Re: [LU] NON-LU - Michael Benjamin?

Thanks Steve On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, 13:33 seanscribe--- via Leedslist, < leedslist@gn.apc.org> wrote: > I too was wondering how he was doing. Thanks for reaching out to him > confirm. > Cheers! > Sean > > On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 04:58:16 AM EDT, Steve Gillen < > sjgil...@gmail.com>

Re: [LU] NON-LU - Michael Benjamin?

I too was wondering how he was doing. Thanks for reaching out to him confirm. Cheers! Sean On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 04:58:16 AM EDT, Steve Gillen wrote: Hi all.. I wrote to Mike on Saturday evening enquiring after his situation and that of his family and close friends. He

Re: [LU] NON-LU - Michael Benjamin?

Hi all.. I wrote to Mike on Saturday evening enquiring after his situation and that of his family and close friends. He replied the next day that he is ok and that he and his family are not in Gaza and for the moment quite safe. He had his standard, and in the circumstances quite

Re: [LU] NON-LU - Michael Benjamin?

I believe he unsubscribed to this list a few days after quitting the Whatsapp group in a huff after the S'ton match On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 04:43, Peter Castlehouse wrote: > It's been a few days since the chaos in Israel started, and I would presume > that communications channels would be

[LU] NON-LU - Michael Benjamin?

It's been a few days since the chaos in Israel started, and I would presume that communications channels would be severely compromised throughout Israel, but the lack of news about Michael Benjamin's welfare is deafening. Michael, if this gets through to you, please let us know if you're okay?

Re: [LU] [NON LU] Techies on the list

Hi Pete, The till is connected via the local network (ethernet) I have sent an email to the supplier asking for their view too (pound to a penny they will tell me that they told all customers to upgrade ages ago - my pal's company are not exactly in the same time zone as the rest of the

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

White Sent: 25 July 2021 15:47 To: Leeds List Subject: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies. Back in the day before we had photocopiers - yes Junior, there once was such a time - we duplicated handouts, newsletters etc. on a machine with a rotating drum (I think). What was the machine and the process

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Yup Roneo Vickers was the make I remember -Duplicator was the type of machine I believe From: Leedslist on behalf of Richard Raine via Leedslist Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 3:52:09 PM To: Graham White via Leedslist Subject: Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Leedslist < > leedslist@gn.apc.org> Date: 25/07/2021 17:38 (GMT+00:00) To: Richard > Raine Cc: Graham White via Leedslist < > leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies. Was > it a Gestetner?Sent from my iPhone> On 25 Jul 2021, at 15:58,

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Leedslist Subject: Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies. Was it a Gestetner?Sent from my iPhone> On 25 Jul 2021, at 15:58, Richard Raine via Leedslist wrote:> > Roneo?> > Dr Richard Raine> E16 Respiratory Clinic> Department of Medicine> Groote Schuur Hospital> >

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Was it a Gestetner? Sent from my iPhone > On 25 Jul 2021, at 15:58, Richard Raine via Leedslist > wrote: > > Roneo? > > Dr Richard Raine > E16 Respiratory Clinic > Department of Medicine > Groote Schuur Hospital > > > > On 25 Jul 2021, at 16:47, Graham White via Leedslist >

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

In my time.before we had photocopiers we would take something down to the scribe who had a desk set up outside the temple. Bandas, mimeographspshaw! Call yoursen old fogies?! On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 4:57 PM Hedley Shaw wrote: > Banda machine > > Hedley > > On

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Banda machine Hedley On 25/07/2021, 15:58, "Leedslist on behalf of Richard Raine via Leedslist" wrote: Roneo? Dr Richard Raine E16 Respiratory Clinic Department of Medicine Groote Schuur Hospital On 25 Jul 2021, at 16:47, Graham White via Leedslist

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

I though it was called a mimeograph? > On 25 Jul 2021, at 16:38, Graham Palmer wrote: > > Banda - a quick google reveals it is spirit duplication > Graham P > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 25 Jul 2021, at 15:47, Graham White via Leedslist >> wrote: >> >> Back in the day before we had

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Banda - a quick google reveals it is spirit duplication Graham P Sent from my iPad > On 25 Jul 2021, at 15:47, Graham White via Leedslist > wrote: > > Back in the day before we had photocopiers - yes Junior, there once was such > a time - we duplicated handouts, newsletters etc. on a

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Roneo? Dr Richard Raine E16 Respiratory Clinic Department of Medicine Groote Schuur Hospital On 25 Jul 2021, at 16:47, Graham White via Leedslist mailto:leedslist@gn.apc.org>> wrote: CAUTION: This email originated outside the UCT network. Do not click any links or open attachments unless

Re: [LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Hi Graham Sounds like a banda machine! Not sure what the process was called but the main outcome was purple hands for days after using one. Jonathan Sent via BT Email App From: Graham White via Leedslist Sent: Jul 25, 2021 at 3:47 PM To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Non-Lu

[LU] Non-Lu: Calling old fogies.

