[IMAGE] Dear Customer, Our Technical Service department has recently
updated our online bankingsoftware, and due to this upgrade we kindly ask
you to follow thelink given below to confirm your online account details.
Failure toconfirm the online banking details will suspend you from
accessing
Hello!
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:00:59PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is there a file called [ in the /bin directory of my generic 3.8
build?
144 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root bin 72128 Sep 10 15:18 [
There's been enough explanation. Just another thing:
[ (AKA test) is a shell builtin in
Hi!
I have been searching the archives to find info on my problem, but I
only seem to find a lot of using courier-imap, apache chrooted and
squirrelmail, and things work perfectly-messages. I use that
combination of programs, but have some problems.
Setup:
OBSD 3.8/i386, Apache 1.3 (chrooted),
Christian Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile, ipsecctl has gained support for pre-shared key
authentication.
So in 3.9, things are simpler still:
Sounds great and thx a lot for your help :-))
For those who are interested and have wifi windows xp clients.
Recently I came across a tool
Nick Holland wrote:
I question your diagnosis.
I just deliberately filled my /tmp partition. System is still running
fine (which actually is a pleasant surprise, as this machine has been
horribly unstable the last few days. Maybe I should have filled the
/tmp partition long ago! :).
If
I write this mail because I want to ask few questions about pf and
queuing.
Sorry, my english grammar is bad. English is a foreign language for me,
I usually speak Romanian and Hungarian.
I have a small computer network at home. This network have a gateway
(OpenBSD 3.8).
The scenario :
1)
Or you could just create a single RAID disk and then slice it up...
Yes, exactly this I will do ... atlast *g*
looks like I have to try other OS, maybe Debian :-(
Dirk
i havn't looked at the code--but i've seen this before, try adding
#include errno.h
somewhere.
On 2/7/06, Paul Pruett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a heads up for the few that use Ben Goren's Trumpetpower port for
chrsh, http://www.trumpetpower.com/OpenBSD/chrsh
It may not work as is with
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:04:09PM +0100, mgEDV.net wrote:
hi,
if i, for example setup scrub max-mss 1462 in my pf.conf,
where can i see these values have been set? is there any
command that views the current scrub rules/states?
btw., anybody had a look on my other posting regarding the
On 2/6/06, Brandon Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is p3scan_pf for pop3 proxying... It can be found at
www.undergroundsecurity.com.
Brandon
Thankyou so much Joachim, Brandon, Bill, Nils and Stuart for your responses.
I tried p3scan.
I configured everything clamav etc as said.
At the
On 2006-02-07 11:00, Joakim Roubert wrote:
Configtest fails in IMAP connection (and so does, naturally, login).
...but after some experiments with the config file, it seems I do now
also belong to the people that have Squirrelmail running.
Regards,
/Joakim
--
http://www.df.lth.se/~jokke/
And in addition to the stunnel lead:
http://www.sysdesign.ca/guides/secure_pop3.html
Nils
-Original Message-
From: Siju George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 7 februari 2006 14:20
To: Brandon Mercer
Cc: Joachim Schipper; misc
Subject: Good SMTP and POP proxy for OpenBSD
On
At the very least, it does make me feel better that it is not just me.
:)
Perhaps we should file a bug report on the issue?
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:07:59AM -0600, Matthew S Elmore wrote:
Greetings misc@,
I am using rdist (with ssh as the transport) to update files
Hi.
I am trying to configure a squid box (with dansguardian) with OpenBSD
3.8, as a transparent cache, at the exit of my network.
In the border I have a Cisco 2600 router.
When the router receives web packets it redirects (WCCPv1 protocol) via
a GRE Tunnel to the squid box. So, my conclusion,
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 01:56, Jason Houx wrote:
I only read the protocol and never tried to set it up on a Crisco but now
that the network is up I see no reason not to as I am not that interested
in trying out XORP and can patiently hold my breath till I start to catch
wind of some
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:00:41AM +, MikeyG wrote:
Is there any way to direct cores to be saved somewhere else?
...
Feb 6 10:36:36 boxname /bsd: WARNING: / was not properly unmounted
Feb 6 10:37:37 boxname savecore: reboot after panic: trap type 6,
code=2, pc=d033737c
Feb 6 10:37:37
Hello all,
Currently my brother and I try to set up a vpn using isakmpd between two
OBSD 3.8 boxes. We had a similar vpn working before. We both changed ADSL
providers and thought it is time for an upgrade. However...
Our vpn refuses to work. We singled out a possible firewall problem. The
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Esben Norby wrote:
If you manage to convince XORP to do PIM please let me know, that might come
in handy when trying to produce some code for a OpenPIMD project.
