Re: [Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis

Dear all: No objections were raised during the call for adoption of draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis. Several members have volunteered to review and contribute. Authors, please submit the draft as a working group document. Zhen and Mohit On 5/29/22 07:46, Mohit Sethi wrote: Dear all: This is a

[Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis

Dear all: This is a call for adoption of draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis) as a LWIG working group item. Please respond to this call and answer the following questions by 13th June, 2022: 1. Do you think this draft should be an LWIG

[Lwip] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-05

Mohit Sethi has requested publication of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-05 as Informational on behalf of the LWIG working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp/ ___ Lwip mailing

Re: [Lwip] [IPsec] draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp shepherd writeup

67fb3e0-8692dc8284cb-4b11e1d62003bf58&q=1&e=de278ec7-abe4-4a5c-bad8-76ad8f57cf87&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmglt%2Fdraft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp%2Fcommit%2F47f1351b1928ba687af18e75e253e98720448e8e On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 5:12 AM Mohit Sethi M <mailto:mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson@dma

[Lwip] draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp shepherd writeup

The current version of the shepherd writeup is now in datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp/shepherdwriteup/. I have copied the text here for your convenience: Mohit Sethi is the document Shepherd. Erik Kline is the responsible Area Director. The document

[Lwip] draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp shepherd writeup

I am now preparing the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp. I wanted to clarify and double check a few things: - If the SPI is not random and is chosen by some application specific method -> it can reveal the application using ESP. - I assume a resource-constrained device would not

Re: [Lwip] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-19: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Murray, IESG, Sorry for the somewhat long email but I thought it is worth elaborating on the history of this document a little. I guess many of us struggled with the question if LWIG is the right venue before this document was adopted. Suresh (AD at the time of adoption), Ben Kaduk, and I (c

Re: [Lwip] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-19: (with DISCUSS)

, John Mattsson wrote: Argh, 2020-11-18 14 Mohit Sethi Changing to proposed standard as requested by the COSE experts. I think this might have been triggered by my comment on the COSE list. If that is the case, I would like to clarify that I am not a designated IANA COSE expert and I did not

Re: [Lwip] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-19: (with DISCUSS)

ent from this telechat and then performs the IETF last call before it gets scheduled again. Argh, I completely missed that the intended status had been changed on draft 14 from the LC (draft 12). 2020-11-18 14 Mohit Sethi Changing to proposed standard as requested by the COSE experts. 202

[Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp

Dear all, This email initiates the working group last call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-02 The draft has been reviewed by Tero, Scott, and Valery in the past. If you have any remaining concerns or issues, please comment on the m

Re: [Lwip] [COSE] draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-13

Wei25519 and W-25519... Cheers, John From: Mohit Sethi M <mailto:mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, 10 November 2020 at 09:40 To: John Mattsson <mailto:john.matts...@ericsson.com>, Rene Struik <mailto:rstruik@gmail.com>, Göran Selander &

Re: [Lwip] [COSE] draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-13

Hi John, As a co-chair of the LWIG working group, I am happy that you find this draft from LWIG "very good" and believe that it could help solve "some of the problems IoT devices have with Ed25519". The IANA registrations of this draft have been reviewed by experts such as Russ Housley and Jim

[Lwip] Fwd: Reminder: Survey on planning for possible online IETF meetings

You have a chance to influence how the upcoming IETF meetings for this year are organized. Please answer the survey if you haven't already. See the details below. Here is the link for your convenience: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5328FFJ --Mohit Begin forwarded message: From: IETF Executiv

Re: [Lwip] CoAP Implementation Guidance and IPV6_RECVERR

Hi Christian, Yes, we (Zhen and I) as chairs are definitely interested in finishing this document. There is plenty of valuable information there. @Authors (Matthias, Olaf, Carsten): What do you think? Do you need any help to revive and finish this document? Zhen and Mohit On 3/10/20 6:55 PM,

Re: [Lwip] [T2TRG] QUIC on IoT boards

Hi Eliot, I find your example rather disturbing. I am sure a dad does not want everyone else on the Internet to see what his daughters toy is exfiltrating. You would need encryption for that? I am totally with you on the need for knowing what's inside the device and how is the device behaving.

[Lwip] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-08

Mohit Sethi has requested publication of draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-08 as Informational on behalf of the LWIG working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representa

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations

is in a good shape, and it is ready for IESG review. Thanks, Kind Regards Kepeng -- Subject: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:27:20 + From: Mohit Sethi M <mailto:mohit.m

Re: [Lwip] Review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04

Hi Ilpo and Markku, Could you confirm that -08 version of the draft addresses all your concerns. We will then send it to the IESG for review. Zhen and Mohit On 6/5/19 11:58 AM, Carles Gomez Montenegro wrote: > Hi Ilpo, > > (CC'ing also TCPM.) > > First of all, sorry for the delay in our respons

[Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations

Dear all, This email initiates the working group last call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-08 The draft has an implementation and has been reviewed by the Crypto Review Panel (Stanislav Smyshlyaev). If you hav

Re: [Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-05.txt

Hi Rene, Thanks for addressing the comments. I wasn't looking for exact computational cost comparisons and rather some hints on what to expect if I re-use the underlying implementation of a different curve. Your statement "the overall cost differential is somewhere in the interval [1.00 - 1.25]

Re: [Lwip] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-04.txt

Hi Rene, In Section 1, the draft says: Montgomery curve, and of points of Edwards25519, a so-called twisted Edwards curve, which are both specified in [RFC7748] What about referencing RFC 8032: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8032? A lot of normative par

Re: [Lwip] [IPsec] The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

ot;LWIG is chartered to provide guidance on lightweight implementations. > Almost all drafts in this WG are informational in nature and we don't intend > to change existing standards or define new ones. > """ > > [4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-ipsecm

[Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks

Dear all, This email starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-07 Many of you have already provided useful feedback that has helped us improve this document. If you have any remaining concerns or is

[Lwip] Meeting Minutes for LWIG @ IETF 104

Hi all, Thank you for participating in the LWIG session at IETF 104. A special thank you to Jiye Park for writing the detailed minutes of the meeting, and to Francesca Palombini for serving as the jabber scribe. The minutes from IETF 104 are uploaded here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/

[Lwip] Preliminary agenda for LWIG @ IETF 104

Meeting IETF 104 - Prague Room: Athens/Barcelona Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 11:20-12:20 Chairs: Zhen Cao, Mohit Sethi AD: Suresh Krishnan Presentation materials: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/session/lwig

[Lwip] Agenda Items for IETF 104

Dear all, Some of you have already sent in a request for presentation time during the LWIG session @ IETF 104. Thank you! For those who haven't, please send Zhen and I requests for presentation slots.  We have a 1 hour session on Tuesday, March 26, between 11:20-12:20 in room Athens/Barcelona.

[Lwip] Fwd: Re: (initial triage - final disposition with rev-02) Re: Fwd: Review of draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-00 by crypto review panel

gt; To: Rene Struik <mailto:rstruik....@gmail.com> CC: Mohit Sethi M <mailto:mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com>, l...@ietf.org<mailto:l...@ietf.org> <mailto:l...@ietf.org>, Николаев Василий Дмитриевич <mailto:nikol...@cryptopro.ru> Dear Rene, Thank you very much

[Lwip] Fwd: Review of draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-00 by crypto review panel

. Smyshlyaev <mailto:smys...@gmail.com> To: Mohit Sethi M <mailto:mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com>, sur...@kaloom.com<mailto:sur...@kaloom.com> <mailto:sur...@kaloom.com>, zhencao.i...@gmail.com<mailto:zhencao.i...@gmail.com> <mailto:zhencao.i...@gmail.com&g

[Lwip] Meeting Minutes from LWIG @ IETF 103

Hi all, Thank you for participating in the LWIG session at IETF 103. A special thank you to Lijo Thomas and Ari Keränen for taking the minutes and to Rahul for serving as the jabber scribe. The minutes from IETF 103 are uploaded here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/minutes-

Re: [Lwip] [Suit] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-urien-suit-security-classes-00

LWIG has time available on its agenda. Let us (Zhen and I) know if you intend to present in LWIG tomorrow (Wednesday 11:20 - 12:20). --Mohit On 11/6/18 1:05 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Hi Pascal, > > One document that is intended to collect classifications like the one you > propose here is t

Re: [Lwip] [IPsec] The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Hi Paul, Heinrich and Tero, The authors have updated the draft based on the feedback received: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp/ Please let us know whether you still have objections to this being adopted as a WG document. --Mohit On 8/31/18 7:50 PM, Paul Wouters wro

Re: [Lwip] Agenda Items for IETF 103

Dear all, Please let us know if you need a presentation slot during the LWIG session at IETF 103. Zhen and I have prepared a preliminary agenda based on the requests we have received so far: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/agenda-103-lwig-00 --Mohit On 10/9/18 4:58 PM, Mohit

Re: [Lwip] Call for Papers - IEEE NetSoft 2019

Hi Lisandro, I am extremely sorry to see messages like these (which some would call spam) being posted to the list. As a general etiquette, please first discuss with the chairs before sending out such advertisement emails. People on other lists have already expressed their displeasure about t

[Lwip] Agenda Items for IETF 103

Dear all, Please send Zhen and I requests for presentation slots during IETF 103. According to the preliminary agenda, we have a 1 hour session on Wednesday, November 7, between 11:20-12:20 in room Boromphimarn 1/2. Don't forget to include the title of your presentation, related drafts, and th

Re: [Lwip] [IPsec] The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Hi Tero, You raise some very interesting points here. I personally think that the draft can benefit from more information about existing implementations of ESP. For example, documenting the fact that many implementations do not send dummy packets or which implementations use TFC. Adding speci

Re: [Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-struik-lwig-curve-representations-02

Hi Nikolas, Thank you for your feedback on the draft. Is any of the two libraries open source? I personally think that it would be nice to see some performance numbers in the draft. For example, is an implementation supporting both the curves with the same underlying primitives slower than

Re: [Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-struik-lwig-curve-representations-02

the draft as a working group document (draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-0). It would also be nice if you can incorporate the feedback from Nikolas already now. Zhen and Mohit On 07/30/2018 09:28 PM, Mohit Sethi wrote: Dear all, At the IETF 102 LWIG meeting in London, there was support

[Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-struik-lwig-curve-representations-02

Dear all, At the IETF 102 LWIG meeting in London, there was support for adopting draft-struik-lwig-curve-representations-02 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-struik-lwig-curve-representations-02) as a working group item. This is a call for adoption of this draft as a working group item. If

[Lwip] Minutes of LWIG @ IETF102

Hi all, Thank you for participating in the LWIG session at IETF 102. We had a productive meeting and covered all the agenda items in the 90 minutes allocated for us. A special thank you to Francesca for taking the minutes and to Rahul for serving as the jabber scribe. The minutes from IETF 1

[Lwip] ACT: Agenda Items for LWIG at IETF 102

later. Zhen and Mohit On 06/25/2018 11:54 AM, Mohit Sethi wrote: Dear all, Please send Zhen and I requests for presentation slots during IETF 102. We have a 1.5 hour session on Friday, July 20, between 11:50-13:20. Don't forget to include the title of your presentation, related drafts

[Lwip] Early chair review of Neighbor Management Policy for 6LoWPAN

Hi Rahul and co-authors, Here is my early chair review of the Neighbor Management Policy draft. I believe that more work is needed to improve the document going forward. - The document currently needs more text on what kind of networks is the suggested neighbor management policy suitable for.

[Lwip] Agenda Items for IETF 102

Dear all, Please send Zhen and I requests for presentation slots during IETF 102. We have a 1.5 hour session on Friday, July 20, between 11:50-13:20. Don't forget to include the title of your presentation, related drafts, and the approximate amount of time that you need. Please also let us 

Re: [Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-mattsson-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-01

Dear all, Seeing no objection, this draft is now adopted as a working group document. Authors, please re-submit the draft as WG document. --Mohit On 04/05/2018 04:20 PM, Mohit Sethi wrote: Dear all, At the IETF 101 LWIG meeting in London, there was support for adopting draft-mattsson-lwig

[Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-mattsson-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-01

Dear all, At the IETF 101 LWIG meeting in London, there was support for adopting draft-mattsson-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-01 as a working group item. This is a call for adoption of this draft as a working group item. If you have comments/objections/concerns regarding the adoption of t

[Lwip] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-06.txt

et-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Light-Weight Implementation Guidance WG of the IETF. Title : Practical Considerations and Implementation Experiences in Securing Smart Object Networks Authors : Mohit Sethi Jari

[Lwip] Presentation slot for IETF 101

Dear all, Please let Zhen and I know if you want a presentation slot during the LWIG session at IETF 101 in London. Don't forget to include the title of your presentation, related drafts, and the approximate amount of time that you need. Also, please let us know if you plan to present remot

Re: [Lwip] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04

Dear Samita, Thanks for the detailed review and positive comments. We have now submitted an updated version which can be found here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-05. The diff from the previous version can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-iet

Re: [Lwip] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04

Dear Tim, Thanks for the detailed review and positive comments. We have now submitted an updated version which can be found here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-05. The diff from the previous version can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l

Re: [Lwip] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04

Dear Christian, Thanks for the detailed review and positive comments. We have now submitted an updated version which can be found here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-05. The diff from the previous version can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Hi all I have read a previous version of this draft. The draft has already provided useful input to the neighbor discovery work ongoing in 6lo. I believe this work is relevant for the working group. +1 for the adoption call. --Mohit On 08/11/2017 12:49 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote: The LWIG

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Hi I have read this draft. I find this draft relevant for the working group. I was happy to see in the presentation during IETF 99 on how the different constrained OS implement the TCP stack. +1 for adoption call. --Mohit On 08/11/2017 11:34 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote: The LWIG WG has place

[Lwip] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04.txt

Object Networks Authors : Mohit Sethi Jari Arkko Ari Keranen Heidi-Maria Back Filename: draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04.txt Pages : 31 Date: 2017-08

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

liminary experiences with those libraries for signing operation on small devices. Regards Tobias -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Mohit Sethi [mailto:mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com] Gesendet: Montag, 7. August 2017 18:20 An: Tobias Guggemos ; Carsten Bormann Cc: lwip@ietf.org Betreff: Re: AW: [

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

and should say that this document discusses security architectures and cryptographic functions for authentication/signing only? Just a thought to avoid missunderstandings. Regards Tobias -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Lwip [mailto:lwip-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Mohit Sethi Gesende

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

secure key agreement. Grüße, Carsten On Aug 6, 2017, at 12:18, Mohit Sethi wrote: Hi all The authors of the document believe that it is ready to move forward. During the previous last call we had already received support from several working group members. Based on the feedback during th

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

Hi all The authors of the document believe that it is ready to move forward. During the previous last call we had already received support from several working group members. Based on the feedback during the previous last call, we removed the performance measurements of RSA key sizes smaller

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02

Hi Hannes I had refrained from responding earlier because there was an ongoing discussion about this draft within the IoT directorate. I wanted to wait for it to conclude before responding. But in any case, here is my response: This is how you want to solve the IoT security problem: Use ARM c

[Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02.txt

Dear all We have submitted the next version of the working group document "draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors". The next version can be found here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02 The draft has mostly undergone minor changes since the last IETF. We have addressed th

[Lwip] Review of draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-05

Dear all The chair has asked me to do the shepherd write up for draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-05. I have gone through the document again and I have some comments that I think should be addressed first. Most of them are minor and editorial in nature. It would be great if the authors can fi

Re: [Lwip] draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00 & Crypto Performance

Hi Hannes Please see the responses inline. On 07/25/2016 07:23 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: I have a question regarding draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00. Table 2 shows ECDSA signature performance with TinyECC. The execution time in the first row says 1,858 msec. A different writing style for

Re: [Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01.txt

nd DTLS memory footprint? Many thanks, Zhen On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Mohit Sethi wrote: Dear all, We have uploaded the next version of our draft documenting the implementation experiences of public-key cryptography on 8-bit micro-controllers. The draft is available here: https://tools.ietf.org/

[Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01.txt

Subject:New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01.txt Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 02:48:04 -0700 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: Mohit Sethi , Heidi-Maria Back , Jari Arkko , Ari Keranen A new version of I-D, draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01.txt has been

Re: [Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00.txt

older ECC curves. I didn't find anything about P-256 (CoAP's current MTI curve) or the 25519 curves, which are the more likely ones to be used going forward. So I'm wondering a bit what an implementer of IETF IoT protocols can take home specifically here. Grüße, Carsten Mohit Sethi

[Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00.txt

...@ietf.org To: Jari Arkko , Heidi-Maria Back , Heidi-Maria Back , Ari Keranen , Mohit Sethi , Jari Arkko , Mohit Sethi , Ari Keranen A new version of I-D, draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Ari Keranen and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft

[Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sethi-gba-constrained-01.txt

, Patrik Salmela , Vesa Lehtovirta , Mohit Sethi , Mohit Sethi , Patrik Salmela A new version of I-D, draft-sethi-gba-constrained-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Mohit Sethi and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-sethi-gba-constrained Revision: 01 Title