A new release was proposed back in September 2017[0] but I guess that
effort ran out of steam. Is there still a plan/desire to cut a release?
(Cc list is those who contributed to that thread).
I'm asking because I was about to upload 1.4.2 (long overdue) to Debian
when I noticed that sunxi-fel
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 11:05 +, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> > I don't have any major comments but I guess it all depends on the DT
> > maintainers view on the symbolic link to share the DTSI.
>
> I am curious too ;-)
> But I saw symlinks for the RaspberryPi 3 (check
>
On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 21:38 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> Even if we had a firmware implementation under a DFSG-compatible
> license, inclusion in main would still pose a problem as we
> cannot build it with the tools in main
I think if the source is available and it is DFSG free then it should
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 16:51 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> So it doesn't error out if the symlink already exists (E.G. is pointing
> to
> the old name).
Thanks, I guess I always cleaned my tree between tests!
>
> Also add the -n option for consistency with the install target.
>
>
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 00:49 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:59:29 +0100
> Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 16:51 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > > So it doesn't error out if the symlink alre
r raw binaries since they would not
normally be installed in $PATH.
Do not prefix "phoenix_info", since "phoenix" already seems like an appropriate
prefix for this particular tool.
Update in-tree callers, README and .gitignore accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell &l
$(TOOLS)
into $(FEXC_LINKS), because install(1) does not seem to have a mode which
preserves symlinks so it needs to be done separately.
Supports DESTDIR to allow for convenient installation into a staging dir for
distro packaging convenience.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org
, by letting packagers only include the
target tools when building for a suitable ARM architecture.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk>
---
Makefile | 19 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c6b790f..6
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 21:11 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Ian" == Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> > The Debian package (of v1.2-ish) has:
> > install -m0755 usb-boot $(PKG)/usr/bin/sunxi-usb-boot
&
As discussed in
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux-sunxi/skn-959DYHU and
specifically
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux-sunxi/skn-959DYHU/w6YGlnfbAwAJ he
re are some patches to add a sunxi- prefix to (most) tools and to add
an install target.
Ian.
--
You received this message
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 21:11 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Ian" == Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> > The Debian package (of v1.2-ish) has:
> > install -m0755 usb-boot $(PKG)/usr/bin/sunxi-usb-boot
&
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 12:06 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> [...]
> > There is still an unresolved inconvenience related to Linux
> > distributions arbitrarily renaming the tools when doing sunxi-tools
> > packaging. It would be great if we could have a unification of th
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 10:21 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > > > > > "Ian" == Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'd be inclined to:
> > * Prefix everything except bin2fex+fex2bin with sunxi-
> > * Try d
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 11:42 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> IMHO it's best to do this renaming right now.
I agree, lets get this squared away now and then do the v1.3 release
afterwards (but, hopefully, soon).
Ian.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
(adding some CCs of people who I think might be in a position to do
this)
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 21:13 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> AFAICS the sunxi-tools "fel" utility rework is complete now, so
> how about tagging a new sunxi-tools upstream release (v1.3)? I
> think that
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 12:10 +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
> > (adding some CCs of people who I think might be in a position to do
> > this)
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 21:13 +0200,
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 13:36 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 10:54:32 +0100
> Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > (adding some CCs of people who I think might be in a position to do
> > this)
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-10-
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 11:17 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:08:21PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:06 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > The R8 is very close to the A13, but it still has a few differences,
&
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 10:22 +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey all,
Did you CC the wrong Hans by mistake?
> just working on a _defconfig for our board and noticed that u-boot fails
> to compile if my defconfig doesn't have:
> # CONFIG_CMD_IMLS is not set
>
> What supprised me is that it has
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:06 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The R8 is very close to the A13, but it still has a few differences,
> notably a composite output, which the A13 lacks.
>
> Add a DTSI based on the A13's to hold those differences.
Is this a direct import of one from the Linux tree?
