Re: [mailop] Article Describing Mail Policy Changes

> On Feb 8, 2024, at 7:33 AM, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote: > > I'm seeing more and more people (not commercial mailers, but ISPs, individual > businesses, etc.) asking in groups about delivery issues to the major mail > companies. Most likely (though not guaranteed) that it's related to

Re: [mailop] Looking for feedback on the Certified Senders Alliance (CSA)

> On Feb 6, 2024, at 12:59 PM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote: > > I have worked with people from the CSA over the past few years, mostly > on webinar training sessions, and they seem kind and seem to care > about email. I also observed them ejecting a company from their > organization for not

Re: [mailop] DKIM signed with parent domain

> On Jan 25, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Byron Lunz via mailop wrote: > > Or, you can use https://aboutmy.email/ - not affiliated, just a pleased user. Yes, absolutely, aboutmy.email rocks! And, is offered by a very trusted source! Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney CEO

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact?

>> Small pedantic point: DNSBLs, not RBLs. > > As an erstwhile MAPS employee, the persistence of this pedantry warms my > heart... me too (on both counts) > Also, to author[-1], I think it is a bit of a misimpression that DNSBL > operators share data. In some cases they may have

Re: [mailop] Email deliverability issues to Outlook

> On Dec 5, 2023, at 11:49 PM, Grant Gordon via mailop > wrote: > > A friend brought to my attention the following blog post which seems to have > started around the same time we started experiencing issues and seems to be > the same issue, though it's light on details. > >

Re: [mailop] Yahoo Feedback Loop

> On Nov 27, 2023, at 10:13 AM, Mike Hammett via mailop > wrote: > > But on a mailman list with thousands of subscribers, I don't necessarily know > who did it. Actually the report includes the email address of the reporter; I just received it too, and I can tell you who it is if you want

[mailop] Does anyone have *any* contact at Centurylink?

If anybody has *any* contact, no matter how tenuous, at Centurylink, can you please connect with me (ideally offlist so as to not clutter up the list). It's quite urgent. Thank you! Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy

Re: [mailop] Amazon SES using SAME sender Domain for multiple customer?

> There is a company which is sending a lot of misdirected/unwanted email > via Amazon SES and has failed to react to my attempts to contact them > by email and phone in the last 14 days or so to try to solve the issue. Benoit, if you are saying this is spam, please connect with me off-list, and

Re: [mailop] The info on Validity's charging for FBL access (Was Re: New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF))

> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:30 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > >> We just wrote up everything that we know about this, including how much it >> will cost, what it actually means, what's still free, etc. It's too long to >> quote here (and it contains quotes from Validity) but here it is in case you

[mailop] Was Re: New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF)

We just wrote up everything that we know about this, including how much it will cost, what it actually means, what's still free, etc. It's too long to quote here (and it contains quotes from Validity) but here it is in case you want all of that info:

[mailop] RNC v. Google Dispositioin

I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this here, because it was a big win for Gmail plus has language which is applicable to any ISP. In the order (in which the RNC complaint was dismissed) the court basically not only smacked down the RNC, but made clear that the Communications Decency Act

Re: [mailop] Legit-looking mail to the wrong address with no unsubscribe

> On Aug 24, 2023, at 6:12 AM, Chris Adams via mailop wrote: > > What do you do when legitimate mail (lately, DoorDash order info and > Delta Airlines tickets) is sent to the wrong address? These types of > messages rarely have an unsubscribe method. I get a ton of crap to a > Gmail address

[mailop] ANY OVH Contact?

Does anyone have *any* contact at OVH? Reports to abuse@, and through the abuse page, have yielded nothing for this very unrepentant spammer. :-( Thanks in advance for any assistance here. Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell Attorney at Law Email Law & Policy Attorney CEO Institute for Social Internet

Re: [mailop] Outlook.com: missing data in SNDS + IPs blocked on Apr 06

> On Apr 15, 2023, at 4:12 PM, Mark Dale via mailop wrote: > > Did you make any headway this issue? We've been having the same issues since > April 6. > > Regards, > Mark > > On 2023-04-13 15:25, Fernando MM via mailop wrote: >> Hi, >> On Apr 06 we detected that 28 IPs were blocked in

