That links to a 322 kb pdf, which depending on your browser will either prompt you to
save or just open it remotely, which if it does the remote open (I think that is
default on IE), your going to see a polar bear in a snowstorm while it opens the
document or your browser may hang entirely. If
-Original Message-
From: John Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tar up directory structure but not contents
snip
P.S. Laugh all you want. In the Unix environment there are
usually 17 different ways to do
Maybe they need the outrageously new and cutting edge ability to do a subselect or run
stored procedure ;)
-Original Message-
From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MySQL 4.0
Thanks Mark.
I don't
Why doesn't IBM sell you a device - call it a Linux co-processor, (really an Intel
chip in a box) to attach to the mainframe to offload your java and other high cpu work
onto;) Obviously I'm joking, but it just seems to me the phrase different horses for
different courses seems to apply in
The sad part is that only people/organizations doing their own development are likely
to take this much care when coding. You commercial vendors will just allow you to buy
more CPU and ram as they need to get their product out the door.
-Original Message-
From: James Melin
My opinion is the same as yours. I tend to like efficient programs rather than
language du jour for the sake of being fashionable. I've got a lot of friends that
are all on the latest bandwagons and can't believe anyone would use a mainframe or the
mini computers anymore. I keep telling them
Plus, it's very un-unix like to give the user any sort of clue what to do;)
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: Administrivial
Harry,
That's cool. I just hope you don't think this will help anyone actually
about the new MySQL install.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:37:48 -0600 Ryan Ware said:
I don't believe you can. RPM only manages RPM's.
-Original Message-
From: Aria Bamdad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RPM
To which SCO will say, you're not the boss of me It ain't over.
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Novell has sent a new letter to SCO
Basically telling them to knock it off in a
Ok so then everyday when a new Windows virus comes out we get mailed and
told to go to Microsoft's update site. I think this service would be way to
noisy. It's telling me to update my virus definitions and patch my
system everyday. Course on the brighter side, consumers may get the idea
that a
I don't know what OS the rover uses, but are you implying that Linux
tolerates bad ram any better?
-Original Message-
From: Ranga Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows? Blue Screen?
News:
Spirit's Troubled
We're stopping about 2 per minute now. I guess the web is being slowed down
due to the bandwidth suckage. If the rate I'm seeing them at is an
indicator of the number of machines, I'd say SCO will go dark again.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
Yes. No need to discuss when we can participate in one of our regularly
scheduled holy wars such as best text editor, language, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Henry Schaffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PLEASE don't
-Original Message-
From: Chris Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SCO sues Novell
Dave Jones wrote:
SCO sues Novell over Unix rights
It's kind of interesting... I think that SCO does have
more rights
-Original Message-
From: Nick Laflamme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewalls?
Post, Mark K wrote:
I would also echo Adam's sentiment about keeping the number of
point-to-point links per guest small. It
-Original Message-
From: Ceruti, Gerard G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LINUX-390] MS url
=20
Hi People
=20
Is anyone aware of rebuttals to the doco on
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/facts/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: Chris Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone Nagios? (GPL discussion)
snip
RMS speaks of the need for localized customizations (non
distributed) work on GPL software. The idea is
although to make a
living I have to work with it. That speaks volumes.
-Original Message-
From: Ranga Nathan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/5/04 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone Nagios? (GPL discussion)
Wrong. GPL protects the developers more than open source.
Open Source allows commercial
That's what is nice about the BSD for commercial development. Yes you can
use it in your closed product enhance it if you want and not contribute a
damn thing back. Here's the key, so can ANYONE else. It's standing on the
shoulders of giants so to speak, whereas the GPL is staning on the
I think it's like I heard the other day. Just mention the special LINUX
promotional code, and save thousands on your next Microsoft purchase
I think you will see more governments and large companies playing the Linux
card. Not because they really plan to use Linux, but because Microsoft has
-Original Message-
From: Doug Fuerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: At last some real achiever being recognized by
the monarch
Everyone know that Al Gore invented the Internet. When is he being
knighted, and do
-Original Message-
From: Jay Maynard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: At last some real achiever being recognized by
the monarch
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 04:54:12PM -0500, David Boyes wrote:
Perhaps Richard
Conflicting reports amongst itself? Today, they will tell us it IS ready
for the desktop.
http://news.com.com/2100-7344_3-5104650.html?tag=nefd_top
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I just ran accross this a couple of weeks back. Here be the link
http://www.cs.unm.edu/~dlchao/flake/doom/
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Perpetuating Myths about the
Happy 4th of July.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Fuerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SCO Attacks Open Source License
Easy Phil. We all have to respect the others laws. The bottom
line is, most
of us don't
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Connectix--now MS--Virtual PC drops guest OS support
Everyone noticed that MS dropped support for Linux, BSD, Netware, and
Solaris from the new
-Original Message-
From: Jim Sibley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Notes server finally available on Linux for 390!
