Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-02 Thread John Roper
Ok, so what are the major things you would like from a new web redesign (not including the docs)? I know of: Not reliant on JavaScript Can be translated Can be updated with each new build -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-03 Thread John Roper
February 3, 2017, at 2:43 AM, Graham Percival wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:31:39PM -0500, John Roper wrote: >Ok, so what are the major things you would like from a new web redesign >(not including the docs)? >I know of: >Not reliant on JavaScript >Can be tran

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-03 Thread John Roper
There is a template system. You setup page templates and Blended inserts the text from any file into that template. On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper > >

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
Blended now has support for *eleven* markup languages and it has a new website! http://jmroper.com/blended/ On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:39 PM, John Roper wrote: > There is a template system. You setup page templates and Blended inserts > the text from any file into that template. > >

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
; Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper > >> ha scritto: > >>> OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML > >>> site generator that builds from HTML, Markdown, reStruturedText, > >>> Textile, Plain Text (.txt), and Microsof

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
Design update. It looks better and attracts more users to the software. On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > John Roper writes: > > >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >>> Urs Liska writes: > >>>

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
I wrote the Blended system to fit all of the requirements for redesigning the website (not documentation) for LilyPond. A nice side effect was that I can use it for other things. On Feb 4, 2017 5:59 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > John Roper writes: > > >> On Sat, Feb

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-07 Thread John Roper
Yes I can. I also have a Github repository of my own where I can store the code. -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston MA, USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-08 Thread John Roper
> > >> John, can you set up > >> > >> http://jmroper.com/lilypond/ > >> > >> with `blended' together with a README so that we can inspect the > >> source code, CSS, etc., and the necessary steps to create it? I > >> think only a direct comparison can answer our questions. > Ok, you can see the

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-08 Thread John Roper
Ok, I changed the image to something that made more sense. What do you guys think about everything else? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-09 Thread John Roper
t command line > >> that I have to call to convert the input data in the git repository > >> to the output html, where to expect the output files, etc., so that > >> I can actually try to generate the output by myself. > That has been added. It is 'blended build' Al

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-09 Thread John Roper
my design does both. The current one only really works for people who already have even a little idea of how LilyPond works. -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston MA, USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list li

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-09 Thread John Roper
I just pushed a new version of Blended which allows you to get other (HTML) file contents as variables. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-09 Thread John Roper
Sadly the community does not want JavaScript to be used because most of the users don't like using it. I had that idea already but did not bring it up. I would love to though. On Feb 9, 2017 5:12 PM, "Bernardo Barros" wrote: > lilybin.com could be included into the official website as part of it

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-09 Thread John Roper
> > in total. After enabling scripts this problem vanishes. > > In Vivaldi I don't see the background image at the top of the page at all. > I test using all major browsers including Vivaldi (my main browser) and I am not getting any of these issues. -- John Roper Fre

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-12 Thread John Roper
On Feb 10, 2017 7:54 AM, "Johan Vromans" wrote: On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:51:05 +0100, Michael Gerdau wrote: > The ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-12 Thread John Roper
I am redesigning with a serif font and a lilybin integration. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-12 Thread John Roper
For this to work can someone tell me if it is possible to embed lilybin? If not I am not going to bother to try. On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 13.02.2017 00:52, John Roper wrote: > >> I am redesigning with a serif font and a lilybin integration. >&g

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-03-03 Thread John Roper
If I have a patch for an update of the css for the existing site, where can I submit it? -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston MA, USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https

New LilyPond website

2016-11-28 Thread John Roper
Hi, my name is John Roper and I am a freelance developer who does web design among other things. I use LilyPond occasionally and I felt that the website needed a little bit of a sprucing up. I decided to see what I could do and I have created a new, nicer looking, website based on wordpress which

Fwd: Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-28 Thread John Roper
-- Forwarded message -- From: "John Roper" Date: Nov 28, 2016 7:55 PM Subject: Re: New LilyPond website To: "tisimst" Cc: The making notes blog? The image that I used I got off of unsplash (cc0 images). As for images not loading, what browser/O's are y

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-28 Thread John Roper
On Nov 28, 2016 7:03 PM, "tisimst" wrote: > > Hi, John! > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:27 PM, John Roper [via Lilypond] <[hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=197214&i=0>> wrote: >> >> Hi, my name is John Roper and I am

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-28 Thread John Roper
Ok, the image errors should all be fixed now. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:56 PM, John Roper wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2016 7:03 PM, "tisimst" wrote: > > > > > > Hi, John! > > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:27 PM, John Roper [via Lilypond] <[hidden &g

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-28 Thread John Roper
https://unsplash.com/search/sheet-music?photo=6mXWOm43zZg On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:06 PM, John Roper wrote: > Ok, the image errors should all be fixed now. > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:56 PM, John Roper > wrote: > >> >> On Nov 28, 2016 7:03 PM, "tisimst&q

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-28 Thread John Roper
The download links are shown as such for the learning resources because they are listed as downloads on the actual LilyPond website. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:09 PM, John Roper wrote: > https://unsplash.com/search/sheet-music?photo=6mXWOm43zZg > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:06 PM, J

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-28 Thread John Roper
oday.com/wordpress-used-on-25-percent-of-all-websites-report-151115). Even the lilypond blog runs on wordpress. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:23 PM, John Roper wrote: > The download links are shown as such for the learning resources because > they are listed as downloads on the actual LilyPond websi

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
OK. This was an idea that I had that I thought I'd share with you. My overall plan was that the website looks old and could use a redesign. I did it in WordPress because that is what I thought would be easiest for you, especially for things like the news and blog. Technically we could get a site th

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
Yea, where could the templates for the website now be found? I could do style updates. I wouldn't look as good as the WordPress but it can be better. On Nov 29, 2016 7:06 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > "Andrew Bernard" writes: > > > Hello John, > > > > > > > > Firstly, welcome to the lilypond com

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
A great example of an open source project's website is blender.org. It has an excellent design and it gives you all the information you need to know. The old version of their website can be found on archive.blender.org On Nov 29, 2016 7:15 AM, "Thiago Censi" wrote: > I am new here, but I leave m

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
I see a number of things on the current website that could be fixed even in its current form. For one, the items on the news page are all mixed up and jumbled together. On Nov 29, 2016 7:23 AM, "John Roper" wrote: > A great example of an open source project's website is blende

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
Not at my computer right now, but when I went to run make website in the Documentation folder, I got an error that said there was not target to make omp something. On Nov 29, 2016 3:44 PM, "Karlin High" wrote: > On 11/29/2016 10:22 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > > And, maybe wait for further suggest

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
ch better than any before... > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
jmroper.com/lilypond On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:58 PM, John Roper wrote: > Ok, I have updated the website. There is a little problem with the sidebar > pushing the other content down, but that is fine. My goal was to recreate > the current website using just html and css with a nicer

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
html/css... It's not my forte but I think it > might be one of yours! :) > > Chris > > On 29 Nov 2016 22:54, "Karlin High" wrote: > >> On 11/29/2016 4:42 PM, John Roper wrote: >> > I am trying to build the lilypond docs now. >> >> Very good! Ch

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
n my > laptops, tablets and phone, the Learn page is very difficult as it stands. > It's row upon row of basically undifferentiated choices- if you didn't go > there already knowing what you wanted, the page doesn't help you choose.

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
wysiwyg" way. > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
The issues are all fixed. This is my proposal. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:32 PM, John Roper wrote: > Also, the nice thing about this new design is that it is fully responsive. > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Chris Yate wrote: > >> On 30 Nov 2016 01:00, &qu

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
I just checked the website using lynx, and it renders perfectly in a text-based browser as well! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:43 PM, John Roper wrote: > The issues are all fixed. This is my proposal. > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:32 PM, John Roper > wrote: > >> Also, the nice

Re: New lilypond website - documentation

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
; > > > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/ __

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
The demo homepage on the site is fully working. All links are correct (except the navbar). On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:50 PM, John Roper wrote: > I just checked the website using lynx, and it renders perfectly in a > text-based browser as well! > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:43 PM

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread John Roper
I also tested in WebbIE 4 and the site looked fine. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:23 PM, John Roper wrote: > The demo homepage on the site is fully working. All links are correct > (except the navbar). > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:50 PM, John Roper > wrote: > >> I just c

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
m for the hours he put > > into it. The scrolling is not annoying on my tablets but was on my > > laptops, for some reason. That being said, having looked at the > > sample web site on my laptops, tablets and phone, the Learn page is > > very difficult as it stands. It's

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
You may have to reload your page a couple of times for the changes to update. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:46 AM, John Roper wrote: > >Text should stand out. It should be dark. Sometimes it should be bold; > >judiciously used of course like it is with the current main banner

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
Thanks Urs. I have no problem with concise and readable, the text is fine. Just please update the font. On Nov 30, 2016 7:08 AM, "Urs Liska" wrote: > > > Am 30. November 2016 12:58:43 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : > >Urs Liska writes: > > > >> A

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
I can make the links in the footer brighter and I will look into other fonts to use. Arial is the default font for many websites and it is the fallback font for most web browsers. On Nov 30, 2016 7:30 AM, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > >>> One of the major things on the site that make it look anti

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
In all sans-serif fonts that i's look like l's. Just writing this message, my email client's font (Gmail) is the same way. On Nov 30, 2016 7:35 AM, "John Roper" wrote: > I can make the links in the footer brighter and I will look into other > fonts to use. Aria

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
You make the argument of readability, and I counter it with this: https://www.google.com/amp/www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/03/serif-vs-sans-the-final-battle/amp/?client=ms-android-google On Nov 30, 2016 7:39 AM, "John Roper" wrote: > In all sans-serif fonts that i's look like

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
ogle > > Perhaps a misunderstanding: The readability concern is the grey > colour in combination with too thin letter strokes, not sans-serif per > se. > > > Werner > -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulatio

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
ompletely agree with this. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:21 AM, John Roper wrote: > Updates have been made. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> >> > You make the argument of readability, and I counter it with this: >> > https://www.goog

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
> Are you going to dictate to The New York Times, for example, that they >> > convert their serif to sans? >> >> You appear to be a person of very fixed opinions... >> > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-u

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
I added a small shadow to the boxes, and I fixed some coloring of links. You may have to force-refresh the page to see the changes (CTRL + F5) On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:15 AM, John Roper wrote: > Also, I should note that the text on my design is actually larger than > that on the current w

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
Once we agree on the particulars for this page, I will make one more page and then start to integrate with the textinfo docs. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Paul wrote: > On 11/30/2016 09:19 AM, John Roper wrote: > >> I added a small shadow to the boxes, and I fixed some coloring

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
t; > I feel we are not arguing at a level here where agreement or > disagreement makes any sense with regard to arriving at a consensus. > > -- > David Kastrup > > ___ > lilypond-user ma

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
nd-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
I updated the font with a serif font that looks good to me. Please, what do you think? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:44 PM, John Roper wrote: > I wanted to do that, but I got so much dislike from the community > members about the design, I redid it in a way that would be more > pleasin

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
>I like it, thanks! No problem, I do too! On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> I updated the font (again) and I think it works for everyone's >> requests. > > I like it, thanks! > > > Werner -- John Roper Freelance Develope

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
I updated the font (again) and I think it works for everyone's requests. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:47 PM, John Roper wrote: >>Can you try such a beast (whatever you recommend)? > Ok, I will take a look at it. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
e-a-sans-serif-font-that-appears-different-for-i-capital-i-and-l-small > > Can you try such a beast (whatever you recommend)? > > > Werner -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
>Are you aware of Steve Gibson's Pure-CSS Menu System? I am but I'd rather not use it. I am working on the download page. Just click on the download link in the menubar to see how it looks. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Karlin High wrote: > On 11/30/2016 3:51 PM, John Roper

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
wrote: > On 11/30/2016 4:06 PM, John Roper wrote: > >> Are you aware of Steve Gibson's Pure-CSS Menu System? > > I am but I'd rather not use it. > > Sure, no problem. > > > I am working on the download page. Just click on the download link in > > the m

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
>Thanks for working on this, John. No problem! On Nov 30, 2016 6:07 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > Thanks, Paul. > > My favorite of these is the current (second) sans-serif font. I didn't > think I would like it better than the current web page, but I do. > > Thanks for working on this, John. > >

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
I am prepared to take my design and start to convert it over to the text info generator (at least on the home page). On Nov 30, 2016 6:29 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > > > On 11/30/16 2:58 PM, "Noeck" wrote: > > > > >I was a bit disappointed that the suggestions have narrowed down so > >quickly

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
I am going to put the code in a GitHub repo for now so that I can keep track of it. On Nov 30, 2016 6:53 PM, "John Roper" wrote: > I am prepared to take my design and start to convert it over to the text > info generator (at least on the home page). > > On Nov 30, 2016 6

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
https://github.com/johnroper100/LilyPond-Web-Redesign On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:55 PM, John Roper wrote: > I am going to put the code in a GitHub repo for now so that I can keep track > of it. > > > On Nov 30, 2016 6:53 PM, "John Roper" wrote: >> >> I am pr

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
So, does texinfo create all the markup and you add the styling, or do you add some of the markup? If so, where is it? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:07 PM, John Roper wrote: > https://github.com/johnroper100/LilyPond-Web-Redesign > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:55 PM, John Roper wrote: >

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
What I had to do for the new design was create entirely new markup from scratch. If it is not possible to use that, we have no new design. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, John Roper wrote: > So, does texinfo create all the markup and you add the styling, or do > you add some of the mark

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
Why specifically do we *need* to use textinfo? If I could make a new system that would auto generate the docs that works with the current system would you use it? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:23 PM, John Roper wrote: > What I had to do for the new design was create entirely new markup >

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
Why is the website auto generated? What content is auto generated or is it just setup that way so that it is always built to the latest version for releases? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Paul wrote: > On 11/30/2016 04:51 PM, John Roper wrote: > >> OK, I removed the JavaScript dr

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
e. > > Cheers, > - Graham > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:48:53PM -0500, John Roper wrote: >> Why specifically do we *need* to use textinfo? If I could make a new >> system that would auto generate the docs that works with the current >> system would you use it? >&

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
Ok, here are my updates on the lilypond-website.css. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Paul wrote: > On 11/30/2016 08:01 PM, John Roper wrote: > >> Why is the website auto generated? What content is auto generated or >> is it just setup that way so that it is always built to the

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
Ok, I tested, and I made some more fixes. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:18 PM, John Roper wrote: > Ok, here are my updates on the lilypond-website.css. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Paul wrote: >> On 11/30/2016 08:01 PM, John Roper wrote: >> >>> Why is th

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread John Roper
And another fix for links. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:35 PM, John Roper wrote: > Ok, I tested, and I made some more fixes. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:18 PM, John Roper wrote: >> Ok, here are my updates on the lilypond-website.css. >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:53

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-01 Thread John Roper
ecause it is very uniform, not > distracting from the contents. > > >Werner -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-01 Thread John Roper
I saw that. The text does not scale as it should so I need to fix that. It wasn't very high on my priority list. On Dec 1, 2016 6:19 AM, "Urs Liska" wrote: > > > Am 01.12.2016 um 12:14 schrieb John Roper: > >> So, in my experience as a professional (web) desi

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-01 Thread John Roper
My css file is a proposed inclusion into the website. On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On 11/30/16 6:53 PM, "Paul" wrote: > >>On 11/30/2016 08:01 PM, John Roper wrote: >> >>> Why is the website auto generated? What conten

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-02 Thread John Roper
a small change; this CSS file includes a few changes at > once, and that makes it harder to view how this file has changed > over time. Would you be willing to send a file which only changes > the navbar, for example? > > Cheers, > - Graham > >

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-07 Thread John Roper
>>Am 07.12.2016 um 11:24 schrieb Phil Holmes: >> it would be too much effort to fix something so minor >From my naive point of view, there is something inherently wrong with a >website system if it is too much effort to correct a typo... >Joram LOL doesn't this sound familiar? _

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-11 Thread John Roper
>> Why this unwarranted hostility? ? >And my view is, if > you refuse to use JavaScript, or try to run a defunct browser, that's your > problem. That is my view too. I understand about your blind users, but you can view a javascript-enabled website with a text website. It is possible. __

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-11 Thread John Roper
I would really love to help, but I can spend the time fighting with every single person on the thread. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user