I don't understand the behaviour of this code:
\version "2.19.81"
var = {a \tag #'here {b} a}
{\var} %Result: a b a
{\removeWithTag #'here \var} %Result: a a
{\pushToTag #'here b! \removeWithTag #'here \var} %Result: a a ; Expected:
a b! a
The result is:
a b a - ok!
a a - ok!
a a - not ok; sh
On 13 April 2018 at 09:47, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 13 April 2018 at 09:15, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Gianmaria Lari writes:
> >>
> >> > I would expect the two scores generated by the following code were
On 14 April 2018 at 15:15, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I don't understand the behaviour of this code:
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > var = {a \tag #'here {b} a}
> > {\var} %Result: a b a
> > {\rem
On 14 April 2018 at 15:34, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>
> On 14 April 2018 at 15:15, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>
>> > I don't understand the behaviour of this code:
>> >
>> > \version "2.19.81
On 14 April 2018 at 15:46, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I found a not nice solution but something that work:
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > var = {a \tag #'herea {} \tag #'hereb {b} a}
> > {\pushToTag #'her
When I want to try a lilypond snippet using Frescobaldi, I normally create
a new file and I compile it without save it explicitly. Frescobaldi saves
it for me in a temporary folder (in my Frescobaldi settings I have "Save
the document if possibile" checked).
For example if I do it now, in the lily
On 21 April 2018 at 08:39, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.04.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>
> When I want to try a lilypond snippet using Frescobaldi, I normally create
> a new file and I compile it without save it explicitly. Frescobaldi saves
> it for me in a te
On 21 April 2018 at 09:44, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> On 21 April 2018 at 08:39, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 20.04.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>>
>> When I want to try a lilypond snippet using Frescobaldi, I normally
>> create a new file a
On 22 April 2018 at 00:48, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.04.2018 um 14:54 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>
>
>
> On 21 April 2018 at 09:44, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>> On 21 April 2018 at 08:39, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 20.04.201
On 22 April 2018 at 04:55, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Hi Kieran,
>
> Using F 3.0.0, if you don't save the file a temp filename is generated.
> The output goes to a file in /tmp (Linux) which is a randomly generated
> name different each time. So how are you even looking at that?
>
I will avoid to h
The following frescobaldi snippet call the "more.com" program with the
parameter "\\readme"
-*- python;
from subprocess import call
call(["more.com", "\\readme"])
This other one-line snippet pastes, in the frescobaldi editor window at the
cursor position, the lilypond file name (including pa
On 23 April 2018 at 15:48, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 23 Apr 2018 at 09:43:01 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > The following frescobaldi snippet call the "more.com" program with the
> > parameter "\\readme"
> >
> > -*- python;
> > from s
My question is off topic. I hope it will not be a problem.
The following is one excerpt from the Sitt book, 20 studies in Double Stops.
Why in the first three measures the G, D and A are written as g4~4~4~4 d
4~4~4~4 a4~4~4~4 instead of g1 d1 a1? Any idea?
Ciao, g.
___
I don't understand the difference between s8 8 8 and s8*3.
For example have a look to the following code that engrave two scores:
\version "2.19.81"
rh = \fixed c'{g8 8 8 8}
dyn = { s8 \> 8 8 8 \!}
{ << \rh \new Dynamics \dyn >> }
dyn = { s8 \> 8*3 \!}
{ << \rh \new Dynamics \dyn >> }
These a
ll might remember from
> their childhood. Every block has a single slot to attach stuff to.
>
> s8 8 8 are 3 distinct cubes of edge length 1.
> s8*3 is a single block measuring 1x1x3.
>
> Cheers, Robert
>
>
> On 25 Apr 2018, at 10:09, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
> I don'
On 24 April 2018 at 21:13, Trevor Bača wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Gianmaria Lari
> wrote:
>
>> My question is off topic. I hope it will not be a problem.