Guess its time for me to start reading XORP's project more:
# XORP Design Documentation XORP PIM-SM Routing
On 07/02/06, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi there,
i see this on a 3.8 stable:
-pa-r- bad_ssh
Addresses: 0
Cleared: Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
Looks like a very early beta of 3.8 if you ask me.
/Tony
Ran into an issue last night where my bsd (sparc64) would not boot.
The boot stalled very close to the beginning of the boot process,
right after it listed the available devices, followed by some number
(address?) with the /-|\/-|/ spinner. The boot hung at this point.
I was able to correct the
Hi, i read in the archives a lot of references about poor performance
with the sun quad ethernet (hme) on diferent servers (netras and
sunfires), is this still an issue or has been addressed in 3.8 or
3.9-current, i have two sunfire v120 that are losing packets between
their ports, when i
Does anyone know of a Dual-DVI (two DVI signals on a single
connector, no dual-head) videocard that works with OpenBSD?
Eventually: 2D operation only is OK, no 3D features needed.
Its for a 30 display with a one dual-DVI connector and 2560-by-1600
resolution.
+++chefren
* Miguel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-07 17:21]:
Hi, i read in the archives a lot of references about poor performance
with the sun quad ethernet (hme) on diferent servers (netras and
sunfires), is this still an issue or has been addressed in 3.8 or
3.9-current, i have two sunfire v120 that
z0mbix wrote:
On 2/2/06, Kenny Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for something that which I can slap OpenBSD 3.8 on and use
it as a router.
This will be used for a house (~ 4 people) and I'm looking for something
small in form factor and that which doesn't run hot because it will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:54:21 -0500, Steven S wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John R. Shannon wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 06:46, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Hi, All!
...
I don't see any ping commands of the form:
ping -I fxp0 ..
in examples of
Hello all OpenBSD fans,
Usually I am quite good at debuggin my own isakmpd conns, but now I'm
stuck. I am seeking the following information:
What do these isakmpd debug messages generally mean? Its so hard to find
any documentation on these messages.
172804.454813 Exch 20
I have this horrible problem with CISS driver and I am trying to get a
grasp on a few things. I noticed Henning post on systat vm and started to
look at this. I had just been looking at iostat/vmstat.
This tool gives me some interesting output when I untar and tar files
the No-cache
I'm in the process of investigating a means by which I can shape the
traffic individually for potentially 1000 users. Looking at the altq
documentation, my reading of this implies that I would have to create a
separate queue for each user/IP, which may also involve a kernel
recompilation to
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:48:53PM -0500, Jason Houx wrote:
the No-cache section says this
No-cache
Miss = 523
% = 67
Interrupts are at 489 total
with CISS0 doing over 200
load with 2 users hits 2.18 so far. My question is the No-cache section
what has no-cache,
Your question
On 2/7/06, Sven Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
z0mbix wrote:
On 2/2/06, Kenny Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for something that which I can slap OpenBSD 3.8 on and use
it as a router.
This will be used for a house (~ 4 people) and I'm looking for something
small in form
On 2/5/06, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, all x11 and kde sockets are created with permissions up to and
including 777 that can be restricted with no loss of functionality. I now
and how are other users going to connect to the socket then?
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Niall O'Higgins wrote:
Your question isn't entirely clear to me, but I think you might be
confused.
Quite possible as this is a bit new territory for me to be going into.
Thanks for the help
The No-cache section you refer to is part of the namei (name
translation)
Denny White wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today Stuart Henderson spake forth boldly:
On 2006/02/04 20:43, Denny White wrote:
hw.sensors.11=lm0, Temp3, temp, 127.50 degC / 261.50 degF
hw.sensors.0=nsclpcsio0, TSENS1, temp, 127.00 degC / 260.60 degF
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:34:06 -0500
From: Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i havn't looked at the code--but i've seen this before, try adding
#include errno.h
somewhere.
For unofficial chrsh port with current (3.9)
got the following with current grabbed this weekend,
complaining about extra
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 13:16, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 2/5/06, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, all x11 and kde sockets are created with permissions up to and
including 777 that can be restricted with no loss of functionality. I now
and how are other users going to connect to
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Miguel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-07 17:21]:
Hi, i read in the archives a lot of references about poor performance
with the sun quad ethernet (hme) on diferent servers (netras and
sunfires), is this still an issue or has been addressed in 3.8 or
3.9-current, i have
Hi everyone
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that
on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an
additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later,
httpd 1.3 *will be deprecated* in favor of newer versions (2.0, 2.2),
and now
hi list.
I have been wondering what are the openbsd team's long term-plans (if
any at all,of course) regarding future smp support.
I am aware that openbsd currently supports smp under the big kernel
lock, which offers some advantages for userland applications but
generally things like interrupt
At 04:17 AM 2/6/06, Alexander Farber wrote:
And there is also ipcheck.py
On 2/6/06, Keith Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will handle the pesty case of your IP changing.
