Re: [pfSense] looking for perfect pfsense box for home?

+1 On 08/04/2016 06:50 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: Open source is no different, there are sill value exchanges that must exist. All sides must be content with the exchange. I look forward to your response. Jim ___ pfSense mailing list

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

Will the 2.4 run on Odroid C2 (arm, quad 64bit) running with the Ethernet and a USB<->Ethernet external converter to get 2 ports. On 07/29/2016 11:19 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the 'nano' image. We are including ARM support

Re: [pfSense] 2.3_1 ?

On 05/05/2016 03:13 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-05-05 15:11, Bob Gustafson wrote: On 05/05/2016 02:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-05-05 14:23, Bob Gustafson wrote: On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather <p...@gromit.dlib.vt.

Re: [pfSense] 2.3_1 ?

On 05/05/2016 02:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-05-05 14:23, Bob Gustafson wrote: On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather <p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Vick Khera <vi...@khera.org> wrote: On Tue,

Re: [pfSense] 2.3_1 ?

On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather wrote: On May 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Vick Khera wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeppe Øland wrote: Does this update actually work?

Re: [pfSense] USB3 to ethernet adaptor

There is a FAQ for the v3: Compare to v2, is there any new feature for GS108Ev3? Yes, staring from v3, GS108E can be managed by web browser IE9 ~ 11, Firefox 26 ~ 29.0.1, Chrome 33.0.1750.117 ~ 35.0.1916.114 m, Safari 10.8.5. On 05/03/2016 08:44 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote: The only

Re: [pfSense] USB3 to ethernet adaptor

The only downloadable user guide refers only to Windows utility software. At least there is downloadable user guide.. Bob G On 05/03/2016 05:47 AM, Philipp Tölke wrote: A Netgear Prosafe GS-108E (or 105E) is reasonably cheap (~$50) and manageable; try to get the version 3, it has a

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.2-RELEASE Now Available

Folks in the past have wondered about the time it takes to upgrade Today - except for the initial clicks, the process was totally automatic 14:21 Started uploading new version 14:36 logging started on new version (?) 14:37 started reinstalling package Asterisk 15:18 completed reinstalling

Re: [pfSense] Packages are currently being reinstalled in the background. since last night... nothing showing on the console...

I have an Alix board and upgraded to 2.2.1 just fine (I think..) I have the application Asterisk installed as a package. In the past I have noted that it can take a long time to install/re-install this package on an update of the system. On the order of 40min - 1hr. Nothing much is happening

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.1-RELEASE sudo issues?

Maybe your 'user' is not a member of the 'wheel' group or whatever it is called - the sudo eligible group. Bob G On 03/17/2015 03:55 PM, Manojav Sridhar wrote: I should add the sudo works when logged in as root, but not any other user, strange. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Manojav

Re: [pfSense] serial port sadness

Years ago I had problems with serial cables - I invested in a little in-line gadget that had red and green LEDs for each line. The one I have uses 25 pin connectors, so the cable is a mix of 9-25 pin adapters and the LED viewer. You can shut down/disconnect one end to see what lights remain

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.2 Strongswan rekeying issues

Excellent clue! On 02/24/2015 08:15 AM, Brian Candler wrote: However based on Nagios logs, after the tunnel has been up for pretty much exactly one hour, it drops out again. This would coincide with the P2 SA expiring and being re-negotiated. It would be *really* helpful if the debug message

Re: [pfSense] Release 2.2 - more problems than success by upgrades / looping packet installations / sshd is not working any more / crashes on X5550 CPU

On a plain vanilla Alix 3port board with 2.1.5 previously installed, my autoupdate installed Asterisk (my only package) with no problems. I have only lightly tested things though - perhaps problems will pop up. FWIW Bob G On 01/28/2015 03:41 AM, WolfSec-Support wrote: 2015-01-27 22:13

Re: [pfSense] Message could not be delivered

I get one of these messages from 'pfsense' about once a month.. It is more often than from other lists I am member of. Bob G On 01/26/2015 03:28 AM, Geoff Jankowski wrote: Am I the only person to receive this? It contains a .scr file which would not do anything to me but will to any gamers

Re: [pfSense] 2.2-RELEASE now available!

I tried it and on an overnight auto upgrade - in the morning Asterisk was there. Not tested, but the code is there. So far so good on the rest. Bob G On 01/25/2015 01:47 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote: Has anyone tried Asterisk? On 01/24/2015 08:05 PM, Brian Caouette wrote: Lightsquid

Re: [pfSense] 2.2-RELEASE now available!

Has anyone tried Asterisk? On 01/24/2015 08:05 PM, Brian Caouette wrote: Lightsquid and vnstat2 do not work with 2.2 Can anyone else confirm? Sent from my iPad On Jan 24, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Jon Gerdes gerd...@blueloop.net wrote: 2.2 Cheers cmb 'n' troops. Great piece of work.

Re: [pfSense] More ports

This is even cheaper: 5 G ports for $36. It is 'managed' but you need to dig deep into the configuration. A manual is available on-line - http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/SwOS http://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-routerboard-rb-260gs-complete-with-enclosure-and-power-supply-fiber-enabled.html

Re: [pfSense] Returned mail: Data format error

Is anyone else on this list getting bounce notices? On 09/08/2014 01:50 AM, Bounced mail wrote: The message was not delivered due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a

Re: [pfSense] Returned mail: Data format error

I thought so - thanks for the confirmation. My copy included a message.zip file which contained a file ending in .COM This was probably the malware.. On 09/08/2014 07:55 AM, Stefan Baur wrote: Am 08.09.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Bob Gustafson: Is anyone else on this list getting bounce notices

Re: [pfSense] How do I fix this?

What version pfsense? On 09/03/2014 12:30 PM, Brian Caouette wrote: Sep 3 09:00:58 apinger: ALARM: dlois(192.254.233.145) *** loss *** Sep 3 08:59:55 apinger: alarm canceled: dlois(192.254.233.145) *** delay *** Sep 3 08:59:47 apinger: alarm canceled: dlois(192.254.233.145) *** down ***

[pfSense] Dual IP nets over one ethernet connector

I have a small Alix board with only one Ethernet connector. It would be nice to pass packets from two different networks through that one Ethernet connector. I know it is possible, I'm just wondering whether pfsense can do it and whether anyone has some recipes for implementation. I would

Re: [pfSense] Dual IP nets over one ethernet connector

, 2014 10:48 AM, Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com mailto:bob...@rcn.com wrote: I have a small Alix board with only one Ethernet connector. It would be nice to pass packets from two different networks through that one Ethernet connector. I know it is possible, I'm just wondering whether

Re: [pfSense] Dual IP nets over one ethernet connector

Do you have any reason why? On 08/16/2014 01:07 PM, Espen Johansen wrote: Not doable in a sensible way. 16. aug. 2014 20:06 skrev Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com mailto:bob...@rcn.com følgende: I'm interested in doing it all within the Alix using pfsense. A minimum hardware approach

Re: [pfSense] Dual IP nets over one ethernet connector

no pf sense :-) this is network basics. You dont seem to understand some network fundamentals. Sorry but this is not doable without using vlans or 2 physical interfaces. 16. aug. 2014 20:06 skrev Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com mailto:bob...@rcn.com følgende: I'm interested

Re: [pfSense] 2.1.3 Release Now Available

On 05/06/2014 12:27 PM, David Newman wrote: On 5/6/14, 10:24 AM, Jeremy Porter wrote: I've posted in a separate thread about issues with upgrading, even with a 4 GB card. This is an on Alix 2d13 with 256 Mbytes of RAM. Both from the GUI and the serial console, it appears that the new image

Re: [pfSense] Upgrading Alix WRAP

I think you can just go into System - Firmware and do a Manual Update. I did it 7 days 02 hrs 56 mins ago and it is pretty intuitive It takes a long time to update (maybe 30+ minutes for my Alix board), but it is done all over the Internet. Click a couple of times and then wait. Status of

[pfSense] Disk Read failure (but it seems to work anyway)

I installed 2.1 on a SanDisk 4GB Ultra (200x) for use on an Alix board. I configured the ethernet ports using the serial connection and then left the connection and minicom running while I did more configuration using the ethernet webConfigurator. Every time I would make a change to the

Re: [pfSense] Disk Read failure (but it seems to work anyway)

Ok, you have it nailed already - thanks much. Bob G On 10/28/2013 12:21 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/DMA_and_LBA_Errors On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com mailto:bob...@rcn.com wrote: I installed 2.1 on a SanDisk 4GB Ultra (200x

Re: [pfSense] Very slow printing when 2 of pfSense on network

It might also be useful to point Wireshark at the problem. With two pfSense and with only one. The packet capture tool on pfSense can be used. If the packets are delayed, that can be measured. If the packets are going back and forth, or crossing from one pfSense to the other (confusion), then

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

+1 On 10/12/2013 12:41 PM, Adrian Wenzel wrote: I'm behind Jim on this. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] [liberationtech] NSA Laughs at PCs, Prefers Hacking Routers and Switches

On 09/05/2013 08:58 AM, Jim Pingle wrote: On 9/5/2013 9:43 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote: But it doesn't matter if the vendors issue a patch, people actually have to install the update to fix it, and odds are high that typical end users

Re: [pfSense] Syslog settings

If you put the 3 words: syslog facility meaning into Google, you will see a variety of web sites which give the answer in general. For pfsense specifically, I await a better answer. Hope this helps Bob G On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 03:54 +0900, mikio.ki...@gmail.com wrote: Could anyone please

Re: [pfSense] Problems with installing pfSense Kernel 8.1 on R420 Poweregde?

You don't have to use a hardware RAID controller, even if it is free on the motherboards. Software RAID works fine. On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 13:45 -0200, jorhardware wrote: Hello Luiz, follows the intel raid controller, see the link below:

[pfSense] Akamai reports IPv6 showing signs of growth.

From USTelecom NEWS OF THE DAY * Akamai: IPv6 showing signs of healthy, consistent growth ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] Open VPN or IPSec for site to site VPNs

On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 21:04 +0200, David Brown wrote: On 20/04/12 20:08, Jim Pingle wrote: On 4/20/2012 12:23 PM, Gavin Will wrote: Traditionally used IPSec VPN's for site to site links however with replacing remote site routers with PFsense boxes I thought about using Open VPN instead.

Re: [pfSense] Dynamic DNS force update?

Change the cached number, then do as Martin Fuchs suggested. On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 10:02 -0600, Karl Fife wrote: Hi Martin. You've hit right on the problem. The IP is NOT different than the cached IP, thus the client will not update no matter what I do, even if I delete the entry entirely and

Re: [pfSense] Dynamic DNS force update?

Hmm, must be stored somewhere. Check the source code. On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 12:06 -0600, Karl Fife wrote: My question is of course, HOW. How does one change the cached number without releasing the address on the monitored interface? -K On 2/22/2012 11:47 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote: Change

Re: [pfSense] Dynamic DNS force update?

See also http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2166 On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:20 -0500, Yehuda Katz wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Yehuda Katz yeh...@ymkatz.net wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Karl Fife karlf...@gmail.com wrote: My question very