>>
>> The following is one excerpt from the Sitt book, 20 studies in Double
>>
On 25 April 2018 at 10:09, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> I don't understand the difference between s8 8 8 and s8*3.
>
> For example have a look to the following code that engrave two scores:
>
> \version "2.19.81"
> rh = \fixed c'{g8 8 8 8}
>
> dyn = { s
On 27 April 2018 at 11:56, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Hi Gianmaria,
>
> The shorthand of using a duration number only applies to notes, not rests.
>
> As per the NR:
>
> Isolated durations – durations without a pitch – that occur within a music
> sequence will take their pitch from the preceding not
On 27 April 2018 at 14:58, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Wright writes:
>
> > On Fri 27 Apr 2018 at 13:49:24 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> >> On 27 April 2018 at 11:56, Andrew Bernard
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Gianmaria,
> >> >
> &
On 24 April 2018 at 16:30, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 24 Apr 2018 at 08:53:01 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > On 23 April 2018 at 15:48, David Wright
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon 23 Apr 2018 at 09:43:01 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > > > The
On 27 April 2018 at 15:44, David Wright wrote:
> [...]
> Well, I don't know how the decision was arrived at, but my own view is
> that it's the correct one. The duration-only notation is aimed at
> people writing rhythms, and they write them for instruments that play
> notes (and pseudonotes like
On 27 April 2018 at 15:45, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 27.04.2018 10:53, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>> To fix it I found two different ways.
>> First one:
>>
>> \version "2.19.81"
>> \score {
>> \new Voice <<
>>
On 1 May 2018 at 00:09, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 27 Apr 2018 at 22:56:31 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > On 27 April 2018 at 15:44, David Wright
> wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> > > Well, I don't know how the decision was arrived at, but my own vie
On 1 May 2018 at 05:32, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 01 May 2018 at 00:15:24 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> > David Wright writes:
> >
> > > AFAICT the important exception that was introduced with naked
> > > durations was that c 4 notates a single note whereas c4 4 notates two.
> >
> > There w
On 1 May 2018 at 09:39, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > --- Exceptions ---
> > Making "s8 8 8" acting differently than "c8 8 8" introduce an
> > exception.
>
> Not "introduces" but "constitutes" since ther
Is there any way to write this
\version "2.19.81"
{a( b c' a a b c' a)}
with a repeat percent? Something similar to this:
\version "2.19.81"
{\repeat percent 2 {a( b c' a} ) }
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https:/
On 2 May 2018 at 08:56, David Kastrup wrote:
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > How can I create custom fingerings which are made of a number and a
> > letter?
> > I want to display 3t, 2t, etc.
> >
> > I found this snippet in the LSR:
> > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=83
> >
> >
On 2 May 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 2 May 2018 at 08:56, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>
> >> Something like this?
> >>
> >> \version "2.19.81"
> >>
> >> t =
> >
On 2 May 2018 at 14:50, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 02.05.2018 08:19, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>> Is there any way to write this
>>
>> \version "2.19.81"
>> {a( b c' a a b c' a)}
>>
>>
>> with a repeat percent? Something s
On 2 May 2018 at 16:31, Tim Slattery wrote:
> I installed Frescobaldi on my new Win10 PC. Everything's good, except
> that the installation process didn't create a shortcut on the desktop.
> I tried to look at the properties of the entry in the Start menu, but
> apparently you can't do that on Wi
On 2 May 2018 at 08:19, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> Is there any way to write this
>
> \version "2.19.81"
> {a( b c' a a b c' a)}
>
>
> with a repeat percent? Something similar to this:
>
> \version "2.19.81"
> {\repeat percent 2 {a( b c&#x
I have short music exercises (for accordion) that I would like to engrave
with alternate fingering like in the following example:
\version "2.19.81"
\fixed c' {c-2 d-3 e-2 f-3 g-2 a-3 b-4 c'-5}
\fixed c' {c-1 d-2 e-3 f-4 g-2 a-3 b-4 c'-5}
\fixed c' {c-1 d-2 e-3 f-4 g-2 a\3 b-4 c'\5}
and this is
On 3 May 2018 at 01:27, Aaron Hill wrote:
> Is there any way to write this
>>>
>>> \version "2.19.81"
>>> {a( b c' a a b c' a)}
>>>
>>> with a repeat percent? Something similar to this:
>>>
>>> \version "2.19.81"
>>> {\repeat percent 2 {a( b c' a} ) }
>>>
>>> Thank you, g.
