+1
On 08/04/2016 06:50 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
Open source is no different, there are sill value exchanges that must exist.
All sides must be content with the exchange.
I look forward to your response.
Jim
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.p
Will the 2.4 run on Odroid C2 (arm, quad 64bit) running with the
Ethernet and a USB<->Ethernet external converter to get 2 ports.
On 07/29/2016 11:19 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the
'nano' image.
We are including ARM support (f
On 05/05/2016 03:13 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-05-05 15:11, Bob Gustafson wrote:
On 05/05/2016 02:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-05-05 14:23, Bob Gustafson wrote:
On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather
wrote:
On May 5, 2016, at
On 05/05/2016 02:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-05-05 14:23, Bob Gustafson wrote:
On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather
wrote:
On May 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeppe Øland
wrote:
Does
On 05/05/2016 02:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On May 5, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
On May 5, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeppe Øland wrote:
Does this update actually work?
After hitting install and crunching for a while, it showed "firmw
There is a FAQ for the v3:
Compare to v2, is there any new feature for GS108Ev3?
Yes, staring from v3, GS108E can be managed by web browser IE9 ~ 11,
Firefox 26 ~ 29.0.1, Chrome 33.0.1750.117 ~ 35.0.1916.114 m, Safari 10.8.5.
On 05/03/2016 08:44 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
The only
The only downloadable user guide refers only to Windows utility software.
At least there is downloadable user guide..
Bob G
On 05/03/2016 05:47 AM, Philipp Tölke wrote:
A Netgear Prosafe GS-108E (or 105E) is reasonably cheap (~$50) and
manageable; try to get the version 3, it has a web-interf
It could be your ISP serving you a new lease on a small pool of IP
addresses.
Andrew Martin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Wiater"
To: "pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 1:02:33 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Recipe to safely allow re
Folks in the past have wondered about the time it takes to upgrade
Today - except for the initial clicks, the process was totally automatic
14:21 Started uploading new version
14:36 logging started on new version (?)
14:37 started reinstalling package Asterisk
15:18 completed reinstalling pa
Did you check whether your 're-enable' actually went to pfsense?
I have been ignoring those messages (which have been coming for years..)
- and I am still getting pfsense email..
Have fun
Bob G
On 04/08/2015 01:48 PM, WebDawg wrote:
Same here,
Viruses being detected by my ASSP spam filter
I have an Alix board and upgraded to 2.2.1 just fine (I think..) I have
the application Asterisk installed as a package.
In the past I have noted that it can take a long time to
install/re-install this package on an update of the system. On the order
of 40min - 1hr. Nothing much is happening d
Maybe your 'user' is not a member of the 'wheel' group or whatever it is
called - the sudo eligible group.
Bob G
On 03/17/2015 03:55 PM, Manojav Sridhar wrote:
I should add the sudo works when logged in as root, but not any other
user, strange.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Manojav Sridha
Years ago I had problems with serial cables - I invested in a little
in-line gadget that had red and green LEDs for each line. The one I have
uses 25 pin connectors, so the cable is a mix of 9-25 pin adapters and
the LED viewer.
You can shut down/disconnect one end to see what lights remain li
Excellent clue!
On 02/24/2015 08:15 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
However based on Nagios logs, after the tunnel has been up for pretty
much exactly one hour, it drops out again. This would coincide with
the P2 SA expiring and being re-negotiated.
It would be *really* helpful if the debug message
On a plain vanilla Alix 3port board with 2.1.5 previously installed, my
autoupdate installed Asterisk (my only package) with no problems.
I have only lightly tested things though - perhaps problems will pop up.
FWIW
Bob G
On 01/28/2015 03:41 AM, WolfSec-Support wrote:
2015-01-27 22:13 GMT+0
I get one of these messages from 'pfsense' about once a month..
It is more often than from other lists I am member of.
Bob G
On 01/26/2015 03:28 AM, Geoff Jankowski wrote:
Am I the only person to receive this?
It contains a .scr file which would not do anything to me but will to
any gamers o
I tried it and on an overnight auto upgrade - in the morning Asterisk
was there.
Not tested, but the code is there.
So far so good on the rest.
Bob G
On 01/25/2015 01:47 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
Has anyone tried Asterisk?
On 01/24/2015 08:05 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
Lightsquid and
Has anyone tried Asterisk?
On 01/24/2015 08:05 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
Lightsquid and vnstat2 do not work with 2.2
Can anyone else confirm?
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 24, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Jon Gerdes wrote:
2.2
Cheers cmb 'n' troops. Great piece of work.
___
You could use the packet capture feature of pfSense - look at the port
with IP 10.0.0.5 and then try to register the phone and make a call.
Look at the packets coming into the pfSense at 10.0.0.5.
Then configure the packet capture for the 192.168.1.200 port and
duplicate your registration and
This is even cheaper: 5 G ports for $36. It is 'managed' but you need
to dig deep into the configuration. A manual is available on-line ->
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/SwOS
http://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-routerboard-rb-260gs-complete-with-enclosure-and-power-supply-fiber-enabled.html
I thought so - thanks for the confirmation.
My copy included a message.zip file which contained a file ending in .COM
This was probably the malware..
On 09/08/2014 07:55 AM, Stefan Baur wrote:
Am 08.09.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Bob Gustafson:
Is anyone else on this list getting bounce notices
Is anyone else on this list getting bounce notices?
On 09/08/2014 01:50 AM, Bounced mail wrote:
The message was not delivered due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was
not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a mess
Why not try the upgrade. Maybe the problem will go away..
On 09/03/2014 01:20 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
2.1.4 Just one version behind. I haven't updated to the announced a
few days ago.
On 9/3/2014 2:14 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
What version pfsense?
On 09/03/2014 12:30 PM, Brian Cao
What version pfsense?
On 09/03/2014 12:30 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
Sep 3 09:00:58 apinger: ALARM: dlois(192.254.233.145) *** loss ***
Sep 3 08:59:55 apinger: alarm canceled: dlois(192.254.233.145) ***
delay ***
Sep 3 08:59:47 apinger: alarm canceled: dlois(192.254.233.145) ***
down ***
Se
it would make no pf sense :-) this is
network basics. You dont seem to understand some network
fundamentals. Sorry but this is not doable without using vlans or
2 physical interfaces.
16. aug. 2014 20:06 skrev "Bob Gustafson" mailto:bob...@rcn.com>> følgende:
Do you have any reason why?
On 08/16/2014 01:07 PM, Espen Johansen wrote:
Not doable in a sensible way.
16. aug. 2014 20:06 skrev "Bob Gustafson" <mailto:bob...@rcn.com>> følgende:
I'm interested in doing it all within the Alix using pfsense. A
minimum hardw
On Aug 16, 2014 10:48 AM, "Bob Gustafson" <mailto:bob...@rcn.com>> wrote:
I have a small Alix board with only one Ethernet connector.
It would be nice to pass packets from two different networks
through that one Ethernet connector.
I know it is possible, I
I have a small Alix board with only one Ethernet connector.
It would be nice to pass packets from two different networks through
that one Ethernet connector.
I know it is possible, I'm just wondering whether pfsense can do it and
whether anyone has some recipes for implementation.
I would l
On 05/06/2014 12:27 PM, David Newman wrote:
On 5/6/14, 10:24 AM, Jeremy Porter wrote:
I've posted in a separate thread about issues with upgrading, even with
a 4 GB card. This is an on Alix 2d13 with 256 Mbytes of RAM.
Both from the GUI and the serial console, it appears that the new image
su
Check that you are in the correct release version.
When I clicked on your 'master branch' link, it dumped me in RELEASE_1_2
Bob G
On 04/27/2014 03:26 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
The place you would need to modify in the PHP code is in
/etc/inc/dyndns.class around line 600 (that is where it is in th
I think you can just go into System -> Firmware
and do a Manual Update.
I did it 7 days 02 hrs 56 mins ago and it is pretty intuitive
It takes a long time to update (maybe 30+ minutes for my Alix board),
but it is done all over the Internet. Click a couple of times and then wait.
Status of up
On 04/02/2014 04:55 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
This would enable multiples of 10G performance for load-balancing,
packet filtering, and even NAT (with the right switch hardware).
Dreamer - from my Chicago franchised ISP - only on a good day do I get
close to the 10Mb I am paying for..
Bob G
__
Ok, you have it nailed already - thanks much.