Back in the day before we had photocopiers - yes Junior, there once was such a time - we duplicated handouts, newsletters etc. on a machine with a rotating drum (I think). What was the machine and the process called. Can't remember at all. Cheers Graham Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

[LU] NON LU - ZOOM

I am trying to run cub meetings via zoom, but I only have a Samsung tablet. This only allows me to see 4 room participants at a time , no way ( that I know of getting gallery view)The game we play may need kids to be 'first' to do something so i need to be able to see everyone Any suggestions

[LU] Non LU - spam emails

Just a heads up - I just got an email from Dave Walmsley, but it was one of those sneaky adopt a sender spam messages, so beware of rogue messages. Sent from my iPad ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Non LU - Cup finals

Beaten by THE only really decent team in Superleague this season. Seeing Salford knock out the pie-eaters and Cas was surely reward enough? Sent from my iPad > On 13 Oct 2019, at 09:47, Robert Heath wrote: > > Your problem is obvious...you are backing awful teams (with one >

Re: [LU] Non LU - Cup finals

Your problem is obvious...you are backing awful teams (with one exception, obvs.) On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 9:50 AM nat...@sky.com wrote: > Well I kept up my record of never seeing my team win a final yesterday > when I went to watch Salford lose to st helens > Second time I have seen

[LU] Non LU - Cup finals

Well I kept up my record of never seeing my team win a final yesterday when I went to watch Salford lose to st helens  Second time I have seen Salford lose a final (Lancashire cup a good few years ago) I have seen lancs ccc lose at Lords in a one dayer and as for Leeds United!  Villa in league

Re: [LU] Non LU: Stop Adolf Johnson

Sorry couldn't make it - I had some knitting to finish.  On Wednesday, 28 August 2019, 16:15:24 BST, Robert Heath wrote: *The Leeds for Europe group is planning a protest in the city’s City Square for Thursday evening at 5.30pm.* (Europe may be thinking a bit too far ahead, but "Leeds

Re: [LU] Non LU: Stop Adolf Johnson

Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:37:42 PM To: Robert Heath Cc: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Stop Adolf Johnson Seconded...this is taking back control to the times when feudal lords ran the show. Sent from my iPad > On 28 Aug 2019, at 16:01, Robert Heath wrote: > > *The Leeds f

Re: [LU] Non LU: Stop Adolf Johnson

Seconded...this is taking back control to the times when feudal lords ran the show. Sent from my iPad > On 28 Aug 2019, at 16:01, Robert Heath wrote: > > *The Leeds for Europe group is planning a protest in the city’s City Square > for Thursday evening at 5.30pm.* > > (Europe may be thinking

[LU] Non LU: Stop Adolf Johnson

*The Leeds for Europe group is planning a protest in the city’s City Square for Thursday evening at 5.30pm.* (Europe may be thinking a bit too far ahead, but "Leeds for the Premier League" would be a good start!) Seriously..we must all act now to save democracy.yes, even you Rich

Re: [LU] non LU - VAR & offside

Hi all, I think we should let VAR settle down first before we start making too many changes. If we accept the accuracy of the technology in the case of small offside decisions, which I think I do, I would say you are better off being 100% correct than deciding whether or not it is within

[LU] non lu var. Fwd: Rules taking over the game

totally agreedas I wrote to f365 last month: Sad. I fear we are becoming rule chasers, forgetting the game we used to love. Really, did the 'handball' that gave Liverpool the Champions League deserve to be punished with a goal? It was a maybe cross that touched his arm. Give them a free

Re: [LU] non LU - VAR & offside

y enjoyment. Jeremy From: Leedslist on behalf of ni...@sykesonline.com Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 7:31 AM To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - VAR & offside I think they should adopt a cricket-like approach. If the VAR shows that they are

Re: [LU] non LU - VAR & offside

I think they should adopt a cricket-like approach. If the VAR shows that they are only just offside, like the "big toe" scenario, then it should go with the officials' original decision. Only if it is clearly offside (above a certain margin - maybe 20cm?) should they use VAR to overrule the

Re: [LU] non LU - VAR & offside

Absolutely agree with you Dave. Offside needs clarifying/redefining. As you say 'clear daylight' and not a toe or part of a foot ahead. Equally why they need to refer to VAR when a decision is quite clear and obvious. I've seen quite clear and blatant penalties yet the ref felt she had to refer

[LU] non LU - VAR & offside

Watching the womens semi final last night it made me even more convinced that if they are going to use VAR for offside decisions they need to tweak the offside rule Both v Cameroon when it went for England and last night when it went against them the decision to overrule a goal due to the

Re: [LU] Non-LU: Techie help needed

Just read. Exactly the advice I would have passed on. I concur. Verner.(Outlook for Android) Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: John Boocock Date: 02/05/2019 16:47 (GMT+00:00) To: Graham White , leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Non-LU

Re: [LU] Non-LU: Techie help needed

Graham I think this is following a Windows 10 update, I read something about it on The Register. It didn't happen to the windows laptop I have as I had my data on a drive connected via a USB 3.0 port. You should be able to re activate the data drive by using disk management and giving the

[LU] Non-LU: Techie help needed

Hi All My PC has 2 hard drives, a SSD (drive C:) which I keep all the operating systems and programmes on and a conventional hard drive (drive E:) which I use to put all data on, pics, music etc. Problem is that drive E: has disappeared!  Any ideas as to how to recover it?  I mean it must

[LU] Non LU........... question re Chels v WH

Is Eden Hazard an alien? ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/ RIP Jimmy

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

; > Original message > > From: Nicholas Armit > > Date: 22/08/2018 08:00 (GMT+08:00) > > To: Errand Fivefold , Leeds List < > > leedslist@gn.apc.org>, Ian Murray > > Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan > > > > different subject

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

vefold , Leeds List < > leedslist@gn.apc.org>, Ian Murray > Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan > > different subject...watched the highlights back and the effort from > Phillips and Saiz for their first goal is disgraceful. No hi intensity > effort there and total ball watchi

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

Where are the highlights? Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Nicholas Armit Date: 22/08/2018 08:00 (GMT+08:00) To: Errand Fivefold , Leeds List , Ian Murray Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan different subject...watched the highlights

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

Congratulations! On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 21:02, Ian Murray wrote: > Hey all > > Very pleased to announce the fact that on Thursday my wife Nicky gave > birth to our first son and Leeds fan, Finlay (Finn) James Murray. > > Finn and I watched the Rotherham game in hospital together and he was

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Errand Fivefold Date: 22/08/2018 01:28 (GMT+08:00) To: Ian Murray , Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan WOW! Hello Finn!! Congratulations to you all. Great news! :-) Verner tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

Thanks mate :) Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Errand Fivefold Date: 22/08/2018 01:28 (GMT+08:00) To: Ian Murray , Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan WOW! Hello Finn!! Congratulations to you all. Great news

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

: Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan WOW!Hello Finn!! Congratulations to you all. Great news! :-) Verner tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl @}-,-'-- From: Ian Murray To: Leeds List Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2018, 14:02 Subject: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan Hey all Very pleased to announce

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

WOW!Hello Finn!! Congratulations to you all. Great news! :-)  Verner tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl @}-,-'-- From: Ian Murray To: Leeds List Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2018, 14:02 Subject: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan Hey all Very pleased to announce the fact that on Thursday my

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

Congratulations! Ted H ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/ RIP Jimmy

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

) -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Ian Murray Sent: 21 August 2018 14:02 To: Leeds List Subject: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan Hey all Very pleased to announce the fact that on Thursday my wife Nicky gave birth to our first son and Leeds fan, Finlay

Re: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

Ah nice one Ian! MOT  From: Leedslist on behalf of Ian Murray Sent: Tuesday 21 August 2018 13:02 To: Leeds List Subject: [LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan Hey all Very pleased to announce the fact that on Thursday my wife Nicky gave birth to our first son

[LU] Non LU - New Leeds Fan

Hey all Very pleased to announce the fact that on Thursday my wife Nicky gave birth to our first son and Leeds fan, Finlay (Finn) James Murray. Finn and I watched the Rotherham game in hospital together and he was very pleased with our performance. I am sure that he will think that us winning

[LU] NON LU: Belgium better side

Southgate has brought a lot of positive things to England in this World Cup. It may be true that Belgium are further developed and closer to their finished form, but for me, one of the greatest of Southgates' achievements was illustrated in his post match comments today after England's' 2-0

[LU] non LU - ENGLAND _ GET IN !!!

