Alive and kicking! I've been lurking out here, but awfully busy with a client using WL$...
Marc Fleury wrote:
Danch is still alive, amazing,
marcf
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools
you _are_ joking, right?
Andrew Oliver wrote:
If we forego unnecessary features from the bug tracker such as:
Fields (really just a nicety)
Search/filter on fields (nice to have but who needs it)
History (Nice to have but you only need to know that there is a bug)
Change notification for bugs
Congratulations, Bill!
-danch
Bill Burke wrote:
October 26th. 12:36 AM.
Proud dad and mom doing fine.
http://www.jboss.org/bill/burke/baby.jpg
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net
concerned with portability.
Scott, Bill, Marc - can one of you clarify?
thanks,
danch
Rahul Ganjoo wrote:
but one of the goals of JBoss 4 is to make it so developers don't have
to deal with all the J2EE APIs
from this and the discussion in general.. Jboss4 and J2EE compliance are
two entirely
who are.
Also, in a lot of cases, a certification like that can wind up as a
checklist item, and a lack of a check in that column can just force
technical people to have to waste a lot of time explaining the political
situation, which makes executives nervous...
-danch
of the JMS hullabaloo for this
purpose - it's designed for a different purpose. Also, don't make the
application coders worry about creating a thread, just provide an
aspecty-type thing so that I can plug it all together.
-danch
---
This SF.NET
If I understand you right, you're asking to propagate transactions via
JMS messages because they're not propagated via non-local EJB calls. I
think that begs the question, doesn't it?
Meanwhile the conversation has gone on to (basically) asynchronous EJB
(really AOP) calls.
Barlow, Dustin
proposing something altogether different, more akin to a one-way from
CORBA land. That's great, I love it, but referring back to how JMS does
it is just confusing the issue.
-danch
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
Understand how
on the caller's instance. Basically a workflow
style system.
exactly. that's what MOM systems are for.
-danch
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing
SSL
. What's the question, other than 'this
doesn't work in 3.x.' It should.
-danch
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing
SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click
in an event that will look an awful lot like a
process table attack to most sysadmins.
'course my sensitivity here is related to my experience on Linux and
Windows, where threads are either limited or expensive to create.
-danch
marc fleury wrote:
hmmm
I thought we had cleared the questions
I think his point was that all of the threads in the pool being used
will become polluted with whatever crap this framework put into its
thread local. At least that's what annoys me when frameworks use
threadlocal stuff (IIRC, ObjectStore did this to me at one point)
-danch
Scott M Stark
, but it's not
something I want to base an enterprise infrastructure on.
-danch
Rhett Aultman wrote:
According to what I've read from various sources
(http://www.kerneltrap.org, assorted Ingo Molnar interviews, etc), the
cost of thread creation on Linux is comparable to that of process
creation
danch wrote:
Sacha Labourey wrote:
The Object pooling question was definately settled on the side of it's
not worth it, but things like threads and sockets _are_ different in
that the underlying OS has its own limits and imposes them on us.
maybe for sockets, but not for threads: a JVM
to write a good general scheduling algorythm
than anybody writing a proprietary VM.
-danch
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing
SSL on your Apache Web
Sorry I'm getting argumentative here - I've been hammering code and my
social graces shut down.
danch wrote:
Sacha Labourey wrote:
The Object pooling question was definately settled on the side of it's
not worth it, but things like threads and sockets _are_ different in
that the underlying OS
Adam Heath wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, danch wrote:
It's not especially computation intensive, but it is resource intensive:
it consumes a process table entry. Each user is allowed only a certain
number of process table entries, and the overall system has an upper limit.
This latter point
And having a way to do that would probably be a Bad Idea. Propogating a
transaction through asynchronous transports doesn't sound like a good
idea to me, anyway.
-danch
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Just a small correction.. your example would have to be in at least 2 units
of work. There is NO WAY
for the target object, or something...
-danch
marc fleury wrote:
one of my favorite topics is coming up again
One day I will sit down and write a tx spec.
