Carolyn Diaz wrote:
http://netprojx.com/STU/facts.htm.
The problem is the left navigation in IE 6. The sub elements or 2nd
level of
the navigation loses its background, sometimes the color, sometimes the
image...in other words, extremely buggy behavior!
Add...
li {height: 1%;}
...or another
Carolyn Diaz wrote:
Thanks so much! I should have seen that right off. Isn't that also known as
the Holly hack or some such thing?
That's right...
http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?page=2cid=C37E0
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
Designer wrote:
It seems to me that pragmatism can sometimes outbenefit the religion
of standards - and I'd really like some real world feedback on when
such a table approach causes real problems. (Yes, I know it's not
truly semantic, and I agree that it's a problem because of that).
If
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
So any attempt to include markup just for screen readers is doomed
to failure - screen readers don't use markup.
Do screen readers reveal cover-ups ?
Example: http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_chaos_14.html
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
John 'Max' Maxwell wrote:
I will get on to the 'more' links and add the names.
The names are there already. Just link them to the relevant pages.
Need some font-resize testing and improvements. Text is overflowing
containers in the good browsers under certain conditions, and IE6'
Tony Crockford wrote:
and having caught up with my reading, the use of CC's seems to be
frowned upon.
I can't see why - as long as CC's are used to serve a minimal number of
fixes to _old_ IE/win versions. Old browsers are fixed in time.
It is when one starts a design-process by preparing
Barney Carroll wrote:
link?
style @import?
Which do you use, for what, and why?
In document: 'link' with relative path.
I use 'style' for adding page-specific, and often media-dependent,
styles, but do not use @import in documents.
- All browsers understand 'link', and some don't
Kat wrote:
I'm beginning to think modular css using @imports are actually quite
smart, not just for re-use reasons but also because if you do need to
support really old and dodgy browsers (sometimes it happens to the
best of us) you can create stylesheets for those, and then over-rule
them in
Cole Kuryakin wrote:
[...] To see what's going on, please go here:
http://www.x7m.us/_problems/index_problem.htm.
Sure would appreciate any advise on how I can get overflow:hidden to
target just the images on this site.
You can target all images with 'max-width' in the good browsers, and
Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer wrote:
Christian in your opinion - those sites are inaccessible... without
any argues I cannot agree so that's why I've asked...
I define 'accessible' as be given access. In normal terms that means
that if one access-point is closed to particular
Rachel May wrote:
In IE6 all of my floated divs disappeared which I have currently
'patched' with removing the floats until I have guidance from the
client on how he wants to support IE6.
Keep them floating, and add 'position: relative'.
* html #content div {float: left; position: relative;}
Cross-list answer... :-)
You have the class on the anchor itself - *not* the anchor inside an
element with the class.
Also I miss the :link pseudo-class.
You should write...
a.shoplogo:link, a.shoplogo:visited {
stuff
}
a.pagelink:link, a.pagelink:visited {
stuff
}
...etc.
Mihael Zadravec wrote:
that is rigt. I will stop doing that... But than again... Opera
displays arrow even when cursor is positiond over the text...
Do you people think that they should change that because users maybe
don't know if they can grab the text or not?
Might be confusing for a few
Hrvoje Markovic wrote:
I'm seeing this glitch in Opera 9, IE7, FF 2... On both
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/horizontal16.htm AND
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/horizontal27.htm I see a one
character wide whitespace (bluespace because of the bg color) before
every link,
Ron Jonk wrote:
I've read it before in this list that backgound rendering on xhtml on
the body is not always supported for xhtml strict documents.
Background rendering in itself is always supported.
On firefox when I have a background image for my body tag on a xhtml
strict doctyped
Hrvoje Markovic wrote:
I'm seeing this glitch in Opera 9, IE7, FF 2... On both
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/horizontal16.htm AND
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/horizontal27.htm I see a one
character wide whitespace (bluespace because of the bg color) before
every link,
Soren Johannessen wrote:
FYI: the Danish Ministry of Taxation has got a new logo
http://www.skat.dk/SKAT.aspx First they pay 38 US dollars for
the design of the logo . Then they spend 138 US dollars in
working labour money for inserting the logo manually (SIC!) on every
single web
Dwain Alford wrote:
1. the menu operates as expected, except that only on the index page
is the sub-li background transparent and the copy and the menu gets
all jumbled together in ie 6 and 7 and is unreadable.
http://www.studiokdd.com/sandbox/index.html
The background isn't transparent,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. On a scale of 1-10, how important is W3C validation?