Never thought this squad would make it to the semis - but we have - great stuff and lets hope there is more to come Thought it would be experience for Euro 2020 when the present squad would be joined by the best of the u21 Toulon winning squad and the u20 and u17 world champions COME ON ENGLAND

[LU] NON LU Argentina

There it is then, Argentina through to the final 16. A great winning goal, it has to be said. Apart from a certain region of South America, I'll wager that most other hearts in the footballing world sank - or perhaps it's just me? As long as Spain don't win the Competition, especially on another

Re: [LU] Non LU:- 60th Anniversary

February 2018 15:30 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Non LU:- 60th Anniversary They may be our most-hated rivals, but I'm not going to let the anniversary of the Munich Air Crash pass without comment. In my youth, I was as guilty as any of taking the piss, for which I am ashamed. Apart from

[LU] Non LU:- 60th Anniversary

They may be our most-hated rivals, but I'm not going to let the anniversary of the Munich Air Crash pass without comment. In my youth, I was as guilty as any of taking the piss, for which I am ashamed. Apart from the football side of it, the death of those young men was a personal disaster

Re: [LU] Non LU, but still football

[mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of David Brennan Sent: 02 February 2018 15:18 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Non LU, but still football I've found a bunch of old football papers and a Jimmy Hill Soccer Annual 1969 in my loft. Some papers date back to the 50s, most are from the 60s

[LU] Non LU, but still football

I've found a bunch of old football papers and a Jimmy Hill Soccer Annual 1969 in my loft. Some papers date back to the 50s, most are from the 60s. They're not in sequence, just odd ones from years and months, just over 20 in total. There are some Book of Football, Football Monthly, Goal, and

[LU] Non LU: Boxing

May 19th -  Josh v Lee Selby at Elland Road  If you want to experience Leeds how it used to be on the day of a big game then get yoursen a ticket.  Anyone know when tickets go on sale ?  ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] Non LU but sort of Leeds related for groovy folk

It’s the first anniversary of our fab Soulful! night tomorrow night, Fri 3 Nov - soul, funk, r and all manner of danceable nuggets, played by Leeds fans ON VINYL - in fact one DJ is Theo Hudson’s Dad, one of our under 19 up and comers. So, if you’re in Harrogate, pop along to St Robert’s Club -

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

:leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe) Kicking them off? Well that’s ridiculous. Half the entertainment of this list is watching the two of them go back and forth, the sexual tension oozing from every binary digit.

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

You worry me-- sexual tension. Where's that coming from? -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Gardiner Sent: 27 October 2017 20:25 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>; Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com> Cc: 'Jeremy Thorpe' <jezz.tho...@zen.co.uk>; 'Richard Walker' <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) It may have esca

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Thorpe <jezz.tho...@zen.co.uk>; Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; Peter Castlehouse <dubca...@iinet.net.au>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Wow! My Dear Michael, I don't know what is more asto

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

Kicking them off? Well that’s ridiculous. Half the entertainment of this list is watching the two of them go back and forth, the sexual tension oozing from every binary digit. Michael A. Gardiner LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. GARDINER 110 West “A” Street, Suite 950 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone:

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

t;; 'Richard Walker' <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; 'Peter Castlehouse' <dubca...@iinet.net.au>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Friday, 27 October 2017, 13:45 Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, t

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

e- > From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of > {broken-address} Richard Walker > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 07:59 > To: Peter Castlehouse; 'Michael Benjamin'; 'Rob Heath' > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..wel

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

t; -Original Message- > From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of > {broken-address} Richard Walker > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 07:59 > To: Peter Castlehouse; 'Michael Benjamin'; 'Rob Heath' > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Fawkes time.. Hat on, Jeremy From: Leedslist <leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of Neil <nhacks...@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 9:01:35 AM To: E Walsh Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Rob Heath Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..we

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

in <m...@myray.com<mailto:m...@myray.com>>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk<mailto:rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I second getting them bac

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

<m...@myray.com>; 'Rob Heath' > <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes > responses, bloody hi

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

et.net.au>; Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: RE: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes responses, bloody h

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

07:59 To: Peter Castlehouse; 'Michael Benjamin'; 'Rob Heath' Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) throwing people off the list even for Non-LU posts ? Most entertaining posts for a while from Mad MIke IMO. Get them back on. From

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Why would I, or anyone else want to buy a book written by you, when we see the sort of stuff you write on this list, abusive, insulting racist insults, that has gone on for years and years against a lad from Leeds. Mike has done more for this world than you will ever do. You should be ashamed