>>>
>>
>> I found in th
Have a look to this code and the resulting engraving:
\version "2.19.81"
{
\repeat volta 2 {a( a a a}
\alternative { {b1)} {c'1}}
}
Is there any way to indicate that the second alternative should be slurred
like the first one - "a( a a a c1)" ? Maybe an half slur? It's just a
curiosity.
T
This is more a notation question than a lilypond question.
Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be
played for example with 2 or 3? I normally write
\finger "2(3)"
or
\finger "2/3"
but I'm not sure this is correct.
Thank you, g.
On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>
> Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>
>> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question.
>>
>> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be
>> played for exam
On 5 May 2018 at 22:37, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
> On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>>
>>> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question.
>>>
>>> Does exist
On 7 May 2018 at 23:59, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2018-05-07 23:35 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari :
>
> >
> > I tried to write alternative fingering putting fingering numbers on a
> > column. This is what I did:
> >
> > { c' \finger \markup \center-column {2 3}}
This code generate a midi file where the first and last measure are played
"legato" because of the slur.
\version "2.19.81"
\include "articulate.ly"
music = { b( b b b) | d' d' d' d' | c'( c' c' c') }
\score {
\articulate \music
\midi{}
}
Now I would like to rewrite the previous code separat
On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I would like to tie the last note contained in a variable like this
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > var = {a b a}
> > {\var ~ a}
> >
> > but this generates
On 9 May 2018 at 10:45, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Gianmaria Lari writes:
> >> >
> >> > At the moment I do this
> >> >
> >> > \ve
Sorry to bother with a simple question. Why this does not work?
\version "2.19.81"
pit = #(define-music-function
(p) (ly:pitch?)
#{ $p #}
)
{ \pit c' }
Changing the body to
#{ $p $p #}
or
#{ $pit 4 #}
or
#{ $p a' #}
it works
g.
__
On 11 May 2018 at 17:58, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-05-11 08:46, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Aaron Hill writes:
>>
>> On 2018-05-11 06:53, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry to bother with a simple question. Why this does not work?
>>&
On 15 May 2018 at 00:40, Gilles Thibault wrote:
> Le 2018-05-12 00:16, Sirius Barras a écrit :
>
>> I have a sequence of notes and a music expression.
>> How could be done a function concatenating each element of the sequence
>> with the music expression?
>>
>> For instance, if the sequence is {c
On 15 May 2018 at 11:40, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
>
> Thank you Gilles I have yet a problem, how can engrave the foo
> generated list in a score?
>
>
Thank you Lukas & Malte. I tried your solutions and they works! Thanks!!!
___
lilypond-user mailin
On 15 May 2018 at 12:10, David Kastrup wrote:
> Malte Meyn writes:
>
> > Am 15.05.2018 um 10:27 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> >> Thank you Gilles I have yet a problem, how can engrave the foo
> >> generated list in a score?
> >
> > You should make a
On 15 May 2018 at 15:45, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 15 May 2018 at 12:10, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Malte Meyn writes:
> >>
> >> > Am 15.05.2018 um 10:27 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> >> >> Tha
I have a musical expression made of several musical expression like the
following:
{ {a b} {c' d'} {e' f'} }
I would like to loop on it and generate a different score with each
sub-expression. Something like this:
{ foreach x in X
\myScore \x
}
How can I do it?
Thank you.
P.S. The follow
On 16 May 2018 at 02:23, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Hi Gianmaria,
>
> From your posts I suspect you may find a use for Abjad. Have you looked
> into it?
>
> Just a suggestion.
>
> Andrew
>
>
Ciao Andrew,
your suggestion is welcome! I had a look to Abjad when I discovered
Lilypond, maybe a couple ye
On 16 May 2018 at 09:04, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>
> On 16 May 2018 at 02:23, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
>> Hi Gianmaria,
>>
>> From your posts I suspect you may find a use for Abjad. Have you looked
>> into it?
>>
>> Just a suggestion.
>>
The following function increase a counter by 1 and return it as string
#(define count 0)
#(define (nextcount) (begin
(set! count (+ 1 count))
(number->string count)
)
)
Is my code ok, or I should write it in a different way?
Is
Thank you David, Urs and Andrew for the code, the link to the documentation
and the study suggestion!
On Thu, 24 May 2018 at 11:00, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> Hi Gianmaria,
>
> The others have beat me to it, but I just wanted to say you should read up
> on closures in Scheme. This will give you are
If I compile the following code in Frescobaldi
\version "2.19.81"
\score { {a b } \midi{}}
\score { {a b } \midi{}}
\score { {a b } \midi{}}
lilypond generates the following midi files:
document.mid
document-1.mid
document-2.mid
Is there any way to change the numeration like this:
documen
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 at 16:29, Karlin High wrote:
> On 6/13/2018 9:03 AM, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way to change the numeration like this:
> >
> > document-01.mid
> > document-02.mid
> > document-03.mid
>
> I asked The Goo
This code
\version "2.19.81"
\new RhythmicStaff { \easyHeadsOn a4 b8 a }
generate this score:
[image: image.png]
That's great.
Now instead of the note name, I would like to write the numbers
representing the scale-degree inside the note head. So I tried adding to
the previous code the snippet
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 15:00, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-06-15 05:27, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > #(define Ez_numbers_engraver
> >(make-engraver
> > (acknowledgers
> > ((note-head-interface engraver grob source-engrave
I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
The following code
\version "2.19.81"
#(define (f w) w)
$(f "Hello")
generates a pdf file containing "Hello".
If my function f is called passing something that is not a string l
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 20:12, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-06-15 09:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
> > frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
> > The following code
> >
> > \
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 19:33, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 15.06.2018 18:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
> > frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
> > The following code
> >
> >
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 22:47, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2018-06-15 20:11 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill :
> > On 2018-06-15 09:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
> >> frescobaldi and I need some hel
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 at 21:49, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
>
> 2018-06-16 16:56 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari :
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 22:47, Thomas Morley
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2018-06-15 20:11 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill :
>>> > On 2018-06-15
On the accordion scores to indicate that the button to press is on the
counter bass we put a small dash under the finger number. This is how David
Kastrup suggest me to do it:
\version "2.19.81"
{a_\markup \underline \finger 3}
This is perfect.
But, is there any way to make it removed when I sp
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 19:01, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On the accordion scores to indicate that the button to press is on the
> > counter bass we put a small dash under the finger number. This is how
> David
> > Kastrup suggest me to do it
I have a code similar to this
\version "2.19.81"
\markup "Etude"
{a b c' d'}
\markup "Etude"
{a b c' d'}
[.]
Is there any way to keep the markup and score together?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
eBreak
> {a b c' d'}
>
>
> HTH
> Jan-Peter
>
> Am 20.06.2018 um 10:15 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> > I have a code similar to this
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > \markup "Etude"
&g
Is there any scheme function returning the number of beats and the duration
of each beat of the mesure where the function is invoked?
For instance, I would like this code..
\version "2.19.81"
{
\time 3/4
\writeBeats \writeBeatDuration
a4 b a %just some music
\time 4/4
\writeBeats \writeBeatD
This code define a variable containing a duration and the use it:
\version "2.19.81"
#(define myDuration (ly:make-duration 4 0))
{ a\myDuration}
I can do something similar wit fingering:
\version "2.19.81"
myFinger = \finger "3"
{ a\myFinger}
How can I rewrite the previous
myFinger = \finger
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 15:49, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > This code define a variable containing a duration and the use it:
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > #(define myDuration (ly:make-duration 4 0))
> > { a\myDuration}
> &
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 22:44, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 15:49, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Gianmaria Lari writes:
> >>
> >> > This code define a variable containing a duration and the use it:
Is there any way to refer a scheme variable containing numbers in the name,
in lilypond?
For example, if I write:
#(define duration32 (ly:make-duration (ly:intlog2 32)))
duration32 is a valid scheme variable name. But this is not a valid
lilypond variable name. Is there any way to access it anyw
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 23:37, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2018-06-25 23:31 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari :
> > Is there any way to refer a scheme variable containing numbers in the
> name,
> > in lilypond?
> >
> > For example, if I write:
> >
> > #(define d
Few days ago I asked how to get the number of beats and the duration of
each beat of a measure.
The reason was that I wanted to try to write some facilities to add a
ticktock measure at the beginning of a score:
My idea was to transform a score like this
\version "2.19.81"
music = {\time 3/4 a b
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:47, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > For this I thought to write a substitution function etc. Something like
> > this (it doesn't compile):
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > myScore =
> > #(defi
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 12:03, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:47, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Gianmaria Lari writes:
> >>
> >> > For this I thought to write a substitution function etc.
This code
\version "2.19.82"
\fixed c' { a8\3( b d'-5 c'\4 b a) r4}
generate this
[image: image.png]
I don't like having some fingering above the slur (3) and some below it (5
& 4). How can I change this?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing lis
Thank you David and Noeck, your solutions work. I will also check the
documentation about staff-padding and avoid-slur as soon as the lilypond
site will work again.
Thanks, g.
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 00:22, Noeck wrote:
> Dear Gianmaria,
>
> here are two more options:
>
>
> \fixed c' {
> \once
To avoid having one or two staves on last page, I use often page-count.
Unfortunately this often cuts the bottom of the page (the tagline or some
notes).
Today I tried to understand better the problem, checking the printable area
of the printer, playing with annotate-spacing, margin etc,. And I
di
Thank you Ben and Michael. Good to know!
g.
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 21:03, Michael Rivers
wrote:
> I have always had formatting problems printing from Frescobaldi too. The
> built-in PDF printer in Windows 10 works just fine for me.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Us
This code write some fingering on "b" pitch.
\version "2.19.82"
{b4\finger\markup {2 \circle 3 2} \prall}
.. and here it is the result:
[image: image.png]
This is ok except the fact that the elements 2 (3) 2 are written not enough
close each other.
How can I make them more close like in the fo
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 17:44, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
>
> 2018-09-22 17:29 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari :
>
>> This code write some fingering on "b" pitch.
>>
>> \version "2.19.82"
>> {b4\finger\markup {2 \circle 3 2} \prall}
>>
>>
I would like to create a footnote attached to a fingering. Ideally
something like this
\version "2.19.82"
{b\finger "2*"}
[image: image.png]
... and then in the footnote I would like to give some indication about the
fingering.
I saw the footnote examples but I have not been able to attach the
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 19:27, Abraham Lee
wrote:
> Hi, Gianmaria!
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 10:42 AM Gianmaria Lari
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 17:44, Thomas Morley
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2018-09-22 17:29 GMT+02
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 02:55, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-09-22 10:17 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > I would like to create a footnote attached to a fingering. Ideally
> > something like this
> >
> > \version "2.19.82"
> > {b\finger "2*"}
>
Ciao Peter,
I know this is a totally different story but I suggest also to give a try
to avoid the "\relative" and to use absolute octave entry. It takes some
weeks to get used but in my opinion it is more easy to manage code in this
way. IMHO "\relative" is too much prone to annoying mistakes and
Few months ago I switched from relative to absolute octave entry.
In the rare cases I need to write very high or very low octave notes and
consequently I need to write too much single quote ( ' ) or comma ( , ) I
use the "\fixed" function that I just discovered (before I was using
"\transpose")
\
On 21 December 2016 at 20:47, David Wright
wrote:
>
> I don't understand "annoying"/"unannoying" mistakes,
I'm not an expert user. I have used relative and absolute entry and with
relative I makes mistakes more frequently and spend much time fixing it. I
personally consider these mistakes annoy
On 21 December 2016 at 23:22, Nathan Ho wrote:
> [...]
> I also stopped using \relative a few years ago (I think it was in
response to one of your posts here). No regrets here.
>
> It's alright for simple monophonic melodies, but it gets in the way when
engraving anything with chords or polyphony.
On 23 December 2016 at 09:59, Shevek wrote:
> I compose in \relative mode, and my practice is to use \resetRelativeOctave
> at the beginning of every new phrase. It is a lot of characters to type,
> but
> I've found that creating unnecessary aliases makes code harder to read and
> libraries harde
On 23 December 2016 at 10:39, ptoye wrote:
> [...] I really didn't mean to start a theological discussion about how one
> should
> type in music, but obviously some people feel much stronger about it than I
> do. There are three ways of telling LilyPond what the pitch of a particular
> note shoul
I have a problem with (the fantastic) addFingering snippet.
Here it is my simple code.
\version "2.19.54"
\include "addFingering.ly"
{
\addFingering {a b a b} #"12"
}
{
\addFingering {\repeat unfold 2 {a b}} #"12"
}
I expected that the two generated score would be exactly the same that i
I probably figured out the reason of this behavior. The function
"addFingering" is evaluated before evaluating the repeat. So lilypond
evaluate this
\addFingering {\repeat unfold 2 {a b}} #"12"
as
\repeat unfold 2 {a-1 b-2}
instead of
\addFingering {a b a b} #"12"
But why? Is it possibl
Thank you David Kastrup and Nalesnik and Gilles for you answer your help
and your explication!
I don't like the idea to use a custom repeat instead of the standard. But I
will make some test and see.
Thank you again!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
Novice question. Attached it's a small music fragment from an harpe score.
How can I write it using lilypond?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> \repeat unfold is not evaluated at all. It stays a repeat expression
> until it gets interpreted. One reason it is implemented that way is in
> order to keep the repeats in
>
> \relative c' { \repeat unfold 4 { c e g } }
>
> in the same octave rather than get
>
> \relative c' { c e g c e g c e
Thanks to all for the very quick and fantastic help.
g.
On 14 January 2017 at 11:36, Noeck wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Am 14.01.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> > 'Change staff' is perfectly fine in English.
>
> Thanks, Andrew. Reading the German translation for the two words (the
> closest w
> \repeat { }
>
> generates a repeat expression. Whether that is "unfold" or not.
> And relativity works "linearly" across the expression even when
> alternatives are involved where having to write \relative each time
> would be a royal pita.
> --
> David Kastrup
Yes that's clear.
But
I'm sorry, clearly there is a misunderstanding and it is probably from my
side, my apologies.
Let's me try to explain what I mean. Try to have a look to this code and
the related output (it is attached).
\version "2.19.54"
\include "addFingering.ly"
fragment = {c' d' e' f'}
\markup "Plain" {\fr
David Wright wrote:
> But your response here addresses a second point, the
> interpretation of \repeat unfold. Looking at my attached
> example, it seems to me that you want "\repeat unfold 2 { foo }"
> to behave like "foo foo" (B and C).
Yes, that's exact!
> But, if that's what you want,
> wh
Trevor wrote:
> I'll definitely turn on my financial contribution again.
>
what's the better way to give a financial contribution?
g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 25 January 2017 at 00:31, Sam Frybyte wrote:
> I know it's possible but I need someone to direct me to the snippet or
> place in the manuals so I can invisiblize it for a cadenza piece, just the
> link.
>
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms#metronome-marks
301 - 400 of 590 matches
Mail list logo