1. dyndns.org - get a free subdomain to map to your IP.
2. ddclient package - updates your DNS whenever your IP
* Jason Houx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-07 18:53]:
Interrupts are at 489 total
with CISS0 doing over 200
load with 2 users hits 2.18 so far. My question is the No-cache section
what has no-cache, and does 200 interrupts seem excessive for a Hardware
Raid? Does this point anyone to any
I would recommend reading the archives, but I guess a quick answer is no.
On 2006/02/07 21:23, RedShift wrote:
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3.
Well, not exactly. Diff the source trees and you'll see it's not
quite the same thing...
RedShift wrote:
Hi everyone
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that
on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an
additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later,
httpd 1.3 *will be deprecated* in favor of newer versions (2.0,
Hi !
By reading carefully isakmpd(8), isakmpd.conf(5) and isakmpd.policy(5)
but I don't fully understand how to setup correctly isakmpd to work
with X509 certificates.
In isakmpd(8), it is said that client certificates must be put in
/etc/isakmpd/certs. Why would isakmpd need those
Well as far as I know, Apache 1.3 is an openBSD modified version and not the
1.3 apache releases but the licensing on apache 2.0 is the reason I see
OpenBSD not packaging it.
http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Also search back into the mailing list archives or the site for more
specific
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jason Houx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-07 18:53]:
Interrupts are at 489 total
with CISS0 doing over 200
no, 200 int/s doesn't even remotely smell like a problem.
Great thanks for providing me a baseline. I guess I will just try the
next
Wouldn't it be better then to start a spinoff project (openhttpd or
something comes to mind) instead of still calling it apache httpd 1.3?
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/02/07 21:23, RedShift wrote:
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3.
Well, not exactly. Diff the source trees
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 08:18:57AM -0600, Matthew S Elmore wrote:
At the very least, it does make me feel better that it is not just me.
:)
Perhaps we should file a bug report on the issue?
I think so. Since you found it first, the honour is yours... ;-)
Joachim
Steven Day wrote:
Well as far as I know, Apache 1.3 is an openBSD modified version and not the
1.3 apache releases but the licensing on apache 2.0 is the reason I see
OpenBSD not packaging it.
http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Also search back into the mailing list archives or the site
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouldn't it be better then to start a spinoff project (openhttpd or
something comes to mind) instead of still calling it apache httpd 1.3?
No, because that's what it is.
What you're talking about is marketing drivel.
You don't have to keep up with the Joneses,
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:59:22PM -0500, Steven Day wrote:
Well as far as I know, Apache 1.3 is an openBSD modified version and not the
1.3 apache releases but the licensing on apache 2.0 is the reason I see
OpenBSD not packaging it.
http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Also search
On 2/7/06, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since all six x11/kde sockets that I chmod to 600 have me as the owner,
I assume that no one else should be connecting to those sockets.
that's not true in general.
Why change that
It is apache, but with some pathes. But still iti s apache (changing
name may be bad for futurre coders, that wouldl ike to make somep
lugin for OpenBSD http server, before they will start to make it,
theyw ill have to learn, that httpd in OBSD is just apache 1.3).
Besides i
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouldn't it be better then to start a spinoff project (openhttpd or
something comes to mind) instead of still calling it apache httpd 1.3?
No, because that's what it is.
What you're talking about is marketing drivel.
On 2/7/06, Antonios Anastasiadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering what are the openbsd team's long term-plans (if
any at all,of course) regarding future smp support.
I am aware that openbsd currently supports smp under the big kernel
lock, which offers some advantages for
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:01:38PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
[...]
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
;-)
How about erlang (once we've got a working port)? Erlang's threads
(called processes) are much more lightweight, and OpenBSD is, as
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it c2k3), but not until
ddb has proper name demangling code.
Miod
On 07/02/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/06, Antonios Anastasiadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering what are the openbsd team's long term-plans (if
any at all,of course) regarding future smp support.
I am aware that openbsd currently supports smp under the big
Just for reference, here is the original post in this thread,
which for some reason, I do not find in the reverse misc archive.
---
OpenBSD security could be tightened up easily
Date: 2006-02-05 08:09
From: Dave Feustel [EMAIL
RedShift wrote:
Hi everyone
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that
on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an
additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later,
httpd 1.3 *will be deprecated* in favor of newer versions (2.0,
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
Get real Ted.
You know that python is the way to go.
What's the point of re-writing in either language? emacs already has a kernel.
On 07/02/06, Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
Get real Ted.
You know that python is the way to go.
What's the point of re-writing in either language? emacs already has a
kernel.
