o
> shell and the sets could inded be fetched with "ftp" program from
> that location. BTW ftp is also not offered, only disc and http.
were those files also visible by pointing a browser at http://10.0.0.1/5.8/i386
?
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of
All of the functionality you are requesting is already provided.
look at finish_up() in src/distrib/miniroot/install.sub.
There is no reason at all to modify pkg_add. Just setup /etc/pkg.conf.
On 2016 Jan 04 (Mon) at 04:02:07 -0600 (-0600), Luke Small wrote:
:I am realistically thinking more
Because there seemed to be more patches than normal in 5.8, and I am lazy and
there was lots of time over the holidays.
I thought I would compile the all the source rather than do the patches
piecemeal.
I have never tried to compile all the source, I ran into some errors.
First: Several make
7
26 processes: 25 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states: 0.7% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.1% interrupt, 98.4% idle
Memory: Real: 15M/48M act/tot Free: 378M Cache: 17M Swap: 0K/514M
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND
1 root 100 468K 464K
9M act/tot Free: 326M Cache: 50M Swap: 0K/514M
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIMECPU COMMAND
1 root 100 472K 456K idle wait 0:01 0.00% init
14061 _ntp 2 -20 1120K 2264K sleep poll 0:00 0.00% ntpd
30305 _ntp 20 932K
On 2015 Dec 24 (Thu) at 20:23:38 -0600 (-0600), Luke Small wrote:
:I wanna make a c program that checks for a PKG_PATH that exists and
:connects to a workable link for pkg_add(). If you ever upgraded using
:http mirrors on the install disk, it offers list# which links directly
:to numbered
On 2015 Dec 24 (Thu) at 22:53:24 -0600 (-0600), Amit Kulkarni wrote:
:Ugh, that wasn't worded properly. Proposed diffs of new versions of ports,
:which might break other ports, are also built, in a bulk build. This might
:cause mismatches...
:
Those are *not* done on the real build clusters.
it a few hours and try again.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected a
On 24 December 2015 08:00:01 GMT+00:00, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
>Returning back to the discussion where I suggested it would be nice to
>build
>OS kernels that would fail deliberately when virtualized to close off
>that
>class of malware, especially on the new Intel Skylake chips that
On 23 December 2015 02:04:01 GMT+00:00, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
>I would be interested in any code that can knowingly break inside a VM
>to
>verify unvirtualized status, esp. on Skylake. Older processors can
>probably
>use the virtualization bugs in the hardware for this function.
Who
This has gone wildly off-topic, please take it off list
--
A fool must now and then be right by chance.
1) does "bgpctl reload" detect it?
2) does -current work as you expect?
On 2015 Dec 17 (Thu) at 09:38:45 +0100 (+0100), Tony Sarendal wrote:
:"network inet connected" does not pick up new vlan interfaces, same problem
:as 5.6.
:
:bmr0.esp1# ifconfig vlan69 create
:bmr0.esp1# ifconfig vlan69
pair(4) was created for this exact situation, and is available in
-current and will be in 5.9 and later.
On 2015 Dec 17 (Thu) at 12:19:42 +0100 (+0100), Claer wrote:
:Hello,
:
:I'm trying a "strange" setup with rdomains, bridge and vether. As there is
:something I don't understand, I'd like to
es usually
helps, and of course some version of throwing more or faster hardware at
the problem might also help.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit o
in a lot of laptops out there but possibly more in the slightly
older ones such as the one mentioned in my old piece[1]
Case in point, with a simple /etc/hostname.iwm0
nwid we_see_all_your_naughty_bits wpakey alltomorrowsparties[2]
the resulting config becomes
[Wed Dec 16 22:31:42] peter@elke
an override the default flags by specifying a different set or even
'flags any' but the question remains, why?
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious ne
to
be fully supported.
Now, as Jiri said already, what's the real problem you need help solving?
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious ne
I have been an Emac user for 20 plus years, and I often look at mg to replace
it.
The functionality of mg is getting close.