>
>
On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 03:50 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> > > -swaptbl_start:
> > > +appended_data:
> >
> > If I'm reading correctly you've changed things so that there is an
> > implicit data structure present here, namely the spl addr followed
> by
> > the swaptbl (as before).
>
> That's
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 09:33 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Add a new field 'spl_addr' to the SoC description structure and adjust
the code to honor it. This is needed for supporting Allwinner A80.
Tested on Allwinner A20 by changing the 'spl_addr' to 0x28000 in the
'fel' tool and using a
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:21 +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey,
On 13-08-15 09:55, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:24 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:01:39 +0100
Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
A cross-binutils is generally a bit
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 03:39 -0700, ghl.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 1:10:45 PM UTC+5:30, Ian Campbell
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 12:27 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
I assume that all allwinner core enable in hyp mode and
following
code
checks for hyp
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 12:27 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
I assume that all allwinner core enable in hyp mode and following
code
checks for hyp mode in u-boot( in start.S)
HYP mode requires PSCI and HYP support in U-boot. Last I checked we don't
support the H3 yet.
I vaguely recall
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 01:26 +0200, Bernhard Nortmann wrote:
void aw_fel_write_uboot_image(libusb_device_handle *usb,
- uint8_t *buf, size_t len)
+ uint8_t *buf, int len)
Siahei's comments may make this moot, but if you want len to be signed you
most likely want
to the cross-as.
There is no change to the resulting header file.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
---
fel-to-spl-thunk.S | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fel-to-spl-thunk.S b/fel-to-spl-thunk.S
index 93350b3..08c7423 100644
--- a/fel
On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 10:51 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/07949bf9c63c9a80027fe8452d5fe8b9ba9b3c23
I'll see about backporting that to the 4.1 kernel in Debian until we
move to 4.2.
It turns out that this patch while necessary is not sufficient and I
also needed
This allows the module to be autoloaded.
Together with 07949bf9c63c (cpufreq: dt: allow driver to boot
automatically) this is sufficient to allow a modular kernel (such
as Debian's) to enable cpufreq on a Cubietruck.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
Cc: Liam Girdwood lgirdw
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 15:47 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Ian Campbell i...@debian.org
wrote:
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 22:54 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Leonardo Canducci
leonardo.candu...@gmail.com wrote:
I got lost
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 14:22 +0200, Bernhard Nortmann wrote:
Regarding the 'auto-execution' of code: I think this is somewhat
independent of
the suggested extension to load the main U-Boot binary. It would probably be
useful if the fel utility was able to keep track of addresses it has
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 11:19 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 06-07-15 16:28, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 14:11 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 06-07-15 09:02, Bernhard Nortmann wrote:
Hello Hans!
Am 05.07.2015 11:54, schrieb Hans de Goede:
This seems like
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 14:11 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 06-07-15 09:02, Bernhard Nortmann wrote:
Hello Hans!
Am 05.07.2015 11:54, schrieb Hans de Goede:
This seems like a good idea to me, am I reading both the --help
and the code correctly that this only writes u-boot but
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 09:38 +0200, Roy Spliet wrote:
Please try and avoid sending HTML Mail as well as top posting.
Oh yes, thanks for pointing this one out. I increased the malloc pool
during debugging as google hinted towards UBI being rather
memory-hungry, but forgot to double-check
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 09:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 21-05-15 21:02, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 20:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
[...]
Please create a struct reflecting the register layout and
then initialize a ptr to this struct from the base-address
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 20:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
[...]
Please create a struct reflecting the register layout and
then initialize a ptr to this struct from the base-address
and get register addresses this way, this is how we deal
with this in pretty much all other sunxi code, see e.g.:
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 23-04-15 14:36, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le 2015-04-23 12:00, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 23-04-15 11:03, Reinhard Max wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 at 18:31, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
I think we should do that too for
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 10:00 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:34:42PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 21:17 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Well, the discussion has started on the other part of the thread. I
think we've agreed so far that it should
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 21:17 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Well, the discussion has started on the other part of the thread. I
think we've agreed so far that it should be: [Vendor]_[Device], except
in a few cases where [Vendor]_ should be omitted:
[...]