The current Notes client is very tied into the MS
APIs. Porting
it to any other platform
-Original Message-
From: Henry Schaffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Notes server finally available on Linux for 390!
Ryan Ware writes:
--
From: Jim Sibley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
That's a really
This article speaks about that article and the topic of indemnification
http://www.technewsworld.com/perl/story/31702.html
-Original Message-
From: David Boyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: [IP] more on the
Actually I think this from the OP answeres the question
SuSE arguments
typically
revolve around: first on s/390, work more closely with s/390
community,
and GA SuSE at more current patch-levels than RH (particularly
where
s/390 or VM is concerned).
It sounds like Suse is the better choice for
Everybody wang chown tonight ;)
-Original Message-
From: Michael MacIsaac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: chown problems
Operation not permitted
Only root can chown.
-Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at
Link?
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Paper on Web Site - Migrating Windows Servers to Samba
Mike MacIsaac of IBM has generously contributed a new paper that he spent
of hearing
it.
http://linuxvm.org/present/
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Ware [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Paper on Web Site - Migrating Windows Servers to Samba
Link?
-Original Message
-5940
VM Enterprise Servers, The Boeing Company
--
From: Ryan Ware
Reply To: Linux on 390 Port
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: [IP] China blocks foreign software
And vehicles kill more people than guns
Well, it is true, that we don't actually know every thing windows does
because we can't see the code. Not trying to start any conspiracy theories,
but you get my point.
-Original Message-
From: David Boyes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL
Although I believe it is far better to put foot to ass with terrorism than
hugs and understanding their viewpoint.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thornton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: [IP] China blocks
Microsoft has used Akamai for eons for downloads of all sorts. I find it
amusing that people think that Microsoft would have an issue with using a
linux server for something. I guess this
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.linuxworldexpo.com is amusing
also.
-Original
]
Subject: Re: Microsoft beats the blaster
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
Microsoft has used Akamai for eons for downloads of all sorts. I find
it
amusing that people think that Microsoft would have an issue with using
a
linux server for something. I guess this
http
using/fixing their Windows servers. At least that's what I gathered from
the article.
Ryan Ware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ic.comTo
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED
I tend to think in this case Akamai were the people for the job, it was
irrelevant to Microsoft what they used to do it. To Akamai, it was a
strategic decision to use Linux in their business. Both decisions were
pragmattic.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Casey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That document shows that for some things windows is definitely not a ready
fit. Internet infrastructure is definitely one of those things. If
Microsoft is truly switched over, I've heard the database backend is still
on Solaris - which I would believe, they probably are running a hybrid
version
Yes and no. From what I've read Canopy's strategy filters down to all their
holdings.
-Original Message-
From: David Andrews [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nothing to do with SCO (was: SCO Wins Again)
On
I'm desperately searching for a patch for my Amiga.
-Original Message-
From: paultz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Very Serious Virus Alert
Naturally, this only effects Windows operating systems! Linux and
Edit the sshd config file. Usually it is /etc/ssh/sshd_config The line
that says allow root login change from yes to no.
-Original Message-
From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: where root can login from
On
Did you stop and start the ssh server after changing the config file?
-Original Message-
From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: where root can login from
Edit the sshd config file. Usually it is
Didn't Elwood pick up Jake at Joliet?
It's 106 miles to Chicago
We've got a half a tank of gas
A full pack of cigarrettes
It's dark and we're wearing sunglasses
Hit it!
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL
I think the person has next to no grasp of computer technology and probably
meant crackers even though that is wrong too.
-Original Message-
From: Richards.Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Background on SCO
Would you
I don't think IBM is going to dump AIX for a long time. Linux can't scale
vertically as well as any of the commercial Unices. Eventually it probably
will, but it will take years before you'll be able to buy a 64 bit version
of Redhat loaded on a 64 processor system.
-Original Message-
-Original Message-
From: Rod Furey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SCO ups the ante (this is getting interesting)
will, but it will take years before you'll be able to buy a 64 bit version
of Redhat loaded on a 64
As the larger Linux vendors grow they may look into Akamai for ditributing
downloads similar to what Microsoft does. But you are correct in that when
something popular hits they tend to go dark.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003
-Original Message-
From: Tom Duerbusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ftpd documentation
Which ftpd are you using? ProFTP? Something else
What? There is more than one? I should have known that I have too
many
-Original Message-
From: Fargusson.Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unsupportable FUD
While SCO did not put anything about GPL or OSS in the suit, they have =
been making comments that Linux, and perhaps GNU software,
A lot of companies, mine included strip attachments at the mail gateway,
that way new viruses will not get through, assuming you've blocked that type
off attachment. This helps prevent the -our vendor doesn't have definitions
for that yet or their ftp server is unreachable.
-Original
and Viruses
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
A lot of companies, mine included strip attachments at the mail gateway,
that way new viruses will not get through, assuming you've blocked that
type
That's a bit excessive. Using attachments is perfectly legitimate, and
with procedures like
He is right, if there were an office suite that ran like Office on windows
available on Linux, it would be a no-brainer to switch.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ellison:
-Original Message-
From: Gustavson, John (IDS ECCS) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ASP?
Instant ASP converts the ASP's to JSP's. The server runs as a jvm.
there are also some commercial products.
Since we all know telnet is horrible in this day and age, why isn't it
dropped entirely? Is there any function it can do that SSH cannot? Every
time someone brings up Telnet, they are smacked down by everyone telling
them find another way. Shouldn't we just end the debate and get rid of it?
. It
isn't always feasible to make other departments install an SSH client to
access your system.
It would be nice if Microsoft would distribute an SSH client with windows
like it does telnet, but then they would probably break it like they did
telnet.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Ware
This is no less significant than IBM keeping score for the US Open tennis
tournament :)
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: recipie macros now available for download
On
Can you switch shells? Or logon as a different user that has a different
shell than bash. Does either of those make a difference?
-Original Message-
From: Noll, Ralph [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: logon
login
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bielefeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISPF for Linux + Other Question
Wow, I sure got lots of replies to this. There seems to be a
lot of controversy over what the best
Basically there are a bunch of things that make up TCO. In a mainframe
solution the hardware makes up more of the costs, people, network
infrastructure, etc make up less. In a PC server solution it is reversed.
TCO is a very hard thing to define. I think the mainframe has the deck
stacked
Although, I must add Windows is improving. Our payroll app runs on Win2k
and has an uptime of just over 100 days. Much better than we ever achieved
when the same app ran on windows NT. It is still short of our Unix
performance, and from what I am reading far short of Mainframe reliability.
AMD may steal some of Intels play because their 64 bit chip will also be
backwards compatible. Everyone associates Intel with cheap commodity
processing. Itanium does not fit that bill. They will need to do some
marketing to inform corporate America why they should spend more money on a
: Re: IBM stops Linux Itanium effort
On Thursday, 02/13/2003 at 08:37 CST, Ryan Ware [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I do like Intel's approach of brand new, not backward
compatible. Backwards compatible is another phrase for compromise.
The phenomenal success of S/360, S/370, S/370-XA, S/370-ESA
is going to have a hard time getting everyone
converted to Itanium. I suspect that the AMD 64 bit chips will have a
much easier time attracting vendors once it is actually available.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Ware [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:22 AM
Raid 1+0 is faster than raid 5 if your have a lot of writes to the database.
I would guess IBM probably has a Redbook on some of this somewhere for DB2.
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup and I'm getting blank ones from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ken Dreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple posts Yep
Yes, I am also seeing this...
Ken
At 12:38 PM 2/6/2003 -0800,
MVS B1 SUPPORT: Selected MVS/ESA products, collectively called a
trusted computing base (TCB), were evaluated by the United States
Department of Defense's National Computer Security Center (NCSC),
found to meet the criteria for a B1 level of trusted system, and
Microsoft has only achieved a
It looks like it installed succesfully sans noticing that libaprutil.so.0
is missing. Either libaprutil.so.0 is missing or there is a link to it
missing. I would take a spin out to Apache.org and look through faq's.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Vance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
70 matches
Mail list logo
