[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2022-05-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEEDINFO

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2022-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2022-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2022-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #62 from Timur

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #61 from Dieter --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #60) > In any case, now QA has a reliable aid for evaluating "Add to List" bug > reports. I agree -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #60 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 170658 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170658=edit another version using unordered list instead of table Here is another version, using

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #59 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 170657 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170657=edit How "Add to List" works (In reply to Dieter from comment #0) >For me it is very difficult to

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #58 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Suggest changing summary to something like: How "continue previous numbering" / "Add to List" actually works and should work -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #57 from Dieter --- I think we've reached a very specialized discussion. I'm afraid, that no new people will join the discussion and read all (or most) comments. So my initial question was: How should command work? Heiko gave

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #56 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #53) > wrong terminology creates seeming inconsistency (so the terminology is wrong). Let me try without terminology. My interest is to highlight

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #55 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #54) > > 1. Get the topmost point of the last selected chunk; > "topmost" means sequential position in the document. > And this is the same as what you called

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #54 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #51) > There is only one rule. One and only one. And it is explained already. Cool. Just need one point of clarification, which I asked about before.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #53 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #52) > From a UI/UX point of view, it is inconsistent to have "Add to List" > disabled in some cases where there is nothing to change, but not in all > cases,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #52 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #50) > and so no need to try to make it a special case. Wasn't trying to make a special case. Only speculating a possible reason because did not have

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #51 from Mike Kaganski --- Oh... There is only one rule. One and only one. And it is explained already. 1. Get the topmost point of the last selected chunk; 2. From that point, go to the previous paragraph; 3. Check if

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #50 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #49) > But it is not so intelligent, because it also uses itself as a list, > so it sometimes shows itself as active, when there is nothing to >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #49 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #46) > No, and actually your test 4 is the example that you ask for: Thanks. It is tricky (impossible?) to summarize succinctly, because there are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #48 from Commit Notification --- Seth Chaiklin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/help/commit/cf21df79f4499a4836adbb0e2c448048b5be418b tdf#140579 add "add

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #47 from Commit Notification --- Seth Chaiklin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/7d76581ed37851ba1e588ecb919738e1d33784d6 tdf#140579 "Continue

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:7.2.0 -- You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #46 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #45) > Probably my simple test document is too simple to be able to see the > significance of *start* of active chunk over "cursor position". No, and actually

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #45 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #44) > Let me describe the internal logic here. Maybe that would help you. Definitely. I prefer (that word again...) theoretical knowledge over

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #44 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #33) > ---test document here --- > Para 1 – top of page > 1. List entry 1 > 2. List entry 2 > > ---end of test document--- > > Test 1 > ... > > Test

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #43 from Dieter --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #42) > Possible final version for "Add to List" help Yes, no further comments from my side. > Perhaps you also imagine a "guide" page, that gives some > examples of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #42 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 170539 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170539=edit Possible final version for "Add to List" help (In reply to Dieter from comment #41) > So

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #41 from Dieter --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #40) > Proposed alternative: > > Select paragraphs to be added to a list. Paragraphs can be in a different > list or no list at all. I was talking about the "target"

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #40 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #39) > "1. Select ... added to a different list." Because selected paragraphs do not have to be in a list, "different list" would not always be meaningful.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #39 from Dieter --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #38) > Created attachment 170533 [details] Thank you. Two remarks: "1. Select ... added to a different list." After step 3: "Result: Selected paragraphs get the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #38 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 170533 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170533=edit Second proposal for Help to Add to List Here is a help page proposal, based on the analysis

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #37 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #36) Thanks for thorough checking of my hastily written proposal, which was meant to check whether I found a valid "simple" description (but written for

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #36 from Dieter --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #35) > This might make the documentation very easy. > 1. Select paragraphs to be added to a list. > 2. Place cursor in the list. > 3. "Add to List" For me behaviour is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #35 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #31) > If it happens to be in the middle of a list, it simply > happens that the closest previous paragraph-in-a-list is the previous > paragraph that

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #34 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #33) > 1. Why should “continue previous numbering” be inactive in Test 1? (given > Test 3)? Correction: "Test 3" -> "Test 2" (because Test 2 shows that

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #33 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- ---test document here --- Para 1 – top of page 1. List entry 1 2. List entry 2 ---end of test document--- Test 1 1. Select (some part) of Para 1 2. Press Ctrl, while selecting (some