* When the device can clearly be
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 09:39 -0700, Fabio_Khan wrote:
Hello Everyone!
I have just bought a Cubietruck and I really want to set up an
hypervisor on it. My aim is to build the system entirely on a SD card
Cool!
FYI I'm one of the developers of Xen on ARM, but.. I'm about to go on
vacation for
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 12:44 -0700, Dániel Varga wrote:
I have the same problem, with both mainline kernel and the latest
sunxi. I have a gigabit switch, I also set 100mbit link speed to
workaround TCP session stalls. It does not stall anymore, but the
actually speed is about 5Mbit. I did some
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 12:20 +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
Hi,
Just saw this:
https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2015/20150327
Some sunxi based boards (bananapi, lime, linksprite) seems to be
supported by the next debian jessie installer.
Testers welcomed, since RC1
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 17:23 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
Based on that I'm now running a full test with tx delay == 1.
First results are positive, running with tx delay on the two problematic
boards I've managed a few successful flights runs over the weekend.
Today I'll deploy to all
Hi all,
At work I am in the process of deploying an array of 4 cubietrucks for
use in the Xen Project automated test framework.
2 of the 4 boards seem to work just fine in (repeated) pre-commissioning
tests but two are failing fairly reliably.
One with:
Timeout, server not responding.
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not really sure where to start looking. Perhaps CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY
on the u-boot side might be relevant?
Yes that is the first thing I was thinking of, the cubietruck is the only
gbit phy
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:42 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not really sure where to start looking. Perhaps CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY
on the u-boot side might be relevant?
Yes that is the first
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 18:32 +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le vendredi 20 mars 2015 à 19:21 +0200, Siarhei Siamashka a écrit :
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:51:03 +0100
Paul Kocialkowski cont...@paulk.fr wrote:
After investigating a bit, I found out that I was unable to boot
sunxi-3.4 on
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:39 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm going to triple check my remote recovery procedures and then do
some experiments on one of the problematic boards.
Actually, I remember I could use mw.l on the u-boot prompt to fiddle
with the register values, so no need
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:27 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 20-03-15 15:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:42 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not really sure where to start
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 19:13 +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Now how am I to enable OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT
through Kconfig without modifying anything on the tree and in a
scriptable way (no menuconfig)?
You can edit .config by whatever scripting means you like really.
construct a default
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 12:16 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
I'm not sure if stdout-path supports aliases
I thought it did but ePAPR section 3.5 says A string that specifies the
full path to the node which suggests not, and AFAICT the code doesn't
try to handle alias.
Ian.
--
You received this
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 22:45 +0100, Jens Lucius wrote:
The Forfun Q88DB is an A13 tablet in the common Q8 format.
Features are 512MB RAM, 4GB NAND, 7 Display, RTL8188 Wifi, 2 cameras.
For more details see: http://linux-sunxi.org/Forfun_Q88DB
Signed-off-by: Jens Lucius i...@jenslucius.com
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:52 +0100, Jens Thiele wrote:
B.R. Oake bro...@openmailbox.org writes:
Hi Ian, Hans,
On 28/02/15 16:18, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 11:49 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 21-02-15 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
Speaking of which, if someone were
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 02:11 +, B.R. Oake wrote:
we should also include:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ba168a3c7ff6df2e346959445190484b8331eb3d
Hans, do you agree?
Ian, do you need me to raise a Debian bug about this last missing patch?
If
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 00:07 +0200, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Just one suggestion. It would be really nice if the Debian installer
could present itself on all the available consoles, so that the user
can use any of them for providing input to the installer.
There is some reason why d-i doesn't
On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
What would be actually your suggestion?
For sunxi-tools: simple makefile with a working 'make install
DESTDIR=/path/foo'.
...which installs not-too-generically named binaries, with that: ack
from me too.
WRT not-too-generically named:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 11:31 +0200, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:12:32 +
Ian Campbell ijc+ub...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 18:55 +0200, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
We might want to push sunxi-tools into more Linux distributions than
just Debian
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 09:11 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note assuming you're using linux-sunxi kernels and not upstream kernels you
also
need Enable workarounds for booting old kernels for things to boot at all
on A20 based devices,
IIRC there is also an env var which can be set to force
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 11:46 +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
ADDITIONS:
A33: datasheet and user guide, both at version 1.1. (released 5 days ago)
A80: datasheet and user guide, both at version 1.1. (released 2 months ago).
Finally, at the https://github.com/allwinner-zh/bootloader
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 16:30 +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey guys,
with FOSDEM 2015 approaching rapidly again, I was wondering if there is
anything organized again this year? If not, Who's up for it? :) I will
be attending FOSDEM and will have a stand for saturday/sunday for my
work
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 14:53 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Or alternatively, nuke your environment so that you get the default
one using:
sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=1024 seek=544 count=256
You can do this with the env command from the u-boot cmdline too. I
forget the parameters, but
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:15 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/17/2014 04:55 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:39:18PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 15:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
This is a preparation patch for making the pll5 p divisor configurable
through Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
--
You received this message because you
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 22:48 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 04:23:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 22:17 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
-if TARGET_SUN4I || TARGET_SUN5I || TARGET_SUN6I || TARGET_SUN7I
+ default sun4i if TARGET_SUN4I
+ default sun5i if TARGET_SUN5I
+ default sun6i if TARGET_SUN5I
There is a typo here which is apparent with MAKEALL -s sunxi, since
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 06:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/12/2014 11:19 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 20:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Ian,
Here is v3 of my second sdcard slot patch-set.
Changes since v2:
- Rebased on top of latest u-boot-sunxi-next
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 10:43 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:11 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
The basic blocks of the A23 are similar to the A31 (sun6i). Re-use
sun6i code for initial clock, gpio
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 16:23 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:11 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
From: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
The A31, A23 and later SoCs have an extra pin controller, called
, we make it dev 0 because that is where the SPL
will load the tertiary payload (the actual u-boot binary in our case) from,
see: common/spl/spl_mmc.c, which has dev 0 hardcoded everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
--
You
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 20:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Unify the sunxi Kconfig code, instead of having seperate code blocks for
separate
each of sun4i, sun5i and sun7i.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Looks pretty familiar ;-)
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 20:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Ian,
Here is v3 of my second sdcard slot patch-set.
Changes since v2:
- Rebased on top of latest u-boot-sunxi-next
- Fixed Kconfig help text for : sunxi: Turn MMC_SUNXI_SLOT_EXTRA into a
proper Kconfig option to also mention
-by: Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
(nb: this isn't pure code motion, please mention that in the commit log
in the future).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group
or have been moved out.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/timer.h | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/timer.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi
the empty string directly, but I
think it will do the right thing (i.e. return -1) via a more or less
convoluted path. Did you check this?
Assuming you have then: Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
Ian.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
linux
will need to change things to be a bit more flexible.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
(right address this time ;-))
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/gpio.h | 2 ++
board/sunxi/board.c| 6 +++---
2 files
can also boot, and there we want to have both in the SPL, so that
a single u-boot binary can both from both. So for the M3 we do prefix the
defconfig setting with the special +S: syntax so that it applies to the
SPL too.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:11 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
The Allwinner A23 SoC has reset controls like the A31 (sun6i).
The FIFO address is also the same as sun6i.
Re-use code added for sun6i.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
---
arch
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:11 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
The basic blocks of the A23 are similar to the A31 (sun6i). Re-use
sun6i code for initial clock, gpio, and uart setup.
