Re: tex2lyx Feature Request

Jean-Marc Let's make it --list-textclasses -l that was just an example. The request concerns tex2lyx. I am getting the available textclasses out of it. el n 30/06/2023 11:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 30/06/2023 à 11:07, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit : >> so I wonder if one

Re: tex2lyx Feature Request

Le 30/06/2023 à 11:07, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit : so I wonder if one should not implement a similar switch like --list-modules [--list-layouts, right?] or similar which would do just that and return something like AEA IEEEtran-CompSoc IEEEtran-TransMag

tex2lyx Feature Request

Hi, I am doing an exercise of translating OpenOffice formatted files into Lyx via pandoc and tex2lyx. The LyX file is readable but when I use scrlettr it wants Koma Letter V1 which is not installed. I had to do find /Applications/LyX.app/ -name 'scrl*' to find

Re: feature request: text search in LaTex Preamble

On 03/31/2018 04:32 PM, David Pesetsky wrote: > I often find myself hunting for something in the preamble and having to cut > and paste the contents of the "Document Settings/LaTex Preamble" window into > a text processing program to search for what I want. (And then I sometimes > tinker with

feature request: text search in LaTex Preamble

I often find myself hunting for something in the preamble and having to cut and paste the contents of the "Document Settings/LaTex Preamble" window into a text processing program to search for what I want. (And then I sometimes tinker with it in the text processing program, forgetting that this

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file type* in LyX under Preferences File Handling

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file type* in LyX under Preferences File Handling

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

Vergara Gil" <a...@cphr.edu.cu> Cc: "Richard Heck" <rgh...@lyx.org>; "lyx-users Users" <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>; <lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the call to compile

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

To: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu Cc: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the call to compile

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

To: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu Cc: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: "Richard Heck" Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >> "converts" plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the >>

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: "Richard Heck" > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >>> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >>> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >>> "converts" plantuml

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

i...@krugs.de> To: "Alex Vergara Gil" <a...@cphr.edu.cu> Cc: "Richard Heck" <rgh...@lyx.org>; "lyx-users Users" <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>; <lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python bind

[Feature Request] python binding

Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package. I know there already exists a similar binding for

[Feature Request] quality ePub export: Was [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one

[Feature Request] python binding

From: Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:35 PM On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck mailto:rgh...@lyx.org *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one

[Feature Request] python binding

Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package. I know there already exists a similar binding for

[Feature Request] quality ePub export: Was [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one

[Feature Request] python binding

From: Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:35 PM On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck mailto:rgh...@lyx.org *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one

[Feature Request] python binding

Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package. I know there already exists a similar binding for

[Feature Request] quality ePub export: Was [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 "Alex Vergara Gil" wrote: > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python > code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? > This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such

[Feature Request] python binding

From: "Steve Litt" Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:35 PM On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:36:29 -0500 "Alex Vergara Gil" wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: Richard Heck > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM > > > On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of > python code within its own

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: "Alex Vergara Gil" writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code > within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? > This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one

Re: Feature request

Thanks Jim. I just responded to your feature request. Let's continue the conversation on the trac ticket. Scott On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Jim Rockford jim.rockfo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your attention Scott. I just submitted the enhancement request you suggested. Best, Jim

Re: Feature request

Thanks Jim. I just responded to your feature request. Let's continue the conversation on the trac ticket. Scott On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Jim Rockford jim.rockfo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your attention Scott. I just submitted the enhancement request you suggested. Best, Jim

Re: Feature request

Thanks Jim. I just responded to your feature request. Let's continue the conversation on the trac ticket. Scott On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Jim Rockford <jim.rockfo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your attention Scott. I just submitted the enhancement request > you suggest

Feature request

specify the dimension explicitly. I find this a bit of a nuisance and thus make the feature request. Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user feature requests. Jim

Re: Feature request

find this a bit of a nuisance and thus make the feature request. Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user feature requests. Jim

Feature request

specify the dimension explicitly. I find this a bit of a nuisance and thus make the feature request. Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user feature requests. Jim

Re: Feature request

find this a bit of a nuisance and thus make the feature request. Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user feature requests. Jim

Feature request

specify the dimension explicitly. I find this a bit of a nuisance and thus make the feature request. Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user feature requests. Jim

Re: Feature request

ways > specify the dimension explicitly. I find this a bit of a nuisance and thus > make the feature request. > > Thanks to the Lyx team for their great work and their consideration of user > feature requests. > > Jim

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde milde at users.sf.net writes: On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth of the initial Table of

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 16/10/2013 7:02 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Guenter Milde milde at users.sf.net writes: On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde milde at users.sf.net writes: On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth of the initial Table of

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 16/10/2013 7:02 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Guenter Milde milde at users.sf.net writes: On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde users.sf.net> writes: > > On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: > >> Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: > > ... > > >> However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth > >> of the initial Table of

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 16/10/2013 7:02 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Guenter Milde users.sf.net> writes: On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth of the

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth of the initial Table of contents. This is controlled in LyX by going to

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: ... However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth of the initial Table of contents. This is controlled in LyX by going to

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-13, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: >> Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: ... >> However I am still getting the problem of being unable to control the depth >> of the initial Table of contents. > This is controlled in LyX by going to Document >

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Andrew Parsloe aparsloe at clear.net.nz writes: On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth changes, but the initial Table of Contents

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 4:08 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Andrew Parsloe aparsloe at clear.net.nz writes: On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Andrew Parsloe aparsloe at clear.net.nz writes: On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth changes, but the initial Table of Contents

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 4:08 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Andrew Parsloe aparsloe at clear.net.nz writes: On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Andrew Parsloe clear.net.nz> writes: > > > On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > >> Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. > >> Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly > >> suggested I try to find out about

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: > Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. > With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… > The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth changes, > but the initial Table of Contents still lists

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 4:08 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Andrew Parsloe clear.net.nz> writes: On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 14/10/2013 5:35 a.m., Mark Horton wrote: Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: Nevertheless I have continued to work in TeXworks to see how far I can get. With the Tables of Contents and have got quite far… The new mini TOC’s seem to be behaving ok, and respond to depth changes, but the

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 9/10/2013 11:34 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

stefano franchi stefano.franchi at gmail.com writes: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk wrote:I found the package to do the job called Minitoc.  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in this field  I don't know how to Install it and make it

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: stefano franchi stefano.franchi at gmail.com writes: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk wrote:I found the package to do the job called Minitoc.  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a pretty impressive document (if only by weight) in

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

stefano franchi stefano.franchi at gmail.com writes: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk wrote:I found the package to do the job called Minitoc.  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in this field  I don't know how to Install it and make it

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk writes: stefano franchi stefano.franchi at gmail.com writes: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton mark.horton001 at yahoo.co.uk wrote:I found the package to do the job called Minitoc.  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a pretty impressive document (if only by weight) in

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

stefano franchi gmail.com> writes: > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> wrote:I found the "package" to do the job called Minitoc.  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in this field  I don't know how to "Install it " and make > it work from Latex. > > > >

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Mark Horton yahoo.co.uk> writes: > > stefano franchi gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton > yahoo.co.uk> wrote:I found the "package" to do the job called Minitoc. >  Unfortunately being anignorant beginner in this field  I don't know how to

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Stephano has replied, but he has not used MikTeX and doesn't use windows. Combining that with my near complete ignorance he has quite sensibly suggested I try to find out about installing packages with MikTeX. Having so far managed to produce a pretty impressive document (if only by weight) in

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde milde at users.sf.net writes: On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton mark.horton...@yahoo.co.ukwrote: I found the package to do the job called Minitoc. Unfortunately being an ignorant beginner in this field I don't know how to Install it and make it work from Latex. Mark, installation of a Latex package is

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde milde at users.sf.net writes: On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton mark.horton...@yahoo.co.ukwrote: I found the package to do the job called Minitoc. Unfortunately being an ignorant beginner in this field I don't know how to Install it and make it work from Latex. Mark, installation of a Latex package is

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: >>> Hi Developers >>> It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the >>> the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. >>> Plus

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Guenter Milde users.sf.net> writes: > > On 2013-10-06, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: > >>> Hi Developers > > >>> It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the > >>> the ability to

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mark Horton wrote: > I found the "package" to do the job called Minitoc. Unfortunately being an > ignorant beginner in this field I don't know how to "Install it " and make > it work from Latex. > > Mark, installation of a Latex

New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chapter. Best Regards Mark Horton

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chapter. This is a LaTeX issue, first and

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 7/10/2013 4:49 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each

Re: New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

On 10/06/2013 07:33 AM, Mark Horton wrote: Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chapter. This is a LaTeX issue, first and

New Feature Request: Chapter Contents

Hi Developers It would make navigation a lot easier for large documents if we had the the ability to generate a contents of Chapters at the start. Plus a more detailed contents page at the start of each Chapter. Best Regards Mark Horton

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >