Re: [lustre-discuss] Could not read from remote repository

Glad to help! On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:03 PM Jannek Squar wrote: > > There must have been a problem with the connection, the same line is now > working again. Thanks for your help. > > On 11/04/2024 20:54, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > Works fine for me. Make sure you don't have

Re: [lustre-discuss] Could not read from remote repository

aften > Fachbereich Informatik > Arbeitsbereich Wissenschaftliches Rechnen > > Bundesstraße 45a > D-20146 Hamburg > > Tel: +49 40 460094-219 > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://

Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.15.4 o2iblnd on RoCEv2?

A LU ticket and patch for lnetctl or for me being an under-caffeinated idiot? ;-) On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:06 PM Andreas Dilger wrote: > > It would seem that the error message could be improved in this case? Could > you file an LU ticket for that with the reproducer below, and ideally along

Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.15.4 o2iblnd on RoCEv2?

np1s0np0 Lots more to test and verify but the original mailing list submission was total pilot error on my part. Apologies to all who spent cycles pondering this nothingburger. On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 7:45 PM Jeff Johnson wrote: > > Howdy intrepid Lustrefarians, > > While starting d

[lustre-discuss] 2.15.4 o2iblnd on RoCEv2?

Howdy intrepid Lustrefarians, While starting down the debug rabbit hole I thought I'd raise my hand and see if anyone has a few magic beans to spare. I cannot get lnet (via lnetctl) to init a o2iblnd interface on a RoCEv2 interface. Running `lnetctl net add --net ib0 --if enp1s0np0` results in

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] MDS hardware - NVME?

; >> ___ > >> lustre-discuss mailing list > >> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > >> https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!1QmOnUbmSPpZPcc39

Re: [lustre-discuss] OSS on compute node

> > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeonco

Re: [lustre-discuss] OSS on compute node

application. > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Lustre Principal Architect > Whamcloud > > > > > > > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lus

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lnet errors

back()) event type 2, status -5, desc > 9a39ad668000 > > Does anyone have any ideas about what could be causing this? > > Thanks, > Alastair. > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http:/

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: [EXTERNAL] No port 988?

Nothing better than sliding in at the last moment to steal all the glory ;-) —Jeff On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 07:10 Jan Andersen wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Yes, that was it! Things are working beautifully now - big thanks. > > /jan > > On 27/09/2023 15:07, Jeff Johnson

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: [EXTERNAL] No port 988?

Any chance the firewall is running? You can use `lctl ping ipaddress@lnet` to check if you have functional lnet between machines. Example `lctl ping 10.0.0.10@tcp` —Jeff On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 05:35 Jan Andersen wrote: > However, it is still timing out when I try to mount on the oss. This is

Re: [lustre-discuss] How to eliminate zombie OSTs

ejandro Aguilar Sierra > LANOT, ICAyCC, UNAM > _______ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-F

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Installation Question: 158-c: Can't load module 'osd-zfs'

> > lustre:mgsnode=10.34.0.103@tcp > > lustre:version=1 > > lustre:flags=98 > > lustre:index=0 > > lustre:fsname=lustre > > lustre:svname=lustre:OST > > > > I have 51G for /dev/vda > > df -H /dev/vda2 > > Filesystem

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Installation Question: 158-c: Can't load module 'osd-zfs'

>> step 6 Generate a persistent hostid on the machine, if one does not >> already exist. This is needed to help protect ZFS zpools against >> simultaneous imports on multiple servers. For example: >> >> hid=`[ -f /etc/hostid ] && od -An -tx /etc/hostid|sed

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Installation Question: 158-c: Can't load module 'osd-zfs'

7] LustreError: 223535:0:(super25.c:183:lustre_fill_super()) > llite: Unable to mount : rc = -19 > > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > --

Re: [lustre-discuss] CentOS Stream 8/9 support?

iscuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- ------ Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard,

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] MDTs will only mount read only