Re: [mailop] I received a scam letter from Paypal

> What I'm saying here, is what the hell? How a scam can come from Paypal like > this? Simple, it uses Paypal's own invoicing system: https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/new-paypal-invoice-scam-emails-come-from-paypal-and-uses-actual-paypal-links/ Anne --- We provide the Good Senders email

Re: [mailop] Recommendations on ESP

> Who would you recommend has a good feature set but also and critically keeps > spammers off so that I would not be negatively impacted on deliverability > for actions outside of my control? Mark, here is a list of ESPs that we recommend:

[mailop] Google Gives Gmail Mass Email Services the Boot

It's about time, and to the extent that you were involved (if at all), Brandon, *thank you*! "Users of mass email services such as Gmass, Woodpecker, Lemlist and others that have been using Gmail’s API to send bulk email that tricked recipients into thinking that they were receiving personal

[mailop] Level3 / CenturyLink?

Who is our current Level3 / CenturyLink contact? Thanks for any pointers! Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook Board of

Re: [mailop] Unexpected SPF rejections from Gmail et al

Russell, > We're getting rejects from Gmail (mostly) claiming an SPF failure, but I > can't see any problem. > > Here's an example of the rejection notice: > > Last error: 5.0.0 5.3.0 - Other mail system problem 550-'5.7.26 > This message does not pass authentication checks > (SPF and DKIM

Re: [mailop] Blocked on Earthlink.net

Is this for a domain through which Adobe is sending email on behalf of Adobe or an Adobe subsidieary, or is it for a customer of Adobe for whom you are acting as an ESP? --- We provide the Good Senders email sender reputation certification list to inbox providers around the world. Learn more

[mailop] Gmail Pilot Program for Political Campaigns Opens for Business

"Google’s Gmail Verified Sender Pilot Program for political campaigns is up and running, and political campaigns can now apply to be part of Google’s program which allows political campaign email to bypass the spam filter and be delivered directly to Gmail users’ inboxes, but only once unless

Re: [mailop] The oligopoly has won.

> On Sep 15, 2022, at 7:37 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop > wrote: > >> https://cfenollosa.com/blog/after-self-hosting-my-email-for-twenty-three-years-i-have-thrown-in-the-towel-the-oligopoly-has-won.html > > To get back to the original topic: In my opinion many of the claims made in > this

Re: [mailop] The oligopoly has won.

> I am not a lawyer and it's difficult to discuss laws in a different language, > but according to the definitions of the Telecommunications Act, anyone who > provides e-mail services to others is obliged to maintain the secrecy of > telecommunications. For this reason, they may not evaluate

Re: [mailop] The oligopoly has won.

> If I have to check a spamfolder for false positives every day, I can just > have them delivered to my inbox. The spamfolder does not have an advantage > then. I think what is being lost here is that for any inbox that is being provisioned by a webmail provider (and maybe others), it is an

Re: [mailop] The oligopoly has won.

Hey Al! > it's been great to add more granular filtering directly and watch mail > bounce. We run our own server and I do this too...it's pretty gratifying, almost zen... but what I really wanted to say was: > and it dawns on me that I'm already running all the pieces of a mailbox >

Re: [mailop] HR 8160 and SB 4409: The "You're not allowed to run political campaign email through your spam filter" act

On 2022-07-30 21:07, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote: > > I think in this case we all know what they're doing and you've hit it dead > on. They're targeting Gmail and they're not really interested in anyone else. Which is one reason the bill may not go any further, because now that Google

Re: [mailop] HR 8160 and SB 4409: The "You're not allowed to run political campaign email through your spam filter" act

> On Jul 31, 2022, at 1:29 PM, Laura Atkins via mailop > wrote: > > The research paper seems reasonably well done and I encourage people to > actually read it and their conclusions rather than paying attention to the > popular press takes on it. Totally agreed and, in fact, my

[mailop] HR 8160 and SB 4409: The "You're not allowed to run political campaign email through your spam filter" act

I want to be sure that everyone here is aware of a piece of pending legislation in the U.S. that is in committee in both the House and the Senate right now. It's called the Political BIAS Emails Act of 2022 (BIAS is short for “Bias In Algorithm Sorting”), and it requires that, and I quote:

Re: [mailop] So, Sendgrid / Zoom, planning on actually doing anything about webinar spams?

> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote: > > The basic problem is allowing an ESP customer to import a list that > existed before the customer became a customer of this ESP. I can't > think of an ESP that would not allow that. Many of the ESPs that we certify will require

Re: [mailop] Google's Request to the FEC about Allowing Political Email to Bypass Spam Filtering

> On Jul 9, 2022, at 8:15 PM, Brett Schenker via mailop > wrote: > > Just put it all in quarantine. It only requires reporting on how much is > going to spam. Reporting 0 would technically be correct since quarantine is > different. Or a 'Political' tab, just like the 'Promotions' tab.

Re: [mailop] Google's Request to the FEC about Allowing Political Email to Bypass Spam Filtering

> On Jul 9, 2022, at 4:19 PM, Jarland Donnell via mailop > wrote: > > Is it normal to request such an opinion? As someone who doesn't follow > business of the FEC but obviously takes interest in the topic, it seems odd > to me though that may be due to the formerly mentioned thing. It is

Re: [mailop] Google's Request to the FEC about Allowing Political Email to Bypass Spam Filtering

> An interesting and useful project would be to identify political senders in a > way that would allow Google's users and the broader public of mail handlers > to shun them selectively. I can still dream... Someone else suggested a new 'Political' tab, go go along with the 'Promotions' tab.

[mailop] Google's Request to the FEC about Allowing Political Email to Bypass Spam Filtering

To those of you who aren't already aware of it, Google has asked the Federal Election Commission for an opinion about Google's 'pilot project' to allow political candidates and campaigns to bypass Google's spam filters. This was just published by the FEC to the public yesterday, because Friday

[mailop] Contact at GoDaddy?

Sigh, Ben (RIP) used to be our main contact for both security and spam issues. Does anybody have a contact anywhere within GoDaddy to whom they could introduce me? Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of

Re: [mailop] Anyone have any contacts at Intuit?

> A small (abuse) matter appears to have arisen. > I may have a contact at Intuit, they are in the legal department (if they are still there), but it's a start. I've sent of an email and will let you know if I can make an intro asap. Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO Institute

Re: [mailop] Contact at NameCheap?

> On Jun 15, 2022, at 12:17 PM, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop > wrote: > > On 15 Jun 2022, at 12:37, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote: > >> Does anyone have a technical contact or an abuse contact at NameCheap? > > The contact information they publish in their WHOIS (

[mailop] Contact at NameCheap?

Hey guys, Does anyone have a technical contact or an abuse contact at NameCheap? Thank you in advance! Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Author: The Email

Re: [mailop] Talking DOXING of spammers on this mailing list..

> On Jun 2, 2022, at 1:19 PM, Bernardo Reino via mailop > wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2022, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote: > >> I *really* want to see the original email to which MDR is replying, however, >> ironically, our default install of rspamd rejecte

Re: [mailop] Talking DOXING of spammers on this mailing list..

I *really* want to see the original email to which MDR is replying, however, ironically, our default install of rspamd rejected it (which is saying a lot because to be rejected by the default install you have to amass 15 points or more...). :-\ I see that the top points were for: DBL_SPAM

[mailop] Any reason to NOT block the entire .cam domain?

We've started getting a fair amount of spam from .cam domains; in fact they all look the same, using the same HTML template with the same body format, but from different .cam domain for different 'businesses', so I suspect that one operation is selling "email marketing" packages to clients and

Re: [mailop] Calling out Mailjet and diginico.com

ceive this message in error, please destroy it > and notify the sender immediately. > > > > From: mailop on behalf of Anne Mitchell via > mailop > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 4:25 PM > To: Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop > Subject: [mailop] Calling out Mailjet

[mailop] Calling out Mailjet and diginico.com

I am at my wit's end (I realize some may think that not a far distance); diginco.com has been spamming us for *2 years* Sometime at the end of 2020 they jumped from mailin.fr to Mailjet, and they have been spamming through through Mailjet since January of *2021*. We have reported them to

Re: [mailop] FTC Report on Feasibility of Creating a 'Do Not Email' List

> On May 19, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Dave Crocker via mailop > wrote: > > As noted earlier in the thread, there are some actors who are not criminally > inclined. Ignorant and/or aggressive, but willing to follow the rules, or at > least mostly. So, for example, they properly identify

Re: [mailop] FTC Report on Feasibility of Creating a 'Do Not Email' List

> On May 17, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Paul Vixie via mailop wrote: > > that was vernon schryver, and the list is still online, and vernon still adds > to it from time to time. rather than post the url itself, i'll post the > KARKIVE link from news.admin.net-abuse.email where it was first announced.

[mailop] FTC Report on Feasibility of Creating a 'Do Not Email' List

For those who didn't know, you may find this infuria...interesting. Did you know that CAN-SPAM mandated that the FTC look at creating a Do Not Email list and report their findings within 6 months of CAN-SPAM being enacted? That report was created and delivered, and it is 60 pages of "why we

Re: [mailop] is caniuseapurchasedemaillist.com down?

> On Apr 27, 2022, at 10:00 AM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote: > > Try https://www.shouldiuseapurchasedemaillist.com That's awesome! Even better than the original (because, explanations)! Anne ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] is caniuseapurchasedemaillist.com down?

> i need this page from time to time. > > caniuseapurchasedemaillist.com I know it's not as succinct as caniuseapurchasedemaillist.com ;~), but until that site is back up feel free to use: https://www.isipp.com/blog/can-i-use-this-list/ Anne --- Outsource your email deliverability headaches

Re: [mailop] WTaF? I just got spammed BY Active Campaign

> On Apr 26, 2022, at 4:50 PM, Matt Vernhout via mailop > wrote: > > Sure but Active Campaign sent this not Shopify. > > One rogue sales person sending cold email doesn’t mean the whole company is > bad either. Did I mention that they put me on a mailing list, from which I could opt out

Re: [mailop] WTaF? I just got spammed BY Active Campaign

> On Apr 26, 2022, at 3:59 PM, Michael Rathbun via mailop > wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:30:28 -0600, Anne Mitchell via mailop > wrote: > >> WTaF?? > > I presume they are encouraging you to spam your legal services through them, > rather than on

[mailop] WTaF? I just got spammed BY Active Campaign

WTaF?? (Excuse the unladylike acronym.) I just got spammed BY Active Campaign. Not _through_ Active Campaign, *by* Active Campaign. For their services. Anyone else? So far as I'm concerned, when an ESP transits spam, well, it doesn't necessarily mean "block on sight" because it depends on how

Re: [mailop] Interesting passage from the new EU Digital Services Act

> How can we be possibly become aware of such possible threats without SPYING > -read it all- the email passing by our mail servers ??? only a jackass wana > be terrst will put dangerous/alarm trigger stuff in the Subject of his > emails. so do the EU wants us to play as NSA for free ? and

[mailop] Interesting passage from the new EU Digital Services Act

"Where an online platform becomes aware of any information giving rise to a suspicion that a serious criminal offence involving a threat to the life or safety of persons has taken place, is taking place or is likely to take place, it shall promptly inform the law enforcement or judicial

Re: [mailop] [E] $GOOG

> On Apr 22, 2022, at 11:05 AM, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop > wrote: > > On 21 Apr 2022, at 11:45, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote: > >> Until Google manages to shut down outfits like MailShake and Woodpecker and >> Gmass, instead of turning a blind eye to it, Goo

[mailop] Anyone have a mail.ru contact?

I know that this is a heck of a time to ask for a mail.ru contact, but... does anybody have one? Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO Get to the Inbox by SuretyMail Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law) Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook Board of

Re: [mailop] [E] $GOOG

>> .. I'd suggest anything that shows gmailapi.google.com in the header be >> rejected -- at least until Google can get a handle on the abuse. Until Google manages to shut down outfits like MailShake and Woodpecker and Gmass, instead of turning a blind eye to it, Google will never get a handle

Re: [mailop] Best mailbox provider for personal domain?

Hey Tara! :-) Does your domain registrar not offer email hosting included with your domain? Most do, although of course some do it better than others. Anne > On Apr 8, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Tara Natanson via mailop > wrote: > > A while back there was a thread about the best place to host small

Re: [mailop] Our experience on Gmail blacklisting our IPs range

> at MAPS we got sued a lot, but we always answered requests for removal from > the RBL. Which is one of the reasons that to this day MAPS is seen as the most ethical of RBLs (not to mention the first ;-)) ever. Even by some spammers. ;-) > what google is doing is an active harm which

Re: [mailop] [External] Re: IP Reputation Services

>> FWIW - spamassassin checks the ISIPP by default since 3.10 and reduces >> the score if your address is found there. > > Unfortunately, too expensive for a little guy. Scott, it is free to query, I guess we need to make that clearer, the pricing you found is for senders wanting to be