To get some degree of programmability, I suggest that you could implement
Emac's "name-last-kbd-macro"
then allow one to bind that named-kbd-macro to a key.
To be really
On 5 December 2015 09:36:29 GMT+00:00, Daniel Ouellet
wrote:
>On 11/13/15 12:02 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>To the kind sole.
>
>Not sure who did the new current updated release, but many thanks to
>who
>ever did it!
It cod not have come at a better time, it stopped me going
n, as I'm sick of doing bank transfers.
As far as the USB stick goes, I think it's a good idea, I'd buy it but
if it's too much effort and cost then don't worry about it.
-peter
this has been discussed ad-nauseam, please search the archives.
(ps: do not respond to this, we are not interested in having this
discussion again)
On 2015 Nov 27 (Fri) at 08:33:00 -0700 (-0700), fran??ais wrote:
:The Free Software Foundation (FSF) says that:
:
:"FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD
ndles the
situation.
Go search the archives, nothing much has changed since the first time
this issue came up on misc. And I remember this actually being a topic
of one of Theo's presentations and possibly others. Seek and you shall find.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC
do a bit of reading?
HTH, HAND
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected a
Hi Thorleif
Looks like you are hitting the openfiles limit. You'll need to edit
/etc/login.conf and look at the
bgpd:\
:openfiles-cur=512:\
:tc=daemon:
block. bgpd takes approx 30 files to run, then one per session. I
would recommend bumping it up to 2048 for a route server.
Yes, it is possible for grub to boot Windows. LILO too, it can even boot Xen
if you use mbootpack (otherwise it doesn't support initrd).
The point is that if you use Windows you must use its boot menu, and it's
easier to configure it to boot multiple OS than grub or lilo. EasyBSD handles
all
You are making life unnecessarily difficult for yourself, even apart from
running multi boot (mind, I have multi boot here on various legacy systems,
but not for anything serious).
Install Windows first, although I would note a 32GB boot partition is not
large enough to properly maintain any
experiment with pledge, kqueue and c anyway, I've
implemented the bare minimum I needed. I'm not sure however if there
are other solutions that would fit my need. Do you know about one?
If not, feel free to try out the outcome and give feedback.
http://github.com/peterhajdu/fwa
--
Peter Hajdu
On 17 November 2015 15:46:59 GMT+00:00, "Luis P. Mendes"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that development time is not a determinisc thing, but
> nonetheless I'd like to know if it's closer to one, six, twelve (or
> more) months until we get the possibility to run Linux guests
>
Don't insult other people on the mailing list.
--
SCCS, the source motel! Programs check in and never check out!
-- Ken Thompson
Your userland and ports are out of sync.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun
On 2015 Nov 06 (Fri) at 17:06:02 + (+), gso...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
:Building firefox38.4.0esr
:
:===>?? Verifying specs:?? icudata icui18n icuuc X11 Xext Xrender Xt atk-1.0 c
:cairo?? fontconfig freetype
Hi,
could it be that you need to 'sh /etc/netstart iwn0' for it to negotiate
DHCP? That, or do a dhclient iwn0. It's not apparent by your series of
commands if you left out dhclient..
Regards,
-peter
On 11/03/15 13:59, misc nick wrote:
> I can't connect my Thinkpad x220 to my phone's hots
eed to adjust some of the rather conservatively set resource limits upwards.
Some relevant, possiby suboptimal choices but of the WorkedForMe(TM) kind, see
http://home.nuug.no/~peter/transition/eurobsdcon2014/desktop.html and the
following slide.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 i
Hi,
There is IPC between the seperated parts though. Which makes me wonder
if someone gets the
protocol right on the compromised part they would be able to pull the
certificates no? What would
need to be done to get the protocol right then?
Regards,
-peter
On 10/29/15 11:34, ludovic coues
Oh interesting. My drive is a Seagate 2TB drive as well
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Matej Nanut wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've reported, possibly incorrectly, the exact same issue here:
>
> https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=144408289116398
>
> I tried formatting a different
ter.
I've attempted to mount using options nosuid and nodev but that doesn't
help.
Is this a known problem or am I missing something obvious, a mount option I
skipped over? Any other diagnostics that someone would like to see?
Thanks,
Peter
works perfectly fine as an ntp server. you won't see any problems.
On 2015 Oct 23 (Fri) at 15:39:26 -0700 (-0700), Gene wrote:
:Howdy,
:
:Has anyone here used the PC Engines apu1d system board as an NTP server?
:
:I'm looking at setting up some in house stratum-2 servers so I can be a
:better
bugs, see http://www.openbsd.org/report.html
Good luck!
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29
hat fairly basic fact, that's their loss, not ours.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.2
If you are using bgp, then you shouldn't have a default route.
Do you see routes from both peers? bgpctl show should give you
something like:
T-LEVEL3 3549 60101591 399386 0 04w1d23h 552098
T-COGENT 174 26910070 397509 0 06w2d20h 548495
the
ou add entries to your blacklist would be
useful
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.1
; patch -p0)
signify: signature verification failed
Hmm... I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
Anyone else seeing the same problem?
-peter
Looking at http://www.openbsd.org/papers/tame-fsec2015/
When I first heard of "tame", I thought there would be a problem with
log files. I assume that is what the "Whitelist path feature" is being added
to try to solve.
I wonder if a new system primitive could solve the log file problem in a
,
-peter
On 09/30/15 11:10, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36:21AM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
>>> Thanks for your help,
>> I assume you are not able to ping the other way around either when the
>> network goes down, i e from gamma to fritzbox?
> Si
es its linkspeed
or does otherwise operations that would impact the net?
Thanks for your help,
-peter
al first question on this list is: can you provide a full
> dmesg from gamma?
> It is almost always more helpful than people think, so never leave home
> without it! :-)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> /Benny
Thanks for your effort Benny. The dmesg follows...
-peter
my own part,
getting any real work done requires a unix, whick in my case tends to
be OpenBSD unless something specific to the occasion trips me up.
- - Peter
- --
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.n
On 2015 Sep 24 (Thu) at 12:37:03 +0300 (+0300), Pantelis Roditis wrote:
:On 09/24/2015 11:39 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
:>On 2015 Sep 23 (Wed) at 18:14:51 +0100 (+0100), Craig Skinner wrote:
:>:Hello,
:>:
:>:Zombies are often attacking ports which don't have services running,
:>:such
On 2015 Sep 23 (Wed) at 18:14:51 +0100 (+0100), Craig Skinner wrote:
:Hello,
:
:Zombies are often attacking ports which don't have services running,
:such as telnet (most popular indeed), mysql, 3551, 8080, 13272, etc.
:
:With a default pf block drop in on $ext_if, how can those source ips be
sysmerge will be quicker and
easier, but in the general case, yes.
> 3. If one use a 5.8 snapshot (i.e [1] ), is it possible to apply updates
> for 5.8 *-stable* later?
No. As I said earlier (and would be clear from a careful reading of the FAQ),
snapshots track -current, not -stable.
- Peter
--
On 2015 Sep 21 (Mon) at 09:37:11 -0400 (-0400), Quartz wrote:
:>>I took that to mean:
:>>
:>>1) run (presumably as root) 'time sh /etc/rc shutdown'
:>>2) check 'ps -aux' to see what's still running
:>>3) 'kill -HUP [PID]' for each of the remaining processes
:>>4) check 'ps -aux' again
:>>5) 'kill
On 2015 Sep 19 (Sat) at 20:26:02 + (+), Alexey Suslikov wrote:
:Stuart Henderson spacehopper.org> writes:
:
:> On 2015-09-18, Alexey Suslikov gmail.com> wrote:
:> > I think you should try 5.8, there was stability fixes in urtwn(4).
:>
:> 5.8 hasn't been released yet.
:
:How about
Actually never mind, I think I'm gonna switch to TAILQ instead.
Cheers,
-peter
On 09/13/15 09:56, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm programming with queue(3) and noticed there is no LIST_PREV. LIST
> is a doubly linked list, no?
> FreeBSD's LIST_PREV (from an older 11-curr
ULL : \
__containerof((elm)->field.le_prev, \
QUEUE_TYPEOF(type), field.le_next))
But I don't know if we can just stick that in OpenBSD's? Could someone
do the work for me, pretty please? Even then my development has stalled
here at home.
Cheers,
-peter
When ARIN prepared for the IPv4-pocolypse[1], they put aside a /10 for
**smaller than /24 allocations**. Our default ruleset will not allow
those, even though they will be for various pieces of critical dual-stack
infrastructure to help IPv6-only systems survive.
RIPE is currently[2] announcing
spamdb corrupted, not that I've noticed. What are the symptoms more
specifically?
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
del
Backslash says "ignore the following charecter". You are using it to
ignore the newline.
If you ignore the space instead, the newline then matters.
This is not a bug, this is 100% by design.
You'll need to ensure there are no trailing spaces after a backslash
(and we do recommend removing
Are you doing anything above 5Gbps? Or above 500k pps?
if not, get whichever.
If you are, then higher frequency cores are better; today.
If you are running dhcp server, then you are likely not.
On 2015 Aug 31 (Mon) at 22:38:47 -0400 (-0400), Quartz wrote:
:Quick question: I need to make a
Keep this off list.
On 2015 Aug 28 (Fri) at 06:32:54 -0400 (-0400), Quartz wrote:
:Just out of curiosity, are there any plans to support bluetooth at some point
:in the future?
:
There needs to be interest from a developer who can write a not-crappy
bluetooth stack.
Odds are fairly low right now.
On 2015 Aug 27 (Thu) at 10:16:31 -0400 (-0400), Quartz wrote:
:OpenBSD doesn't support bluetooth on any hardware.
:
:Does that also include usb-bluetooth dongles for wireless keyboards?
:
That includes all forms of bluetooth where it is presented to the OS.
If it fakes a keyboard, and shows up
Please keep this off list.
OpenBSD doesn't support bluetooth on any hardware.
On 2015 Aug 27 (Thu) at 07:59:22 +0100 (+0100), Gareth Nelson wrote:
:Hi all
:
:I'm thinking of building a project (for those curious, it's an implant -
:see biohack.me for info on this kind of stuff) on top of the Intel Edison
:and was curious
If you don't need the keepass 2x functionality, then the keepass 1x package
is available and works great.
On Aug 20, 2015 8:28 AM, Andrzej Drewnowski andrewdrewnow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to run KeePass on OpenBSD (amd64)- current (but on 5.7 are the
same errors). I installed
version are you running now?
Peeking at /usr/src/sys/net/hfsc.{c,h} appears to indcate that hfsc
(which is what the 5.5 and later queues uses) has 64 bit values where
it counts.
- - Peter
- --
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http
I'm currently seeing 32M of memory used on my amd64 system. 20M of it
is the feed itself. CPU usage is minor. Disk use is only the trapped
list, which is currently at 1.1M on disk.
Hope this helps.
On 2015 Aug 10 (Mon) at 15:15:42 -0600 (-0600), Devin Reade wrote:
:In general terms, what
On 2015 Aug 05 (Wed) at 10:08:05 +0200 (+0200), Mark Patruck wrote:
:No issues on systems running
:
:em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Intel I210 rev 0x03: msi, address 0c:..
:em1 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 Intel I210 rev 0x03: msi, address 0c:..
:
:Also working on
:
:em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel
:with 1000baseT as well.
:
:em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82574L rev 0x00: msi, address 00:..
:em1 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 Intel I218-V rev 0x00: msi, address f0:..
:
:
:On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
: On 2015 Aug 05 (Wed) at 10:08:05 +0200 (+0200), Mark Patruck wrote
this is a real problem for real people.
On 2015 Jul 31 (Fri) at 02:33:00 +0300 (+0300), li...@wrant.com wrote:
:Congrats to raising another time wasting topic for a public commentary.
