Chris Staub wrote:
I had a user in IRC insisting they were looking at LFS 6.4, specifically
the pdf -
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/stable/LFS-BOOK-6.4.pdf.bz2
- and that it mentioned $LFS_TGT in that command. I tried checking the
pdf myself to be certain, but I'm having
Dustin W. wrote:
Hello all,
I'm following LFS 6.4. Where do I download the files for this
section:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/linux-headers.html
? I used the wget-list to download everything else, but I don't see
it, and it's not in the package list (from
Stealth wrote:
/tools: symbolic link to '/mnt/lfs/tools'
Looks good then. If you follow everything step by step, you should be
fine. I bet you just forgot to run 'make install' with gcc-pass1 last time.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Trent Shea wrote:
On November 30, 2008 10:29:25 pm Stealth wrote:
Is there anything on this page (book 6.3 ch 5.2) that needs to be
done before going to 5.3 to follow the binutils build instructions?
Everyone has been amazingly patient with your criticism of the book.
Just for the record,
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Trent Shea wrote:
Everyone has been amazingly patient with your criticism of the book.
Just for the record, this comment is more about the historical attitude
of the LFS community, not about the questions raised.
Sorry, this sounds like it was my comment... :) What I
Greg Schafer wrote:
Simon Geard wrote:
One other thing I wonder about, in the find 6.4 book. As I noted before,
one of my earlier problems was that libtool was ending up with hardcoded
references to /tools/bin/grep, which I corrected by moving grep to be
build a little earlier. However, the
Stealth wrote:
If you are one of those growing tired of my mail don't read it, just
delete it. Save us both some aggravation. If you really want to
help and not insult, then read on. Blame Trent for this opening
paragraph.
This was unecessary.
I have arrived at the exact same place as
Chris Staub wrote:
You forgot the in the command.
Good eye. I knew it was something small like that... :)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Chris Staub wrote:
Just practice - that's been a frequent issue mentioned in the IRC
channel. Apparently a number of users assume the in that command in
the book is just the secondary bash prompt, not part of the command. I
suppose the could be moved to the end of the 1st line or
Chris Staub wrote:
As I said, I don't think it's unclear. None of the other commands in the
book (including the multi-line ones) have the bash prompt there, and as
the book says in the Typography page, all the stuff in the command
blocks is to be *typed* exactly as seen. But I guess since
Stealth wrote:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:33:05 pm Wolfgang Messingschlager
wrote:
Stealth wrote:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 02:17:30 pm Herman Gerritsen wrote:
gcc -dumpspecs | sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/tools@g' \
`dirname $(gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
and I
Stealth wrote:
Does chapter 5.1 and 5.2 actually give instruction that is supposed
to be done at that time? This is not clear to me.
Yes. The first big red (okay, pink) note labeled 'Important' in section
5.1 answers your question. Read it carefully and try again.
What I haven't found is
DJ Lucas wrote:
Stealth wrote:
I have read the book from start to chapter 5.3.1 about 6 or 7 times
trying to figure out what I missed. I don't see anything unless 5.1
and 5.2 actually have steps that I am supposed to do.
5.3
He said he was using the 6.3 book, which is why I said
Gernot Jander wrote:
What is wrong?
Just guessing, but you may need a populated /dev, too. Try:
mount --bind /dev /home/jhalfs/dev
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:53:07AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After finishing lfs install i must say the lfs is the best linux/GNU yet!
However i would be thankful if someone could clarify this:
would it be possible to skip to chapter 6 when installing glibc in 5
chapter, meaning
Jon Fullmer wrote:
Does GRUB work with Open Firmware? The Mac Mini may be Intel-based,
but it doesn't have a PC BIOS (which is what you would normally use
with GRUB). It uses Open Firmware. I would think that you would need
to use yaboot.
Careful what 'facts' you spread around here.
Jon Fullmer wrote:
Jeremy, thanks for the correction. I use LFS on a lot of Macs, but
none that new. ;-)
No problem. Sorry if it sounded gruff. It's been a wet rainy day today
and I haven't been feeling well.
