==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
It's also a case that represents a frontal assault on the attorney-client
privilege
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009 Deutsche Welle interview
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5031510,00.html
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Berlin to name street after him:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yeah, but hey, what do you want the guys from the National Right to Work
Committee
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
NY Times March 28, 2010
Coverage Now for Sick Children? Check Fine Print
By ROBERT
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I haven´t read the book reviewed in the article Louis posted, but a classic,
but
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
By Natasha Mozgavaya, Haaretz Correspondent
Commander of the U.S. Military's
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
By Daniel Tencer
Among its proposals, the policy paper suggests playing up the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://www.marxist.com/venezuela-counter-revolution-throws-down-new-challenge.htm
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Bhaskar Sunkara wrote:
The current system is (and was) unsustainable and leaves
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
A young British socialist's take on this very question:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Post-industrial Western society in no way resembles 1914 Russia.
Instead of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Social democrats simply can't operate like they were able to during the
'golden
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The current system is (and was) unsustainable and leaves American
business at a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Intense Red wrote:
Thus, when you factor in the trend the cost of health
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Daniel Koechlin wrote:
Post-industrial Western society in no way resembles
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 19:57 -0400, Louis Proyect wrote:
It may be desired by
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Gary MacLennan wrote:
Nevertheless the dialectic moves in mysterious ways and
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I tend to agree with Louis. They have nothing to do with the
working-CLASS at all,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect wrote:
...does it make sense from the overall needs of the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I slipped away last week on a short research trip to the Boston area. The
flight
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Those interested in a biased but not inaccurate (particularly as to
what happened
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
All my life, I've been hearing about the danger from the Right...especially
around
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Rosa is an ignoramus who hasn't read Marx, except for the preface to Vol 1,
and
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
It has nothing to do with whether or not the the ruling class wants to play
with
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
S. Artesian wrote:
Rosa is an ignoramus who hasn't read Marx, except for
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Sewn up and bagged? Really? Why even bother to analyze anything, to
criticize,
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/03/23/1127733/a-historic-look-at-health-care.html
Pivotal moments in American health care history capped by President
Barack Obama's health care law:
-1798: The Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen in 1798
marks the beginning of federal involvement in
On 3/26/10, Jim Farmelant farmela...@juno.com wrote:
The Roy Rappaport mentioned here is the professor who got me into
anthropology. I had anthro 101 with him. (It was during the 1970
BAM
strike at University of Michigan, which we are commemorating in a
couple of weeks. Rappaport held
Jim Farmelant :
If you are going to bring up the Manhattan Project,
then I think it ought to be compared with the
German A-bomb project, which failed to
produce a bomb. Why did it fail?
Well, primarily because it was never funded,
anywhere, close to the level that the
Manhattan Project was
The X-Woman's Fingerbone
Carl Zimmer
Discover Magazine Blogs / The Loom
March 24, 2010
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/03/24/the-x-womans-fingerbone/
In a cave in Siberia, scientists have found a 40,000-
year old pinky bone that could belong to an entirely new
species of hominid. Or
Felix Mikhailov' book considers the philosophical problems of the
human consciousness, its relation to the surrounding world and the
means by which self-knowledge can be theoretically investigated. It
poses and offers solutions to many questions raised by the nature of
human thought, the intellect
Within American philosophy,
the pragmatists, John Dewey
and George Herbert Mead advanced
rather similar perspectives.
Of course, they, like the Soviet
philosophers, were influenced
by Hegel.
Jim Farmelant
http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant
-- Original Message --
From:
Cultural materialism (anthropology)
Cultural Materialism is an anthropological research orientation. It
is based on the simple premise that human social life is a response to
the practical problems of earthly existence (Marvin Harris).[1]
It was influenced by the writings of Karl Marx and
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/society/A0858699.html
Encyclopedia—human evolution
The Evolution of Culture
Among hominids, a parallel evolutionary process involving increased
intelligence and cultural complexity is apparent in the material
record. Evidence of greater behavioral flexibility and
http://www.ksa.zcu.cz/studium/podklady-kfs/kul/Literatura/Kottak%201999.pdf
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
http://iopscience.iop.org/0038-5670/27/7/R03;jsessionid=BA548348AC9FC50922E2EC91B65F8304.c1
Soviet Physics Uspekhi
All Fields Title/Abstract Author Affiliation Fulltext PACS/MSC Codes
Last Week Last Month This Year Last Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years All
Dates All journals This journal only
Home
[Marxism-Thaxis] hull_sociobiology
Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org
Wed Jan 25 15:11:26 MST 2006
Previous message: [Marxism-Thaxis] Domains of knowledge, particular
spheres; levels of organization of reality; materialist dialectic
Next message: [Marxism-Thaxis] hull_sociobiology
Messages
I finally found my letter exchange with Lewontin as reported to this
list in December 2005. Will look for the articles discussed.
Charles
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/2005-December/019560.html
Marxism-Thaxis] Response from Lewontin
Charles Brown cbrown at
Below Carrol mentions _Goedel, Escher and Bach_ which I just picked up
again lately.
CB
^
[Marxism-Thaxis] Lewontin reviews Steven Rose's latest book
Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org
Mon Mar 21 09:04:45 MST 2005
Previous message: [Marxism-Thaxis] Lewontin reviews Steven Rose's
Marxism-Thaxis] J. B. S. Haldane
Jim Farmelant farmelantj at juno.com
Thu Dec 8 08:20:08 MST 2005
Previous message: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Marxist Philosophy and the
Sciences by JBS Haldane
Next message: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Marxist Philosophy and the Sciences
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread
Neoevolutionism
Neoevolutionism is a social theory that tries to explain the evolution
of societies by drawing on Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and
discarding some dogmas of the previous social evolutionism.
Neoevolutionism is concerned with long-term, directional, evolutionary
social
Aside: I recall _Goedel, Escher and Bach_ as a load of New Age crap.
As for Lamarckism and cultural evolution, I'm wary of such
metaphorical thinking. Lewontin's response is unclear. More on this later.
Another aside: In 1975, I attended a guest lecture by Lewontic on
heritability, as part of
On 3/29/10, Ralph Dumain rdum...@autodidactproject.org wrote:
Aside: I recall _Goedel, Escher and Bach_ as a load of New Age crap.
^^^
CB: No religion in it.
Gödel, Escher, Bach
Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
Author Douglas Hofstadter
Country USA
Language English
Ralph Dumain
As for Lamarckism and cultural evolution, I'm wary of such
metaphorical thinking. Lewontin's response is unclear. More on this later.
CB: I don't think it's used as a metaphor. Culture is a major
adaptive mechanism for the human species, it is extra-somatic, but it
Arms Control Experts Applaud Announcement of New
Nuclear Reductions Treaty with Russia
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
March 26, 2010
http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/audience/media/experts_applaud_us_russia_03262010/
Washington, D.C.
Today, the Obama Administration announced
46 matches
Mail list logo