XHTML: 10+ (regardless of MIME type)
HTML: 8 (but it depends on what lowers its importance from a 10)
CSS: 10 (until IE/win needs its fixes, and weak standard-support must be
solved by non-standard workarounds)
Geoff Pack wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
So, old hacks like the 'star html' hack for IE6 (and older
versions) is now perfectly valid IMO, while hacks relying on bugs
that have survived into IE7, are extremely unsafe.
'extremely unsafe'? I'd say they are safe until Microsoft releases
another
Rob O'Rourke wrote:
I had the last letter of some floated form elements appearing on the
next line. I've managed to get rid of the letter itself with
position: relative; on the form input but there's still a 'phantom
line' in IE adding a load of 'padding' to the bottom of the label or
fieldset.
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
All works well in the browsers you'd expect it to, but of course IE6
has an issue. For some reason its leaves the background image in the
hover statehmmm...and doesn't move it back to its predefined
position!
Here's the url: http://akolsonlimo.com/about.php
If
Dwain Alford wrote:
but it's supposed to be up to standards, yes?
Not according to those who have created it.
They have only said that IE7 is up to _some_ of the standards :-)
I would start by deleting 'width: 10%' on #valid, and 'width: 100%' on
.wsg, .xhtml, .css. Those width-values only
Dwain Alford wrote:
so will ie7 behave without the width and height values now, or just
width?
IE7 will in many cases behave a bit more like the standard compliant
browsers, when no dimensions are declared. IE7 has plenty of bugs
though, so there are enough exceptions to keep you busy.
IE7
Dwain Alford wrote:
ie6, ff 2.0, opera 9.0.2 and mozilla 1.7.12 render the page properly.
ie 7 sticks some copyright info, which is enclosed in a div with the
powered by info, to the left of the validate buttons. why?
http://www.alforddesigngroup.com/
IE7 ignores the 'star html' hack.
Tee G. Peng wrote:
http://project.lotusseedsdesign.com/SH-new/georg_method.html
My mistake, placing the overflow:hidden in content' does work for IE
7, but I still can't figure why the background images are not
showing up.
Quite simple, really: they are positioned 3px too low because
Tee G. Peng wrote:
Example: http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/moa_11.html
Yeah, Al is right. I see the endless vertical scrolling from IE7. Got
fix for IE7 -:)
Yes, I think so, but I can't check it since I don't have IE7 installed.
IE7 is reported to react well for similar layouts if the
Tee G. Peng wrote:
http://project.lotusseedsdesign.com/SH-new/georg_method.html
My mistake, placing the overflow:hidden in content' does work for IE
7, but I still can't figure why the background images are not
showing up.
Quite simple, really: they are positioned 3px too low because
Tee G. Peng wrote:
Hi, I am doing a layout that requires equal height for each column
and row, however the contents inside of each column and row are
different and in some pages, in certain sections, the length of the
content will be decided by end users' data feed.
I suggest you try building
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/columns.html
The page displays as intended in Opera and Firefox 2, but in IE is a
*mess*. I don't quite know where to start, I wonder whether anybody
has any solutions?
1. Why is the header (Rahul Gonsalves...) so much lower in IE? Fix?
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/index.html
The only small, niggling thing left is that whenever there is a
paragraph preceded by a h2, it seems to be adjusted, only by a pixel
or two, to the right. Any ideas as to how I could fix this? It's a
small thing, but since the
Taco Fleur wrote:
Ahh I see, better undo all those fixes that weren't fixes ;-)
How about giving it a height of 100%?
If it's still Opera 9 you're trying to fix, then 'height: 100%' will
work - at least in the window-version.
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
Tee G. Peng wrote:
Both methods work well except with Georg's method, there are slight
shortcomings.
You've changed/added more from the original than I did :-)
I tested my suggested additions/changes on a copy of your original page
in Firefox from -6 to +20 font-steps, without any
Tee G. Peng wrote:
http://new.marinersq.com/html/aerobics-3.html
The only thing I see that the right column drops to the bottom is
when I resize the text to smaller. Is there a way to fix?
