Either Web Start or a standalone JAR would work. I'm not sure about
trying this with an applet, mainly because of security restrictions. (Web
Start has security restrictions as well, but you don't have to deal with
the possibility of a buggy browser JVM.)
Artur's script is a good start on this.
I think that a user-friendly install-shield-like GUI wizard for the Windows
folks would be very nice. You know, with check-boxes and Next buttons. :)
Heh, feel free to create such one. I am the one who hates GUI wizards.
If I would love them you can be sure I would prefer to use JBuilder like
Althought we're getting off the topics of installers, I say I agree,
but that doesn't mean GUI's. If emacs people like GUI's they wouldn't
be emacs people. But we need better UI for jde in general. For
example, what's with the C-c C-v keybindings? This is only one key
off from the C-x C-c
Daniel Hegyi writes:
I think that a user-friendly install-shield-like GUI wizard for the
Windows
folks would be very nice. You know, with check-boxes and Next buttons.
:)
Heh, feel free to create such one. I am the one who hates GUI wizards.
If I would love them you can be sure I
My personal opinion is that Emacs should become a little more user-friendly,
otherwise IDEs like JBuilder and WebSphere Studio Enterprise Developer WILL
take over, and Emacs will become a notepad on steroids. I don't know about
you, but I have a tough time remembering just a few function
Andrew Hyatt writes:
For example, what's with the C-c C-v keybindings? This is only one key
off from the C-x C-c binding which exits emacs. Not good.
I think the point of these keybindings is that they are easy to type.
In any case, you are right about C-x C-c being easy to inadvertantly
[This response is off topic, but it is hoped that it is useful to
someone.]
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:02:25PM -0800, Andrew Hyatt spake thus:
For
example, what's with the C-c C-v keybindings? This is only one key
off from the C-x C-c binding which exits emacs. Not good.
I agree with the
Daniel Hegyi writes:
I think that a user-friendly install-shield-like GUI wizard for the
Windows
folks would be very nice. You know, with check-boxes and Next
buttons.
:)
Heh, feel free to create such one. I am the one who hates GUI wizards.
If I would love them you can be
My personal opinion is that Emacs should become a little more
user-friendly,
otherwise IDEs like JBuilder and WebSphere Studio Enterprise Developer
WILL
take over, and Emacs will become a notepad on steroids. I don't know
about
you, but I have a tough time remembering just a few function
Gee, I really think you are being unreasonable here. I think JDE
could improve in user friendliness. A lot of things in emacs-land
can. That doesn't mean to switch to GUI's or anything. But JDE
SHOULD be user-friendly. You can have user-friendly emacs programs,
look at BBDB. It's usually
Peter Dobratz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Hyatt writes:
For example, what's with the C-c C-v keybindings? This is only one key
off from the C-x C-c binding which exits emacs. Not good.
I think the point of these keybindings is that they are easy to type.
In any case, you are
To jump into this discussion at a non-linear place, another useful addition
to the jdee would be the ability to add custom javadoc tags for xdoclet.
Xdoclet comes with a java gui tool for this (xdocletgui) which modifies the
source files. It would be considerably easier to use in emacs if the
Title: RE: jde-jalopy.el
http://home.nc.rr.com/nascifandelaine/emacs.html
Enjoy,
Nascif
-Original Message-
From: Keith Kee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jde-jalopy.el
Hi:
Is anybody working on a JDEE installer that would get ALL the
required and
optional packages (that the user selects in the setup process,
such as ECB,
Jalopy) and would set all the necessary settings (such as
jde-bug-jdk-directory, jde-jdk-registry) and some optional
settings, such as
Andrew Hyatt writes:
Althought we're getting off the topics of installers, I say I agree,
but that doesn't mean GUI's. If emacs people like GUI's they wouldn't
be emacs people. But we need better UI for jde in general. For
example, what's with the C-c C-v keybindings? This is only
Andrew Hyatt writes:
Gee, I really think you are being unreasonable here. I think JDE
could improve in user friendliness. A lot of things in emacs-land
can. That doesn't mean to switch to GUI's or anything. But JDE
SHOULD be user-friendly. You can have user-friendly emacs programs,
On Wed, 04 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emacs IS changing. The question is, is the change fast enough.
As far as I can tell, Gnus, in its infancy, used to be horrible.
Other newsreaders blew it away. Now, it does things other
newsreaders can't dream of doing.
Emacs had the issue that
Yes, JDE lacks the find-usage option, and I think it would be a nice feature to have,
its not
high on my priority list though, as Paul Kinnucan pointed out the find-expression can
be used
as a substitute. I don't understand the fuss about it - maybe it because emacs/jde
doesn't support
it that
Andy Piper writes:
Is anybody working on a JDEE installer that would get ALL the
required and
optional packages (that the user selects in the setup process,
such as ECB,
Jalopy) and would set all the necessary settings (such as
jde-bug-jdk-directory, jde-jdk-registry) and some
19 matches
Mail list logo