Do I take it that sun8i is also in the same position wrt DRAM bring up
code not existing yet and there therefore being no
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:11 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
From: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
The A31, A23 and later SoCs have an extra pin controller, called CPUs_PIO
or R_PIO, which handles pin banks L and beyond.
Does it also have enough space for 9 banks? Since you overlay a struct
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:11 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
The prcm apb0 controls multiple modules. Allow specifying which
modules to enable clocks and de-assert resets so the function
can be reused.
How come this isn't actually called on sun6i?
(naughty of me not to notice this when it was
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 17:11 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:11 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
The prcm apb0 controls multiple modules. Allow specifying which
modules to enable clocks and de-assert resets so the function
can be reused.
How come this isn't actually called
better
but I suppose sticking with the h/w names is fine.
CONFIG_CONS_INDEX is also getting a bit out of hand, eventually we
should make it a Kconfig choice option.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c
On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 17:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 10:32 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note we also drop the SPL check for initializing the 2nd mmc slot, the SPL
check is not necessary with Kconfig, because only
On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 17:10 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 10/04/2014 10:35 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
sunxi SOCs can boot from both mmc0 and mmc2, detect from which one we're
booting, and make that one mmc dev 0 so that a single u-boot
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 10:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 10:37 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
None of the known sunxi devices actually use mmc1 routed through PH, where
as some devices do actually use mmc1 routed through
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
drivers/gpio/sunxi_gpio.c already has sunxi_gpio_input exported via the
standard gpio_get_value name.
Ian.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
board/sunxi/Kconfig | 27 +++
drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c | 20
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/sunxi/Kconfig
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note we also drop the SPL check for initializing the 2nd mmc slot, the SPL
check is not necessary with Kconfig, because only options explicitly marked
as also being for the SPL get set during SPL builds.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
sunxi SOCs can boot from both mmc0 and mmc2, detect from which one we're
booting, and make that one mmc dev 0 so that a single u-boot binary can
be used for both the onboard eMMC and for external sdcards.
Where does the dependency on dev
will need to change things to be a bit more flexible.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Although it seems that adding a Kconfig choice option would only be a
dozen or so lines of pretty trivial stuff if we wanted to do it now.
Ian
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
diff --git a/configs/Mele_M3_defconfig b/configs/Mele_M3_defconfig
index 645b236..50979e2 100644
--- a/configs/Mele_M3_defconfig
+++ b/configs/Mele_M3_defconfig
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
CONFIG_SPL=y
-September/190043.html
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org
Cc: Maxime Ripard maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
I'll apply these to u-boot-sunxi#next once I get a spare moment,
probably
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:06 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 14:37 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 08:16:30PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
The Colombus board is an A31 evaluation board
),
100Mbit ethernet, HDMI out, 3 USB A receptacles, VGA, and A/V OUT connections.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 09:38 +0200, Jorge wrote:
You'll need to run an hypervisor to arbitre the access to shared
resources for the two OSs, look
at http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Allwinner
http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 09:19 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 09:38 +0200, Jorge wrote:
You'll need to run an hypervisor to arbitre the access to shared
resources for the two OSs, look
at
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Allwinner
http
his reply downthread) of what's going on, but other than that:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
and ack to pushing it for v2014.10.
---
board/sunxi/gmac.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/sunxi/gmac.c b/board/sunxi/gmac.c
index e7ff952..f58c963
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:08 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Right, so lets just drop the board and I'll do a pull-req with only
the
bananapi gmac fix, can I have your Reviewed-by for that one please?
Done.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 20:09 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 16:01 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
The Colombus board is an A31 evaluation board from WITS Technology.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org
---
configs/Colombus_defconfig | 4
1 file changed, 4
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 17:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
If you take a closer look at the code you will see not all 3 writes are the
same:
/* Set PLL ldo voltage without this PLL6 does not work properly */
writel(PRCM_PLL_CTRL_LDO_DIGITAL_EN | PRCM_PLL_CTRL_LDO_ANALOG_EN |
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
