Oron Peled wrote:
On Thursday, 22 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Mike Kemelmakher, from the post of Thu, 22 May:
I completely agree and support Gilads opinion - developing commercial
product on Fedora is a bad idea.
great. so we all agree.
No we don't ;-)
2008/5/25 Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The developers work on Windows workstations. In the good scenario they pull
an Eclipse session with X windows. In the bad scenario they run Linux +
Eclipse and toolchain in VMware. In the really bad situation they program
everything in Visual
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:04:00AM +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
2008/5/23 Oron Peled [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another advantage in this kind of setup, is that when people develop
on Fedora (while integrating with RedHat/Centos) they have a looking
glass into the next RedHat/Centos release.
I completely agree and support Gilads opinion - developing commercial
product on Fedora is a bad idea.
-Mike
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Oron Peled wrote:
On Monday, 5 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
which brings me to the question - should I stick to Fedora (7? 8?)
for the
devel environment
Quoting Mike Kemelmakher, from the post of Thu, 22 May:
I completely agree and support Gilads opinion - developing commercial
product on Fedora is a bad idea.
great. so we all agree. Fedora is bad for production.
also RHEL/CentOS because it's missing a lot of packages and external
repos
On Thursday, 22 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Mike Kemelmakher, from the post of Thu, 22 May:
I completely agree and support Gilads opinion - developing commercial
product on Fedora is a bad idea.
great. so we all agree.
No we don't ;-)
Fedora is bad for production.
That's
Hi,
2008/5/22 Oron Peled [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday, 22 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Mike Kemelmakher, from the post of Thu, 22 May:
I completely agree and support Gilads opinion - developing commercial
product on Fedora is a bad idea.
great. so we all agree.
I do Agree
2008/5/23 Oron Peled [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another advantage in this kind of setup, is that when people develop
on Fedora (while integrating with RedHat/Centos) they have a looking
glass into the next RedHat/Centos release.
This means that if they started few months ago using Fedora-8, by the
Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Gilad Ben-Yossef, from the post of Tue, 06 May:
Ira Abramov wrote:
centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell
I would say that claiming that CentOS5 is not a good development
environment for a
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:40 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop
for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL repositories give us binaries
newer than what Ubuntu
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:25 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:40 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop
for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. as other have mentioned, if the machines are being used for
development and testing, CentOS should be OK.
If the machines are being used for production (servers, machines that
will end up in your client's hands,
Quoting Gilboa Davara, from the post of Wed, 07 May:
- Gilboa
[1] http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/
yup, that's the repo that supplies us with a really unstable kdevelop...
P.S. as other have mentioned, if the machines are being used for
development and testing, CentOS should be OK.
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 22:21 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. as other have mentioned, if the machines are being used for
development and testing, CentOS should be OK.
If the machines are being used for production
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 15:26 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Gilboa Davara, from the post of Wed, 07 May:
- Gilboa
[1] http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/
yup, that's the repo that supplies us with a really unstable kdevelop...
Have you reported the problem in the kde-redhat ML?
Quoting Gilad Ben-Yossef, from the post of Tue, 06 May:
Ira Abramov wrote:
centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell
I would say that claiming that CentOS5 is not a good development
environment for a program that will deployed on
Ira,
which repository did you use for the KDE RPMS? what centos shipped
with or from kde-redhat.sf.net? The ones that comes with Centos are
crappy as hell.
Thanks,
Hetz
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Ira Abramov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Ira Abramov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop
for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL repositories give us binaries
newer than
On Monday, 5 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
which brings me to the question - should I stick to Fedora (7? 8?) for the
devel environment and break from the RPM world and go for Lenny or Hardy?
Generally, the requirements of any enterprise/stable distributions
are bad for developers by
Ira Abramov wrote:
you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop
for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are
seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL repositories give us binaries
newer than what Ubuntu offers, but it gets stuck and sometimes
Oron Peled wrote:
On Monday, 5 בMay 2008, Ira Abramov wrote:
which brings me to the question - should I stick to Fedora (7? 8?) for the
devel environment and break from the RPM world and go for Lenny or Hardy?
Generally, the requirements of any enterprise/stable distributions
are bad
21 matches
Mail list logo
