Hi Claudio,
About Libero (IOL) try to use a single connection. I got that error by
using 2 concurrent connections from the same IP: you can send very
fast but you can only use a single connection. I've never been able to
get in touch with a Libero postmaster recently.
About Yahoo from what I saw
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 10:09, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Mar 14 06:54:17 srv1.xyz sm-mta[498019]: 42DK6aqc496761:
> to=, delay=09:47:40, xdelay=00:00:03, mailer=esmtp,
> pri=5370980, relay=alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com., dsn=4.7.28,
> reply=421 4.7.28 Gmail has detected an unusual rate of
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 00:01, Michael Peddemors via mailop
wrote:
> save.ca descriptive text "v=spf1 ip4:70.33.236.0/25 mx a
> include:sendgrid.net include:thestar.ca include:thestar.com
> include:spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com
> include:spf.yahoo.com include:spf.aol.com
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 18:10, Alexandre Dangreau via mailop
wrote:
> I see the issue is solved, but I’m interested of the solution you found.
The solution was writing to peer...@mcbone.net (the address I found in
the RIPE DB for their AS). The email had also n...@ovh.net as a
recipient.
When
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 17:47, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > Poking a few people, this looks like a return path issue on Freenet's
> > side; So they likely fnorded something on their side.
> > Guess the only way to get this fixed is for them to realize the issue.
> > ;-)
>
> I wrote an email to
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 17:18, Tobias Fiebig via mailop wrote:
> Moin,
> to get a bit back to the networking part of things...
:-)
> Poking a few people, this looks like a return path issue on Freenet's
> side; So they likely fnorded something on their side.
> Guess the only way to get this fixed
OVH is spammy. We hardly see a similar
block when there is a war between 2 countries.
Stefano
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 14:49, Yuval Levy via mailop wrote:
>
> On 2024-03-08 07:48, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 13:04, Mark Alley wrote:
> >> Have yo
4 AM Stefano Bagnara via mailop
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm experiencing routing issues to freenet.de MX since almost 3 days.
>>
>> I can't even lookup the domain as I cannot reach their NS, but the
>> same happens even if I try to ping their email server
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 13:17, Marco Moock wrote:
> Can you access their website on freenet.de from OVH?
No. I can't even reach their NS from OVH network.
So I can't resolve www.freenet.de: but if I try with the IP, then I
can't ping it.
> > From my servers @OVH they are not reachable at all.
>
>
Hi,
I'm experiencing routing issues to freenet.de MX since almost 3 days.
I can't even lookup the domain as I cannot reach their NS, but the
same happens even if I try to ping their email server IP address:
194.97.8.138
195.4.92.217
From my servers @OVH they are not reachable at all.
I
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:09, Benny Pedersen via mailop
wrote:
> > I think I wrote here too early: from further investigation seems like
> > the issue has gone and now those emails are not refused anymore.
>
> https://totaluptime.com/kb/cname-and-mx-for-the-same-host-name/
>
> dont use cname for
Well,
I think I wrote here too early: from further investigation seems like the
issue has gone and now those emails are not refused anymore.
According to the logs the issue lasted around 5 hours from 28/02/2024 07:00
CET to 28/02/2024 11:40 CET.
I had no answer from their postmaster, so I don't
Hi,
we are an ESP (a very small italian alternative to Mailchimp).
Today an italian mailvox provider started refusing our emails with this
message
> 550 5.1.0 sender rejected:
domain does not have neither a valid MX or A record
The "e.#customerdomain" is a CNAME record that points to
they are not able to
handle the reputation transition from the shared DKIM to the additional
sender dkim is somehow related to this. Another technical problem.
Stefano
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 9:30 AM Stefano Bagnara via mailop <
> mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 1
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 18:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 05.02.24 14:56, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote:
> >we are a small ESP and every email sent from our system has SPF+DKIM
> >authentication from our system and most email also have a second DKIM
> >signature (o
Hi all,
we are a small ESP and every email sent from our system has SPF+DKIM
authentication from our system and most email also have a second DKIM
signature (one signature with our domain, one with the domain of the
sender).
Since the past november we started seeing some
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 12:54, Ralf Hildebrandt via mailop
wrote:
> We're running the postfix-users ML on list.sys4.de, and all over a
> sudden we're being tempfailed by GMAIL:
I saw something similar happening on a couple of my IPs recently. I
thought Google is slowly applying more restrictive
On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 04:10, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Stefano Bagnara via mailop said:
> >Sounds like our standard senders using @e.example.com domain in their
> >RFC5321 are able to deliver to Yahoo while italian municipalities
> >using, e.g., @e.comune.bardo
On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 20:50, Marcel Becker via mailop wrote:
> I can't speak for the Yahoo of over a decade ago, but I can assure you that
> the Yahoo of today will respond and try to help you if you actually reach out
> to us having a problem delivering your mail people actually want.
We
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 13:32, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop
wrote:
> A given mailhost (ran privately for smaller entities) can't send
> messages to T-Online anymore.
>
> 554 IP=168.119.159.241 - A problem occurred. …
Do you get this error at the connection or after you transmitted the
Hi,
Since 4 hours we are experiencing slowness (e.g. connections timing
out, very slow responses), to Microsoft both sending to their SMTP and
reading via IMAP, from europe (checked from 4 different datacenters in
europe).
Do you see the same?
--
Stefano Bagnara
Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 11:45, Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop
wrote:
> the requirements posted before only apply to ESPs (email service providers |
> mass mailers | ... mailhosters).
> Mailing lists should not be concerned as far as I can tell from our stats.
> []
> that's the reason we didn't
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 09:26, Thomas Walter via mailop
wrote:
> I have just received an abuse report from USGOabuse.net regarding an
> incident that happened on July 6th and was resolved immediately:
>
I had an issue with usgoabuse, too, in past.
They first sent to our abuse@ email an FBL
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 11:02, Benoît Panizzon via mailop
wrote:
> We have a customer who orders software licenses via paddle.com
>
> He should get keys via Email. But they never arrive. I also don't see
> any trace of those emails in our logs.
Hi had an issue with missing email from them to me.
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 21:39, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> No, it's to deliver the mail that the users want. One point that bulk
> mailers often miss is that, while the recipients at large providers do
> not object to getting the bulk mail, they also do not really want it.
I received Microsoft
We recently saw that "S3150" on 3 IPs part of 3 larger netblocks.
For all of them we opened a ticket and they "mitigated the IP": I
tried collecting more info to no avail, of course :-( .
Weird thing is at least one of them has always been *green* on SNDS
and had not abuse reports at all in the
On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 05:08, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
> S3150 is throttling.
> Open a ticket and ask for a more realistic hourly/daily throttle limit.
Can you confirm?
This is weird because SMTP error is: "550 5.7.1 Unfortunately,
messages from [IP] weren't sent. Please contact your
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 19:31, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
> JMRP doesn’t send every email reported as spam to the sender.
> Last I heard, it was 1 in 1,000 or some such.
> This is to prevent listwashing, as should be obvious.
But what about SNDS "Complaint rate" and "Trap hits"? Are they
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 11:14, vsai--- via mailop wrote:
> Outlook is blocking mails that are auto-forwarded from my domain.
Open a ticket here:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866
PS: email forwarding nowadays is a PITA and maybe there's no fix to
your issue but stop forwarding.
--
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:49, Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:
> These questions! WOW! IS THIS FOR REAL? Don't get me wrong, I like Len
> Shneyder
> and I think he's a good person TRYING to do the right thing - but -
> considering what is coming
> FROM SendGrid in recent years, is this the right
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 18:16, Jim Popovitch via mailop
wrote:
> > Maybe you'll grasp the issue only when they will list Ramnode :-)
> > Or maybe you'll be happy to pay or to move to another ASN until they catch
> > up...