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #32 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #31) > It adds to the list that is the list of closest paragraph-in-a-list *prior* > to this paragraph. If it happens to be in the middle of a list, it

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #31 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #30) > I prefer to called it ... Heh. You just put it from feet to head, and prefer that ... It adds to the list that is the list of closest

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #30 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #29) > ... which would be confusing for a paragraph that is first in a following > list. It is already in a list - where should it be added to? Yeah,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #29 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #27) > I propose to change the command name from "Continue previous numbering" to > "Add to List" ... which would be confusing for a paragraph that is first in

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #28 from Dieter --- +1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #27 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- I propose to change the command name from "Continue previous numbering" to "Add to List" Reasons: 1. Possible to add paragraphs: (a) that appear prior to a list. (b) that appear both

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #26 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #25) > Are all techniques desired or is there a technique, that should be changed? Only question I see is the directional Easter egg, and we have a discussion

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #25 from Dieter --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #24) > So I'm the wrong person to ask about documentation. I don't ask for documentation, but for functionality. Comment 15 describes four different techniques how

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #24 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #23) > What do you think, Heiko? It wouldn't be helpful to me because I approach the page from either the command itself being interested in its functionality or

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #23 from Dieter --- Thanks again for your work. My comment: - Is the sentence "Choose the list to get additional list items" necessary (because you already inform how to access to the command). But if you think it is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #22 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 170520 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170520=edit proposal for initial help page about "Add to Previous List" "Continue previous numbering"

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #21 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #20) Heh, funny to see the inconsistency, when some correct terms (outline numbering) get replaced with "layman" terms ("chapter numbering"), and others go in

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #20 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #19) > What is "ordered" and "unordered"? Do we use these terms somewhere? bug 139667, comment 12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #19 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #17) > Add selected paragraphs to immediately preceding ordered or unordered > list. What is "ordered" and "unordered"? Do we use these terms somewhere?

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #18 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #17) > Add selected paragraphs to immediately preceding ordered or unordered > list. No need to be too short, and "immediately preceding" is not super simple

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #17 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Proposal for "tooltip" for .uno:ContinueNumbering -- in connection with renaming to "Add to Previous List" Add selected paragraphs to immediately preceding ordered or unordered list.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #16 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #15) > Note -- this is *not* an issue of DF vs. list styles And not an issue of numbers vs. bullets either. The directional techniques work the same with

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #15 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 170117 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170117=edit How to combine items from three lists with two selections (In reply to Heiko Tietze from

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #14 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #13) > making the label depending on the context involves a lot of coding fwiw probably not much coding would be required, because a TargetURL to

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #12 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- *Suggestion*: For non-list paragraphs, rename "Continue previous numbering" to "Add to previous list", and rename "continue previous numbering" to "Combine lists" for paragraphs with a list

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #11 from Dieter --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #6) > I propose: > 1. Add an icon to "Continue previous numbering" That's bug 126689. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #10 from Timur --- This needs no complication more than needed. I see 2 issues here 1. is Continue action from Comment 3 is correct? looks so. 2. it should be in Help, just where? F1 on Continue gives missing help for

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #9 from Dieter --- (In reply to Timur from comment #7) > Icon is not a proper idea, there's already a bug with drop-down proposal > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117233. To be precise bug 117233

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #8 from Timur --- For tracking in UI, it's seen, click in front and all list is shaded. Revisiting bug 36220, Help I proposed in 135895 also works here: just select 1st and numbered and it will work in step 5. Or select all

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #7 from Timur --- Icon is not a proper idea, there's already a bug with drop-down proposal https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117233. I don't see point in this bug, I just closed a few pf these bugs from

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #6 from Dieter --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #4) I propose: 1. Add an icon to "Continue previous numbering" 2. Make that icon visible in toolbar by default 3. Add informations about it to

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #5 from Dieter --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #3) > The action of "Continue previous numbering" is: > For the paragraph where the cursor is placed, assign the list id for the > last list that appears before this

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #4 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #0) > because there is no documentation about that command in LO Help. There is a mention in Writer's Guide 6.4 (p. 182, p. 266), but it seems to be wrong.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #3 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > "Continue previous numbering" command works on different list styles > and overrides the current style with the previous one. The action of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 --- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) I suppose that UX-wise, for Benjamin (who is the main audience of DF numbering applied through toolbar buttons, where indeed each time a new list style is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda