> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 10:56:08 2004
> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:55:45 +0200
> From: Mario Vanoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Patrick Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Patrick Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: LPRng: problem not mentione
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 19 11:17:40 2004
> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:16:34 +0200
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: LPRng: problem with as/ae in printcap
> From: Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi there,
>
> from an accounting filter launched with as and/or ae in printcap
> file, I'd
Dave Lovelace wrote:
Hi Dave,
So it sure looks as though these printers aren't responding to PJL, and
so ifhp thinks that it needs to wait & retry, endlessly. I don't see
anything in the printers' configuration that would address this. Does
anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks ...
I'm not in
Install the ghostscript fonts. They belong in
{PREFIX}/share/ghostscript/fonts where PREFIX by default is /usr/local
You download them separately from the ghostscript program(they are not
included with gs), and just move the un-tgz'd directory into the proper
spot and all should be well.
Sean
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 31 12:14:53 2003
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:21:11 +
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Eclectic Attitude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with ifhp-3.5.14 and Ghostscript 8.12?
>
> When I try to 'sh ./configure' ifhp-3.5.14 for compilation, with
> Gh
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 29 08:11:35 2003
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:56:57 -0600
> From: Jeremy Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with routing scripts
>
> I'm trying to use a router script to filter out bsize (ledger) print
> jobs and route t
> - Have you enabled heavy debugging, and waded through what gets
> logged?
Yes, and it says that it's setting the router to
/opt/printserver/CAE/router, but I never see it try to run it.
> - Have you verified that sending jobs directly to the
> cae-170-gang works?
Yes, direct printing to cae-17
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2003 15:56 schrieb Jeremy Baumgartner:
> I'm trying to use a router script to filter out bsize (ledger) print
> jobs and route them to a single printer instead of to the gang of
> printers.
>
>
> Here is my printcap:
> -- snip --
> .commo
In regard to: LPRng: Problem with routing scripts, Jeremy Baumgartner said...:
>We want to have multiple input queues which get fed into a single
>routing queue.
Hmmm, we're using a router queue as the "front line" queue, rather than
as a secondary queue. I wonder if that's why you're seeing pro
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Matt Forrest wrote:
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:07:11 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Matt Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with 'file'
>
> Any hex editor would work
Argh! I had never seen this with the software I was using and since vi
didn't show the NULL's, I just assumed that the beginning was fine...
I got the same thing printed to file or looking at the df from the spool
directory. Looks like the driver is hosed. I am using the Win2k v3.1 PCL3
driver (it
ly Kruse wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem
HP-UX vi screws it up too. I never thought of less -- less made it very
obvious what was going on. I am used to not having less (instead having
only more) and it is less obvious with more.
Pff, emacs.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems A
Have you still got the filter?
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
On Thu, 26 Jun 200
Any hex editor would work but since you've mentioned vi, I feel
obligated to tell you I looked at it using emacs.
emacs is your friend - let the holy wars begin!!! :)
hm I just loaded it up in vi and it also shows the nulls...
I'm on a RH 7.3 box right now so it's actually vim.
yeah... on so
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> How were you able to determine that? None of the programs I threw at it
> seemed to be able to tell.
>
od -xv Job927-df-data.prn | less ... (or more if you don't have less)
This will show you your data in hex-dump format. Each 00 is a null.
I think the "x"
How were you able to determine that? None of the programs I threw at it
seemed to be able to tell.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and De
Hmm. Sorry, Ryan, I see that in my hurry late yesterday I got mixed up
as to which file was which.
I guess I'm with both whoever said that files from Windows boxes normally
should not be filtered at all on the print server, and with those who
said that the Windows print driver appears to be broke
> On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:58, Matt Forrest wrote:
> I too confirmed this, there is something seriously wrong with one of
> your drivers.
Can I put in a "me too". I found 600 null bytes on an HP driver for the
1200C. I wrote a filter to rip off NULL's and then pass the result onto the
normal if
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:58, Matt Forrest wrote:
> The 1st 1200 bytes of the file are all zero (AKA 0x00) immediately after
> that you have the normal ESC code for some PJL stuff
>
I too confirmed this, there is something seriously wrong with one of
your drivers.
How did you generate this file?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with 'file'
>
> Treating it as data
The 1st 1200 bytes of the file are all zero (AKA 0x00) immediately after
that you have the normal ESC code for some PJL stuff
Try stripping off just those bytes or get
http://www.scs.ryerson.ca/mforrest/printing/Job927-df-mf.prn
In the -PCL- you don't have the ESC code to end the job.. shouldn't
Message -
From: "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with 'file'
> Treating it as data is fine with me -- however, when file can't figure out
> what it is, ther
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> Yes, I have since fixed the permissions -- sorry about that.
>
> I am running file 3.4.1, just because I am leery of switching to a
> completely different rev without knowing the affect it will have on LPRng.
> AFAIK, 3.4.1 is the most recent 3.x release.
>
Ryan,
This
Yes, I have since fixed the permissions -- sorry about that.
I am running file 3.4.1, just because I am leery of switching to a
completely different rev without knowing the affect it will have on LPRng.
AFAIK, 3.4.1 is the most recent 3.x release.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> Treating it as data is fine with me -- however, when file can't figure out
> what it is, there is a problem, as I do check for file type with ifhp and
> it will refuse unrecognized file types.
>
> As you can see from the files below, vi appears to have halved the
> con
al Science Bldg - C630
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Villy Kruse wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:09:24 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:09:24 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with 'file'
>
> There is a LOT different
> College of Engineering
> University of Nevada, Las Vegas
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with '
There is a LOT different. The most noticeable seems to be the outputs of
cmp -l in the first column are about 2-3 times larger than the second one.
I'm guessing maybe vi chopped some long lines, if that's what those
numbers are? Why would ifhp care?
In any case, I'm going to produce a set of small
ginal Message -
From: "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with 'file'
> Nope -- the file behaves exactly the same after the tr (I redirected it to
> anothe
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> Nope -- the file behaves exactly the same after the tr (I redirected it to
> another file), and still will work only after being vi'd (or probably
> otherwise massaged, but this is what I know works).
>
I was somewhat doubtful about CRs being the problem; in my experie
Nope -- the file behaves exactly the same after the tr (I redirected it to
another file), and still will work only after being vi'd (or probably
otherwise massaged, but this is what I know works).
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
David Bear wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:58:39AM -0400, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> > So what is the appropriate way to repair such a file before it gets to the
> > printer, then?
>
> if indeed it is the extra cr chars, you could
>
> cat file | tr -d \r | ifhp
>
> or something like that.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:58:39AM -0400, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> So what is the appropriate way to repair such a file before it gets to the
> printer, then?
if indeed it is the extra cr chars, you could
cat file | tr -d \r | ifhp
or something like that. tr is fast...
>
> _ _ _ _ ___
So what is the appropriate way to repair such a file before it gets to the
printer, then?
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST
At work I use gVim on Windows. Under some circumstances, it
auto converts Unix line endings to windows when saving a file, I
think based on the file name ending. Sounds like this happened
here...
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Henrik Edlund wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> RN> I
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
RN> I am printing via the HP 2500cm driver for Win2k, which sends some PJL and
RN> says @PJL ENTER LANGUAGE=PCL3GUI. That's just fine. The problem is that
RN> 'file' claims that the file is of type 'data'. I vi'd the file, did
RN> nothing to it, saved i
CTED] On Behalf Of
Henrik Edlund
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with errors, notification of errors, and job
saving...
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Tim Gaastra wrote:
TG> B) Have the operator mailed that error
Do like I do, mail from within your
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Tim Gaastra wrote:
TG> B) Have the operator mailed that error
Do like I do, mail from within your scripts and leave LPRng out of any
mailing other than fatal errors (JREMOVE) to the operator.
Then you can still return JHOLD and still get a mail sent to the person
that handle
Run:
ls -la /usr/bin/file
...and also
/usr/bin/file -v
...and see what the results are.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | I
Hi walter,
Thanks for the help.
I tried what you asked me to do and i guess you are right, its a problem
with the filter. Following is the error message
pagecount using 'pjl info pagecount' at 11:05:07.717
setting up printer at 11:05:07.718
getting sync using 'pjl echo' at 11:05:07.718
id = '"LA
hi,
The first thing to try is to save a sample file (change lp -> lp=/tmp/test.ps)
and see if it look like something usefull IF NOT its a filter problem.
Second is to send the file direcly to the printer lpr -P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And see what happens.
walter
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Origina
Sorry for the long delay, but maybe this will still help someone. I have
no problem with the HP5000 series printers that I have. Here is my
printcap:
laser3
:ae=|/opt/LPRng/libexec/filters/accounting-umdnj.pl end
:af=/var/spool/lpd/%P/acct
:as=|/opt/LPRng/libexec/filters/accounting-umdnj.pl sta
If you are using linux the system wide amount of open files is specified
at run level in the file
/proc/sys/fs/file-max
just change the number to any number higher than what is allready
specified and is a power of 2.
ex:
echo 16386 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max
On the other hand it is rarely nee
Hi,
I had this problem at one stage when using bash. It had to do with the
maximum number of file descriptors open at one time..."ulimit" wasn't set
high enough. A setting of 1024 fixed the problem.
ie...
root@test]# ulimit -n 1024
Hope this helps...
Regards
===
In regard to: LPRng: Problem with checkpc, Scott Schorling said (at 2:46pm...:
>Any idea why I get the following errors when running checkpc?
>
>
>Warning - Printer_DYN 'bb-b3183bd' spool dir
>'/var/spool/lpd/bb-b3183bd' cannot be scanned 'Too many open files'
Sure. You have too many open file
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 02:09:35 2002
> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:52:13 +0100
> From: Mark Vinkx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: LPRng: problem with queues passed to chooser script
>
>
> I user LPRng-3.8.9-4 on redhat 7.3
>
> I defineded a loadbalancing queue xer
Please ignore above post. Apparently the error message was caused by not
having ghostscript fonts in the proper directory.
-
YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
The address you post from
I have spent many happy hours on a problem like this, too. Memory fades
fast, but, thankfully, I keep all my old email. Love those big hard
drives. I had three problems in my situation:
1. A required program didn't have it full path name specified.
2. There was an error in the script in my prin
Works well. Thanks!
> --
> Once again the overloading of the client and server information
> in the printcap file causes headaches. Add the following:
>
>
> remote:\
> :cm=lpdfilter method=raw color=yes:\
> :[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\
> :sd=/var/spool/lpd/remote:\
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 11 18:05:48 2002
> From: "David Milligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with lprng 3.8.5 on SUSE 8.0
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:56:58 +1200
>
>
> I am using lprng 3.8.5 that comes with SUSE 8.0 to print. I set things up in
Hi All
I'm getting this same problem, ifhp doesn't seem to be interpreting
the @DEVFD3 as the LPRng output device, and is instead sending the
output to a file in the spool directory with the name @DEVFD3.
I an using Red Hat 7.3 with:
LPRng-3.8.9-3
ifhp-3.5.8-1
The gs command in ifhp.conf is:
Hi Ignacio,
you seem to run into some kind of ghostscript problem, the converted file
has 0 bites, that's why you don't get any output. Try the gs string on the
commandline and change it in the ifhp.conf as you need it...
hope this helps
best regards
~christoph
--
/* Christoph Beyer
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 20 03:42:31 2002
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with OF filter on latest ifhp
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 10:42:33 + (GMT)
> From: Jonathan Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> I've got the latest ifhp but seem to have a problem when it is used as
I observed a similiar behavior unfrequently. I think that is happening
while printing PDF Files, but I may be wrong.
For example here is a job from our queue "lex1200c":
The status file status.lex1200c in the spool directory shows entries
like this:
status.lex1200c:waiting for subserver to exit
Just a wild guess here but were the legacy print packages removed or moved
prior to the new lprng being installed, I swear I had seen this before whn
the solaris print packages were still in place.
Thanks,
Phil Moses
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Sergij Kovalenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The problem appeared
> Hmm. In my (not all *that* broad) experience, lp is the normal username
> for running the lp subsystem on SYSV systems, but RH runs things like
> this as daemon. Certainly that's how lpd runs on our RH (6.2) system.
> But I see that there is a user lp, and
> it doesn't look as though it has
Tomas Pluskal wrote:
>
> This looks quite real, I'll do some research this way.
>
> But still it means there are 2 problems:
>
> 1) why lprng says the job was succesfully sent ?
>
> 2) why is RedHat set (in default installation) to such limit ? (I know
> it's a question for RH developpers)
>
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Dave Lovelace wrote:
> Tomas Pluskal wrote, in part:
> >
> > I tried running lpd -D10, and saw some messages like "can't fork", but I
> > don't know if this is related to the problem.
> >
> > Then I found out, that when I run LPD as root (normally it runs as "lp"
> > user), i
Did you use checkpc to check your configuration?
It checks owners and groups and if the needed directories and files are
there, etc.
Just try it!
Bye, Richard
--
Richard Ems
... e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg
Unix IS user friendly. It's ju
Tomas Pluskal wrote, in part:
>
> I tried running lpd -D10, and saw some messages like "can't fork", but I
> don't know if this is related to the problem.
>
> Then I found out, that when I run LPD as root (normally it runs as "lp"
> user), it works OK !
>
> Does anybody have any idea what this
Thanks Chad.
Using GNU make fixed my problem.
--Mohamed
-Original Message-
From: chad schrock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem compiling LPRNG 3.7.4 in Solaris 7
"Osman, Mohamed" wro
"Osman, Mohamed" wrote:
>
> I have mixed UNIX environment and was able to compile LPRNG 3.7.4
> in Linux, but it is not compiling correctly in Solaris 7.
>
> Below is the errors error messages when I attempt to do:
>
> make clean all
>
> Any idea why???
You need to use GNU make and not the
CAn anybody help with this ?
--
Amit Deshmukh
Graduate Student (EECS)
University of Toledo.
Contact Address
~~~
2952, Kendale Drive,
Apt #202,
Toledo OH 43606
Ph. 419-471-9789
--
Soo Hom wrote:
>
> Hi! I gave that a try and got:
>
> checking disable stripped binaries... yes
> checking for gcc... (cached) /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
> checking whether the C compiler (/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -lresolve)
> works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C co
Yes; many thanks!
Do you happen to know a solution for RedHat Linux 6.x as well?
Best regards,
--
Rick Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301/435-2983
/
All effort and exertion put forth by man from the fullness of his
heart i
On Monday, April 09, 2001 15:24:57 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
| checking whether the C compiler (/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -lresolve)
+--->8
There is no such thing as "-lresolve"; for historical reasons it's
"-lresolv". Also, that should be in $LIBS instead of $CC or it will be
seen t
Hi! I gave that a try and got:
checking disable stripped binaries... yes
checking for gcc... (cached) /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
checking whether the C compiler (/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -lresolve)
works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot
create executables
Hi! I gave that a try and got:
checking disable stripped binaries... yes
checking for gcc... (cached) /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
checking whether the C compiler (/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -lresolve)
works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot
create executables
hi,
this worked for me
./configure --with-ldopts=-lresolv --with-cc=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
regards
~Christoph
Soo Hom schrieb:
>
> This worked. Thanks!
>
> Soo
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Rick Troxel wrote:
>
> > I reported this as a bug about a month ago. My "solution" was
This worked. Thanks!
Soo
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Rick Troxel wrote:
> I reported this as a bug about a month ago. My "solution" was to settle
> for ifhp3.3.31.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Rick Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301/435-2983
>
>...
syhom>I am compiling ifhp3.4 on a Sun and am getting this error:
syhom>
syhom>gcc ifhp.o accounting.o vars.o errormsg.o plp_snprintf.o
syhom>globmatch.o open_device.o stty.o checkcode.o linelist.o
syhom>-lsocket -lnsl -o ifhp
syhom>Undefined first referenced
syhom> symbo
I reported this as a bug about a month ago. My "solution" was to settle
for ifhp3.3.31.
Best regards,
--
Rick Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301/435-2983
/
All effort and exertion put forth by man from the fullness of his
The problem mentioned early for 3.7.1 remeains in 3.7.4.
Situation: Local Linux RedHat 6.2 is used to spool
jobs from central site and send it to the several
local print-servers {Axis 560, HP Jetdirect).
The problem with gdbm occurs when more then 100 jobs
at once are sent from central site. LPR
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 27 10:04:50 2000
> From: John R Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with ifhp 3.4.4
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 09:39:48 -0700
>
> I noticed a problem after installing ifhp 3.4.4 - my job prints over and
> over. lpq shows:
>
I have stared at this with no inspiration.
Could you please try LPRng 3.7.2 and tell me if the same problem exists?
Also, 3.7.3 has a --disable-gdbm option now.
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 15 12:35:40 2000
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:48:29 -0500
> From: John Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 28 14:40:45 2000
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with multiple copies
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 15:24:59 -0500
>
>
> Hi, Sorry to bother you directly, but I thought you could have a fast
> answer to a problem I am having
> "p" == papowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
p> Try the latest LPRng beta
p> ftp://ftp.astart.com/pub/LPRng/private/LPRng-3.7.1beta...
I see that 3.7.1 is out, so I installed it and the problem has gone away.
Thanks a bunch!
- J<
-
Right This was a 'cut and paste-o' and I think Frank sent me
the patch already...
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 15 01:10:01 2000
> From: Frank Botte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lprng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with lp=|/path/to/progra
Try the latest LPRng beta
ftp://ftp.astart.com/pub/LPRng/private/LPRng-3.7.1beta...
and tell me if this problem still exists
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 14 16:18:36 2000
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with lp=|/path/to/program after 3.6.23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Jason L Tibbitts III <[
#
#gs_uniprint driver
#
# Does the following for GhostScript:
# gs @MODEL.upp -sOutputFile=-
#
# Uses:
# gs_converter= \%s{gs_unidriver}
# gs_unidriver =
#@GS@ -q -dSAFER -dBATCH -sOutputFile=- \
#@\%s{gs_device}.upp \%s{gs_options} -
#
# set gs_device to MODEL
Hello,
i have noticed the same problem. There is some code missing in the
file lpd_jobs.c. The filedescriptor is not set. Just add the following
code at line 2251 (Version 3.6.26) of the lpd_jobs source.
if( (close( in[0] ) == -1 ) ){
LOGERR_DIE(LOG_INFO)"Printe
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 12:38:13 2000
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:22:46 -0200
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9?= Morelli Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with Laserjet Hp4000n
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
>
>
&g
Hi Matthias,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Neto,
>
> > I have a problem with my printer. I have a HP laserjet 4000n and i want to
> > get the pagecounter, but my printer don´t return this value. It´s conected by a
> > parallel conection with a bidirectional cable.
> > Anyone know why
Hi Neto,
> I have a problem with my printer. I have a HP laserjet 4000n and i want to
> get the pagecounter, but my printer don´t return this value. It´s conected by a
> parallel conection with a bidirectional cable.
> Anyone know why i don´t get it?? it´s a problem with this model of HP??
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 20:22:21 2000
> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 20:31:08 +
> From: David Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with ifhp-3.3.21
>
>
> Found the solution !!
>
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 07:25:37 2000
> > From: David Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with ifhp-3.3.21
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:07:02 -0400 (EDT)
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 07:25:37 2000
> From: David Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with ifhp-3.3.21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:07:02 -0400 (EDT)
>
>
> Yes there may be a problem with the printer but
one <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with ifhp-3.3.21
> >
> >
> > My apologies ... I spoke too soon. On small jobs everything appears to work. On
>larger
> > jobs in PS only some or none of the output is printed.
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 13:14:04 2000
> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 18:45:21 +
> From: David Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with ifhp-3.3.21
>
>
> My apologies ... I spoke too soon. On small jobs
My apologies ... I spoke too soon. On small jobs everything appears to work. On larger
jobs in PS only some or none of the output is printed. However in these cases the
status according to LPRng is okay - ie sent correctly and removed from queue. However
on the printer the status is still the
Further update ... installed 3.6.24 and 3.3.21 on a "clean" rh 6.2 system
and exactly the same thing occurs. Using the tried and true elimination
method I removed 3.3.21 and installed 3.3.20 - everything now works !
What changed in 3.3.21 to cause the below failure ?
David Livingstone wrote:
As per our conversation I "completely" removed all lprng,ifhp packages and
reinstalled 3.6.24 and 3.3.21 as below. Same result with identical results(ie
same status, status.deslz files). I am "sure" there was no residual lpd packages
on the system.
If in the printcap I comment out the bp,if
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 26 07:14:15 2000
> From: David Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: LPRng: Problem with ifhp-3.3.21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 08:55:12 -0400 (EDT)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Posted this on the 14-15th originally and never saw a re
Thanks ... I will give it a try.
Edwin Lim wrote:
>
> I have a similar (the same) problem when I ugraded *LPRng*:
>
> Old config: LPRng-3.6.21 ifhp-3.3.17
> New config: LPRng-3.6.24 ifhp-3.3.17
>
> Problem description:
> Partial job output when using @status on HP JetDirect interfaces.
>
>
I have a similar (the same) problem when I ugraded *LPRng*:
Old config: LPRng-3.6.21 ifhp-3.3.17
New config: LPRng-3.6.24 ifhp-3.3.17
Problem description:
Partial job output when using @status on HP JetDirect interfaces.
Workaround:
Since I can't turn on status due to some weird problems, the w
An error does show up in the output of lpq -v using these options, but it
DOES seem to work (at least so far). Here's the error:
Filter_status: error = 'timeout;' at 10:30:00.895
Filter_status: offendingcommand = 'timeout' at 10:30:00.895
Thanks,
Brent
PS Judging from the PPD, I'm going to
In the ifhp.conf configuration for the printer add:
ps_eoj_at_start@
end_ctrl_t@
These are my 'desperation options' and this looks like a desperation
printer
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 5 16:19:41 2000
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 18:14:51 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Brent A. Nelson" <[EMAIL PROT
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 31 12:40:09 2000
> From: "Matanya Elchanani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem in Direct TCP/IP printing with Win2K
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:21:56 GMT
>
> Hi Patrick and all,
>
>
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