I take it you use LFS on PowerPCs then? More help testing the JH branch
which
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:17:23AM -0600, Wehner y Asociados wrote:
“Stopping dhcpcd on the eth0 interface - LEASEINFO Test Failed! - dhcpcd
is not running [WARN]”
Not relevant, you were in chroot so this is from the host system's
initscripts, and anyway it isn't a
lanas wrote:
Folks,
I'm still unclear about the very simple following thing. I've built
successfully a LFS system using VmWare running a 32-bit version of
Fedora 8. That's all sweet and nice. The host is Fedora Core 6
x86_64. I'm about to embark on building a x86_64 version using CLFS
lanas wrote:
Obviously I haven't read the CLFS book from A to Z. Do you mean by
that, that it'll go natively because of the 'chroot or boot' choice,
even though there was an extra step (compared to plain LFS) at building
and using a cross-compile toolchain in the first place ?
Yes. The final
Rod Waldren wrote:
Just to satisfy my curiosity. Is there any reason not to just build a
32-bit static grub with Pure64? I realize it isn't pure at that point
but it's only to kick things off. I think I found the idea on the CLFS
lists, I just googled and found alot of references to
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:19:38AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Clyde Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the end of Chapter 6.12. I gave the following commands:
rm -v dummy.c a.out dummy.log
cd ..
rm -rf gcc-4.1.2
rm -rf gcc-build
Did I just
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:08:50PM -0600, Clyde Forrester wrote:
I think that the book's instructions place those dummy files rather
specifically,
Well, not really. The instructions take place relative to your current
working directory, which, depending on how you view it, may or may not
be
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:24:35PM +, Ross Nesbitt wrote:
i get the error message as follows:
/sources/linux-2.6.22.5/scripts/gcc-version.sh: line 11: /tools/bin/gcc: No
such file or directory
/sources/linux-2.6.22.5/scripts/gcc-version.sh: line 12: /tools/bin/gcc: No
such file or
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
* Does the community still want the LiveCD project? (Consider that a
couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS LiveCD by its nature is
degrading the quality of LFS)
* If so, is the community prepared to lend help in keeping it alive?
Thank you all for your
Jeremy Henty wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:05:28PM +, support wrote:
I guess for the livecd it'd be easier to pass it as a kernel
parameter with VGA=option.
Does VGA=... work on anything except lilo? I could never get it to
work under grub and every solution I Googled
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
So we see at least two non-empty camps. One wants a strictly minimal CD, and
one
wants packages beyond it. The most democratic solution would be to make two
CDs (and that's, in fact, the origin of the talks about package management),
but
we don't have enough
support wrote:
Multiple 'windows' don't require X, personally i logon to 2 or 3 virtual
terminals, carry out the lfs build work in terminal 1 and have a copy of
the book open via lynx in terminal 2, then i can simply select with the
mouse to highlight and right click in VT1 to paste. To open
Hello Everyone,
It has recently been suggested to me that the LFS LiveCD project be
killed. The main arguments for this are, essentially:
1) It is currently unmaintained
2) It removes the essential prerequisite of being able to configure a
Linux system
3) It leads to less testing from other
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Howard_apfc6 wrote:
- Seems like the ultimate build platform for newbs.
That's exactly what I am against. LiveCD users create 90% of support
requests.
Noobs (not to be confused with newbs) should be filtered out, e.g., by
telling
them to install and
Eric Stout wrote:
(that is, tools for raid, not the specific package raidtools.. mdadm is
much better in my opinion)
When was the last time you used the CD? mdadm has been available on it
for a long time. Or were you saying that there are other tools it is
missing?
--
JH
--
Eric Stout wrote:
But main stream distros these days have a lot more tools available to them
than the LiveCD can even dream of (simple technological fact due to the
storage capacity of the medium; CD/DVD versus HD) and typically include a
very simple means of installing what tools you don't
Wit wrote:
All MHO - inaccuracies and all.
dons flame-retardent suit and activitates fire suppression system
No need to do that, at least not on my account. That was a very
interesting response and it has given me a good deal to consider. I
enjoyed the read thoroughly.
Thank you.
--
JH
Wit wrote:
Follow the KISS principal, not the inverse KISS principal (i.e Keep it
Stupid, Simple). ;-)
Yeah, don't get me wrong, I wasn't offering to add more items. On a
related post in another list I was already proposing to make the next CD
bare-bones and design a better core system. If
support wrote:
As for community involvement, if there was an easy
way to see a list of things to be done, i'm sure more people would get
involved, at the moment the contribute page on the website doesn't offer
any way to get involved in the development.
Good point. Noted and will look into
Wit wrote:
Not to be presumptive here, but don't get the cart before the horse. I'm
sure there are many good ideas available from both you and the potential
user community. But first focus only on getting a Yea or Nay about
the desirability and viability of the project. Those who have a
Jon Fullmer wrote:
You don't need CLFS. I built a couple of systems just using a slightly
modified LFS (i.e., obviously GRUB is not needed). The first base system
was running Mandrake PPC on a beige G3 PowerMac.
The biggest difference to watch for is the name of your dynamic linker.
On x86,
Angel Tsankov wrote:
How can I put some files on the LFS Live CD?
Read the README:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/livecd/browser/tags/6.1.1-3/README
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
Ken Moffat wrote:
I think this is an old version of the book ? (certainly,
glibc-kernheaders sounds old). I'm not familiar with the Live CDs,
and slightly surprised that asm-i386 isn't there - surely the full
version of whatever is being used to supply these headers [ sounds
like the kernel,
Chris Staub wrote:
Angel Tsankov wrote:
How do I log into LFS after build and reboot?
You type your username and password.
:D
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Jeremy Byron wrote:
Thanks for the info; I'll keep this in mind for future builds. It's
certainly easier to use the '-s' flag than selectively stripping later
and might shave some time off the builds on slower systems.
FWIW, the LFS LiveCD uses '-Os -s' in its CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, so most
Testing to various lists that were closed to non-subscribers earlier
today. Please ignore.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:50:56AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) I had the CD in hand.
Which CD? The first official CD for LFS was for version 6.0. There were
a few individuals that made and released LFS-based CDs before that but
nothing that was actually part of the LFS project. Not that
fox man wrote:
note:
i have boot as /dev/hda1ext3
and root as /dev/hda4 ext3
Are you specifying the root=/dev/hda4 option in your grub settings? What
exactly is your grub configuration?
--
JH
--
Eric Stout wrote:
It would make large scale operations easier too. Instead of trying to
figure out if the manager wanted something done 8am his time or 8am your
time (or if it even matters), you would just know it has to be done at
0800hrs.
I say abolish time altogether. Who needs it? It just
Nikolai wrote:
Is it possible to build the base LFS system from a Gentoo livecd,
fetching the packages from the Windows partition?
Not really - at least, not without some major tweaking. Gentoo doesn't
include dev tools on their LiveCDs.
Have you tried the LFS LiveCD?
--
JH
--
marco van der grient wrote:
thanx for the suggestion... althoug gcc does not exist on the server
(4.0.3) and changing the packages list to the correct one, it also
search for a non-existing patch for groff... I also downloaded this one
from a different location (patches) but this conflicts
himanshu pahuja wrote:
[snip]
it say sit cant create file /toools/lib/perl5/5.8.7 permission denied
What do you do, as an experienced Linux user, whenever you get a
'Permission Denied' error? If you have met the required prerequisites
for the LFS book, you should be able to figure this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
I'm having problems installing binutils in book 6.0
I get the following error
checking host system type ...i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type ...i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type ...i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for bsd compatible install
Julien Lecomte wrote:
How do I know it's mounted and used ?
cat /proc/swaps
cat /proc/meminfo
How can I turn on logging of the boot process to a file so I can check
what happens ? Must I modify the 'functions' file in /etc/rc.d/init.d to
turn on boot logging or is there an easier way ?
Shivkumar Iyer wrote:
I compiled LFS 5.0 long time back when I had a Debian
Sarge system and a Pentium IV processor but this my
first attemp with a 64-bit system. Can anyone suggest
anything?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/clfs/
--
JH
--
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Sorry, this is an important issue. The expect people took 5.43.0 off
of their web page, and we haven't tested the newer ones. In the
meantime, you can download it from here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~randy/expect-5.43.0.tar.gz
It would probably be better if we
Josh wrote:
hda is my Windows XP, without which, i couldn't have joined this
mailing list or search for information online. I chose to completely
preserve the MBR (and all of my first hard drive) as it is my lifeline
if something goes wrong. The next task at hand is to figure out how to
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Matt Darcy wrote these words on 01/31/06 09:28 CST:
http://redora.redhat.com
It looks like that dog in the old Jetsons cartoon typed this.
What was its name, Astro? :-)
Ruh roh.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
mrdaniel wrote:
hi,
i got another situation here that the following messages appeared in the boot
process :-
starting system log daemon ...
nice: syslogd: no such file or directory
starting kernel log daemon
nice: klogd: no such file or directoty.
we had checked and the
Jeremy Monnet wrote:
Ah yes, one other question: is it possible to configure the network otherwise
on the LiveCD? I have a small home network, with 192.168.1.1 acting as a
gateway. We're on dialup here, and the connection is shared via IP
masquerading. How could I attribute a static IP
mrdaniel wrote:
[1] in ch 6.21.1, pg114 - ncurses-5.4, doing the link line :-
ln -sfv libncurses.so /usr/lib/libcurses.so
note that the 'n' is not present in the word after /lib.
so i added the 'n' into libcurses becomes and it became libucurses.
is it ok.
No. libncurses.so is the real
mrdaniel wrote:
and i had already go all the way to the end of ch6, pg 190
what do i need to do to get back that link without breaking anything.
Install Fedora Core.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Paul G Rogers wrote:
Yes, I suppose so. Why so much resistance to putting a copy of the book
outside in the sources directory? Isn't it trivial to do? It would
certainly help users, if that's important. I still run my 486 everyday
and it can't boot a CD, but it CAN copy files out.
mrdaniel wrote:
its the order of the day, will do and will come back with LFS related matters.
And before you post to this list again, please read the following link:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/index.html#netiquette
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
Hari wrote:
PS. If this message of mine is against the majority of what this
community feels, I take it back.
No, it's agreed. There's always lfs-chat if you're feeling chatty. Also
our channels in IRC are a little bit more informal in nature. However,
if you ask for support in IRC, be
Dan McGhee wrote:
export INPUTRC=/etc/inputrc to export INPUTRC=/etc/profile
:) Good one. I'm sure I've done worse.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I suggest that in future releases the LiveCD also contains the book
relevant for each specific release?
Um, the CDs already do. Read the greeting at the initial console prompt. :)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Rainer Peter Feller wrote:
On the other hand, it is not me who has anything to say :-)
Sure it is. :) You don't have to be an editor to have your opinion
count. LFS needs more of its community to speak up and voice opinions on
issues like this. Thanks for the comments, Rainer.
--
JH
--
David Lyne wrote:
But... surely $LFS/sources does not exist once you've chrooted. The
directory containing sources is now just /sources.
I see what you're thinking, but after chrooting, unless you explicitly
set LFS again, that variable is empty. So $LFS/sources should still
resolve to
Clemens HAUPT wrote:
While searching and seaching
I found that:
Is it of any use?
Seriously, you'd get more support if you didn't use attachments, or if
you do, use non-compressed text attachments.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Clemens HAUPT wrote:
FATAL: kernel too old
make[2]: *** [/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.stmp] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/sunrpc'
make[1]: *** [sunrpc/others] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4'
make: ***
Clemens HAUPT wrote:
Absolutly right. BUT!