Ok frankly WHY DO WE CARE THAT MESSAGING IS ASYNCHRONOUS WITH RESPECT TO
TRANSACTION. Yeah I know the answer you could have a long running
Matt Munz wrote:
Marc,
If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never modify, throw
away when broken), script kiddie languages are great.
If not, be prepared to eat it in the long run on man
hours / maintennance.
And remember that eating used tissue-paper is never a good thing.
that, but it would be legally difficult to defend even incidental
similarities in the code base. There probably are similarities, since
both products attempt to implement the same spec.
Sorry to see you go, Andy, but this is one where pragmatics point to
listening to the lawers.
-danch
Andy wrote:
Hi
and/or village elders who can be relied on to educate
the nubies.
soapbox perspective=pragmatic style=danch-rant
It's absolutely ridiculous to do sequence diagrams that get anywhere
near the fine grained detail of code. development models where some
'design' team grinds through and produces
physical machine...
I think James had more esoteric plans...
-danch
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
So, Ben...are you hinting that your less than satisfied with the build
system? That's odd, _nobody_ _ever_ complains about the build system! ;^})
yours in sympathy,
danch
Ben Tompkins wrote:
To whom it may concern,
Here is a script that ***points vaguely*** in the direction of the
janitorial
Catalin Teodorescu wrote:
Check this link.
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:1513219::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:292016138754,%7Bprimary%7D%20and%20%7Bkey%7D%20and%20%7Bupdate%7D%20and%20%7Btable%7D%20and%20%7Block%7D
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Michael
Seeing a message like 42 is not equal to 48 (and should have been)
would help?
Jason Dillon wrote:
Don't the other Assert.* methods like Assert.assertEquals(a,b) format
the message at all? I would expect this to show a message like a was
not equal to b (and should have been).
--jason
statement gives you any actual advantage. The only thing
this actually pools are the java objects involved, and with modern
garbage collectors that doesn't buy much.
-danch
Jeffrey Wescott wrote:
In the newly-released JBoss 2.4.5, a patch was applied (#532376) to fix bug
#478882. The patch
Will it be possible to set up a CVS get + build + tests on HPUX, as
Chris has done for Linux?
thanks for your efforts,
danch
Duarte Loreto wrote:
Hello!
After a lot of help from Chris Kimpton (many thanks), I've setup and run
the tests over JBoss Branch_3_0 on a HP-UX U 9000/800
This report says 142 errors, but the HTML report it links to says 11.
What gives? The dates don't match, but is that because this email is
GMT and the HTML is server time?
-danch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number of tests run: 757
that it will compile under 1.3 (i don't see why it wouldn't, but...)
I did just do a clean checkout because the 'most' target would build for
me and I felt like it was Just Time to Do That. maybe you have an old
xdoclet or an version mismatch between ant and xdoclet?
-danch
Francisco Reverbel wrote
of these only to run into another. Did someone forget to check this
change in or should I go ahead and fix it up, or have I gone into the weeds?
thanks,
danch
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
I just finished that up. Once I figured it out, it took all of 5 minutes.
For the record, it took added a 'schema' attribute to the ejb:bean tag,
then adding the ejb-ql to a 'query' attribute of the ejb:finder tag.
-danch
Andreas Schaefer wrote:
Hi Danch
No, you are note into the weeds
rememberance of the last
time he had to 'correct' a make file for some daemon on one of his
boxes. And that's on the Unix side of things - think about NT
administrators!
Have fun - Andy
Always!
danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
will be administrable from whatever can use JMX - JSR 88
based tools, SNMP management tools, etc.
my .02$
danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
They bought Orion a while back.
David Ward wrote:
On a related note - I downloaded their OC4J app server (just being
curious, not really straying from JBoss) in mid-March and it appears to
be Orion underneath. All the xml config files are orion-this and
orion-that.
--
marc fleury
We're talking about the volunteer maintained doco. Look at the site,
http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/index.html
The title is JBoss 3.0 documentation. The disclaimer says that it was
developed early in the project and is out of date, but the date on it
is Jan 15, 2002.
danch
marc
, but if you can't look at
your own work from 9 months ago and bitch about it, what _can_ you
bitch about?
