ext Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
>This is interesting, since pango-1.11.1 has our recent optimizations in
>it.
>
>You mentioned that you were using gettimeofday(). Can you please test
>the "pango-profile" module from CVS? It has a slightly more
>sophisticated timer, using times(). I've found i
Hi,
> Note: In Maemo UI user cannot resize windows and applications
> themselves do that very rarely for dialogs, so this is fairly
> moot point for Maemo.
> Try popping up the vkb. Opera takes ~4 seconds to resize the first time.
I doubt this is related to Gtk as VKB pops up just fine for other
ext Koen Kooi wrote:
> Eero Tamminen wrote:
>
> >Note: In Maemo UI user cannot resize windows and applications themselves
> >do that very rarely for dialogs, so this is fairly moot point for Maemo.
>
>
> Try popping up the vkb. Opera takes ~4 seconds to resize the first time.
>
I think this is a
Koen Kooi kirjoitti 29.12.2005 kello 23.54:
Eero Tamminen wrote:
Note: In Maemo UI user cannot resize windows and applications
themselves
do that very rarely for dialogs, so this is fairly moot point for
Maemo.
Try popping up the vkb. Opera takes ~4 seconds to resize the first
time.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eero Tamminen wrote:
> Note: In Maemo UI user cannot resize windows and applications themselves
> do that very rarely for dialogs, so this is fairly moot point for Maemo.
Try popping up the vkb. Opera takes ~4 seconds to resize the first time.
regar
Hi,
> These are just some impressions I had on my systems:
> * Konqueror has a faster UI than Nautilus
> * Opera has a faster UI than Firefox (whereas Mozilla GTK-1.2
> builds were pretty snappy till they switched to GTK-2)
> * The Motif and Fox-Ports of Eclipse are MUCH faster then Eclipse/GTK2
Hi Eric,
> This is so interesting since GTK+ applications feels so much faster on
> all machines I've been using whereas QT once are somewhat slow.. Are
> you running them all in KDE? I'm running everything in Gnome and it's
> fast enough even on my 800MHZ machine at home.
I have to admit that
Hi,
Nils Faerber wrote:
> Have you ever tried recent GPE on a 200MHz iPaq?
> I find that very "snappy" too and it uses GTK2...
>
> The latest GTK release uses Cairo for rendering - which is nice in
> general but really a performance hog. But this is only in the very
> latest release. I hope and g
> - Even large QT apps are snappy and very responsive whereas many large
> GTK-2 apps tend to be unuseable on slower systems (like my Dorun-800).
> 800mhz to render some buttons and layout texts??
> Maybe I am just too old to understand whats going on :(
This is so interesting since GTK+ applicati
> This thread is pretty funny. Nokia tests 1 version of gtk with different
> versions of pango and suddenly people say that *different* versions of
> gtk were tested and jump to conclusions
Reading-Knowledge is an advantage ;)
But I never expect some of the gtk-diehards to tlisten any criticis
ext Koen Kooi wrote:
> Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>
> >>It's disappointing that with every release gtk gets slower...
>
>
> >I absolutly agree - GTK-1.2 has been a nice and fast toolkit but since
> >the jump to 2.0 GTK is just one of those "too-bloated-to-be-tuneable"
> >pieces of software no one wan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>>It's disappointing that with every release gtk gets slower...
>
>
> I absolutly agree - GTK-1.2 has been a nice and fast toolkit but since
> the jump to 2.0 GTK is just one of those "too-bloated-to-be-tuneable"
> pieces of s
Hi again,
> Have you ever tried recent GPE on a 200MHz iPaq?
> I find that very "snappy" too and it uses GTK2...
I have to admit that I do not have a lot of knowledge how qualified
different toolkits are for handheld use - my observations just showed
that GTK2 performs quite poorly on the 770 as i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clemens Eisserer schrieb:
>>It's disappointing that with every release gtk gets slower...
>
> I absolutly agree - GTK-1.2 has been a nice and fast toolkit but since
> the jump to 2.0 GTK is just one of those "too-bloated-to-be-tuneable"
> pieces of so
> It's disappointing that with every release gtk gets slower...
I absolutly agree - GTK-1.2 has been a nice and fast toolkit but since
the jump to 2.0 GTK is just one of those "too-bloated-to-be-tuneable"
pieces of software no one wants to touch since it could break
something.
And do not argue th
Note that many of the optimizations that went into Pango 1.11
only affect the cairo backend. I cannot remember any change that
slows down pango.
behdad
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Hello,
> Here are test results for Pango performance on 770 :
>
>
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 15:15 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Text 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' is rendered to 20 rows 100 times using
> 'sans serif-18' font.
> (Each test is renderering 52000 glyphs.)
This test could be more thorough. You aren't testing word breaking or
the non-latin shapers, for ex
ext Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 15:15 +0200, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
>
>>Text 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' is rendered to 20 rows 100 times using
>>'sans serif-18' font.
>>(Each test is renderering 52000 glyphs.)
>>
>>
>
>This test could be more thorough. You aren't
18 matches
Mail list logo
