Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: Which would not explain why futzing with the environment variables cured (or at least moved) the bug. Then again, perhaps I'm asking too much of the bug as far as consistency goes. This brings me back to my thesis that somewhere there is a buffer overflow. How/why it would

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread TechTonics
TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: This problem with preview is still not 100% gone. I have to change the PATH to point to a different copy of GS (Matlab copy or official copy) depending on which Lyx document I open. At this time, only the document that first exhibit this problem needs PATH to

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread Leonid Belostotski
Why don't you make the Matlab copy of GS the same as the system? I tried that unsuccessfully already. Matlab generates the ps file even when I remove its GS directory completely. When I substitute Matlab GS with official GS, the figures still misbehave after I regenerate them from scratch

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: Which would not explain why futzing with the environment variables cured (or at least moved) the bug. Then again, perhaps I'm asking too much of the bug as far as consistency goes. This brings me back to my thesis that somewhere there is a buffer overflow. How/why it would

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread TechTonics
TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: This problem with preview is still not 100% gone. I have to change the PATH to point to a different copy of GS (Matlab copy or official copy) depending on which Lyx document I open. At this time, only the document that first exhibit this problem needs PATH to

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread Leonid Belostotski
Why don't you make the Matlab copy of GS the same as the system? I tried that unsuccessfully already. Matlab generates the ps file even when I remove its GS directory completely. When I substitute Matlab GS with official GS, the figures still misbehave after I regenerate them from scratch

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: Which would not explain why futzing with the environment variables cured (or at least moved) the bug. Then again, perhaps I'm asking too much of the bug as far as consistency goes. This brings me back to my thesis that somewhere there is a buffer overflow. How/why it would

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread TechTonics
TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: This problem with preview is still not 100% gone. I have to change the PATH to point to a different copy of GS (Matlab copy or "official" copy) depending on which Lyx document I open. At this time, only the document that first exhibit this problem needs PATH

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-11 Thread Leonid Belostotski
Why don't you make the Matlab copy of GS the same as the system? I tried that unsuccessfully already. Matlab generates the ps file even when I remove its GS directory completely. When I substitute Matlab GS with "official" GS, the figures still misbehave after I regenerate them from

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-10 Thread LB
Which would not explain why futzing with the environment variables cured (or at least moved) the bug. Then again, perhaps I'm asking too much of the bug as far as consistency goes. This brings me back to my thesis that somewhere there is a buffer overflow. How/why it would involve both the

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-10 Thread LB
Which would not explain why futzing with the environment variables cured (or at least moved) the bug. Then again, perhaps I'm asking too much of the bug as far as consistency goes. This brings me back to my thesis that somewhere there is a buffer overflow. How/why it would involve both the

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-10 Thread LB
Which would not explain why futzing with the environment variables cured (or at least moved) the bug. Then again, perhaps I'm asking too much of the bug as far as consistency goes. This brings me back to my thesis that somewhere there is a buffer overflow. How/why it would involve both the

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My install of

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
Paul A. Rubin wrote: LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: Having already generated the image files in MATLAB, try temporarily hiding all the Cygwin and Matlab copies of the GS executable (say by adding a $ to the start of their names, which is easy to undo afterward). Then run LyX and see if the images load properly. No they don't. Leo

Re: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Stephen Buonopane
On Aug 9, 2006, at 2:28 PM, TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: Having already generated the image files in MATLAB, try temporarily hiding all the Cygwin and Matlab copies of the GS executable (say by adding a $ to the start of their names, which is easy to undo afterward). Then run LyX and see if

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
Your starting idea seems the easiest place to start. LyX was configured with the system GS. It is now going to use the matlab gs. Does the matlab gs need to be put in the beginning of Path_prefix? Reconfigure/Restart? [SET LC_ALL=en_EN] I think that stands for Locale. I suggested changing that

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Thanks Leo

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Clarification: it works when Lyx path points to Matlab gs. When I change path to the official gs the preview stops working. I have installed matlab after

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Thanks Leo Great! One of the great Presidents said persistence is a far better quality than talent or genius. Still seems like a surprising way to

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Great! One of the great Presidents said persistence is a far better quality than talent or genius. Still seems like a surprising way

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My install of

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
Paul A. Rubin wrote: LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: Having already generated the image files in MATLAB, try temporarily hiding all the Cygwin and Matlab copies of the GS executable (say by adding a $ to the start of their names, which is easy to undo afterward). Then run LyX and see if the images load properly. No they don't. Leo

Re: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Stephen Buonopane
On Aug 9, 2006, at 2:28 PM, TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: Having already generated the image files in MATLAB, try temporarily hiding all the Cygwin and Matlab copies of the GS executable (say by adding a $ to the start of their names, which is easy to undo afterward). Then run LyX and see if

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
Your starting idea seems the easiest place to start. LyX was configured with the system GS. It is now going to use the matlab gs. Does the matlab gs need to be put in the beginning of Path_prefix? Reconfigure/Restart? [SET LC_ALL=en_EN] I think that stands for Locale. I suggested changing that

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Thanks Leo

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Clarification: it works when Lyx path points to Matlab gs. When I change path to the official gs the preview stops working. I have installed matlab after

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Thanks Leo Great! One of the great Presidents said persistence is a far better quality than talent or genius. Still seems like a surprising way to

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Great! One of the great Presidents said persistence is a far better quality than talent or genius. Still seems like a surprising way

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My install of

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its own version as well. My

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
Paul A. Rubin wrote: LB wrote: I think this supports the possibility of a Ghostscript conflict and that Matlab comes with its own version of Gs. I actually have three versions of gs.exe. Cygwin has two. One in cygwin\bin directory and one in cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin directory. Matlab has its

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: Having already generated the image files in MATLAB, try temporarily hiding all the Cygwin and Matlab copies of the GS executable (say by adding a $ to the start of their names, which is easy to undo afterward). Then run LyX and see if the images load properly. No they don't. Leo

Re: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Stephen Buonopane
On Aug 9, 2006, at 2:28 PM, TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: Having already generated the image files in MATLAB, try temporarily hiding all the Cygwin and Matlab copies of the GS executable (say by adding a $ to the start of their names, which is easy to undo afterward). Then run LyX and see if

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
Your starting idea seems the easiest place to start. LyX was configured with the system GS. It is now going to use the matlab gs. Does the matlab gs need to be put in the beginning of Path_prefix? Reconfigure/Restart? [SET LC_ALL=en_EN] I think that stands for Locale. I suggested changing that

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Thanks Leo

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread LB
I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Clarification: it works when Lyx path points to Matlab gs. When I change path to the "official" gs the preview stops working. I have installed matlab after

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread TechTonics
LB wrote: I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Thanks Leo Great! One of the great Presidents said persistence is a far better quality than talent or genius. Still seems like a surprising way to

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-09 Thread Paul A. Rubin
TechTonics wrote: LB wrote: I have changed the names (decreased by one character) of the figures that were given me problems and they are now previewing fine!!! Great! One of the great Presidents said persistence is a far better quality than talent or genius. Still seems like a surprising way

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Stephen Harris
Paul A. Rubin wrote: LB wrote: Ok, it tried this. I commented out SET LC_ALL=en_EN. This resulted in a different image having the preview problem. I placed SET XX=Y in lyx.bat and the preview problem moved back to the original image. The same happens when I comment out the other

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Stephen Harris wrote: The MATLAB Component Runtime (MCR) 7.0 and 7.1 do not contain a copy of the GhostScript program included with MATLAB. Therefore, applications deployed on a target machine rely on a locally- installed version of GhostScript, if one exists, for exporting some graphics. Since

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Stephen Harris
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Stephen Harris wrote: The MATLAB Component Runtime (MCR) 7.0 and 7.1 do not contain a copy of the GhostScript program included with MATLAB. Therefore, applications deployed on a target machine rely on a locally- installed version of GhostScript, if one exists, for

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Stephen Harris
Paul A. Rubin wrote: LB wrote: Ok, it tried this. I commented out SET LC_ALL=en_EN. This resulted in a different image having the preview problem. I placed SET XX=Y in lyx.bat and the preview problem moved back to the original image. The same happens when I comment out the other

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Stephen Harris wrote: The MATLAB Component Runtime (MCR) 7.0 and 7.1 do not contain a copy of the GhostScript program included with MATLAB. Therefore, applications deployed on a target machine rely on a locally- installed version of GhostScript, if one exists, for exporting some graphics. Since

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Stephen Harris
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Stephen Harris wrote: The MATLAB Component Runtime (MCR) 7.0 and 7.1 do not contain a copy of the GhostScript program included with MATLAB. Therefore, applications deployed on a target machine rely on a locally- installed version of GhostScript, if one exists, for

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Stephen Harris
Paul A. Rubin wrote: LB wrote: Ok, it tried this. I commented out SET LC_ALL=en_EN. This resulted in a different image having the preview problem. I placed SET XX=Y in lyx.bat and the preview problem moved back to the original image. The same happens when I comment out the other

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Stephen Harris wrote: "The MATLAB Component Runtime (MCR) 7.0 and 7.1 do not contain a copy of the GhostScript program included with MATLAB. Therefore, applications deployed on a target machine rely on a locally- installed version of GhostScript, if one exists, for exporting some graphics.

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-06 Thread Stephen Harris
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Stephen Harris wrote: "The MATLAB Component Runtime (MCR) 7.0 and 7.1 do not contain a copy of the GhostScript program included with MATLAB. Therefore, applications deployed on a target machine rely on a locally- installed version of GhostScript, if one exists, for

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Ok, it tried this. I commented out SET LC_ALL=en_EN. This resulted in a different image having the preview problem. I placed SET XX=Y in lyx.bat and the preview problem moved back to the original image. The same happens when I comment out the other line in the lyx.bat.

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Ok, it tried this. I commented out SET LC_ALL=en_EN. This resulted in a different image having the preview problem. I placed SET XX=Y in lyx.bat and the preview problem moved back to the original image. The same happens when I comment out the other line in the lyx.bat.

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Ok, it tried this. I commented out SET LC_ALL=en_EN. This resulted in a different image having the preview problem. I placed SET XX=Y in lyx.bat and the preview problem moved back to the original image. The same happens when I comment out the other line in the lyx.bat.

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-04 Thread LB
One more little experiment, if you don't mind, just to confirm symptoms: if you comment out one of the SET commands in lyx.bat, but replace it with a line of equal length (SET XXX=Y... with enough Xs and Ys to match the line you commented out), does the bug move to a

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-04 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: One more little experiment, if you don't mind, just to confirm symptoms: if you comment out one of the SET commands in lyx.bat, but replace it with a line of equal length (SET XXX=Y... with enough Xs and Ys to match the line you commented out), does the bug move

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-04 Thread LB
One more little experiment, if you don't mind, just to confirm symptoms: if you comment out one of the SET commands in lyx.bat, but replace it with a line of equal length (SET XXX=Y... with enough Xs and Ys to match the line you commented out), does the bug move to a

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-04 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: One more little experiment, if you don't mind, just to confirm symptoms: if you comment out one of the SET commands in lyx.bat, but replace it with a line of equal length (SET XXX=Y... with enough Xs and Ys to match the line you commented out), does the bug move

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-04 Thread LB
One more little experiment, if you don't mind, just to confirm symptoms: if you comment out one of the SET commands in lyx.bat, but replace it with a line of equal length (SET XXX=Y... with enough Xs and Ys to match the line you commented out), does the bug move to a

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-04 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: One more little experiment, if you don't mind, just to confirm symptoms: if you comment out one of the SET commands in lyx.bat, but replace it with a line of equal length (SET XXX=Y... with enough Xs and Ys to match the line you commented out), does the bug move

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread LB
Does it display the same old symptoms; it works with lyx.exe or if you delete one of the set commands in lyx.bat? Lyx (or GS) gets stuck at different figures depending on what I comment out in lyx.bat. If the figure doesn't work with lyx.exe then it is the file. Try it with both (the old

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Lyx (or GS) gets stuck at different figures depending on what I comment out in lyx.bat. I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread LB
I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly but get stuck on a later one if you comment something out of lyx.bat? (And how far it gets depends on

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly but get stuck on a later one if you comment something out of lyx.bat? (And how far it gets

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread LB
Does it display the same old symptoms; it works with lyx.exe or if you delete one of the set commands in lyx.bat? Lyx (or GS) gets stuck at different figures depending on what I comment out in lyx.bat. If the figure doesn't work with lyx.exe then it is the file. Try it with both (the old

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Lyx (or GS) gets stuck at different figures depending on what I comment out in lyx.bat. I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread LB
I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly but get stuck on a later one if you comment something out of lyx.bat? (And how far it gets depends on

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly but get stuck on a later one if you comment something out of lyx.bat? (And how far it gets

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread LB
Does it display the same old symptoms; it works with lyx.exe or if you delete one of the "set" commands in lyx.bat? Lyx (or GS) gets "stuck" at different figures depending on what I comment out in lyx.bat. If the figure doesn't work with lyx.exe then it is the file. Try it with both (the

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Lyx (or GS) gets "stuck" at different figures depending on what I comment out in lyx.bat. I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread LB
I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly but get stuck on a later one if you comment something out of lyx.bat? (And how far it gets depends on

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I want to make sure I'm understanding this correctly: in a single document with multiple images, GS will get stuck on image with the original lyx.bat file, then process that image correctly but get stuck on a later one if you comment something out of lyx.bat? (And how far it gets

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-02 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo Does it display the same old symptoms; it works with lyx.exe or

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-02 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo Does it display the same old symptoms; it works with lyx.exe or

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-02 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo Does it display the same old symptoms; it works with lyx.exe or

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread LB
Hi Stephen I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Leo LB wrote: The paths are not supposed to be the same. LyX 1.4.1 did not install a python directory under LyX. Also the batfiles are not the same. This

Re: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: When I start lyx1.4.2 I see two black windows (shell windows???) pop-up and dissapear before Lyx actually appears. Lyx1.4.1 only flashes one black window. Does that mean anything? Normal behavior. The first window is lyx.bat; as soon as it starts lyx.exe, it exits. The second

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread LB
I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo But the original one does display, even when loaded from its

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Bo Peng
On 8/1/06, LB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. I do not know what have gone wrong, just want

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread LB
Hi Stephen I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Leo LB wrote: The paths are not supposed to be the same. LyX 1.4.1 did not install a python directory under LyX. Also the batfiles are not the same. This

Re: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: When I start lyx1.4.2 I see two black windows (shell windows???) pop-up and dissapear before Lyx actually appears. Lyx1.4.1 only flashes one black window. Does that mean anything? Normal behavior. The first window is lyx.bat; as soon as it starts lyx.exe, it exits. The second

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread LB
I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo But the original one does display, even when loaded from its

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Bo Peng
On 8/1/06, LB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. I do not know what have gone wrong, just want

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread LB
Hi Stephen I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Leo LB wrote: The paths are not supposed to be the same. LyX 1.4.1 did not install a python directory under LyX. Also the batfiles are not the same. This

Re: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: When I start lyx1.4.2 I see two black windows (shell windows???) pop-up and dissapear before Lyx actually appears. Lyx1.4.1 only flashes one black window. Does that mean anything? Normal behavior. The first window is lyx.bat; as soon as it starts lyx.exe, it exits. The second

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread LB
I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my figure problem!!! Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. Leo But the original one does display, even when loaded from its

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-08-01 Thread Bo Peng
On 8/1/06, LB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I uninstalled Lyx and reinstalled it into c:\lyx\lyx14. This solved my > figure problem!!! > > Thank you. I can now use 1.4.2 Looks like I spoke too soon. Now a different figure does not want to be displayed. I do not know what have gone wrong,

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-31 Thread LB
Hello I didn't have any bright ideas. But since it seems you are close to giving up, I thought I would toss out some longshots. PROGRA~1\MENTOR~1\PADS\2005_1\Programs;c:\lyx\ly (from 7/28/2006 12:03 pm, PATH report) SH: Maybe that is a typo the ly looks wrong. This was not a typo. That's

Fw: Postscript preview

2006-07-31 Thread LB
Hi one more idea: if this is really a PATH problem and things worked normally under lyx 1.4.1, then I would do the following simple steps (unless you already tried this and I didn't see it in the earlier messages): (a) Revert to LyX 1.4.1 and open the Preferences dialog to find out EXACTLY

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-31 Thread LB
When I start lyx1.4.2 I see two black windows (shell windows???) pop-up and dissapear before Lyx actually appears. Lyx1.4.1 only flashes one black window. Does that mean anything? Leo

Re: Fw: Postscript preview

2006-07-31 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: Hi one more idea: if this is really a PATH problem and things worked normally under lyx 1.4.1, then I would do the following simple steps (unless you already tried this and I didn't see it in the earlier messages): (a) Revert to LyX 1.4.1 and open the Preferences dialog to find

  1   2   >