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:21 AM Mike Mosley wrote: > Jeff, > > At this point we have the OSS shutdown. We were coming back from. full > outage and so we are trying to get the MDS up before starting to bring up > the OSS. > > Mike > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:15 PM

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] MDTs will only mount read only

ode count: 2247671504 >> Block count: 1404931944 >> Reserved block count: 70246597 >> Free blocks: 807627552 >> Free inodes: 2100036536 >> First block: 0 >> Block size: 4096 >> Fragment size: 4096 >> Reserved GDT blocks: 1024 >> Blocks per group: 20472 >> Fragments per group: 20472 >> Inodes per group: 32752 >

Re: [lustre-discuss] storing Lustre jobid in file xattrs: seeking feedback

tinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Lustre Principal Architect > Whamcloud > > > > > > > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Disk failures triggered during OST creation and mounting on OSS Servers

t3sas_cm0: log_info(0x3112011a): > originator(PL), code(0x12), sub_code(0x011a) > May 9 13:44:34 sphnxoss47 kernel: md: super_written gets error=-5 > May 9 13:44:34 sphnxoss47 kernel: md/raid:md8: Disk failure on dm-55, > disabling device. > May 9 13:44:34 sphnxoss47 kernel: md:

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Mounting lustre on block device

h that when we write > something with lusterfs then it can be shown in block device?? > Can share command?? > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Memory Management in Lustre

___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t:

Re: [lustre-discuss] Unable to mount new OST

:59:41 oss03 kernel: sd 15:0:0:92: [sddy] 34863054848 4096-byte > logical blocks: (142 TB/129 TiB) > Jul 6 07:59:41 oss03 kernel: sd 15:0:0:92: [sddy] Write Protect is off > Jul 6 07:59:41 oss03 kernel: sd 15:0:0:92: [sddy] Write cache: enabled, > read cache: enabled, supports DPO

Re: [lustre-discuss] Unable to mount new OST

>> is the exact same one used for all the other OSTs in the system. >> >> >> >> mkfs.lustre --reformat --mkfsoptions="-t ext4 -T huge" --ost >> --fsname=local --index=0051 --param ost.quota_type=ug >> --mountfsoptions='errors=remount-ro,extents,mballoc' --mgsnode=10.0.0.3@tcp >> --mgsnode=10.0.0.1@tc >>

Re: [lustre-discuss] zfs

e cluster. > > > > We called our DDN sales person who gave us a non-answer and has refused to > call us back. > > > > How are other people dealing with this? > > > > sam > > > _______ > lustre-discuss mai

Re: [lustre-discuss] error mounting client

> > Heath > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...

Re: [lustre-discuss] Centos 7.7 upgrade

; Jun 2 00:02:44 hostname kernel: LustreError: > 226253:0:(genops.c:397:class_newdev()) Skipped 887 previous similar messages > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > Thanks, > Alastair. > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-

Re: [lustre-discuss] Any way to dump Lustre quota data?

st > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 41

Re: [lustre-discuss] Wanted: multipath.conf for dell ME4 series arrays

t; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.johnson at aeoncomputing dot com www.aeoncomputing.com 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite C - San Diego, CA 92117 H

Re: [lustre-discuss] Frequency vs Cores for OSS/MDS processors

gards, >> >> Simon >> _______ >> lustre-discuss mailing list >> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >> > -- > -- > Jeff Johnson >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Frequency vs Cores for OSS/MDS processors

_ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001

Re: [lustre-discuss] Issue updating lustre from 2.10.6 to 2.10.7

or: Lustre, HPC > Scientific Computing Group, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility > _______ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > --

Re: [lustre-discuss] Full OST, any way of avoiding it without hanging?

ter Operations. > Maryland Advanced Research Computing Center (MARCC) > Johns Hopkins University > jas...@jhu.edu > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Sizing

gt; rhelversion:7.4 > > lfs --version > lfs 2.12.0 > > And this is a fresh install. So is there any other possibility to show the > complete zpool lun has been allocated for lustre alone. > > Thanks, > ANS > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 11:44 AM Jeff Johns

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Sizing

> lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t:

Re: [lustre-discuss] Can we install lustre on centos 7.5

___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- ------ Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x10

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

: Monday, April 30, 2018 11:49 AM > Cc: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5 > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Johnson < > jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com> wrote: > > RHEL 7.5 support comes in Lustre 2.

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.co

Re: [lustre-discuss] lustre mount in heterogeneous net environment-update

__ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001

Re: [lustre-discuss] Level 3 support

list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170

Re: [lustre-discuss] weird issue w. lnet routers

> lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-41

Re: [lustre-discuss] lustre 2.10.1 MOFED 4.1 QDR/FDR mixing

> On Tuesday 14 November 2017 18:39:49 Jeff Johnson wrote: > > Harald, > > > > As long as your new servers and clients all have the same settings in > their > > config files as your currently running configuration you should be fine. > > > > --Jeff &g

Re: [lustre-discuss] lustre 2.10.1 MOFED 4.1 QDR/FDR mixing

lients and add qdr servers and clients or the other > way > around? > > Thanks in advance > Harald > > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss

Re: [lustre-discuss] 1 MDS and 1 OSS

___ >> lustre-discuss mailing list >> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >> >> > > ___ > lustre-discuss maili

Re: [lustre-discuss] Can Lustre Be Mount to Kuberentes Pod

.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA

Re: [lustre-discuss] Best way to run serverside 2.8 w. MOFED 4.1 on Centos 7.2

assumption? > Or will the 2.10 rpms work on Centps 7.2? > > thanks, > -john c > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- ---

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10 on RHEL6.x?

t; lustre-discuss mailing list >>> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >>> >> >> > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre and OFED

ients: Debian + kernel 4.2 + Lustre 2.8 > IB: ConnectX-3 FDR > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > > -- -

Re: [lustre-discuss] Robinhood exhausting RPC resources against 2.5.5 lustre file systems

ad issues in which the robinhood server consumed >> more than the total amount of 32 CPU cores on the robinhood server (with >> 128 G RAM) and would functionally hang the robinhood server. The issue >> was solved for me by changing to MySQL-5.6.35. It was the "sort"

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.9 performance issues

t; Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Lustre Principal Architect > Intel Corporation > > > > > > > > ___ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustr

Re: [lustre-discuss] design to enable kernel updates

>> Could such a setup be done? It seems that would be a better use case for > >> something like GPFS or Gluster, but being a die-hard lustre enthusiast, > >> I want to at least show it could be done. > >> > >> > >> Thanks in advance, > >> > >>

Re: [lustre-discuss] LNET Self-test

Without seeing your entire command it is hard to say for sure but I would make sure your concurrency option is set to 8 for starters. --Jeff Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 5, 2017, at 11:30, Jon Tegner wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to use lnet selftest to evaluate network

Re: [lustre-discuss] lustre won't build anymore on RHEL 7.3

d here > > struct rdma_cm_id *rdma_create_id(struct net *net, > > ^ > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > make[7]: *** > > [/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lustre-2.8.0/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.o] Error 1 > > make[6]: *** [/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lustre-2

Re: [lustre-discuss] poor performance on reading small files

--Jeff -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117 High-performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out S

Re: [lustre-discuss] [HPDD-discuss] Lustre Server Sizing

-- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117 High-Performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre over 10 Gb Ethernet with and without RDMA

___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001

Re: [lustre-discuss] problem getting high performance output to single file

-- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117 High-performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage

Re: [Lustre-discuss] only root can read/write on new lustre filesystem (Lustre 2.6)

-- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117 High-Performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.5.2 Client Errors

. ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061

Re: [Lustre-discuss] OST Failover Configuration (Active/Active) verification

-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lustre 1.8.5 client failed to mount lustre

. ** ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Broken communication between OSS and Client on Lustre 2.4

-- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117 High-performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Broken communication between OSS and Client on Lustre 2.4

. thank you, Eduardo 2013/10/17 Jeff Johnson jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com Hola Eduardo, How are the OSTs connected to the OSS (SAS, FC, Infiniband SRP)? Are there any non-Lustre errors in the dmesg output of the OSS? Block devices error on the OSS (/dev/sd?)? If you are losing [scsi,sas

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Broken communication between OSS and Client on Lustre 2.4

2013/10/17 Jeff Johnson jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com Hola Eduardo, How are the OSTs connected to the OSS (SAS, FC, Infiniband SRP)? Are there any non-Lustre errors in the dmesg output of the OSS? Block devices error on the OSS (/dev/sd?)? If you are losing [scsi,sas,fc,srp] connectivity

Re: [Lustre-discuss] ldiskfs for MDT and zfs for OSTs?

/sdi /dev/sdk /dev/sdm /dev/sdo /dev/sdq /dev/sds --Jeff -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117

[Lustre-discuss] Known working 1.8.x client mouting 2.x server combinations?

both the 1.8.7 and 2.1.6 LFSs simultaneously from the clients over tcp. I understand that newer server code is friendlier to older client code but how new? 2.1.x tree or do I have to be in 2.3 tree to get this ability? Thanks.. -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Completely lost MGT/MDT

/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 /* New Address */ 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.2 with centos 6.3 gives problem while loading o2ib module for infiniband

://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117

[Lustre-discuss] Job: Lustre Development Engineer, Aeon Computing, Inc - San Diego, CA USA

; or equivalent work experience Development experience preferably with Lustre, LNET, Ethernet and TCP/IP Relocation to San Diego, CA Physical Demands / Work Environment Ability and desire to work as part of a geographically-distributed team -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Adding iSCSI SAN to Lustre

? ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412

Re: [Lustre-discuss] is Luster ready for prime time?

many other options on the market and ended up here. --Jeff -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117

Re: [Lustre-discuss] problem with installing lustre and ofed

with a non Whamcloud, stock kernel (plus headers, devel, etc). Then compile/install the OFED version of your choice. Once you have that you can build Lustre from source where it will compile against OFED and the installed kernel. --Jeff --- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Applications of Lustre - streaming?

On 12/7/12 9:34 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote: I've been using Lustre for years with my home MythTV (Linux PVR) setup. Nerd. :) -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845 m

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lo2iblnd and Mellanox IB question

.To everyone else in the world, have a great weekend! Megan Larko Hewlett-Packard ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

Megan, lnet pings aren't the same as tcpip/udp pings. An lnet ping 'lctl ping' would need to touch an active lnet instance on the target address. I don't think you can bind lnet to a pacemaker virtual IP but I'll let someone smarter than me on this list confirm or correct me. In any event an

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large Corosync/Pacemaker clusters

___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com

Re: [Lustre-discuss] mounting Failover OSTs

-- -- Jeff Johnson Co-Founder Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 /* New Address */ 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117 ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Tar backup of MDT runs extremely slow, tar pauses on pointers to very large files

Whamcloud, Inc. Principal Lustre Engineerhttp://www.whamcloud.com/ ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- -- Jeff

[Lustre-discuss] Tar backup of MDT runs extremely slow, tar pauses on pointers to very large files

1% /mnt/mdt Any feedback is appreciated! --Jeff -- -- Jeff Johnson Partner Aeon Computing jeff dot johnson at aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101   f: 858-412-3845 4905 Morena Boulevard, Suite 1313 - San Diego, CA 92117

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Latest RHEL/CentOS kernel that compiles against Lustre 1.8 git tree?

), but regardless we should have this work completed in the near future. -- -- Jeff Johnson Aeon Computing jeff dot johnson at aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com 4905 Morena Boulevard, Suite 1313 - San Diego, CA 92117 ___ Lustre

[Lustre-discuss] Latest RHEL/CentOS kernel that compiles against Lustre 1.8 git tree?

. Applying the patches manually reveals several hunk failures. I require a kernel more recent than 2.6.18-274.3.1 for non-Lustre related issues. Thanks in advance. -- -- Jeff Johnson Aeon Computing jeff dot johnson at aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com 4905 Morena

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Latest RHEL/CentOS kernel that compiles against Lustre 1.8 git tree?

29, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Johann Lombardi joh...@whamcloud.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:30:03PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote: Does anyone know the most recent kernel (RHEL/CentOS) that can be successfully patched and compiled against the current Lustre 1.8 git source tree? I attempted 2.6.18

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Latest RHEL/CentOS kernel that compiles against Lustre 1.8 git tree?

. -- -- Jeff Johnson Aeon Computing jeff dot johnson at aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com 4905 Morena Boulevard, Suite 1313 - San Diego, CA 92117 ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman

[Lustre-discuss] Lustre-1.8.4 : BUG soft lock up

[800a089a] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0xc4 [80032792] kthread+0x0/0x132 [8005dfa7] child_rip+0x0/0x11 -- -- Jeff Johnson Manager Aeon Computing jeff.johnson at aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845 4905 Morena

[Lustre-discuss] Enabling mds failover after filesystem creation

for enabling failover via tunefs.lustre are for OSTs and I want to be sure that there isn't a different procedure for the MDS since it can only be active/passive. Thanks, --Jeff -- Jeff Johnson Aeon Computing www.aeoncomputing.com 4905 Morena Boulevard, Suite 1313 - San

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Enabling mds failover after filesystem creation

, it's the same procedure as with an OST. cliffw On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Jeff Johnson jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com mailto:jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com wrote: Greetings, I am attempting to add mds failover operation to an existing v1.8.4 filesystem. I have heartbeat

[Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.8.4 - Local mount of ost for backup purposes, fs type ldiskfs or ext4?

to mount read-only as ext4 but any attempt at reading the extended attributes with getfattr fails. Thanks, --Jeff -- -- Jeff Johnson Manager Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com www.aeoncomputing.com t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845 m: 619-204-9061 4905

Re: [Lustre-discuss] aacraid kernel panic caused failover

it was never really explained or resolved. It appears that these controllers, like small children, have tantrums and fall apart. A power cycle clears the condition. Not the best controller for an OSS. --Jeff ---mobile signature--- Jeff Johnson - Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Fwd: Reg /// OSS rebooted automatically

if there are any RAID errors. It might be a network problem as well. Morning is coming and one of the developers will likely respond to this with more suggestions. --Jeff ---mobile signature--- Jeff Johnson - Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com m: 619-204-9061 On Dec 20, 2010, at 23:13

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Fwd: Reg /// OSS rebooted automatically

related that are causing the system to reboot in addition to Lustre complaining that it can't find the OST storage device. Others here on the list will likely give you a more detailed answer. The storage device is the place i would look first. --Jeff -- -- Jeff Johnson

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Fwd: Reg /// OSS rebooted automatically

---mobile signature--- Jeff Johnson - Aeon Computing jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com On Dec 20, 2010, at 22:27, Daniel Raj danielraj2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jeff, Thanks for your reply Storage information : DL380G5 == OSS + 16GB Ram OS== SFS G3.2-2 + centos 5.3

[Lustre-discuss] OST errors caused by residual client info?

Greetings.. Is it possible that the below error can be derived from a client that has not been rebooted or had lustre kernel mods reloaded during a time when a few test file systems were built and mounted? LustreError: 12967:0:(ldlm_lib.c:1914:target_send_reply_msg()) @@@ processing error

Re: [Lustre-discuss] OST errors caused by residual client info?

On 12/6/10 3:55 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote: Hello! On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: Previous test incarnations of this filesystem were built where ost name was not assigned (e.g.: OST) and was assigned upon first mount and connection to the mds. Is it possible that some clients