You can't do anything with all this nice packages, they are all of
no use. One might present them to grandma, but neither oneself
nor grandma can do anything with it when you don't have
a LINUX Kernel not 2.6 on a single machine.
The liveCD in
tcp wrote:
Trying to install from the livecd v. 6.1.1.3 stable version and also the
6.2 pre2 version using the ALFS script but I cannot seem to be able to
get pass the binutils compiling. If I am able to get pass the binutils I
get the same error when it tries to compile the glibc-2.3.4.
Jim Gifford wrote:
Is your time on your computer ok, I've seen this happen only if the
clock is skewed.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/index.html#netiquette
Specifically,
Trim quoted text, especially signatures. But do not trim so that it is
confusing to read your reply without
Michiel Faber wrote:
How you guys solve this? Of course i can do everything as root, but i
learned; only use root when you have to
man su
man chroot
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Richard A Downing wrote:
sudo - nice package, solves the problem of scripting su. It's not in
BLFS (but should be), however it's a straight CMMI package.
Yes it is. :D
Recent addition.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/sudo.html
--
JH
--
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Isn't this discussion somewhat moot (unless it is pertaining to
building BLFS packages) as in LFS you are either:
1) the LFS user (no harm can be done)
or
2) the root user in a chroot environment (no harm can be done).
The discussion isn't about whether you *should*
Randy McMurchy wrote:
So, only if the root account is compromised can it be dangerous.
And, if root is compromised, you're already in big trouble.
Not quite.
Scenario:
User is given access via sudo to run all root commands but without
requiring a password. User logs in to machine. User gets
Randy McMurchy wrote:
So, because I've never needed to do it, I just naturally thought
nobody else did. What a dumb thought, huh?
No problem. :) I probably never would have known it either if I hadn't
gotten so many requests to automate my build process for the LiveCD.
--
JH
--
Andrew Benton wrote:
Me too! I needs them too. I also need a spellchecker that knows what I
meant to say...
Yeah, we all could use that. :) Hard to code though...
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
Richard A Downing wrote:
And then you'd need to decide if it was going to use a Real Language,
or American. ;-)
What's wrong with Armenian? You sound like you're prejumadiced.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Sebastian Salich wrote:
Hallo everyone
I have some problems to compil binutils (2.15.94.0.2.2) without errors, the
config.log says that gmp.h is missing so compiling binutils always fails with
ar.o: In function `mri_emul':
ar.c:(.text+0x23): undefined reference to `yyparse'
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Don't worry about the patch for now. If later you decide that you
want to upgrade the kernel and you want your gcc to be bug free (or
less buggy, maybe), you can rebuild gcc. That's perfectly safe.
But it might cause a slight rash and periodic sneezing. :P
--
JH
--
Ryan Moszynski wrote:
i recently finished my main installation. i used the lfs live cd as
host and everything went smoothly. In fact so smoothly that i'm not
quite ready to give up that environment just yet. I am attempting to
install lynx so i can read the blfs book while actually running
Chandan M. C. wrote:
Hai ,
Can LFS be built over Debian ... As Debian is not supporting kernel 2.6 ,
What I should do ...
As we need our distro to be developed over Debian ,to be bundled with Deb
packages .. I need to try LFS over Debain as a host system
Is it not possible to build
Chandan M. C. wrote:
We r getting
chroot: cannot run command `/tools/bin/env': No such file or directory
error
Well the first place to start should be the obvious one. It says no such
file or directory for /tools/bin/env. Have you tried verifying that
exists? Something like 'ls -l
thorsten wrote:
ok, i already did a lfs once, but i want build a litle lfs, so a want
remove some packages...
I suggest, do a normal LFS-Install by the Book, tar it up in a secure
place, and start to remove things afterwards. In this case you can
always recover your system once it is messed
Kevin Barnard wrote:
I think you are right about GCC most of that I think is around GCJ
(loads of fun)
1) Please don't post in HTML
2) Please don't top-post
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/index.html#netiquette
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Syòndil Boscoverde wrote:
Instead, if I execute the same command ('tar -zxvf
bin...tar.gzip') as root, everything goes ok.
any help?
thanks.