Opinions?
thanks all,
danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Sourceforge claims 0 downloads for several days now. I don't think
that's quite right.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
The former. It thoughtfully switched every line end to windoze style for
me. Sorry about that.
danch
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
How is it you managed to change every line of these files? Is something
wrong in your IDE, or was the file hosed to begin with (and you fixed it)?
-dain
Dan
loaded) is an ugly, ugly hack. An 'INFO' message that an
application has been deployed is far better. Better yet might be a JMX
notification from the deployer. At any rate, the cost of notifying on
deployment is so low that there really isn't a reason for it to not be
INFO (IMNSHO).
danch
Jason
style
and it worked, but I'm leary of checking that one in. Comments?
danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Rel tag for the script changes?
thanks,
danch
Scott M Stark wrote:
I don't use the build scripts in 2.4 to do builds. I only use Ant
1.4 and the build.xml files. If you want to update the build
scripts make them compatible with this and do not change
the build.xml files to work
I believe the one thing that the java.lang.reflect.Proxy won't do that
JBoss needs is to generate implementations of abstract classes (rather
than interfaces) this is important in a few places (EJB 2.0 CMP for one)
danch
Neale Swinnerton wrote:
I've just submitted patch 517088 to completely
JBoss has already weathered a Slashdotting or two with no problems
(according to Marc, not close to pegging CPU).
Craig Johannsen wrote:
Submitting a story to Slashdot is just as good as writing a script to waste Oracle's
add money. People complain that when their site is mentioned on
the java.lang.char issue is a JVM bug: if you have 'char' parameter the
serialization stuff pukes.
danch
Colin Thorburn wrote:
I'm using (JBoass 2.4.1 + Tomcat) reflection to have ejbCreate call an
initialisation class. This class calls ejb public members having single arguments -
byte
See, that's the problem with smart people; they think way too hard!
Dave Smith wrote:
Putting on his big shoes ...
HashMap is not syncnronized, possible another thread is modifing the
HashMap?
or
You are modifing the set inside the loop?
marc fleury wrote:
So I just spent 2 hours
The reason you might want to do that is if it costs significant
processing time to build the message that's being logged (like string
concatenation, or an expensive method call)
-danch
marc fleury wrote:
???
I have a conflict on ServiceDeployer.java
the conflict is due
Andrew Scherpbier wrote:
The object reference and method call are still performed even if nothing
gets logged. By using a simple test, that overhead is removed if it is
not needed.
This is actually a big deal. It is even better if the test can be done
on a constant, because then the
I _think_ he's changing the case of the windows batch file only, so you
should be OK.
Is the shell script marked executable now? I've gotten into the habit of
chmoding it after every major (CVS) update.
-danch
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
My fingers are in the habit of typing ./build.sh so
, this would mean that the timeout would extend accross
transactions - maybe overriding commit option B to some extent?
However, if I am remembering correctly, then the timeout should be more
like 300 seconds than 300 milliseconds.
-danch
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Does anyone remember who originally
, a wrapper application could be developed to
show developers how to tie all these features together?
That would fairly rock.
Depending on how fancy you want to be as an architectural example, it
might not be too difficult to design the components that way.
-danch
implemented the way you really would in production.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Why do they have to be commented out to _compile_ under 1.4? Am I
missing something?
Guillaume Boissiere wrote:
User: boissier
Date: 01/12/04 11:08:59
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/util TestConnection.java
Log:
* In JDK 1.4, the interface java.sql.Connection has new 12
I meant 1.3 8^\ Obviously, I was missing the 3 key.
danch wrote:
Why do they have to be commented out to _compile_ under 1.4? Am I
missing something?
Guillaume Boissiere wrote:
User: boissier
Date: 01/12/04 11:08:59
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/util TestConnection.java
for Tomcat, it gets to be a complete nightmare to figure out how to
do things.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
started, whatever it's
called) for free and charging for something professional makes perfect
sense.
Now: when is the book out (so I can put it on the shelf and piss off the
IBM weenies)
-danch
marc fleury wrote:
| And for the most part it's a great idea - but you really odda consider
is that that quote puts a bit of a pessimistic spin on it.
There's a lot of good info in the online version, and it _does_ get
better with age.
-danch
Scott M Stark wrote:
So if this 400 page book I have in front of me, which is undergoing
author review through Sams and will be released
Luke Taylor wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
There are like five hundred rules on that page. What is it specifically
flagging as a bad practice? I am actually interested.
I had a look at the page too (try searching for the word final :-).
But it doesn't really seem say more than
. Unless I'm missing something big.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Rickard Öberg wrote:
That's much better, assuming I know where the tmp directory is. And I
don't, since the name keeps changing for each deployment. :-(
Something people have been compaining about roughly forever.
___
Jboss-development
in a lot of companies where the production environment was
that separated from development - the simpler the package you can hand
over the better, since the people who support production environments
tend to be on a different planet.
-danch
___
Jboss
When we talk about 'stateless' interceptors, do we really mean
stateless, or do we merely mean stateless with regard to bean instance
and client?
-danch
Scott M Stark wrote:
Any of the interceptors can be made stateless, its a question of the cost
of reassociating the state from
, but at
the same time it's all the same. It's a nice illusion though.
Very cool, indeed. But don't knock practicality 8^})
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
FWIW, Bluestone did this. I tried to get them to stop.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
How do you compile the client code if the home/remote exists only
in the VM of the running server?
Aaron
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, marc fleury wrote:
I know there are many tools out there that do almost what
this kind of problem less likely at the
cost of slightly slower builds?
Thanks
David Jencks
On 2001.10.25 21:16:27 -0400 danch wrote:
On the current CVS, I'm getting errors like the following.
Method disassociateThread() not found in interface
javax.transaction.TransactionManager
On the current CVS, I'm getting errors like the following.
Method disassociateThread() not found in interface
javax.transaction.TransactionManager.
[javac] Transaction t1 = tm.disassociateThread();
So what am I missing?
thanks all,
danch
CMP just shouldn't update primary keys.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaws@Kpi. Com. Au [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: [JBossCMP] RE: [JBoss-dev]
this optimization.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
' edition, which is available only at cost.
Another thing that bothered me about the article was the apparent lack
of cluefulness about what open source _is_: they didn't mention the
difference in license terms or the fact that JBoss can be used by and
contributed to by anyone.
-danch
On Wed, Aug
for each
EJB, and Web war. See the documentation on jboss.xml and jboss-web.xml
for how to map the 'java:/xxx' datasource entry into the java:comp/env
namespace for a component.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Bill Burke wrote:
Man you crack me up sometimes :)
We used to have a running joke about support calls for O2K. I'm sorry, but
you're just too stupid to use our product. Please cd to /usr/local and
rm -rf o2k.
Bill
I think we've _all_ wanted to say that one time or another!
-danch
equivalent.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
transaction.
Also, if it can never happen, why ignore it?
I agree - at the very least freak out into the log, so that we know that something
'impossible' has happened.
-danch (friend of Murphy)
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
still wrote:
hi,everybody:
i use MS Access
You probably shouldn't do that.
.and i have 2 tables to work with.and i successfully load
the sun's jdbc:odbc database driver
That's probably bad too. ODBC driver (used to, anyway, when I had to use
them) be really non-threadable in a bad
missing something.
-danch
Vinay Menon wrote:
Mike,
That is a bean level datasource and quite obviously cannot be commented
out in principal! I mean if you got to have a bean level ds you got to have
one! Client programs should be able to define a datasource at the file level
i.e. applicable
, but
of the particular query you're executing.
2. For any finder method add a fetch-size deployment descriptor in jaws.
Comments ?
This makes sense to me.
It also fits in with my evil plot to do 'cursor' type things on finders.
-danch
___
Jboss-development
query. Do you want me to fix it?
D'Oh! That one I expect to not work - SQL is usually case sensitive with
the _contents_ of columns. Go ahead and fix, if you've the time.
thanks much,
danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Georg Rehfeld wrote:
Hi danch,
Does anybody know what databases are case sensitive WRT column and table
names (or even keywords). I've never run into case sensitive SQL
databases before.
MySQL too is case sensitive on database, table and index names
on a case sensitive file system
I agree with Bill - removing everything involved in the rolled-back
transaction from the cache is a must.
-danch
Bill Burke wrote:
Nope, with the old code, B would be removed from the cache when b.remove()
was called even if it was invoked from within a transaction. Also, all
beans
in an unusual order? Just guessing.
-danch
Bordet, Simone wrote:
Yo,
I'm back to real life !
I'd suggest not to use HEAD tag, it's used by CVS and does not reflect the
most recent code on the main trunk. If I remember well, just deleted files
have HEAD tag, so you will checkout them even
Does anybody know what databases are case sensitive WRT column and table
names (or even keywords). I've never run into case sensitive SQL
databases before.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bugs item #438115, was opened at 2001-07-02 19:50
You can respond by visiting:
User: danch
Date: 01/07/01 20:20:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/pool/jdbc/xa XAPoolDataSource.java
Log:
Added timeout parameter for blocking
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +6 -0 jbosspool/src/main/org/jboss/pool/jdbc/xa/XAPoolDataSource.java
Index
User: danch
Date: 01/07/01 20:29:14
Modified:src/lib jbosspool.jar
Log:
allow specification of a timeout in JDBC connection pools when blocking is enabled
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +356 -359 jboss/src/lib/jbosspool.jar
Binary file
is bad - you could be taking 20 applications down just
because 1 has a database that went down. This like inability to connect
should also be logged at error level.
If nobody objects, I'll take this on and add this feature for 3.0.
-danch.
Ferguson, Doug wrote:
Hi,
This is a thread that I
The first implementation of the read-ahead messed around with the caches
before I decided that I didn't like it and took that out.
-danch
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Jay,
Great point. Up until I started on this code, no part of JBossCMP worked
with the other container objects (cache, invoker
circuiting the interceptor chain is bad, IMHO.
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:32:32
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/readahead/interfaces - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:33:31
jbosstest/src/resources/readahead - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:34:16
jbosstest/src/resources/readahead/META-INF - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:38:05
Added: src/build/subprojects build-readahead.xml
Log:
Added tests for readahead functionality. Note that this only checks to see if they
work: it doesn't verify that it's actually performing well
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:38:05
Modified:src/build build.xml
Log:
Added tests for readahead functionality. Note that this only checks to see if they
work: it doesn't verify that it's actually performing well
Revision ChangesPath
1.37 +7 -2 jbosstest
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:38:06
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/readahead/interfaces
AddressHome.java AddressPK.java AddressRemote.java
CMPFindTestEntityHome.java
CMPFindTestEntityRemote.java
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:38:06
Added: src/resources/readahead client.policy jndi.properties
Log:
Added tests for readahead functionality. Note that this only checks to see if they
work: it doesn't verify that it's actually performing well
Revision ChangesPath
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:38:06
Added: src/resources/readahead/META-INF ejb-jar.xml jaws.xml
Log:
Added tests for readahead functionality. Note that this only checks to see if they
work: it doesn't verify that it's actually performing well
Revision ChangesPath
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:38:05
Added: src/bin readaheadtest.bat readaheadtest.sh
Log:
Added tests for readahead functionality. Note that this only checks to see if they
work: it doesn't verify that it's actually performing well
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:38:06
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/readahead/test Main.java
Log:
Added tests for readahead functionality. Note that this only checks to see if they
work: it doesn't verify that it's actually performing well
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: danch
Date: 01/06/29 21:32:14
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/readahead - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I don't know if you wanted with user configurable, but for now it will allow
you to play with different levels. I can make it static later.
static?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be better suited. If no one wants to do it, I'll look at it.
-dain
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
David Jencks wrote:
Read on - the problem with this occured to a few of us already. Although
none of us mentioned putting it in the container-transaction - that's
interesting. But what if a method at iso 'read-uncommitted' calls a
method in an iso 'serializable' transaction?
thanks,
danch
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