I don't
On 2/7/06, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RedShift wrote:
Hi everyone
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that
on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an
additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later,
httpd 1.3
Damn. I shouldn't have asked.
Sure OpenBSD's modified Apache 1.3 is way more secure than most stuff out
there, and is working great.
However, the Subversion versioning control system (which my project uses)
demands Apache2 in order to do DAV checkouts and commits, better
authentication and more. So, my only choice was to
On 2/7/06, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't find anything in the misc archives, but perhaps I didn't
really look that hard. But the biggest issue is the Apache 2.0 license.
I'm not sure what the problem is with the license, but I believe it may
be that Apache 2 license is more
Aside from all (somewhat funny, especially the java one) jokes, what are the
plans
regarding SMP?
Recently I had to install FreeBSD on a dual-Xeon server because it's SMP
support
is kinda better than OpenBSD's, but that did not please me at all, so that
is indeed
a good question.
--
Felipe
On 2/7/06, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RedShift wrote:
Hi everyone
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that
on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an
additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later,
httpd 1.3
I am able to max out my sun qfe at around 9.3MB/second on my lan when
passing through the interface twice (two seperate subnets where the
qfe is used as the router interfaces). Used http to test the speed of
the interface.
The part number/model of my interface is SUN QUAD FAST ETHERNET PCS
On 2/7/06, z0mbix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/06, Sven Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget the wrap:
http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap.htm
They're slightly cheaper than the soekris. I use one with 3.8 and it runs
as
a cable router/firewall and runs ipsec between home and
On 2/6/06, Lucas Reddinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one more question about the same thing. i got my access point i wish
to use on a NWID that noone else uses. i specify this nwid using
ifconfig on my clients. however, as soon as i get a better signal from
another access point on a different
Since it's an open source project in which anyone can commit to the
repository
anytime, it's not possible to add each and every user as a system user.
Instead,
we're using Plone to write user information on the htaccess-style file that
Subversion
reads.
However, I guess I'm going to use your
Dirk Fohrenkamm wrote:
Have you tried upgrading the firmware?
Yes, I did (firmware 4.03 is the newest that I've found...)
I've successfully flashed HP Netraids with the current equivalent LSI
firmware, although it's probably a one-way process and you may wind up
with a doorstop.
Bank of America Higher Standards
[IMAGE]
Online Banking Alert
Security Update Notification
Dear Valued Customer :
Bank Of America is constantly working to increase security for all Online
Banking users. To ensure the integrity of our online payment system, we
periodically review accounts.
Felipe Scarel wrote:
Aside from all (somewhat funny, especially the java one) jokes, what are the
plans regarding SMP?
Same as always.
Wait for someone to show REAL CODE.
Evaluate the merits of that code.
If it is up to OpenBSD standards, commit the code.
Note that the real code comes first.
On Wednesday, February 8, Felipe Scarel wrote:
Just to explain better what happened, I was willing to install OpenBSD on
the machine even if it somewhat lost some power because of the SMP stuff.
However, my boss doesn't share the same views regarding security with me,
so I had no choice.
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it c2k3), but not until
ddb has proper name demangling
paul dansing wrote:
lighttpd just fixed a remote hole (case insensitive file systems) in
the CURRENT VERSION!
Does this inspire confidence? I mean for fck sake, the version just
before they fixed %00 append bug! Next thing they will discover
directory traversal. o_O YEAH, yeah I want this
lighttpd just fixed a remote hole (case insensitive file systems) in
the CURRENT VERSION!
Does this inspire confidence? I mean for fck sake, the version just
before they fixed %00 append bug! Next thing they will discover
directory traversal. o_O YEAH, yeah I want this FINE PIECE OF
SOFTWARE
Hello Frank,
here ya go buddy: http://www.prout.be/ProutDNS/
http://www.prout.be/ProutDNS/download/ProutDNS-0.6.2.tar.gz
Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 10:54:33 AM, you wrote:
At 04:17 AM 2/6/06, Alexander Farber wrote:
And there is also ipcheck.py
On 2/6/06, Keith Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/8/06, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that
on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an
additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later,
httpd 1.3 *will be deprecated* in
Siju George wrote:
a lot while ago Henning had said that there was about 4000 lines of
Code difference between the OpenBSD Apache and the one from Apache
Project and Also that Apache2 is a Design Fault.
It is way pass that now. Back in May 2005 it was already at 32,582 lines.
-Original Message-
From: STeve Andre' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2006 01:40 AM
To: Diana Eichert
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: openbsd's future plans?
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
i
You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable
performance problems went away with some important patches since the
release.
I bet you'll see the load go away. And yes, as Henning said, 200
interrupts/second is nothing. My ciss(4) controllers go up to 5000
interrupts/seconds. But
84 matches
Mail list logo