Re: [mailop] IP Reputation Services

>> iadb.isipp.com >> >> More general information about the IADB is here: >> >> https://www.isipp.com/for-isps/ > > FWIW - spamassassin checks the ISIPP by default since 3.10 and reduces > the score if your address is found there. True, and that is because when we came up with the idea for

Re: [mailop] IP Reputation Services

Mike, > I've found a few of them out there, but they seem to be priced as if I'm a > hosting company or an ESP, not an end-user-focused ISP. As I mentioned in response to this query on the other list, but thought I'd do so here as well in case others were wanting this information, there are

Re: [mailop] Who Do You Recommend for Small Business Regular (Non-Bulk) Email?

> On Mar 4, 2022, at 8:19 AM, Mike via mailop wrote: > > On 3/3/2022 12:45 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote: >> He is using Google Domains as his registrar and has recently found out >> that he can forward up to 100 email addresses as part of that service. >> [snip] > > gandi.net registrar

Re: [mailop] Who Do You Recommend for Small Business Regular (Non-Bulk) Email?

> On Mar 3, 2022, at 9:39 AM, Miles Fidelman via mailop > wrote: > > I highly recommend GoDaddy. I use them for a couple of domains that I > haven't gotten around to setting up on our own servers. > > As reminded yesterday, after I fat-fingered a whole slew of mail into the > trash, their

Re: [mailop] Who Do You Recommend for Small Business Regular (Non-Bulk) Email?

> Fastmail looks good. I agree! I had completely forgotten about them! Anne ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Who Do You Recommend for Small Business Regular (Non-Bulk) Email?

All, For some reason we have recently had a spate of small businesses coming to us asking us for our recommendations for a service to host their regular one-to-one business communications. Google and MS seem to have the business email hosting thing locked up tight, but surely there must be

[mailop] NCR?

Does anybody here have any clued contacts at NCR? One of their customers is spamming me personally, through their retailapps/radiantretailapps service, and NCR's response is "didn't the unsub link work"? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation

Re: [mailop] Anyone from AOL on this list?

Hi Frank, Rok and Josh, > I just started seeing this: > Site aol.com (152.163.0.68) said after data sent: 421 4.2.1 Dragnet > Timeout > Site aol.com (152.163.0.99) said after data sent: 421 4.2.1 "Service > unavailable. Please try again later." > May I share your info with our

Re: [mailop] How many more RBL's do we really need?

> using Barracuda's RBL for high scoring, and not for outright blocking. I think that in this day and age, this is true for *any* list - black-, white-, reputation- (yes, even ours). Whitelists can also have false positives - even pay for play ones, because while full-on spammers may not pay

Re: [mailop] att.net / prodigy mail admin?

Aaron, please contact me offlist with details including your client's IP address(es), and we can help. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Legislative Consultant CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance http://www.SuretyMail.com/

Re: [mailop] domain research tools?

> > … I just call `whois` from BASH and pipe the results into `less`. I do this too, except I use 'more'. Is there a quantifiable difference between 'less' and 'more'? Or, perhaps, less is more? ;-) Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and

Re: [mailop] Mailchimp / Mandrill App: European VS US Privacy Laws

> > International law? There's no international spam law. I know people > who spend full time trying to piece together spam cases using whatever > law applies in whatever places bits of the spamming happens. > > As others have noted, US companies are not subject to Swiss law, just > as Swiss

Re: [mailop] Mailchimp / Mandrill App: European VS US Privacy Laws

llegal? > > --srs > >> On 10-Jun-2016, at 9:09 PM, Anne Mitchell <amitch...@isipp.com> wrote: >> >> I agree. But that doesn't mean he can't get a satisfactory answer about the >> international law aspect. And by satisfactory I mean one that makes sense, >&

Re: [mailop] I trust my candor is appreciated...?

> If the traffic is Transactional, by all means open a ticket and push it. It > is always the best plan to keep Transactional traffic strictly separate from > all other traffic, and if there are issues, point the nature of said traffic > out in follow-up emails, as once validated, it will

Re: [mailop] signup form abuse

> I personally think that ESP's should make an effort to carefully separate > their confirmed double opt-in mailings, from single opt-in mailers.. We have a lot of ESPs as customers of our email reputation certification service, and we *always* urge them to segregate their IPs by opt-in level

Re: [mailop] signup form abuse

> But I agree with you completely on the, "loose definition" issue, and have a > rather nasty story about that. > Always get the person who asserts their doing it to tell you exactly what > that term means to them. These are the definitions that we use, and that we use in working with our

Re: [mailop] What in the name of all that is evil is this new spam technique?

> Apparently my search-fu was bad. I hadn't marked it as spam, but I lost it > in the Master In Pile. > > It's a rather long message, so I stuck it here: http://dpaste.com/2D7WMFK I've passed this on to them too...and they say, first of all, thank you and they really appreciate it you

Re: [mailop] What in the name of all that is evil is this new spam technique?

> It came in to my GMail account, and I figured I'd mark it as spam. It's gone > now. Sorry. Ok if I forward over the image, with your info obscured? Anne ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] What in the name of all that is evil is this new spam technique?

> Which actor do you see potentially abusing the service, w.r.t. to it being > ripe for abuse? > > I only see the sending domain, the recipients domain and bounce.io involved > in the transaction. Well, clearly not the recipient's domain ;-) Anne

Re: [mailop] What in the name of all that is evil is this new spam technique?

I'm actually surprised it's taken this long for them to appear on the radar - they've been around since late 2014, which leads me to wonder if there's been a change in something there. Anne > On 9/5/2016 22:20, Jay Hennigan wrote: >> >> Their FAQ at betterbounces.net (bounce.io redirects

Re: [mailop] What in the name of all that is evil is this new spam technique?

Yep, I don't disagree with *anything* you've said. But examples from 'not me' are likely to be more compelling than 'just me telling them why it's a bad idea'. Anne > On 5/9/16 11:20 AM, Anne Mitchell wrote: >> >> Without commenting on what I think of the 'service' per

[mailop] Looking for someone to set up DKIM on a Windows server

Does anybody here have experience with setting up DKIM on a Windows server? We have someone needing that done, and our regular contractor that we use is unavailable right now. Thanks! Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/

[mailop] Anybody here familiar with setting up authentication on Windows (particularly Exchange Server)?

Is anybody here familiar with setting up authentication (particularly DKIM) on Windows products (particularly Exchange Server)? If so, please contact me offlist at amitch...@isipp.com. Thanks! Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification Is

Re: [mailop] Spurious 'Client host [xyz] blocked using b.barracudacentral.org' replies

>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Michael Wise >> wrote: >> >> Back In The Day, there was a BCP for shutting down a DNSBL that included >> running a daily check of the IP 127.0.0.1 (which should never hit), IIRC, as >> well as 127.0.0.2 (which should always return

Re: [mailop] New method of blocking spam

> Here is a list of 5505874 words and phrases used in the subject line of HAM > and never seen in the subject line of SPAM > > http://www.junkemailfilter.com/data/subject-ham.txt Well, until the spammers spider the site, get the list, and incorporate the subject lines. What's to stop

Re: [mailop] contact at cantv.net?

Neil...drop me a line offlist. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification Is Email You Send Being Junked? Get to the Inbox Using Your Own Mail System! http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ "Email marketing is the one place

[mailop] Anybody from CheetahMail around?

Need to talk with someone at Cheetah - anybody from there around? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! http://www.SuretyMail.com/

[mailop] Need samples (was Re: Hotmail/Microsoft/Outlook - getting their attention)

So, we have someone within MS who wants to look into this, and who "may know what's going on but needs some headers to diagnose"...so for anyone who is having the problem that may be related to DMARC, forwarding, etc... send me what you have, and we'll pass it on. Anne Anne P. Mitchell,

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft/Outlook - getting their attention

If someone can send me actual error messages, along with the IP address from which you are sending, we'll see what we can do. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation =

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

> And as someone who's job it is to stop spam, do you really want a lawsuit to > find that a mail service has to accept mail from someone else? Not to mention that Federal law specifically exempts ISPs from any liability for acceptance/delivery decisions they make. Federal law specifically

Re: [mailop] ATT Delist issues.

Jarle, Please contact me offlist and I'll see what we can do. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! Figure Out if It's Worth It:

[mailop] T-mobile contact?

Is there anyone from T-mobile here, or does anybody have a T-mobile contact with whom they can put me in touch? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation Certification http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Author: Section 6 of