Basically: don't mix em and px on side-by-side containers/columns.
Instead; leave the tricky
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I just found the issue and put something together:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/test/whitespace_and_rtl_direction.asp
Just an observation: whitespace doesn't matter in Opera 9 (from prev1
onwards).
So, whitespace may be important to browsers when dealing with such
cases,
Taco Fleur wrote:
Thanks, any suggestions on how to solve that? I can't remove the
clear:left
You can hack in a...
form {margin-top: -15px}
...(or another value) for IE/win only - using your favorite hack.
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
Kevin McMonagle wrote:
[...] I was worried that negative margin usage was becoming out of
control.
It was suggested that I use absolute positioning on one of the
columns(navigations) to rely less on negative margins. This caused
the column to vanish in ie pc.
Heres is the negative margin
Kevin McMonagle wrote:
-im relieved that you say that the negative margins are ok. I had a
proggrammer at work complain about them and a couple posts here made
me wonder if it was ok.
I've heard/read complaints about every single CSS-based method in use
for laying out web pages. Yet, most
John 'Max' Maxwell wrote:
Is my syntax or something incorrect or is there just no way of adding
this fix without going 'invalid'?? Does the above code even belong
in a style sheet as it doesn't look like standard CSS to me.
Your syntax is correct, and if you've got the values right it'll
Micky Mourelo wrote:
I wouldn't call the map accessible since you can't access the map
without css ;o).
Yes, you can.
You should have tested first.
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
***
List Guidelines:
Micky Mourelo wrote:
1. No, you can't. (I love this game)
:-)
(I never play games, so have fun then)
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Elle Meredith wrote:
In IE6 my map is pushed down and to the left.
http://waznelle.com/td/v1.php?page=divesitesmap
Add a suitable 'hasLayout'[1] trigger so IE gets something solid to
position in relation to - like...
#content {height: 100%;}
...and it'll work just fine.
regards
Opera has a navigation bar that users can turn on or off. It sits
across the top of a page, and is populated by LINK elements in the
HEAD section of a document.
Do you happen to know any sites that work with this concept? So any
sites that have LINK elements in the HEAD section that would
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
http://www.addictivemedia.com.au/clients/test/test.php
You will see that if youo move the mosue over the Services item,
the dropdown that appears lies behind the Useful links item. I
would rather have it infront of the Useful links item.
I actually
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
I am still waiting for the research, showing how many of majority of
the planet's web users have an idea where they can change their
defaults...
I'm waiting too, but I'd like such a research to cover _all_ web users,
and I'd like to reverse the question. I have no
Ignore this thread. I sent a response to the wrong list :-)
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Richard Czeiger wrote:
poor old me I still have opera 7.5 and it's fine there. I might try
and download opera 9, though I'm tempted to give up on it. Logs for
most of my clients show ALL versions of opera total a massive 0.8% of
users. I don't think I can waste my time on that
No
Richard Czeiger wrote:
I'd appreciate any comments/suggestions/criticisms...
http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/marquee.html
Resulting in a blank page with no Marquee in my Opera 9.
Unreadable even with font-resizing to largest in IE6, because of too
high contrast.
Quite a few steps font-resizing
Designer wrote:
OK, so how far do we take this thinking on semantics etc. For
example, many people use a div called 'header'. Suppose I decide to
put this at the bottom?!!! Taking this to the extreme, it suggests
that 'header' is presentational/positional.
Well, I regularly put parts of what
Mathew Patterson wrote:
You have probably heard this same argument in reference to using
strong instead of b . The idea is that the class name you use
should reflect the semantic *meaning* of what it does, not
necessarily the physical way it achieves that meaning.
The idea is fine and
Doug Wigginton wrote:
[...] The idea is that when the browser resizes, the second
left-floated div will drop down below the first enabling all the
content to display in an 600 x 800 resolution. This works in IE6
(win) but not in Firefox, therefore my css is probably
wrong/incomplete. In
Kenny Graham wrote:
I've noticed many people from this list stil put text-and-broken-pipe
navs at the bottom of their pages. Is this still needed?
I replicate link-relations as ordinary links in the page-footer, since
there are so many browsers that can't make use of, or don't default to
TuteC wrote:
Beautiful!! I´ve never seen link-relations working, it should really
be a built-in spec for browsers... easy to get used to. A way to let
anybody, in any site, know where they are standing.
W3C seems to recommend them...
http://www.w3.org/TR/relations.html
Tony Crockford wrote:
http://www.bclm.co.uk/map.htm
Would be nice to know which browsers are rendered this page correctly
at the moment, as IE6, Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Opera 9.01 don't seem to
agree on much.
The addition of this...
#maprolloverlist{width: 767px; /* needed for IE7 it seems */}
Tony Crockford wrote:
Opera 9 makes big little boxes unless you allow the minimum
font-size to be smaller than the default 9px, so that's an issue I
need to address.
So does Firefox.
IE6 does the same when 'ignore font-size' is applied.
My preference is 'minimum font-size = 14px during
Tony Crockford wrote:
it is driving every page on the site from the one stylesheet and
there are a lot of list menus, hence the need to specifically
identify them.
Makes sense, but how many #maprolloverlist are there? I can only find one.
Example:
#maprolloverlist li#rollover1{position:
Darren Wood wrote:
http://www.dontcom.com works / displays as expected in FF/Safari but
it goes mental in IE.
Someone will probably say that I'm a mental case myself, but anyway.
I changed the order of the two first script-links in a local copy, and
IE6 started to behave just fine.
Can't see
TuteC wrote:
What do you think? I don´t like it, I´m not comfortable using it.
This site is not using a special IE stylesheet and I don´t want to
start using one! Shall I leave it? Testing in different browsers
works as I want, but I just want to make things the best I can.
I don't like it
Saviour on a stick! Every time I think I've heard of the weirdest
thing, along comes Internet Exploder...
Yeah, isn't it fun? :-)
You know, the tech guys at Microsoft can't have a lot of fun with
this, bolting stuff on in order to make the pig fly. I wonder why
they haven't just built a new
Mark Harris wrote:
p id=lennon imagine there's a heaven, I wonder if you can.../p
;-)
Sure I can! I use Opera - but I don't challenge that
inline-style-comment bug all that often.
PS Thunderbird spellchecks Gunlaug as Onslaught heheh
Your Thunderbird didn't do too bad, really. Gunlaug
James Oppenheim wrote:
http://dineenandwestcott.com.au/about.php
The floated content seems to drop under the sub-nav on the left when
you resize the browser to different resolutions in IE on the PC. This
problem does not happen in firefox, netscape, mozzila, advent and
opera on the PC or
Tina Starnes wrote:
Now this is working perfect in FF - but for the life of me IE will
not display proper.
http://heavenly.crsdesignsinc.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6
As mentioned by others: you're using the wrong overflow.
Firefox is getting the 'overflow' wrong, and IE is
Designer wrote:
The 'problem' is that you can use a strict xhtml frameset AND xhtml
files and that's OK with the W3C recommendations - so why on earth
have they done away with one of frames main uses/advantages, i.e.,
targetting one or more of the frames. No matter which way you look
at it,
Designer wrote:
I'm getting fed up with this. You still haven't told me WHY it makes
perfect sense! Why, that is, the W3C have decided that using a target
is undesirable, ultimately.
I have no idea why W3C decide anything, but they have made some
decisions and written the standards
Bruce wrote:
Looks to me like he's blaming ie for his design problems. On
www.newscloud.com there is 226 errors returned by the validator.
Scrollbars at 800px in all browsers, image distortion and odd text
sizes...
Since I always add a bit of user-preference on any site (minimum font
size =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] it just hit me. opera was obeying the css and firefox ignored
it. strange, huh?
:-)
Not at all... ;-)
Seriously, it isn't the first time I've experienced such behavior in
Gecko. Although CSS should rule, Gecko often ignores it and use what's
given in HTML.
Shlomi Asaf wrote:
i just been informed that P Hn Elements are Inline Element. How
Come? how can those elements be inline, and the user-agent render
them as Block-level elements?
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-H1
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#edef-P
Andrew Ingram wrote:
So I added in another rule that changed the background color of the
element with the drop-down hover and suddenly everything started
working, take the rule out and it stopped.
I think you have hit the old IE-bug on CSS popups...
CK wrote:
The problem is solved, but the question lingers is this the most
streamline solution?
Don't know since it is a bit minimal at the moment.
If this is what you're working on...
http://working.bushidodeep.com/table_layout/2Col_layout.html
...then it may at least pass as a valid and
CK wrote:
Your attention is greatly appreciated. Would you expand, off-list as
to not to cause clutter, on the quoted text?
Some more CSS-tuning needed, and you'll have to decide what mode
IE6 should run in.
Don't think the following causes clutter, as there certainly are some
who may
SunUp wrote:
I know how to prevent v.4 browsers from getting my styles, but how do
I stop IE5/Mac from getting them?? All I know how to do is to give
them something different, not how to exclude them entirely.
Wrap all styles you don't want IE/Mac to see in an @media rule.
Georg
--
Joe D'Andrea wrote:
The latest iteration might be the winner though [2]. We'll see.
[2] http://test.joesapt.net/cf/opera-ul-table
Just to state the (more or less) obvious: 'width' = 'min-width' and
'height' = 'min-height' when we're dealing with CSS table elements that
take dimensions.
Michael Kear wrote:
http://beyondharvest.com.au.thecoolserver.com/contact-us.cfm
Loads below the menu structure in IE6 (it's ok in Firefox)
Given the fact that you're using a doctype that isn't valid when served
as 'text/html', and that the page is styled so it can't take any
font-resizing
Tee G. Peng wrote:
Hi, can you please tell me how to use these table display values in
non-table layout, better yet if you can show me examples. I
understand the concept but I don't know how and when to use them in
CSS layout with selectors.
CSS 2.1 about 'CSS tables'...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there then no difference in wanting to serve the visitors to your
web site(s) what you think is best for them?
...and what if you're wrong in your thinking? :-)
To stay within the 'food-analogy':
- good food can kill someone who isn't used to it. Good web-solutions
Also, in happy times when multiple background images are commonly
supported getting rid of one script... is easier than fishing out
all extra divs, spans, etc.
Looks to me like the CSS3 working draft for border-radius and multiple
background-images won't solve much beyond the ordinary round
Paul Novitski wrote:
http://www.gunlaug.no/homesite/main_6_xv.html
Your basic structure looks like it would be easy to implement in
JavaScript or PHP.
Good. I'm almost completely lost when it comes to both Javascript and
PHP, so I couldn't get any further on my own ;-)
In short: I need
Scott Swabey wrote:
Seems like the use of semantically neutral elements to create
imageless rounded corners is more than acceptable. Am I missing
something?
Apart from bloated source-code(?), no, I don't think you have missed
anything :-)
Personally, I think bloated source-code should be
Tee G.Peng wrote:
I always thought transitional doctypes are quirkmode but today I was
told it's not, the quirkmode is when a page has no doctype declared.
All 'doctype vs. modes' are listed here:
http://gutfeldt.ch/matthias/articles/doctypeswitch/table.html
Georg
--
Elle Meredith wrote:
page: http:waznelle.com/td/ css: http://waznelle.com/td/css/base.css
1. unless I declare * {margin:0; padding: 0;} many objects do not fit
in the layout and get pushed down. Now, I tried to limit my paddings
and margins so I don't know where they come from.
Will have
Susie Gardner-Brown wrote:
My ones work fine on my Mac in Firefox, but in IE (PC) they don't.
I'm assuming that something is conflicting from the rest of my
stylesheet, but I can't work out what. If anyone had any clues, I'd
be very happy grin
Susie Gardner-Brown wrote:
It does have a background! [...]
No, it doesn't.
You have styled the span alright, but that doesn't affect the
LINK-element, the a, so IE/win isn't getting it.
This will get IE's attention...
div#content li a:hover {background: #edb;}
Remember, you're dealing
Susie Gardner-Brown wrote:
Thank you Georg. That worked! I didn¹t realise ... Really, the more I do
this, the more I discover I don't know! I'm at a loss to know how to hold
all this info in my head grin Any clues on sites that have these sorts of
things listed?!?!!
Bug-lists with good
Shlomi Asaf wrote:
If i open the site and see that it works on my target browsers, why i
need the validation for? what do i benefit from it?
