Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-13 Thread Rob Seaman
patch to the field that will compromise the performance of our equipment. Regards, Chris Wahler Director of Marketing ACR Electronics, Inc. Original reply: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularly Date: December 8, 2005 2:

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Clive D.W. Feather" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : M. Warner Losh said: : > >> * A second is represented by an integer from 0 to 61; : [...] : > >> but this specification : > >> follows the date and time conventions for ISO C. : : Of course, I

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-09 Thread Daniel R. Tobias
On 9 Dec 2005 at 10:42, David Harper wrote: > On the other hand, the idea of ISO 9000 compliant Morris dancers is a > very funny one. Presumably, they'd have to standardise the size of > their pig's bladders. There's a Monty Python sketch just waiting to be > written. > > I'm guessing that their l

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-09 Thread Peter Bunclark
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Clive D.W. Feather wrote: > boundary than to deal with stuff coming in. In other words, it's easier to > only buy widgets from ISO 9000 compliant suppliers than to provide an > inbound widget quality test department. >From what I understand from some of the recent emails, you w

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-09 Thread David Harper
Clive D.W. Feather wrote: Steve Allen said: This became a long-running joke in the morris dance community. A few years back some English town councils decided to become ISO 9000 compliant. That required them to ascertain that all of their sub-contractors were also compliant. Actually, it d

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-09 Thread Clive D.W. Feather
M. Warner Losh said: > >> * A second is represented by an integer from 0 to 61; [...] > >> but this specification > >> follows the date and time conventions for ISO C. Of course, ISO C fixed this misunderstanding many years ago. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-09 Thread Clive D.W. Feather
Steve Allen said: > This became a long-running joke in the morris dance community. A few > years back some English town councils decided to become ISO 9000 > compliant. That required them to ascertain that all of their > sub-contractors were also compliant. Actually, it does nothing of the sort.

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread Mark Calabretta
On Thu 2005/12/08 15:46:48 BST, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote in a message to: LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL >You need to look even further down the foodchain, starting from the bottom: > >* First comes people who make buying decisions based on price. > >* Then comes engineers who are only in it for the mo

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ed Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : The Java Date class documentation does, at least, show reasonable : awareness of leap seconds: : :http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/Date.html : : Pity those of us who've been reading this list a

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread John.Cowan
Hornaday, Tem SPAWAR scripsit: ' > At the mad tea party in Alice In Wonderland, the prescription for a > stopped watch is to slather its innards with butter. When it is > suggested that perhaps butter wasn't the best solution, the response is, > "But it was the best butter!" That's the world we l

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread Ed Davies
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: ... Some of us have been trying to drive this point though for some time: 99.99% of all programmers have no idea what a leap-second is. ... The Java Date class documentation does, at least, show reasonable awareness of leap seconds: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread John.Cowan
David Harper scripsit: > I discovered last year that implementations of Java up to and including > Java 1.3 did not implement the correct daylight saving time rules for > the United Kingdom during the period between 27 October 1968 and 31 > October 1971 when the U.K. kept its clocks permanently on

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread Hornaday, Tem SPAWAR
these things. --Tem Hornaday GPS Engineering, at a Navy facility in San Diego -Original Message- From: Leap Seconds Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:47 AM To: LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] a system

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Seaman writes: >On Dec 7, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> ISO9000 certification only means that you have documented your >> quality assurance process. There is no requirement that your >> documentation pertains to or results in a quality product

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread Rob Seaman
On Dec 7, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: ISO9000 certification only means that you have documented your quality assurance process. There is no requirement that your documentation pertains to or results in a quality product. That was kind of my point, too. We have standards bodie

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread Randy Kaelber
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:15:08AM +, David Harper wrote: > > When even Sun Microsystems can make this kind of mistake, with all of > the resources at its disposal, Joe or Jane Programmer working for a > small company can be forgiven for not being familiar with the arcane > world of leap second

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-08 Thread David Harper
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Some of us have been trying to drive this point though for some time: 99.99% of all programmers have no idea what a leap-second is. And these are the people who program the technology that runs our civilization. The confusion runs deeper than that. I discovered las

