On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> > [unzip]
> >
> > > Which, according to its home page at
> > > http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/UnZip.html , is "the
> > > third most po
Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> [unzip]
>
> > Which, according to its home page at
> > http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/UnZip.html , is "the
> > third most portable program in the world".
>
> Probably after kermit and "hello world".
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> Robin Szemeti wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> >
> > > BTW - I've just had some fun trying to uncompress a .zip
> > > file on Linux! tar gzip and gunzip don't seem to want to
> > > know. Guess that makes me a luser!
>
Robin Szemeti wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
>
> > BTW - I've just had some fun trying to uncompress a .zip
> > file on Linux! tar gzip and gunzip don't seem to want to
> > know. Guess that makes me a luser!
>
> you need the unzip(1)
Which, according to its home page at
http://www.
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
> > > dribbling idiots, and frankly, I have no
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> BTW - I've just had some fun trying to uncompress a .zip file on Linux! tar
> gzip and gunzip don't seem to want to know. Guess that makes me a luser!
you need the unzip(1)
NAMEunzip - list, test and extract compressed files in a ZI
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
> .tar.gz - wtf is that, why isn't there a zip file.
>
> People keep misundersta
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > > Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
> > > > dribbling idiots, and frankly,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
> > > dribbling idiots, and frankly, I have no
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
> > dribbling idiots, and frankly, I have no wish to do so. If someone is
> > scared by a .tar.g
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:43:08AM -0500, Chris Devers wrote:
> ...except that the Windows extension hiding feature only applies to files seen
>through the normal filesystem tools (Windows Explorer, various dialog boxes, etc),
>and not Internetty stuff. People might still be scared off by seein
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> All this is pre-ir35:
> > as a employee of a limited company you would be paid national minimum
> > wage (4 quid an hour) .. you pay NIC and tax on that ... (minimal) .. you
> > claim expenses off the (ie your own) company for all the driving around
> > you do and
At 04:07 PM 20.3.2001 +, you wrote:
>> Not neccesary from a techical point of view. Neccesary from a
>> social point of view (What's this extension! I don't understand!
>> What's going on!
>
>Except that windows machines tend not to even show the extension by
>default, and so the file w
All this is pre-ir35:
> as a employee of a limited company you would be paid national minimum
> wage (4 quid an hour) .. you pay NIC and tax on that ... (minimal) .. you
> claim expenses off the (ie your own) company for all the driving around
> you do and having to buy things and accomodation whi
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robin Szemeti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
>
>
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001,
> Not neccesary from a techical point of view. Neccesary from a social
> point of view (What's this extension! I don't understand!
> What's going on!
Excewpt that windows machines tend not to even show the extension by
default, and so the file will just have a little WinZip icon[0], which m
> here. Those of you who have yor own company. Did you set yourselves up as
> a Limited Company, or as a Sole Trader. If you set yourself up as a limited
> company did/do you have liability insurance etc.
Ltd, with insurance.
Marty Pauley writes:
> On Tue Mar 20 11:46:25 2001, Gareth Harper wrote:
> > On a completely off topic note I'm appealing to the contractors among you
> > here. Those of you who have yor own company. Did you set yourselves up as
> > a Limited Company, or as a Sole Trader. If you set yoursel
At 15:40 20/03/2001 +, Gareth Harper wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Robin Szemeti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:06 PM
>Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
>
>
> > On Tue, 20 M
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Szemeti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> apart from that the benfits of running as a Limited C
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> On Tue Mar 20 11:46:25 2001, Gareth Harper wrote:
> > On a completely off topic note I'm appealing to the contractors among you
> > here. Those of you who have yor own company. Did you set yourselves up as
> > a Limited Company, or as a Sole Trader. If you set
On Tue Mar 20 11:46:25 2001, Gareth Harper wrote:
> On a completely off topic note I'm appealing to the contractors among you
> here. Those of you who have yor own company. Did you set yourselves up as
> a Limited Company, or as a Sole Trader. If you set yourself up as a limited
> company did/d
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jonathan Stowe" <[EMAIL P
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jonathan Stowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > > * Bundling. Need to build gzipped tarballs of our new versions (I
> > guess
> > > this should be built on top of the CVS stuff). Matt makes pkzipped
> > > versions avaiable
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:51:26AM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:46:25AM -, Gareth Harper wrote:
> > Winzip (what most windows users these days use to unzip) handlers tar.gz by
> > default so that may not be neccesary.
>
> Yes, but I think we should have .zip file
On the subject of having zip archives as well as tarballs on the server,
Gareth Harper said:
> Winzip (what most windows users these days use to unzip) handlers tar.gz by
> default so that may not be neccesary.
Not neccesary from a techical point of view. Neccesary from a social
point of view
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Stowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > * Bundling. Need to build gzipped tarballs of our new versions (I
> guess
> > this should be built on top of the CVS stuff). Matt makes pkzipped
> > versions avaiable as well - so
Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Seems like we've made a reasonable start on this project. We already
> have a few scripts written - anyone want to report progress on any
of
> the others?
I have Guestbook, FFA and simple search all ready to for testing
elsewhere - I'll package and up
At 14:59 19/03/2001 +, Simon Wistow wrote:
>Chris Devers wrote:
>
> > Probably, as is "The Matt's Wrong Archive", which is probably far
> > too negative & obvious anyway... ;)
>
>But if Matt Sergeant put it up ...
... it would all be in XML ;-)
Chris Devers wrote:
> Probably, as is "The Matt's Wrong Archive", which is probably far
> too negative & obvious anyway... ;)
But if Matt Sergeant put it up ...
At 01:12 PM 19.3.2001 +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
>At 12:40 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
>>It has occured to us we need a decent name for this. Discussion
>>on IRC has concluded that:
>>
>> a) It shouldn't mention Matt in the title.
>
>So "Not the Matt Wright Archive" is out then ;-)
Pro
From: "Simon Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 19 March 2001 13:34
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
> At 13:18 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
> >On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > > >
> At 13:18 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
> >On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > > > b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
> > >
> > > How about EasyScripts ? the domain name is available, anyway.
> >
> >Not very perl, but I like it. Something similar though.
At 13:18 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Simon Wilcox wrote:
>
> > > b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
> >
> > How about EasyScripts ? the domain name is available, anyway.
>
>Not very perl, but I like it. Something similar though.
EasyPerlScripts
At Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:27:57 + (GMT), jo walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * CVS Repository (on Penderel?)
> i can sort this, perhaps with veeghelp.
> for leon and marcel's aspect oriented programming project we started a
> /home/projects directory, we could put the not-matt stuff in the
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
>
> How about EasyScripts ? the domain name is available, anyway.
Not very perl, but I like it. Something similar though.
> > c) It should sound at least semi-professional[1].
>
> Can we ma
Title: RE: Matt's Scripts Projects
I was going to suggest 'Perl Is Simply Super' but frankly the acronym lets it down :¬P
Regards,
Darren Clarke
Neophyte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:40 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
>It has occured to us we need a decent name for this. Discussion on IRC
>has concluded that:
>
> a) It shouldn't mention Matt in the title.
So "Not the Matt Wright Archive" is out then ;-)
> b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
It has occured to us we need a decent name for this. Discussion on IRC
has concluded that:
a) It shouldn't mention Matt in the title.
b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
c) It should sound at least semi-professional[1].
But apart from that we've been useless
Later.
Mark.
> * CVS Repository (on Penderel?)
i can sort this, perhaps with veeghelp.
for leon and marcel's aspect oriented programming project we started a
/home/projects directory, we could put the not-matt stuff in there and CVS
all of it, and make a dev group as well as the www group we are using now
wou
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
> * Web page. Need somewhere to point potential users at. Probably two
> versions - one for the developers and one for the users. This can be
> a subdirectory on london.pm.org.
I don't mind doing this bit of it. I would quite like the idea of
creating a fe
41 matches
Mail list logo