Well, since you started out with an example of malformed and non-valid
xhtml Strict (1.0, I guess/hope), then the answer is simple: if it isn't
valid
Michael Kear wrote:
[...]
Now I know that these figures only represent my own audience, and IE
is still the most used browser by quite a long chalk, but it does
signify a shift of quite large proportions in my traffic.
Ever had a quality-check on those figures?
I'm not saying your
Michael Kear wrote:
In fact, that's what I explicitly stated in my post. [...]
And I agreed with you on that, and your decision to go standard. I was
just trying to figure out if you had a sound base for making/checking
that decision, as figures derived from statistics, IMO, is not a good
base
White Ash wrote:
Essentially, I need to be able to manually have text, forms, etc.
wrap below the image on the left in the #content div. Any light to
shed on this would be greatly appreciated.
http://rortax.com/quorum.shtml
Ok, the 'position: relative' on the paragraph in that particular
Darren Wood wrote:
I've been trying to find/develop a nicely source ordered 3 column
liquid layout...with the right and left columns a fixed width. I'm
not having much luck. I couldn't even find an example on the
css-list wiki :(
Think there has been one listen in the css-d wiki for quite
Cole Kuryakin wrote:
So, so-far, IE CC is the way I'll go unless someone can say: Hey
Cole, this is what you're doing wrong with your css. Do ***this***
and it'll be fixed without the need to use IE CC
:-)
I just did.
Covering up for one of IE's many whitespace bugs is *not* necessary,
when
David Dixon wrote:
[...]
It would be useful to get a few more opinions on what others believe
the purpose is...
The purpose of 'text' in the alt-attribute it to expand/complete the
meaning - in context, (as close to) the same as the visible image itself
does.
Describing the image is not
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index2.html
Designer wrote:
How strange - it fits on mine down to 800 by 600, but if I have the
font-size set at anything but 'smallest', it doesn't! And once it's
'gone wrong it's hard to get it right again! I'm talking about
IE6/winXP, viewed via the
Tom Livingston wrote:
In IE6, when the page approaches it's intended max-width, there is a
weird jump in the width. A minor thing, but would like to fix it if
possible. Got any ideas?
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index2.html
Looks like the old, unreliable, quirks mode expression, and
Tom Livingston wrote:
Can't recall how to switch it to quirks mode...
!-- keep IE in quirks mode --
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;
html
That comment will keep IE6, and also IE7, in quirks mode. Not a good
thing to do IMO, but that's
Paul Bennett wrote:
I recall many moons ago a site which had multiple stylesheets (using
the link element). In Firefox, a small icon appeared at the bottom
pane of the browser and allowed the user to switch between
stylesheets.
Can anyone point me to a site that uses this technique? I'd like
Am I alone in thinking that it's disgraceful that, after years of
development, WCAG 2.0 still needs the effort of the community to be
made understandable?
No.
Are WAI fulfilling their mandate by making the guidelines so dense
and obscure that they need translation?
Not unless that is part
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
From their mission statement:
WAI develops support materials to help understand and implement Web
accessibility
http://www.w3.org/WAI/about-links.html
And from the requirements of WCAG 2
Design deliverables with ease of use in mind
http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-req/
its just that for 10 years there is nothing that moves regading
screen sizes and accesability have to follow the smallest standard
size in order to not be refused by visitors.
I can't see why, since we can make our designs adapt to available space.
We just have to design them that way.
I
Tom Livingston wrote:
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index.html
Anyone see why the first line in the first paragraph, which is next
to left nav is pushed over a bit?
3px jog.
Add the usual 'hasLayout' trigger...
* html #content{height: 100%;}
...that'll make it look right in IE - even if
Michael Kear wrote:
The content of the page is flowing around the menu (which is inside
the content div and floated left) in Firefox, but isn't flowing in
IE.
So see what I mean, go to http://incheckdb.com
http://incheckdb.com/ The Around the site box at the bottom
should be almost touching
sarcastic pony
Looks like most efforts towards separation of content and presentation
may cause severe accessibility-failures[1] in the future.
Looks like there will be no need/use for valid markup either - according
to the latest WGAC 2.0 draft.
Ref: article on ALA[2].
Time to go back to
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
