On 12/2/17 5:45 PM, Dave wrote:
kernel-4.14 gives this in the log. Not sure what to look for.
Dec 1 20:40:42 ryzen kernel: <30>[ 2.785898] udevd[1728]: starting
version 3.2.4
Dec 1 20:40:42 ryzen kernel: <30>[ 2.792732] udevd[1729]: starting
eudev-3.2.4
Dec 1 20:40:42 ryzen kernel:
On 11/10/17 5:37 PM, Axel wrote:
Dear all,
LFS makes fun :)
I like to use it on another Laptop as well and installed LFS on a
Aspire one 64 bit amd processor:
Can use copy my existing LFS to the new one?
Can I change from init to systemed?
Hi Axel,
Have you tried?
We aren't going to
On 10/29/17 10:05 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 10/29/2017 01:39 PM, Michael D. wrote:
On 10/29/17 2:04 PM, Axel wrote:
Dear all,
now I reached chapter6.20.
My host is an Aspire one with 4.9.0-4-amd64 and not very fast. But I
want to install LFS on this device finally.
I think about to use
On 10/29/17 2:04 PM, Axel wrote:
Dear all,
now I reached chapter6.20.
My host is an Aspire one with 4.9.0-4-amd64 and not very fast. But I
want to install LFS on this device finally.
I think about to use another device with with an amd64 processor as
well (Asus) to compile LFS and to
On 10/27/17 9:43 PM, Axel wrote:
Dear all,
what is the best way to safe /tools after step 5.37. Changing Ownership ?
I like to safe it on an usb-stick.
Can I use tar? If yes with witch options, please?
Thank you for your answers!
Hi Axel,
My preferred method is using tar.
Place
On 10/27/17 8:25 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 07:20:53PM +0200, Michael D. wrote:
On 10/27/17 7:00 PM, Axel wrote:
make[3]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4'
 YACC    examples/calc++/calc++-parser.stamp
 CXX     examples/calc
On 10/27/17 7:00 PM, Axel wrote:
Hello,
in step 5.17. Bison-3.0.4I got this error in make check:
make[3]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4'
 YACC    examples/calc++/calc++-parser.stamp
 CXX     examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-driver.o
 LEX  Â
On 10/27/17 11:32 AM, Nickolay Sosnitsky wrote:
Hello all!
I build my LFS in VMware and after boot into it I haven't
network. "ip link" show me two interfaces: loopback (lo0) and sit0,
but sit0 has strange attributes (no MAC assigned):
[/source/1inux-4.4.2]# ip link
1: lo:
On 10/23/17 8:18 PM, Gdsi wrote:
Hi.
I had went into ch.8.3., and do not want doing lfs for bootable, at least now.
Indeed, after chroot I have window of lfs-terminal and full Deb.9.1. It is very
easy for me seeing with Tunar (File Manager) what happen after each my doing
into lfs.
May I
On 10/19/17 12:39 AM, Gdsi wrote:
Hi.
After 8 hour work ch.6.20. GCC-7.2.0 result was
Summaries (gcc, libatomic, libgomp, libitm,) equal,
except::-
My=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes11695
# of unexpected failures5
# of expected failures 66
On 10/04/2017 12:28 PM, Gdsi wrote:
Hi.
I begin LFS-8.1 but a issue is appeared.
In ch. 2.2 after running 'bash version-check.sh' the output was:
user@debian:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.3.30(1)-release
/bin/sh -> /bin/dash
ERROR: /bin/sh does not point to bash
version-check.sh:
On 09/28/2017 04:42 PM, Hans Kaper wrote:
I built LFS 8.0 systemd 32 bits succesfully on my desktop (AMD64
processor).
I copied the system to a laptop (32 bits Intel processor) with rsync.
It boots all right there but it refuses to compile new sources.
I did the same a couple of years ago
On 04/16/2017 12:18 PM, t...@uacro.com wrote:
Michael D. L. wrote:
>Hello TPH,
>
>The code on the page is correct. The objective is to build the
libstdc++ >library, and not the entire GCC package.
>
>Best regards
> Michael
Hello Michael,
do you mean, that first w
On 04/16/2017 11:46 AM, t...@uacro.com wrote:
Hello!
Please, check code at this page:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-libstdc++.html
(5.8.1. Installation of Target Libstdc++)
May be it is wrong "../libstdc++-v3/configure \" and "../configure \"
is correct
On 03/25/2017 04:01 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi again
On my full lfs 8.0 rebuild, I have built shadow 4.4 as specified on
the lfs page, however I did it the "blfs way" of first installing pam.
When building shadow, I got the following error:
su.c:376:3: error: too few arguments to
On 03/24/2017 08:56 PM, Glaudiston Gomes da Silva wrote:
I think it's necessary only if you run autogen.sh script. If you
decompress the tarball and run the "configure" script directly flex is
not a prerequisite.
2017-03-24 16:51 GMT-03:00 Michael D. L. <lfs-supp...@cosis.dk>
On 03/24/2017 08:02 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the
situation that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but
is compiled before it.
Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would
allow me
On 03/21/2017 12:40 PM, Thomas Seeling wrote:
Hallo,
I have built an LFS 7.10 system (without systemd) and I'm quite happy
with it so far, everything works great. Now I wanted to transfer some
files so I connected a memory stick but there's no device to mount.
I'm unsure about whether I
On 11/11/2016 03:10 PM, Noam Preil wrote:
Hi,
In chapter 6, I built cracklib and then installed shadow. Everything seemed
fine until I entered "passwd root". Rather than asking for input, it just put
the following on standard output:
Changing password for root
Enter the new password (minimum
On 06/10/2016 05:56 PM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
Hi all,
after a long time of abstinence I'll restart playing with LFS. So for
so good as I come to chap6 until trying to install the headers.
It segfaults at "make install_headers" with
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
UPD
On 05/24/2016 12:15 PM, Nagasayanam,V.S wrote:
Hi,
At present I am installing LFS-7.9. I have completed Seamonkry, pdf
readers, window managers etc. At present, I am in the process of
installing LXDE desktop. Bur libfm and libfm-extra point to the same
file. Will you please clarify?
Hi
On 05/16/2016 03:32 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 16:36, Nathan Bibb wrote:
The LFS system was found and showed up in my Grub Menu, but when I boot to
that, I got the kernel panic mentioned in the subject line.
Hello Nathan,
Grub booted the kernel, so that part is
On 04/11/2016 03:46 PM, Keith Howard wrote:
Greetings!
I am using Knoppix 7, 2016 version as a host system.
I am following the LFS-systemd 7.9 book.
I have an AMD Athlon X2 system with 1GB of RAM.
'file -L liblto_plugin.so' indeed, shows that is a 64 bit
binarybut I thought we were
On 03/18/2016 03:29 PM, Glenn Becker wrote:
Hi,
I've been sailing through the LFS book, having no problems, and
suddenly encountered an issue in *6.24*. I did some Googling, enough
to see that this has been an issue in the past -- but I did not find a
solution.
*What's happening:*
r
Note that the backslash must be followed by an immediate return.
Other whitespace characters like spaces or tab characters will
create incorrect results.
All Code Blocks are written so they can be easily read, and can be
copy'pasted directly from the webpage to the console.
Best regard
Hi Morris,
Welcome to LFS - hope you make it work this time :)
Not sure what has gone wrong, but make sure you have the filesystems
mounted (6.2. Preparing Virtual Kernel File Systems) - and make sure the
$LFS variable is valid.
Second check that you entered the chroot with the correct
26 matches
Mail list logo