:
--
Love thy neighbor as thyself, but choose your neighborhood.
-- Louise Beal
it in an OpenBSD
system
and see if it comes up as something useful. Check -current too. If it isn't
supported, consider tracking down a developer to send the part to.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http
On 07/29/15 03:33, Wong Peter wrote:
Q:why do you believe that your machine was hacked?
A: My pf rules was flushed.This can prove using pfctl -sr. The whoe
firewall was not usable anymore. NO NAT nor packet filtering.
Hi Peter,
Can you let us know the version and architecture of OpenBSD you
Dear All,
Recently, I'm realized that my openbsd firewall router was not usable
anymore due to pf rules had changed by using carp and pfsync mechanism.
Here is my prove.
I'm tried to reinstall the whole machine and plugged in the modem LAN cable
to NIC card. All my written pf rules was flush
What information you all require?
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Em 28-07-2015 06:17, Wong Peter escreveu:
Dear All,
Recently, I'm realized that my openbsd firewall router was not usable
anymore due to pf rules had changed by using carp
might help. It almost
sounds like you are saying that you cannot figure out how whatever happened
occurred so it must have been someone at your ISP. That is a pretty big
leap to make without some evidence that actually points at your ISP.
-Danny
On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:00 , Wong Peter peterap
.
If this doesn't help it is beyond my knowledge.
Good luck!
STEFAN
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 28. Juli 2015 um 11:17 Uhr
*Von:* Wong Peter peterap...@gmail.com
*An:* misc@openbsd.org
*Betreff:* OpenBSD machine was hacked
Dear All,
Recently, I'm realized that my openbsd firewall router was not usable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/15 11:17, Wong Peter wrote:
Recently, I'm realized that my openbsd firewall router was not
usable anymore due to pf rules had changed by using carp and pfsync
mechanism.
It would be a lot easier to offer assistance if you offer some
gaps.
- --
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds
All bluetooth support was removed some releases ago.
The code rotted. If someone wants to work on this again, they are
welcome to.
On 2015 Jul 23 (Thu) at 10:02:55 -0400 (-0400), Richard E. Thornton wrote:
:I am just curious - is Bluetooth supported on any bluetooth enabled
:computers? Or is
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 02:39:50PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering buying a new netbook (currently I have an October 2012 Acer
Aspire One). If at all I'd like to stay with Acer but not necessarily. I'm
worried about UEFI secure boot on these netbooks. Is there any Acer
the
350 euros that I paid. Maybe my own fault then, but I wanted to be
adventurous.
Cheers,
-peter
On 2015 Jul 15 (Wed) at 05:27:37 +0200 (+0200), L.R. D.S. wrote:
:Not that nice. This hardware have many fancy things like UEFI and intel
:ME.
:I run i386 mostly because the /amd64.html say that it is thus safer to
:run those machines in i386 mode
That is an incredibly ancient comment, and is
Hi,
I'm considering buying a new netbook (currently I have an October 2012 Acer
Aspire One). If at all I'd like to stay with Acer but not necessarily. I'm
worried about UEFI secure boot on these netbooks. Is there any Acer models
that I definitely should not buy?
Regards,
-peter
OK, I should be more specific - what I got working was an OpenBSD install on a
GPT disk which included Windows 7 installed in MBR mode. This involves some
nasty hackery with OpenBSD fdisk, and was done at the time because I thought
I'd be installing OS X on the same disk.
What I haven't
The method in the OpenBSD docs is a no extra tools required method. BCDedit
makes it even easier.
1) Install Windows 7/8 on an MBR disk. GPT should work but requires more
effort.
2) As part of 1) create a partition for OpenBSD
3) Use OpenBSD fdisk to change partition type to A6, install on that
On 2015 Jun 30 (Tue) at 14:45:16 -0400 (-0400), Adam Van Ymeren wrote:
:Also the installer prompts you if you want this behaviour, so its
:hardly undocumented.
not in -current.
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for you are crunchy and good
with ketchup.