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Rob Seaman
On Dec 7, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Some of us have been trying to drive this point though for some time: 99.99% of all programmers have no idea what a leap-second is. 100.00% of everybody live on a planet whose rotation is slowing by a couple of milliseconds per day per ce

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Conrad Poelman
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:35:04 +, "David Harper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Rob Seaman wrote: > > I don't know whether to be more embarrassed for the company or for > > the international standards process. How many companies claim ISO > > 9000 conformance? If they don't comprehend the requireme

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : ISO9000 certification only means that you have documented your : quality assurance process. : : There is no requirement that your documentation pertains to : or results in a quality product. : : One of the

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Garrett writes: >And you've gotta love the interpretation of UTC as "Universal Time Code" in >the Canadian report. If they don't understand what UTC is, or at the very >least understand that their users are going to be confused by their >misleading use of the

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Brian Garrett
- Original Message - From: "Steve Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 7:01 AM Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularly > On Wed 2005-12-07T06:59:39 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ: > > it seems that one of two things

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Rob, ISO9000 certification only means that you have documented your quality assurance process. There is no requirement that your documentation pertains to or results in a quality product. One of the Danish ISO9K consultants used to bring a ISO9000 certification case along to explain this to comp

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Steve Allen
On Wed 2005-12-07T14:56:35 +, Markus Kuhn hath writ: > As a general-purpose management standard, ISO 9001 obviously says > nothing about how you have to handle leap seconds. ISO 9001 does not > even specify any particular level of quality. All it does is tell you > how you must document what le

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread William Thompson
Steve Allen wrote: On Wed 2005-12-07T06:59:39 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ: it seems that one of two things must be true. Either the fact that the letter is dated December 5, 2005 indicates that they just now got around to acting on the July, 2005 announcement of the upcoming leap second - or,

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Rob Seaman
Upon rereading my message, I'd like to backpedal a bit. I did not intend to assert any knowledge or comprehension (or even opinion) about the company's internal operations and decision-making process. We would likely all be interested, however, if Mr. Bell were to comment on the delay between the

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Steve Allen
On Wed 2005-12-07T06:59:39 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ: > it seems that one of two things must be true. Either the fact that > the letter is dated December 5, 2005 indicates that they just now got > around to acting on the July, 2005 announcement of the upcoming leap > second - or, they acted upon

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Markus Kuhn
Rob Seaman wrote on 2005-12-07 13:59 UTC: > > http://www.acrelectronics.com/alerts/leap.htm > > Even more remarkably, they proudly proclaim: > > "The quality systems of this facility have been registered by UL to > the ISO 9000 Series Standards." > > So we have a company that manufact

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread David Harper
Rob Seaman wrote: I don't know whether to be more embarrassed for the company or for the international standards process. How many companies claim ISO 9000 conformance? If they don't comprehend the requirements of international standards pertaining to their products, how likely is it that they

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Rob Seaman
On Dec 6, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Steve Allen wrote:Finally we begin to see folks stand up and identify their systems as having abysmally failed to implement the UTC standard. http://www.acrelectronics.com/alerts/leap.htmEven more remarkably, they proudly proclaim: "The quality systems of this fa

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Ed Davies
Francois Meyer wrote: I hardly understand how it is reasonably possible to use a GPS-derived UTC without taking into account the leap second information from the GPS navigation message. Unless the unit gets the UTC-GPS offset from the receiver just once at hardboot time and then forget abou

Re: a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-07 Thread Francois Meyer
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Steve Allen wrote: > Finally we begin to see folks stand up and identify their systems > as having abysmally failed to implement the UTC standard. > > http://www.acrelectronics.com/alerts/leap.htm > > In particular, see their technical bulletin > http://www.acrelectronics.com/a

a system that fails spectacularly

2005-12-06 Thread Steve Allen
Finally we begin to see folks stand up and identify their systems as having abysmally failed to implement the UTC standard. http://www.acrelectronics.com/alerts/leap.htm In particular, see their technical bulletin http://www.acrelectronics.com/alerts/Technical%20Bulletin%202005-12%20_Leap-Second_