
Wayne> I been trying to give a button two lines to display. How is
Wayne> this done? Things I tryed.
Wayne> Button mybutton = new Button ( "my\nbutton) ;
Wayne> Button mybutton = new Button ( "my" + "\nbutton") ;
Wayne> Button mybu
I am not sure that you can do this with a standard Button object. You may
need to use a canvas and create your own button class.
regards,
nate
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Wayne wrote:
> Hello,
> I been trying to give a button two lines to display. How is this done?
> Things I tryed.Button mybutton
Sometimes, the problem is Netscape 4.X where X=0,1... don't support
JDK1.1.X. You can see Java Console. When you open it, shows JVM's version
which is contained in that netscape.
But, when Java Console shows JDK1.1.2 DON'T SUPPORT JDK1.1.X. ONLY IF
JAVA CONSOLE SHOWS JDK1.1.5 to JDK1.1.7
One tim
I've had the same problem..
The classpath from JDK conflicted with Netscapes.
I solved it by using a startupscript for Netscape were I specified
Netscapes classpath.
--
Martin Stenderup
Dustin Lang wrote:
>
> I'm going to perform an act of hypocrisy here, by posting an
> off-topic question, after mildly flaming others for doing the same... so
> shoot me :)
;=- Bang!
> [...] I've tested my code on as many machines
> as I have access to, but any others people could help me out
On Sun, 29 Nov 1998 17:32:54 + (GMT),
Bernd Kreimeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
...
Bernd> I agree that Java is not dead, not by far (just look
Bernd> at C++ to see how long these language developments take).
Bernd> It's not outright well either, and not because of MS FUD,
Bernd> but becaus
>I am running some RMI applications on a machine which doesn't have
>the necessary classes installed -- the RMI class loader runs out and
>grabs the ones that are needed, using the codebase property. That
>works great.
Yay mobile code!
>I wonder if I will have to obtain the javac source and hack
How about this;
Its not Ok to post off-topic to any newsgroup.
--- or ---
Those of us who get tired of filtering it manually just unsubscribe and let
this list go the way so many have before it. I'm sure the hardest working,
most dedicated people will be the first to go.
There are some things
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Ernst de Haan wrote:
> What about agreeing on prepending "OFFTOPIC: " to the subject line if
> the message neither concerns the port nor using Java on Linux? Those of
> us who want to, can filter these messages out...
Good idea in theory, but in my experience not likely to b
70 matches
Mail list logo