This is not a LFS issue, this is a general Linux issue. The fact that
you're asking for help on this point reveals that you haven't met the
LFS
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
should work OK for the development version but that may not be suitable
if it's your first attempt at LFS. I've had good results
Jeremy Byron wrote:
thorsten wrote:
As far as I know, this stage1-5 is not needed.
Yes it is. The book tells you to copy the necessary stage1-5 files just
below the copy command for the stage 1/2 files. If you are following
the book, all you need is the e2fs-stage1-5 file. If you use
Matt Darcy wrote:
I'd do final pass 3 - don't polute your toolchain, just your final
system. But thats just a personal opinion.
Ugh. Did you not just see the post I sent in reply to Chris? Please
*try* to trim your posts. I like you guys, but I find your lack of
trimming very annoying.
--
IraqiGeek wrote:
Hi,
I am in 8.4, making the LFS system bootable, and was wondering whether I
am supposed to enter the grub shell from the chrooted filesystem, or
exit from chroot and enter the grub shell???
If you want to use the version of grub you just compiled you should do
it from
IraqiGeek wrote:
Thats what I want to do, but I cant execute root (hd0,2), where the lfs
filesystem is at hda3. In fact, I can execute any root command inside
grub. It keeps telling me that the selected disk doesnt exist.
Sounds like you rebooted your machine and then tried entering into
rick wrote:
At section 6.14 I missed performing the sed substitution. I
did not catch my mistake until I had performed the configure
and make.
What are my options from this point?
Go back to the sed substitution and start from there or do I
have to begin section 6 again?
Yes, that
rick wrote:
I hadn't performed the make install, but would it be
advisable to go ahead and remove the /usr/bin/gcc anyhow or
is this wasted effort?
If you didn't do a make install there shouldn't be a /usr/bin/gcc :)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
David Fix wrote:
Hey folks, just wondering if, when building the LFS system, we can use parallel
makes (make -j2, make -j4, etc)... I have a dual-xeon box that I'm building
on, and was wondering if this would mess anything up... :) Thoughts on this?
:)
Dave
Albert wrote:
This may not be 100% correct, but it got me past a similar rebooting
problem.
Near the end of section 6.2 the book says:
Remember that if for any reason you stop working on the LFS system and
start again later, it is important to check that these file systems are
mounted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm building LFS, following the instructions of the LFS Book. I run an
Mandrake 10.2 with kernel 2.6.11 and gcc 3.4.3.
When trying to compile binutils (1st pass), I get an error with the
following messages :
in ar.o : In function mri_emul : undefined reference to
Chris Staub wrote:
[snipped a lot of the previous thread]
You shouldn't have to symlink anything unless it tells you to in the
book. If you do have to then you need to go back and figure out what's
wrong before going any further. You should go back to the gcc
installation in chap. 6, and
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:20:13PM +0530, Smruti Ranjan Mandal wrote:
checking for kernel header at least 2.6.0... too old!
configure: error: *** The available kernel headers are older than the
requested
*** compatible kernel version
Simply upgrading the kernel should have been fine. A few
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:38:13AM +0200, Michael Stather wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded the latest LFS liveCD and booted it. Unfortunately there are
many messages like this
MCE: non-fatal correctible incident found at CPU 0 which mess up the
console.
What does this mean and can I suppress
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 01:44:41PM -0400, Xander Biglin wrote:
Now I'm doing BLFS and just configured bash. Now it doesn't work
again. I tried en_US, en_US.iso8859-1, en_US.iso8859, en_US.iso88591..
variations that I've seen before, and tried the loadkeys us after each
one, but to no avail.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 09:06:23AM -0400, Mike Clawson wrote:
Hello Linux Folks,
I have gotten a 6.1 system working. Had some trouble, but was
eventually able to work through it. But now there is a very
minor but annoying feature - tty1-6 all have a mysterious
'(K' just before the login
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
