On Wednesday 28 November 2001 17:10, Peter Levart wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 12:49, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
My use of the proxy generator is obviously broken. I'll look
at it after
some sleep.
Good morning!
It might be that your use of the proxy generator is not broken
Hello dear developers.
I've downloaded JBoss 3.0.
Please if you release product, see what you
write in the manifest.mf file and where you after that locates the dependences
'jar' files. And in addition , the bodies of many 'bat' fileshave an
incorrect classpaths.
Trust me, I can
Ok, since you are on the dev list you can at least specify WHAT you have to change to
get it running.
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: Arman Melkumyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] About JBoss3.0
Hello dear
JBoss
3.0 is in ... ALPHA!
Either
indicates a list of bugs/needed changes/... on the ML or on Sourceforge or, if
you want to play directly, use a 2.4.x stable release. Not an
*alpha*.
You
follow?
Cheers,
Sacha
-Message d'origine-De:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User: starksm
Date: 01/11/29 02:02:12
Modified:src/main/org/jboss Tag: Branch_2_4 Main.java
Log:
We don't need no stinking jboss.properties file. If it exists read it,
if not its not a fatal error.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
I'm gonna go and sit in my own corner in the CVS. I looked at the
CVSROOT/modules and think I figured it out -- we can add aliases and direct
the checkouts to go whatever directory names we want.
will deal with build.xml when I get that far
-- Juha
At 08:55 29.11.2001 +0100, Sacha Labourey
Bugs item #487071, was opened at 2001-11-29 05:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=487071group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Vasquez (jpvasquez)
Assigned to:
Hi developers,
In the JBoss 2.4.x releases is a bug with the pk-constraint JAWS-option. In
case of a compound primary key no constraint is generated. In the JBoss 3.0b
this is fixed. Is it possible to downport the code of JDBCInitCommand.java in
package org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jaws.jdbc for the
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Julian Gosnell
|Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:58 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] RH: running SARs unpacked ? and other questions...
|
|
|
|
|Can a sar be run unpacked - I had the
Hi Geeks
I finally could produce a URLClassLoader which can be close
therefore that the lock is released. This help us to inflate the deployed
file and overwrite the content instead of creating a copy after
the other. Unfortunately it does not seems that this can be done
under the cover but
I thought clustering was JBossHA.
-dain
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:58 AM
To: Juha Lindfors; Sacha Labourey; Jboss-Dev
Cc: Bill Burke; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott M Stark
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX vs.
On 2001.11.29 12:40:15 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
Hi Geeks
I finally could produce a URLClassLoader which can be close
therefore that the lock is released. This help us to inflate the deployed
file and overwrite the content instead of creating a copy after
the other. Unfortunately it
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/29 10:42:23
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCFindByForeignKeyCommand.java
JDBCLoadEntityCommand.java
JDBCLoadFieldCommand.java
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/29 11:09:15
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCStartCommand.java
Log:
Added support for pk constraint to relation-tables.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +15 -14
Hi David
On a possibly related question, do you know where the code we would have
to
rewrite to support urls like
jar:jar:jar:file://!!!
is? Maybe we can avoid unpacking completely!
I don't think this would work because JarFile does not allow you to
open an entry in a JarFile and
I committed a change to ServiceDeployer a couple of days ago that means you
can now add a directory to the classpath of a deployment (does that make
sense) as well as jars.
This means you should be able to simply extract your sar into a directory of
your choosing, edit the jboss-service.xml
Not being able to use URLClassLoader seems like to big a restriction
on integrated services. The web containers are too loosely integrated
to be able to replace whatever class loader type they may be using with
a JBoss specific one. Describe the change that was required in more detail.
If a
Bugs item #487071, was opened at 2001-11-29 05:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=487071group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Vasquez (jpvasquez)
Assigned to:
That is what I did:
- take java.net.URLClassLoader, sun.misc.URLClassPath class code
- added a close() method to both of them which closes the JarFile used
to investigate the archive (URLClassPath) as well as in the
JarURLConnection
used to load the files
- added my own
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/29 12:40:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCCreateEntityCommand.java
JDBCFindByPrimaryKeyQuery.java
JDBCRemoveEntityCommand.java QueryParameter.java
Log:
Fixed
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/29 12:40:06
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/ejbql SQLTarget.java
Log:
Fixed bug with FindByPrimaryKey where it was expecting an Entity parameter
instead of a pk object.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +5 -0
Is there a reason why your SAR must call the file jboss-service.xml?
If we deploy services as XML only, any name *-service.xml works, but in
a sar we require it to be jboss-service.xml
It seems kind of inconsistent.
It seems usefull to be able to make a sar contain multiple *-service.xml
files
Ok, I have done some investigation into this and I think I am understanding
the problem, I'm just not too sure of the best solution. I would appreciate
the opinion of someone who has worked with this code before.
The problem is that when a statement obtained from a given jdbc connection
throws
i am a supah stah
;)
marcf
Marc Fleury
President
JBoss Group, LLC
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
You guys better batten down the hatches. Here comes the slashdot effect.
JBoss Founder Interview
[Java] Posted by Hemos on Thursday November 29, @02:36PM
peterdaly writes The JBoss website has an interview with Marc Fleury, the
JBoss founder regarding his vision. In case you have been living
Wow. First page in slashdot with 93 comments. You guys are there.
Now only remember to prepare the jboss.org site for being slashdotted ;)
That means huge traffic.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de marc
fleury
Enviado el: jueves, 29 de
What I found ? was -it seems (when looking at the log) -that it is only the
BMP-test that has this behavior ? ... and maybe rewriting that would solve
it ? ... the result would then *only* be to hide this feature ? ... not what
We want really ...
/peter_f
on 1-11-29 21.57, David Maplesden at
The destroy logic was just changed by thedug, so the validity
of the changes needs to be justified. I would suggest backing
out the change since it seemed to be an unthinking merge from
a 2.4 change that may have no relevance to the 3.0 codebase.
There were two changes to
on 1-11-29 21.57, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and it is happening because our resource and pooling
code decides to destroy the connection when a statement
from the connection throws an error.
could it not be left open ? ... that is :
-there is a connention from pool to db ...
Yes, it was Doug's change that allowed the bug to surface, but on the face
of it Doug's change seems a valid one to me, when a managed connection is
being deleted from a pool the underlying connection should be closed. I
think Doug's change is just showing up some bad handling of the situation
The Java Mail Service raises a
ClassNotFoundException(javax.activation.DataSource) until you include the
lib/ext/activation.jar in the classpath manually.
What I did was to update the deploy/mail-service.xml file. It has a list of
the files that are to be loaded, and since the activation.jar
You probably now know more about this is implemented than anyone else at
the moment ;-). I haven't looked at this for a while but I think the
following is more or less accurate.
The problem IMHO is deciding when a fatal error has occured. When it has,
the ConnectionManager is supposed to call
On 2001.11.29 15:44:21 -0500 David Budworth wrote:
Is there a reason why your SAR must call the file jboss-service.xml?
not really, just how Marc wrote it.
If we deploy services as XML only, any name *-service.xml works, but in
a sar we require it to be jboss-service.xml
It seems kind of
I don't know if you do have to distinguish between fatal and non-fatal
errors though. If the error was fatal then the next time the underlying
connection is accessed then it will indicate this by throwing a SQL
exception of its own.
I guess this is not ideal as you want to avoid returning a
Ok, but the point is that this change broke existing tests in main
but not in 2.4 where the change was originally made. You seem
to be experiencing another side-effect of the change as the
org.jboss.test.cts.test.BmpUnitTestCase failures are SQL exceptions
regarding the fact that the connection
I want to switch create-table off by default, but the tag is being ignored.
I checked the dtd to be sure that everything's ok. Maybe it's time to
download the latest sources?
Only tell me that it works for someone out there and I'll keep trying...
jbosscmp-jdbc:=
Hi Scott
You are write WE CAN FORGET this. Whenever someone is using
the old URLClassLoader even with the new one as parent loading
of Resources locks the archive 8-(.
Sorry - Andy
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
We need more help than this to be of any use. Start with
a sample unit test that exhibits the problem and submit it
to sourceforge as a bug.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Schouten,
Sorry for posting this here, but with Slashdot raving
about JBoss, once again my concers about documentation
emerge.
What will the slashdot masses say if they are confronted
with the following message:
A free volunteer maintained manual was developed in the
early stages of JBoss. A more
Hi Geeks
Because the unlocking of files by the URLClassLoader
does not work we are back at the beginning.
I suggest these chances to JBoss Deployer:
- all deployment units gets their own directory where they
are copied/expanded there (JAR,EAR,WAR,SAR) which
is unique (maybe deploy1,
Bugs item #487071, was opened at 2001-11-29 05:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=487071group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Vasquez (jpvasquez)
Assigned to:
It should work, but I don't know. I'll check it out.
-dain
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio Coloma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Jboss Development
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Is defaultscreate-table working?
I want to switch create-table
The security integration tests fail for this release bundle, so its not a
valid distribution. I'll look at updating the release to run with the 2.4.4
beta this weekend.
[starksm@banshee build]$ ant -buildfile run_tests.xml -Dtestcase=web
run-testcase
Buildfile: run_tests.xml
run-testcase:
Does a table constraint name need to be universally unique, unique within
the table, or not unique at all?
By constraint name, I mean pkProduct and fkCategory in the SQL that follow:
CREATE TABLE product
(id VARCHAR(40),
name VARCHAR(100),
category VARCHAR(40),
...
CONSTRAINT pkProduct PRIMARY
So if this 400 page book I have in front of me, which is undergoing
author review through Sams and will be released to Flashline next
week doesn't constitute active maintenance, what does?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
I think what he's talking about is the whiny kids from slashdot seeing
the quote below (from the doco.jsp page) and loosing control of their
bowels. How much is common between the current doc (which gets dumped
from CVS nightly still, right?) and the book you're preparing?
My impression is
The book is a complete rewrite of the subjects touched on by the
online docs with extensive expansion of the material in all areas.
The model the JBoss Group is moving to is that you get the server
source for free, including its javadoc. If you want professional
documentation by the lead
Bugs item #487071, was opened at 2001-11-29 05:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=487071group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Vasquez (jpvasquez)
Assigned
User: dbudworth
Date: 01/11/29 15:10:09
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/server QueueManager.java
QueueManagerMBean.java TopicManager.java
TopicManagerMBean.java
Log:
Added JNDI name property.
Defaults to
Scott Stark wrote:
So if this 400 page book I have in front of me, which is undergoing
author review through Sams and will be released to Flashline next
week doesn't constitute active maintenance, what does?
Hi Scott,
Does the book cover any of the new JBoss 3.0 stuff? I'm trying to
So let me get this straight... When people want to know how to
use this open source product, they have the choice to either pay $50 or
read the comments in the source code?
Aaron
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
The book is a complete rewrite of the subjects touched on by the
The model for the book and documentation is that we are going to only
support the professional documentation.
Free documentation is just too hard, the guys who write it usually do it and
leave, it comes under heavy criticism still today (see theserverside.com
thread) and generally has been a
Depends on the DBMS I suppose.
But I believe that constraints are in the same namespace as the
tables in most (if not all) DMBSs so your example should work fine.
(Of course assuming the DBA didn't happen to create a PKPRODUCT table
somewhere)
As for if they need to be universally unique,
If it were a software monopolist/marketing master
website, they would offer the outdated/unmaintained
documentation for free _without any apologies_ and
offer to sell you their documentation like they are
doing you a favor. They might even allow you to BUY
the outdated documentation. In either
Also, the book is $10 for the electronic version.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jBoss Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] /. - want you to tell about my fears
So let me get this
Your free to write documentation and give it away as is anyone else.
So let me get this straight, you expect that because I write code for
free, document its API, and answer developer questions about it, I
must also write production quality documentation for free?
Scott
No, this is all about the current 2.4.x production release branch.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Luke Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jboss-development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
| So let me get this straight... When people want to know how to
|use this open source product, they have the choice to either pay $50 or
|read the comments in the source code?
yes you got a problem with that? Also what kind of math gave you $50
dollars? you stupid? we will charge $10
marc fleury wrote:
The model for the book and documentation is that we are going to only
support the professional documentation.
Free documentation is just too hard, the guys who write it usually do it and
leave, it comes under heavy criticism still today (see theserverside.com
thread)
hello,
the price is still very cheap. The documentation is always what is painfull
to keep up to date but save you hours of ramp up time. Most of the
developpers are ready to buy java books for 40$ so why not for up to date
documentation.
regards,
philippe
-Original
Ever since I have used RH it has never worked.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
It should work, but I don't know. I'll check it out.
-dain
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio Coloma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Jboss Development
Subject:
|That's fair enough - if people want to use JBoss seriously then they
|should be prepared to do this. But for someone who's having a look for
|the first time, to see what it is and how it works, the first thing
|they're going to look for is some documentation, howtos etc. Either that
|or they'll
Ok, now that we have the ability to set the JNDI name on a queue/topic,
I would like to fix the bug (that I put in) in regards to deep queue
names.
For simplicities sake, I'll just revert the file PM back to the way it
was.
But, since there was (and will be when I revert) a bug there that if
|From: David Budworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:35 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: Aaron Mulder; jBoss Developer
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] /. - want you to tell about my fears
|
|
|How I came to be using JBoss.
|
|I was working with WebLogic (downloaded trial
I suggest that you make a budworth-service.xml file with no mbeans, only
including a classpath element with the jars you want. Put this in deploy,
and voila, they will be loaded automatically. No messing with startup
classpath necessary. They can be redeployed while the server is running.
Thursday, November 29 - Scott M Stark said:
Your free to write documentation and give it away as is anyone else.
So let me get this straight, you expect that because I write code for
free, document its API, and answer developer questions about it, I
must also write production quality
That would seem to be a little too restrictive a naming requirement.
Using isJavaIdentifierPart may be more acceptable. What is the
current naming problem?
- Original Message -
From: David Budworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:22 PM
After taking a shot at implementing this, by way of making the
QueueManager and TopicManager's startService() function do the
validation and throw if it fails, I find that the MBean get's stuck in
the JMX tree.
Is this a MBeanServer bug? (where a bean doesn't go away when an
exception is thrown
hmm, it never occured to me to do that. Much better solution.
(When I wrote the script, it was when I started using RH, so I didn't
yet know about *service.xml).
I am curious though, is there a reason you don't just add lib/ext/*.jar
automagically? (as though they were specified with
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jBoss Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] /. - want you to tell about my fears
Thursday, November 29 - Scott M Stark said:
Your free to write documentation and give it
The current problem is that the queue name specified in the mbean
descriptor (Or created via the 8082 interface), get's taken literally
and used as the directory to store the persistent messages.
So:
mbean
code=org.jboss.mq.server.QueueManager
| And for the most part it's a great idea - but you really odda consider
| providing some decent enough docs at least for people to get started on,
| otherwise I imagine you'll find alot of people never getting started at
| all...
I don't get it, that is what we are talking about making a
Ok, but this is a name mapping problem that is a function of the
persistent store. Database columns/tables will also only allow
certain names. We should simply have a name mapping interface
that can be specified as an attribute of the persistence manager so
that the PMs can externalize how the
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/11/29 18:34:29
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource/adapter/jdbc/local
StatementInPool.java JDBCManagedConnection.java
Log:
My punt at fixing our jdbc connection problems. I have done two things...
1) added a listener to
User: luke_t
Date: 01/11/29 18:50:06
Modified:src/xdocs faq.xml
Log:
more faq filling ...
Revision ChangesPath
3.1 +162 -89 manual/src/xdocs/faq.xml
Index: faq.xml
===
RCS file:
what I should say clearly is that I believe a quality getting started is
important, not the rants of the current doc, but something sweet short and
to the point, 30 pages max. But a condensed version.
I want more than just a 4 pages html like david budworth said, if you look
at the current doc
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 182
Successful tests: 164
Errors:14
Failures: 4
[time of test: 30 November 2001 3:5 GMT]
[java.version:
Hi Geeks
In the JBoss Survey we have no more than 500 surveys and nearly
50 of them uses JBoss IN PRODUCTION.
What a present for Christmas !!
Have fun - Andy
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On 2001.11.29 21:06:27 -0500 David Budworth wrote:
After taking a shot at implementing this, by way of making the
QueueManager and TopicManager's startService() function do the
validation and throw if it fails, I find that the MBean get's stuck in
the JMX tree.
Is this a MBeanServer bug?
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 182
Successful tests: 166
Errors:13
Failures: 3
[time of test: 30 November 2001 3:44 GMT]
[java.version:
On 2001.11.29 21:06:27 -0500 David Budworth wrote:
After taking a shot at implementing this, by way of making the
QueueManager and TopicManager's startService() function do the
validation and throw if it fails, I find that the MBean get's stuck in
the JMX tree.
Is this a MBeanServer bug?
With David's fix - I just run-testsuite : result 182 tests with 1 error (XA)
Thanks
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
On 2001.11.29 20:57:35 -0500 David Budworth wrote:
hmm, it never occured to me to do that. Much better solution.
(When I wrote the script, it was when I started using RH, so I didn't
yet know about *service.xml).
I am curious though, is there a reason you don't just add lib/ext/*.jar
I got an improvement in the testsuite as well, but not quite that good. I
guess we still have platform differences.
David
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:51 PM
To: David Maplesden
Cc: JBossDev
Subject: Re:
I sent a big patch about a month ago [#475080] that was removing all the
unused import lines from the code. I did not get any feedback on it so I am
resending it, this time on a subset of the code (only the /server directory
from jboss-all).
The patch is at http://www.boissiere.com/diff.txt
On 2001.11.29 17:30:34 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
Hi Geeks
Because the unlocking of files by the URLClassLoader
does not work we are back at the beginning.
I suggest these chances to JBoss Deployer:
- all deployment units gets their own directory where they
are copied/expanded
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/11/29 20:23:16
Modified:src/xdocs resource.xml
Log:
added mssql atinav driver conf, thanks Alex Pavlov
Revision ChangesPath
3.3 +71 -2 manual/src/xdocs/resource.xml
Index: resource.xml
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 172
Successful tests: 156
Errors:13
Failures: 3
[time of test: 30 November 2001 4:45 GMT]
[java.version:
On 2001.11.29 23:19:11 -0500 Guillaume Boissiere wrote:
I sent a big patch about a month ago [#475080] that was removing all the
unused import lines from the code. I did not get any feedback on it so I
am
resending it, this time on a subset of the code (only the /server
directory
from
on 1-11-30 04.59, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got an improvement in the testsuite as well, but not quite that good. I
guess we still have platform differences.
ahhh ... how so ? ...
Could You check it in with a runtime OS check ? ...
/peter_f
I suggest these chances to JBoss Deployer:
- all deployment units gets their own directory where they
are copied/expanded there (JAR,EAR,WAR,SAR) which
is unique (maybe deploy1, deploy2, etc.)
DeployerMBeanSupport does this now (ExpandPackages)
- EAR,WAR and SAR files are
I created a small program in Java to do this. I'd be happy to make this
into an ant task. How would you like this to be structured?
-- Guillaume
How did you create this? What would be even better is an ant task to use
in a build target.
Anyone mind if I commit this?
david jencks
On 2001.11.30 00:14:37 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
I suggest these chances to JBoss Deployer:
- all deployment units gets their own directory where they
are copied/expanded there (JAR,EAR,WAR,SAR) which
is unique (maybe deploy1, deploy2, etc.)
DeployerMBeanSupport does
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 182
Successful tests: 166
Errors:13
Failures: 3
[time of test: 30 November 2001 5:42 GMT]
[java.version:
On 2001.11.30 00:31:10 -0500 Guillaume Boissiere wrote:
I created a small program in Java to do this. I'd be happy to make this
into an ant task. How would you like this to be structured?
I'm not sure what you mean. If it could take a (I think) fileset it would
fit into ant pretty well.
I am still blushing for the interview being posted on slashdot, it was the
guys who host our machines in denver, the wantjava guys that told me we were
on slashdot. I guess it was the spike in traffic that triggered their
alarms and they called me right away. They were all on deck expecting a
I ran accross some interesting behavior in the latest build.
I have a user admin who has roles admin and user.
I have a protected portion of the site with role user being allowed in.
Every other time admin accesses it I get an Error 403 with an Auth Failure.
When i remove the role admin
Ok, I did some research.
On my machine (linux), I can't create a bad queue name to make it throw
an exception (all chars are valid in file names).
I had already nuked my validation code, so I'll have to test a bit more
to make queue creation fail.
What I suspect is, when the new queue mbean
On 2001.11.30 01:41:18 -0500 David Budworth wrote:
Ok, I did some research.
On my machine (linux), I can't create a bad queue name to make it throw
an exception (all chars are valid in file names).
I had already nuked my validation code, so I'll have to test a bit more
to make queue
99 matches
Mail list logo