Bob G
On 10/28/2013 12:21 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/DMA_and_LBA_Errors
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Bob Gustafson <mailto:bob...@rcn.com>> wrote:
I installed 2.1 on a SanDisk 4GB Ultra (200x) f
I installed 2.1 on a SanDisk 4GB Ultra (200x) for use on an Alix board.
I configured the ethernet ports using the serial connection and then
left the connection and minicom running while I did more configuration
using the ethernet webConfigurator.
Every time I would make a change to the confi
It might also be useful to point Wireshark at the problem. With two
pfSense and with only one. The packet capture tool on pfSense can be used.
If the packets are delayed, that can be measured. If the packets are
going back and forth, or crossing from one pfSense to the other
(confusion), then
+1
On 10/12/2013 12:41 PM, Adrian Wenzel wrote:
I'm behind Jim on this.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
I just noticed that the Fedora distribution has a spin that enables a
liveCD installation on a USB stick of a system containing lots of
security tools.
https://fedorahosted.org/security-spin/wiki/availableApps
It would be relatively easy to put a sniffer machine in any pathway
from/to a pf
On 09/05/2013 08:58 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 9/5/2013 9:43 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
But it doesn't matter if the vendors issue a patch, people actually have
to install the update to fix it, and odds are high that typical end
users have no idea tha
Have you done any packet captures - compare your working email clients
with what Microsoft is trying to do with outlook?
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:01 -0500, Gerald Waugh wrote:
> On 03/17/2013 06:43 PM, mark.wia...@greybeam.com wrote:
>
> > What about NAT? Is the mail server on the same network a
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 10:46 +0900, mikio.ki...@gmail.com wrote:
> > For pfsense specifically, I await a better answer.
>
> Yes, I know syslog very much.
> I would like to know pfsense specification of syslog.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Mikio Kishi
>
> On Mon, Mar 1
If you put the 3 words:
syslog facility meaning
into Google, you will see a variety of web sites which give the answer
in general.
For pfsense specifically, I await a better answer.
Hope this helps
Bob G
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 03:54 +0900, mikio.ki...@gmail.com wrote:
> Could anyone please
You don't have to use a hardware RAID controller, even if it is free on
the motherboards. Software RAID works fine.
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 13:45 -0200, jorhardware wrote:
> Hello Luiz, follows the intel raid controller, see the link below:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=iir&apropos=0
>From USTelecom NEWS OF THE DAY
* Akamai: IPv6 showing signs of healthy, consistent growth
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Firewire has an isochronous mode. This is very good for time sensitive
connections like live video and telecom. Perhaps this could be tied in
with the priority queues available in pfSense.
-Bob G
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 16:24 -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> At 400mbit/sec (probably) or 800mbit/sec (us
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 21:04 +0200, David Brown wrote:
> On 20/04/12 20:08, Jim Pingle wrote:
> > On 4/20/2012 12:23 PM, Gavin Will wrote:
> >> Traditionally used IPSec VPN's for site to site links however with
> >> replacing remote site routers with PFsense boxes I thought about using
> >> Open V
I think you are correct. RFC 2136 seems to be focused on the server
rather than the query client.
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:39 -0600, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> It appears as though the DDNS is not updating properly, might be useful
> information.
>
> Johan Braeken says:
> Obs
account.
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:33 -0500, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> I do not have a RFC 2136 DNS setup to debug this with.
> It is probably not related because the DynDNS and RFC 2136 features
> are basically completely separate.
>
>
> - Y
>
>
> On Wed
See also http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2166
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:20 -0500, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Yehuda Katz
> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Karl Fife
> wrote:
> My question very specifically was whether is it
>
Hmm, must be stored somewhere. Check the source code.
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 12:06 -0600, Karl Fife wrote:
> My question is of course, HOW. How does one change the cached number
> without releasing the address on the monitored interface?
> -K
>
> On 2/22/2012 11:47 AM, Bob
Change the cached number, then do as Martin Fuchs suggested.
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 10:02 -0600, Karl Fife wrote:
> Hi Martin. You've hit right on the problem. The IP is NOT different
> than the cached IP, thus the client will not update no matter what I
> do, even if I delete the entry entirely an
50 matches
Mail list logo