>
> You seem to be under the assumption that uceprotect is just looking for
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 17:37, Mary via mailop wrote:
> Linode blocks port 25 on all new accounts/servers. You need to talk to them
> and explain who and what you are, before they open it manually for you.
But this was not enough to prevent them being listed in level-3:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 15:04, Jim Popovitch via mailop
wrote:
> > "Pay us for protection", when it really means "pay us or we'll [break
> > your knees|set your house on fire|break your windows...]" isn't
> > insurance, and can get you arrested.
>
> Neither of those situations describe the
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 20:05, Simon Arlott via mailop
wrote:
> On 20/01/2021 10:50, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote:
> > I'm looking for brainstorming and updated industry "standards" from
> people
> > handling outgoing SMTP services or ESP exporting APIs t
Hi all,
I'm looking for brainstorming and updated industry "standards" from people
handling outgoing SMTP services or ESP exporting APIs to "request
subscriptions" (confirmed opt-in).
Not every website uses CAPTCHA and also webforms using CAPTCHA are being
abused as even reCAPTCHA have been
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 11:54, Jim Popovitch via mailop
wrote:
> For me, it's "appreciate never seeing those emails". I outright block
> level 2 and level 3, and high score level 1. I've been doing that for
> years now and have never seen a reject log message that wasn't already
> listed in
Hi all,
we received few automated abuse reports from Simply.com.
The abuse report is an email from "Simply.com abuse team <
abuse-rep...@robot.simply.com>"
with subject "Abuse report for #IPredacted# (#Providername# / #ASNUMBER#)"
> Hi
>
> This is a complaint regarding spam received from
for the past 3 days SNDS show "No data for specified IPs on this date":
does it work for you?
(I can see data for the previous days)
Stefano
--
Stefano Bagnara
Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs
___
mailop mailing list
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 13:00, Abuse via mailop wrote:
> It is clear, but what must we do when the front door is closed too?
> I used the Support Funnel but didn't get any responses, not even the first
> response from the robot giving me the SRX#.
We use an outlook.com/hotmail.com email address
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 11:33, Laurent S. via mailop wrote:
> Which ESP does 100% (double/confirmed) opt in?
>
> I am looking for an ESP that will, in every case, send a confirmation
> link without ever trusting their clients about the consent status of
> lists they import?
AFAIK no one.
You can
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 14:30, Benjamin BILLON via mailop
wrote:
> ItaliaOnline is rolling out new rules, including the necessity of having a
> DMARC record (and also a valid DKIM signature), among other things.
> I believe those kind of delivery placement (on p=none) is a side effect of
> what
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 14:13, Paul Smith via mailop wrote:
> On 26/11/2019 12:41, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote:
> > I don't know if ItaliaOnLine postmaster follow this list and if they
> > consider this new behaviour a feature or a bug, but I wanted to share
> > this
Hi all,
We noticed that since 3 days, ItaliaOnLine is delivering to Junk every
email failing a DMARC check, even when the sender domain publish a
p=none rule.
You can check the "reason" in the headers:
"X-IOL-DMARC: fail_quarantine con il dominio msn.com"
This is expected for p=quarantine
On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 at 19:22, Jan-Philipp Benecke via mailop
wrote:
> currently we've delivery problems to hotmail/outlook/... O365 looks good.
> SNDS shows us just red for all our IPs since end of September.
> We haven't changed anything neither some crappy mailings nor new spamming
>
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 10:17, Mathieu Bourdin via mailop
wrote:
> We just saw that Gmail Postmaster’s Tools shows a very unusual amount of our
> IP’s as « bad » in the graphs.
> Domain reputation seems unaffected, but basically we see around 50% of our
> IPs for July 2nd and 75% for July 3 going
45 matches
Mail list logo