On 2015 Jun 29 (Mon) at 15:29:57 +0200 (+0200), Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
:Hi,
:
:I'm running a setup where my gateway (a PC Engines APU with
:-current/amd64) have two rdomains :
:
:rdomain 0 :
:- re0 : internal interface (IP 192.168.50.1)
:- re1 : dmz interface
:- re2 : external interface
:
Dear All,
OpenBSD 5.7
Arch: i386
Snort Version:2.9.7.3
Installed from packages
Start by typing snort. Thanks.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Nigel J Taylor ni...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 06/27/15 09:12, Wong Peter wrote:
Dear All,
I had installed Snort but cannot run it.
Error
Dear All,
I had installed Snort but cannot run it.
Error Message: Can't load library liblzma.s0.2.0
What need to install? I had install the lzlib but still cannot solved it.
Which packages need to install or how to tell snort to look up the shared
library?
--
Linux
On 2015 Jun 26 (Fri) at 00:18:40 -0600 (-0600), dsp wrote:
:On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:21:31PM -0600, dsp wrote:
: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:18:34PM -0600, dsp wrote:
: Hello list!
:
: please excuse my probably idiotic question, but i'm still a new OpenBGPd
user.
: (5.7 release)
:
: what
.
-peter
On 06/26/15 10:10, David Dahlberg wrote:
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2015, 09:53 +0200 schrieb Peter J. Philipp:
I can't find the -3 - option to generate NSEC3 RR's with
dnssec-signzone. Am I reading the manual page wrong or is this a
missing feature? If it is I'll probably leave NSEC3 out
NSD (name server daemon) is for authoritative DNS - answering the
question for internet users what is the IP address of my servers.
You may want to use Unbound. It is a recursive DNS lookup that answers
the question: what is the IP address of a server out on the internet
that belongs to someone
The httpd.conf man page uses the term request path, which I assumed when
reading
the man page would be the full http://company.com/web/page;, but I found
through
experimentation that it would be /web/page.
The httpd.conf man page says that for the location directive
The path argument will be
A twenty percent power reduction is no improvement? You have high expectations.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias
roque...@gmail.com wrote:
After realizing that FuguIta runs stable and not current like I thought
(sorry for the noise) I decided to download a snapshot
)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Peter Pauly ppa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an ADATA AUV128-32G-RBE USB3 stick that I've installed 5.7
(release) AMD64 on with encrypted root. It works fine on other
computers and this computer using USB2, but when booting inserted into
a USB3 port I get
I have an ADATA AUV128-32G-RBE USB3 stick that I've installed 5.7
(release) AMD64 on with encrypted root. It works fine on other
computers and this computer using USB2, but when booting inserted into
a USB3 port I get the following:
root device not found
http://i.imgur.com/pflOwXC.jpg
and
192.168.181.0/24 to any
match out on tun1 inet from rfc1916 to any nat-to (tun1)
###
Is there a way I missed other than the pfclt -k id -k stateid, and the
pfctl -Fstate?
Cheers,
-peter
Asterisk seems to run fine on 5.7 with one exception.
I normally have voice mail messages send as emails.
These emails are not being send.
/usr/local/share/examples/asterisk/default/voicemail.conf
has a variable
;mailcmd=/usr/sbin/sendmail -t
which I believe will end up using smptd
since I
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Peter
Fraser
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:18 PM
To: 'misc@openbsd.org'
Subject: OpenBSD 5.7 Asterisk sendmail voice mail as email
Asterisk seems to run fine on 5.7 with one exception.
I
Thanks I managed to miss noting that I should look at
/usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/sendmail-*
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of John
Merriam
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 12:20 PM
To: Peter Fraser
Cc: 'misc@openbsd.org
Don't use PID for seeding ever, in fact don't use seeding. If you want
a random integer use arc4random(), if you want a random buffer use
arc4random_buf(). There is more even to arc4random(3) which is up to
you to read in the manpage system.
Sincerely,
-peter
901 - 1000 of 2798 matches
Mail list logo