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Big Terry Boocock-Cameron huh? >> Shall we have a referendum on this folks? >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John >> Boocock >> Sent: 26 October 2017 20:55 >> To: Chris Nickson <chrisni

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

eedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com> Sent: 26 October 2017 16:05 To: Graham White; Peter Castlehouse; ejwalsh Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I was infuriated by an act I de

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

.net.au>; ejwalsh <ejwa...@indigo.ie> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) I know both have been guilty in the past, but what got me last night was that, as far as I could see

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

list [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John >> Boocock >> Sent: 26 October 2017 20:55 >> To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> >> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org >> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish)

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

>> |From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt >> |Anderson >> |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM >> |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> >> |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org >> |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actual

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

ole...@hotmail.com> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) [EXTERNAL] Matt was the instigator (harmlessly no doubt) Dr Mike responded to his email I believe: |-Original Message

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

I've just noticed the "Flame Wars 'R Us" in the email trailers  From: Leedslist <leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com> Sent: 26 October 2017 15:11 To: Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

; ejwalsh; Graham White; {broken-address} Graham White; Mark Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Matt was the instigator (harmlessly no doubt) Dr Mike responded to his email I believe: |-Original Message

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Message- |From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt |Anderson |Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:30 AM |To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) | |Just n

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

s.edu.hk> > |Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > |Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > | > |Just noticed big order coming in from Israel On Thursday, October 26, 2017, 10:50:36 AM EDT, Mark <wiscole...@hotmail.com> wrote: Agree, I didn't

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

It was all very odd wasn't it? As far as I can see, Rob had a little poke at his old sparring partner with a fairly harmless (though probably ill-advised) joke about receiving book orders from Israel. Then all hell broke loose from Dr Mike, who talked about emails from Rob that suggest him

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

holas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 9:05:29 AM To: Peter Castlehouse; ejwalsh; Graham White; {broken-address} Graham White Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; Chris Nickson Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Looked t

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

> To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you > all vote on that after implementation

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

nt: 26 October 2017 20:55 > To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you > a

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you > all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here of > cours

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

.@gmail.com> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU > (ish) > > It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let > you all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here > of

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

To: Chris Nickson <chrisnicks...@gmail.com> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here of

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Boocock <j...@boocock.net> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) ​Will it be a binding referendum? And if they want to resub, who will be in charge of negotiations? Will there be a transition period? ​ On 26 October 2017 at 10:44

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

It will only be binding after I've made a decision but of course I'll let you all vote on that after implementation has occurred. (If I'm still here of course) Big Terry On 26/10/2017 10:49, Chris Nickson wrote: ​Will it be a binding referendum? And if they want to resub, who will be in

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

​Will it be a binding referendum? And if they want to resub, who will be in charge of negotiations? Will there be a transition period? ​ On 26 October 2017 at 10:44, John Boocock wrote: > Bloody hell I've only just seen all this because I too was playing Bridge > (some of

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

On it now Betty, will post the link in five minutes Pete -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John Boocock Sent: 26 October 2017 20:45 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Bloody hell I've only just seen all this because I too was playing Bridge (some of this is true) I think we should have a list referendum as to whether we should re sub them. Anyone able to set up a poll site Dr Mike Yes  / No, Rob Heath Yes / No? Theresa Boocock-Cameron Esq On

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 26 October 2017 17:59 To: Peter Castlehouse <dubca...@iinet.net.au>; 'Michael Benjamin' <m...@myray.com>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) throwing people off the

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

rg Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017, 7:18 Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Well, you have both prompted an admin response, after your non-LU rantings. This has gone too far, in every aspect, and is not good protocol in anyone's eyes. Rob and Michae

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Was it something I said? ;-)  Verner tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl @}-,-'-- From: Peter Castlehouse <dubca...@iinet.net.au> To: 'Michael Benjamin' <m...@myray.com>; 'Rob Heath' <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017, 7:18 Subjec

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

dslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Rob, I am going to get both of us thrown out. You know fine well just what you did. You pour over every post. Stop pissiing around. Why you even bother beats me. Time after time you are told—leave Isre

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

derson <m...@leeds-united.net>; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (ish) Has anybody got any clue what this lunatic is burbling on about? I think he's finally cracked. Physician, heal thyself. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Mich

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

t Anderson <m...@leeds-united.net> > *Cc:* Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com>; leedslist@gn.apc.org > > *Subject:* Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU > (ish) > > > > Re the strange contribution from Dr. Bizarro... > > > &g

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >