==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Short response to JB:
I did not say, or at least it was not my intention to indicat
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 6/7/2010 6:10 PM, S. Artesian wrote:
> It's interesting that Joaquin would use th
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Just expressing my view, as clear as time allows me to,
nothing personal. I have fr
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I have to go back and read through this discussion, but I have to add
to this point.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Sometime Lou, it isn't ALL about you. I was providing a brief sketch of
what took
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
S. Artesian wrote:
> Did the bourgeoisie of Mexico suffer? Probably some did. But
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Well, thanks for that, but as I said to JB privately, I hope he has 60 more
birthd
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
It's interesting that Joaquin would use this example of 1963-1965--
interesting beca
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 7 June 2010 02:37, Joaquín Bustelo wrote:
>
> Thus Lenin's pamphlet "Imperialism
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
It's not about gospels, or sin, or being so snide you can claim you're not
being sn
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
JB: “But if you want
to deal with the universe as a whole, you *have* to go Einste
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 6/6/2010 5:33 PM, Shane Mage wrote:
> Is India an oppressed or oppressing nation?
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
> s.artesian wrote: [And exactly what does that have to do with the issues...
> '
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
JB: "And you're also not going to convince me to turn against the national
movements
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Jun 6, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Joaquín Bustelo wrote:
>
> No, it's because no matter h
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 6/6/2010 2:22 PM, S. Artesian wrote:
> JB has yet to answer any of those refutati
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Joaquín Bustelo wrote:
>
> adumbrating? ADUMBRATING???!!!
>
> There's never a mac
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 6/6/2010 9:51 AM, Louis Proyect wrote:
> It is also key to Teodor Shanin's "Lat
.
- Original Message -
From: "Louis Proyect"
To: "David Schanoes"
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Right, right. Joaquin laid a trap... after laying out what he thought in
detail.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 6/6/2010 9:32 AM, s.artesian wrote:
> If people don't want to or are not able to
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Angelus Novus wrote:
> Do you think the theory of monopoly capital is correct? That
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Joaquín Bustelo:
> Certainly WHATEVER imperialism might be, it is NOT "big states
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Angelus Novus wrote:
> Again, using 'imperialism' to denote the fact that large nat
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 6/5/2010 7:00 PM, Angelus Novus wrote:
> A concrete analysis of the relation betw
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect quoted from:
> Karl Marx letter to Nikolai Danielson, 1881
To summa
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect:
> It is not too hard to figure out that he reflects confusion on th
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
s.artesian wrote:
>
> What's not too bad, but all too revealing is that Louis claim
ed
in those current relationships, but isn't. That all that is produced is a
letter
from 130 years ago about Britain's relationship to that India of that time.
-Original Message-
>From: Shane Mage
>Sent: Jun 5, 2010 10:38 PM
>To: David Schanoes
>Subject: Re:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
s.artesian wrote:
> And exactly what does that have to do with the issues, data,
>
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
> /S. Artesian wrote/
>
> It would help if could define what you mean by imperialism
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Actually, it was a piece of shit academic "phenomenologist" journal
that pretended a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
And exactly what does that have to do with the issues, data,
definition, evidence of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Further thoughts from Angelus Novus inspired by a deeper reading of Kapital:
Why al
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect wrote:
> Nov 5 2007 16:43
> #11
> Angelus Novus
> User offline. Last s
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Lenin writes of the "semi-colony," in a specific context, and as the world
was bei
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Angelus Novus wrote:
> The second sense is just a fancy way of expressing the fact t
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Shane Mage wrote:
> In asserting that the "relationships" are between *countries*,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Shane Mage:
> In asserting that the "relationships" are between *countries*, rather
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On the other hand, maybe this will
help:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAs8gN0j2Z8
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
> Anyway, before we go further down this path... since it's data Lou wants,
let's
>
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Jun 5, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
> Sounds about right. Too bad th
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yes, where is Les when you need him
Manuel
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
s.artesian wrote:
>
> What's the big deal. Marx wrote like that.
I wouldn't obje
Louis Proyect
>Sent: Jun 5, 2010 6:52 PM
>To: David Schanoes
>Subject: Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?
>
>==
&g
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect:
> If anybody ever finds me writing in this fashion, they have permi
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Angelus Novus wrote:
>
> Hardt and Negri never take issue with Lenin, they simply
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect:
> The same thing can be said about Hardt and Negri, who also sought
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Angelus Novus wrote:
>
> I think that this 'criticism' misunderstands the type of b
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect:
> I just took a quick look at their book and--amazingly--for one on
50 matches
Mail list logo
