mmmhm, RelaxNG is a superset for XML Schema. It could be handled W3C
Schema compliant and could generate standardized XSD from its own
Schema. AFAIR via XSLT.
I would suggest it because of the comfortable, easy and short way to
_get_grip_. I know of no other XML Application which could go fr
IMHO RelaxNG could be the tool to get grip with thiss issue.
bax
Am 15.11.2003 um 06:25 schrieb Ricardo Argüello:
Why not use JAXB, or BEA's XMLBeans?
Since in J2EE 1.4 deployment descriptors are specified in XML Schema,
it should be very easy to get an object model from that, using any
XML
hi adrian,
I am also interested in working in the JACC area.
I propose this roadmap:
0) Make JBoss with run with a security manager config that does not
assign all authority to all classes!
.. and i thought i was a lonely caller in the wild, or rather a catcher
in the rye :-))
thumbs up
bax
Hi all,
During my fresh and enduring experiences of porting the
3.0.4/3.0.8/3.2.1/3.2.2 to AIX 4.3.3 I have the feeling there should by
a seperation between the TBB - to be build and tested - cycle, the
configuration cycle and the lifecycle of the productive JBoss System as
a whole: the enclos
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:36:33 -0800, Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Give me an example of this meaningful description of an applied security
model
that needs to be mapped into a declarative j2ee security descriptor.
The security of the whole system, where j2ee is only a part of, is les
Thanks for pointing me at this :)
I rather think of the special JBoss.org (in my case the
not-JAAS-JavaSecurity, JMX, Service and Adapter parts) metamodel
additions. Maybe sometimes a XSLT of the spec xsd will do the trick
;-)))
thanks
bax
When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of the whol
adata and then passing the object model around?
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
...
Scott's posted some of the requirements in the past, e.g.
removing all the xml fluff. Let the container de
erent semantics on the same XML
content (XSD _is_ an XML Application). You are able to create and
transform vocabularies into each other.
Worth thinking and doing.
bax
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Holger Baxmann - bitwind
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:25 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:22, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:11 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:08, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of the whole stuff defined
in
XSD and throuw the ugly
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:08 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 01:53, Juha Lindfors wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Holger Baxmann - bitwind wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should not be
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:11 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:08, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of the whole stuff defined
in
XSD and throuw the ugly DTD's away?
Then one is able to appy XSLT on the XSD's and all migration things
belong
Am 05.11.2003 um 02:53 schrieb Juha Lindfors:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Holger Baxmann - bitwind wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should not be maintaining past versions of deployment
Am 05.11.2003 um 02:53 schrieb Juha Lindfors:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Holger Baxmann - bitwind wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should not be maintaining past versions of deployment
Am 04.11.2003 um 17:22 schrieb Bill Burke:
Posting to jbosxs-dev. Let's keep it there please!
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should not be maintaining past versions of deployment descr
... and will be open sourced until then ...
bax
Am Donnerstag, 23.10.03 um 23:25 Uhr schrieb Ken Sipe:
http://www.borland.com/news/press_releases/2003/
10_21_03_borland_launches_jb
uilderx.html
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.
anonymous login o.k.
co jboss-all timeout
bax
Am Donnerstag, 02.10.03 um 23:53 Uhr schrieb Adrian Brock:
Anybody else having problems connecting to cvs?
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
--
server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-St
t/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
ist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedi
rect.pl?keyn0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
HB> Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
HB> 41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
HB> Vom-Stein-Str. 29
HB>+49 2133
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.ne
The real question is: Does JBoss _require_ 1.4?
I hope the answer will be 'no'.
bax
Am Freitag, 28.02.03, um 15:36 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb Jeff
Haynie:
What's the reason to support JDK1.3 -- just asking, not against it.
We've been using 1.4.1 for a good while now and it seems to be much
Thanks,
Looking through the jboss website, cannot find one reference to SQL
Server.
Everything is Unix and Oracle.
Also, looking at the forums, looks like some people have tried it, but
that
it doesn't work that good.
Is Oracle better?
Unfortunately not.
But everything in a production server en
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz/
is my bet
bax
Am Sonntag, 02.02.03, um 04:46 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb jora:
OK
This is a list I'll check:
http://drools.org/index.html
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clipscpp
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jeops/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/man
HB> the remote debugging line on page 7 in the pdf docs should read:
HB> -Xdebug
-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt\_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=10250
I wrote the first version of the guide with latex and I forget to
remove
the \.
me t... arrrgh - but it works with the '\'
HB> without any space
thanks a lot for the great work.
on macosx i have had difficulties to setup the remote connection
connection to the vm revoked.
the remote debugging line on page 7 in the pdf docs should read:
-Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt\_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=10250
without any spaces and runjdwp
> I did not read SD with article, but I've browsed their code
> source a lot and I can say that :
>
> They are using mysql as RAM, why ?
>
> 1.PHP cannot share variables between scripts.
> 2.A variable lifecycle last during one request.
>
iirc, we have had a c++ kernel for some messagepassing me
Set the PS1 variable:
>
> jboss-head 746>echo $PS1
> \W \!>
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxx
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Holger Baxmann" <[EMAIL
hi scott,
here in germany no problems at all:
holgerbaxmann@Holger-Baxmanns-Computer:~ $ uname -a
Darwin Holger-Baxmanns-Computer.local. 6.3 Darwin Kernel Version 6.3: Sat
Dec 14 03:11:25 PST 2002; root:xnu/xnu-344.23.obj~4/RELEASE_PPC Power
Macintosh powerpc
holgerbaxmann@Holger-Baxmanns-Comput
thanks you julien for your explanation - now i see clearly ...
;-)
bax
> Von: julien viet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:52:35 +0100
> An: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] My fuck u
thank you, this will sum up my expiriences over the last three years with
these php guys, they have to taken seriously, because of their market
position ...
bax
> Von: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:53:48 -0500
> An: "Jboss-Develop
alent code done poorly.
>>
>> Let's do a port for now, with EJB representing the tables so that at
>> least we remove the JDBC code (or ODBC or whatever it is PHP uses) and
>> leverage some cache. It will speed www.jboss.org speed by ten.
>>
>> marcf
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
>>> Behalf Of julien viet
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:27 PM
>>> To: Holger Baxmann
>>> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the case. Direct
>&
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
>> Behalf Of julien viet
>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:27 PM
>> To: Holger Baxmann
>> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>>
>>
>> I t
hi all,
with the php thing we are back to my favoured item:
how do i describe and call a native method in the jboss semantic. same
procedure as in the embedded world.
any suggs?
bax
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterpr
lem for me.
let's do both
bax
> Von: julien viet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:14:23 +0100
> An: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
> we already tried to investigate that
Servlet server, the latter by the Java
extension.
at: http://php.benscom.com/manual/kr/ref.java.php
bax
> Von: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:57:31 +0100
> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: Re[2]: [JBo
Maybe run PHP as a servlet
> and
> BB> slowly replace PostNuke functionality with JSP/Java/EJB.
>
> BB> Bill
>
>>> -Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>>> Holger
> I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the case. Direct DB
> would still be used and slowness would still be there, PHP db
> functions would be mapped to JDBC.
>
> The problem is not PHP, it's the way PHP guys code.
>
i know, deeply: i know.
my last paid job was for a company with around 8
anybody thought about integrating php (and this way the cms-whatever-this-is
thingy) into the the containers? maybe by calling the zend engine natively?
layer rules ...
just an idea ..
bax
> Von: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:34:1
> I really don't like the idea of
> non-technical clash on jboss-developement.
>
should one open a new discussion board about this issue ?
to prevent future invention of this uncomfortable stuff unconveniently.
couldn't resist too
bax
> Regards,
> Michael Bartmann
>
>
>
> ---
chnology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Holger Baxmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] lookup th
;
>> xxxx
>> Scott Stark
>> Chief Technology Officer
>> JBoss Group, LLC
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Holger Baxmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROT
jndi.properties
simple service discovery, in this case the jndi root
bax
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxx
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Holger Baxmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
hi,
is there a possibilty to lookup the jboss jndi tree via javagroups or
similar mech from the 'client'?
if -> how?
any hint, readings, pointings, regulations concerning
will be appreciated
bax
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek
just found a new name: j2e3
java 2 embedded enterprise edition
-2ct
bax
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now!
Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks, Caffeinated Soap,
MP3 Players, XBox G
whau, great. let us invent a gui.
this is simply bull-shit. explicit and implicit bull-shit.
german: bullenscheisse.
bax
> Von: Peter Fagerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:56:52 +0100
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev
it is late in the night 2:50am, but i have the idea: why not embedded jboss?
-- ejboss --
ok, going fishing some sleep...
bax
> JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
> Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
>
> The project should look into investing in DAS
> JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
> Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
>
emboss was being mentioned by marc back in april. but it is an dna
sequencing software name too.
> The project should look into investing in DASH-O Pro to compress the
> binar
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann:
>
>> according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem
>> doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend.
>> what i am talking about is that a jboss-client
> On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
>
>> btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc)
>> which
>> is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael
>> block
>> cipher. is this
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
>
>> I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds.
>
> oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of
> - Phones
> - PDA's
> - SBC (Single Board Computers)
i do not know the structure of this bullet list is, what the
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 16.01 skrev Holger Baxmann:
>
>> embedded systems constits normally of many - some 1...k - devices,
>> clustering comes to my mind ...
>
> Yes - but lets try break embedded down some, to devise's that use a
> "Mobile
> torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
>
>> btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a
>> whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or
>> similar
>> ieee implementations.
>> Util
)
==> IEC61850
protocols:
DNP3, IEC870-5 available in the luciol project at sourceforge.net
bax
> Von: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:14:00 +0100
> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss
i understand 'it would be great, but we shouldn't do it.'
bax
> Von: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:09:46 -0600
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME
>
> Once again Peter I have no idea what you mean.
>
> -d
d handheld.
>
> -dain
>
> On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 01:56 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
>
>>> Are any of you guys interested in working on a JBossME project?
>>
>> just working in this direction - need a secure device for a mobile pki
>> ca/ra
>
> Are any of you guys interested in working on a JBossME project?
just working in this direction - need a secure device for a mobile pki ca/ra
with some java ibuttons. my constraints are:
- no os, no fs
- only jboss 4.0 - weboss kernel
- ca. 100mhz clk
- 1..16mbyte
- headless
- jca arch for drivi
my work is more targeted to the small 1..16mbyte devices, like ajile,
ds80400 and ez80. should be possible to port the cvm to this ones.
bax
> Von: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:33:20 -0600
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re:
dge about that. But I see the need
> since then jboss can run on mobile and embedded devices.
>
> So far I know 2 guys wants run jboss on embedded devices.
> Lennart and I hear from Holger Baxmann that he work in a releated area.
>
> bye
> Stefan
>
>
> I didn't know you could do that. What spec/library is this in? I want
> to read it.
>
uPnP ?
just a thought
bax
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about
your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte
Apache
http://www.opencores.org/articles?cmd=view_article&id=6
bax
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL,
click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate:
http://www.gothawte.co
Number of tests run: 899
Successful tests: 849
Errors:43
Failures: 7
[time of test: 6 September 2002 10:1 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0_00]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
witch depend on them.
bax
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Kotsbak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss modules as eclipse projects
> On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 16:41, Holger Baxma
it would be interesting to have a eclipse workspace with
compilable[ant/xdoclet]/testable[junit]/debuggable[eclipse] where the
sources still reside in cvs HEAD :-)
bax
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Kotsbak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 4
- Original Message -
From: "Holger Baxmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: [JMX-FORUM] JMX GUI
> will try to crosspost this into the jboss-dev, because clue(bax) >= 0
>
> bax
>
> > > (BTW, this is for 4.0)
is HEAD the way to 4.0 in cvs ?
bax
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?
... and runs _only_ on SUSE linux 8-)
bax
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:12 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] YAJI (Yet Another JBoss Invoker)
> Hi,
>
> I am also playing with a new invoker. Well, not rea
... and he is missing the most importend point - and is in a wondrous
manner right here - with the business jboss group llc is doing, we have
some totaly unequal revenue models then the rest of the industry.
so, we all are srewing up the old economic determinists.
they are not better off than we
... already blown away
will check if it possible to do this with the ibm j9 vm and the tini
boards and eventually with java card 2.0
Am Don, 2002-03-07 um 14.18 schrieb marc fleury:
>
> Coolness...
>
> |Let me know if you find any problems or typeos in the docs... once they
> |get updated. I
Am Son, 2002-03-03 um 12.09 schrieb Juha Lindfors:
> The spec already defines an export policy descriptor that should be used to bind a
>handle of the MBean to JNDI. If an MBean has objects it controls and wants them to be
>bound to JNDI then it should do this by itself or delegate the task to s
Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 20.24 schrieb David Jencks:
> On 2002.02.28 13:45:03 -0500 David Jencks wrote:
> > On 2002.02.28 13:19:44 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> > > > My experience with native libraries is limited, thankfully. The one
> > I
> > > have
> >
> My experience with native libraries is limited, thankfully. The one I have
> to experiment with appears to load ok with the current code. I hope
> someone else who knows more and has some will find out if anything needs
> improvement.
>
peep pep
i just working on the integration of the r
one
java-native mappings.
what i mean is a selfcontained description of things we are dealing
with.
> On 2002.02.28 09:30:58 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> > Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 14.43 schrieb David Jencks:
> > > I haven't had any problems using xsl without xsd, and am plannin
dtd on which it rely.
cu
bax
> david jencks
>
> On 2002.02.28 06:01:37 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> > another thought:
> >
> > is anybody aware of the adavntages of xsd instead of using dtd's ?
> > somebody is then able to use xsl for changing the underl
another thought:
is anybody aware of the adavntages of xsd instead of using dtd's ?
somebody is then able to use xsl for changing the underlying metadata
(i.e. jboss.xsd -> xslt -> jboss-ejb-jar.xsd -> xslt ->
any-believeable.xsd -> xslt -> my-prefered.xml).
Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 02.58 schrieb J
Am Sam, 2002-02-16 um 09.34 schrieb Sacha Labourey:
> Hello Jason,
>
> I don't know if I well understand your problem. So I will give an answer to
> *a* question, hoping it was yours ;)
>
> Situation: when you are in the folder of a particular module (let's say
> "jboss-all\build") and you type
> On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
> > I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the embedable
> > main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams to
> > deploy etc etc
> >
> > what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable i
Hi all,
If sombody is interested in working/testing jboss on s390/linux:
I have managed a setup of an JBoss installation on a
S390 Linux Community Development System
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/os/linux/lcds/
@ http://l012038.zseriespenguins.ihost.com:8082
(please use cut&
Hello tbone,
Wednesday, December 05, 2001, 2:12:40 PM, you wrote:
tfb> Yess, but i want to known wath are doing,
tfb> So what does have an auction application need,
tfb> hmm,
tfb> 1) goods: some things that are for sel (query,details)
tfb> 2) calendar: what is for sell when (with notification)
80 matches
Mail list logo
