Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 07:41:18PM +, Philipp Buehler wrote: > Am 29.07.2023 21:29 schrieb Chris Bennett: > > The other IP's are randomly missing or give this: > > > > link#2 UHLc 0 450 - 3 em1 > > Hi, I'm happy. I practiced on the other server until I was

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 07:41:18PM +, Philipp Buehler wrote: > Oh, you need an alias for each IP that should be bound on em1 > so, like: > # cat /etc/hostname.em1 > inet 103.103.103.170/29 > inet alias 103.103.103.171/32 > inet alias 103.103.103.172/32 > inet alias 103.103.103.173/32 > inet

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

Am 29.07.2023 21:29 schrieb Chris Bennett: The other IP's are randomly missing or give this: link#2 UHLc 0 450 - 3 em1 Each route flush;sh -x /etc/nestart or a reboot changes the result. Oh, you need an alias for each IP that should be bound on em1 so, like:

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 06:18:40PM +, Philipp Buehler wrote: > Am 29.07.2023 20:04 schrieb Chris Bennett: > > inet 103.103.103.168/29 > > That's wrong, you put the "first" IP-address you want to > use/have on em1. So that would be 170/29 > Well, that half-worked. Always get ...170,

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

Am 29.07.2023 20:04 schrieb Chris Bennett: inet 103.103.103.168/29 That's wrong, you put the "first" IP-address you want to use/have on em1. So that would be 170/29 (168 is this network's BSD-broadcast or "net address") /etc/mygate is 103.103.103.169 Cannot forsee what your ISP

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

cc misc@. > Hmm, I also have a newer server with the same company that does have a usable IPMI. I also have to change IP's with it too. It is running -current from a few weeks ago, so this is a fictional address except for the last three digits (168) 103.103.103.168/29 Right now, I have

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI 11 Perhaps they just don't have a proper setup or are not using it.

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 04:34:17AM +, Philipp Buehler wrote: > Moin Chris, > > Am 29.07.2023 04:17 schrieb Chris Bennett: > > The network is 108.181.26.176/28. > > > > Right now,the first IP is 108.181.26.178 and the last regular address is > > 108.181.26.190, which might be wrong. I'm too

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

at they were doing by refreshing the IPMI preview screen. But that really is just a poor set of images. It did let me see the contents of files if I refreshed the image at just the right moment. Getting them to type sh -x /etc/netstart or reboot despite giving them detailed instructions beforehand. It

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

Moin Chris, Am 29.07.2023 04:17 schrieb Chris Bennett: The network is 108.181.26.176/28. Right now,the first IP is 108.181.26.178 and the last regular address is 108.181.26.190, which might be wrong. I'm too tired to read any more man pages or web pages. I needed more than 2hrs of sleep. I'm

Re: I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

cpi0: C1(@1 halt!) acpicpu3 at acpi0: C1(@1 halt!) ipmi at mainbus0 not configured pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Pineview DMI" rev 0x02 uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x02: apic 4 int 16 uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 "Intel

I need help to see if I can reboot new network OK. Wild misadventures with non-OpenBSD support and bad IPMI

(P0P9) acpipci0 at acpi0 PCI0: 0x0010 0x0011 0x acpicmos0 at acpi0 com2 at acpi0 UAR3 addr 0x3e8/0x8 irq 5: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB acpicpu0 at acpi0: C1(@1 halt!) acpicpu1 at acpi0: C1(@1 halt!) acpicpu2 at acpi0: C1(@1 halt!) acpicpu3 at acpi0: C1(@1 halt!)

Re: 6.7 trouble reaching ipmi on supermicro atom

On 2020-06-28, obs...@loopw.com wrote: > > >> On Jun 11, 2020, at 10:31 AM, obs...@loopw.com wrote: >> >> I didn’t have to bisect! Woo! While ipmitool no longer seems to function, >> once I enable ipmi in my running kernel I can successfully reboot a 6.7 >

Re: 6.7 trouble reaching ipmi on supermicro atom

> On Jun 11, 2020, at 10:31 AM, obs...@loopw.com wrote: > > I didn’t have to bisect! Woo! While ipmitool no longer seems to function, > once I enable ipmi in my running kernel I can successfully reboot a 6.7 > ipmi-of-this-vintage system now - where previously, from

Re: 6.7 trouble reaching ipmi on supermicro atom

ntention is to bisect for which change may have caused this, but > if someone knows what’s going on, I’m all ears. I didn’t have to bisect! Woo! While ipmitool no longer seems to function, once I enable ipmi in my running kernel I can successfully reboot a 6.7 ipmi-of-this-vintage system now

6.7 trouble reaching ipmi on supermicro atom

Info command failed I loaded ipmi in this kernel as I have in previous releases, seems to be present: cobalt# echo find ipmi | config -e -o /bsd.test /bsd OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Sat May 16 16:33:02 MDT 2020 r...@syspatch-67-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP

Re: OpenBSD and IPMI

I extend the question to Intel ME (similar to IPMI), cloud hosting (direct access to hardware by sysadmins) and virtual machines. I think the answer is default encryption of both disk and ram. On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 14:11, Denis <den...@mindall.org> wrote: > By reading thi

Re: OpenBSD and IPMI

On 2018-03-09, Consus <con...@ftml.net> wrote: > On 16:11 Fri 09 Mar, Denis wrote: >> By reading this article >> blog.rapid7.com/2013/07/02/a-penetration-testers-guide-to-ipmi/ my hair >> raised. >> >> How to OpenBSD security withstands against IPMI hole

Re: OpenBSD and IPMI

On 16:11 Fri 09 Mar, Denis wrote: > By reading this article > blog.rapid7.com/2013/07/02/a-penetration-testers-guide-to-ipmi/ my hair > raised. > > How to OpenBSD security withstands against IPMI holed solution from top > hardware vendors? > > Best ways to prevent pot

Re: OpenBSD and IPMI

On 09/03/18 15:11, Denis wrote: > By reading this article > blog.rapid7.com/2013/07/02/a-penetration-testers-guide-to-ipmi/ my hair > raised. > > How to OpenBSD security withstands against IPMI holed solution from top > hardware vendors? > > Best ways to prevent potentia

Re: OpenBSD and IPMI

2018-03-09 14:11 GMT+01:00 Denis <den...@mindall.org>: > By reading this article > blog.rapid7.com/2013/07/02/a-penetration-testers-guide-to-ipmi/ my hair > raised. > > How to OpenBSD security withstands against IPMI holed solution from top > hardware vendors? > TOP h

OpenBSD and IPMI

By reading this article blog.rapid7.com/2013/07/02/a-penetration-testers-guide-to-ipmi/ my hair raised. How to OpenBSD security withstands against IPMI holed solution from top hardware vendors? Best ways to prevent potential risks for OpenBSD over IPMI? Thanks

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

On 2017-12-21, Robert Blacquiere wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:50:02AM +0300, kasak wrote: > >> > >> Look at the newest servers with aspeed ast2500, such as supermicro x11 >> platforms, they are manageable through html5. If you still need to manage >> your server

Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

switched to em1, no problem. em0 is clearly defective. Thanks for the help! Chris Bennett

Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

> Original Message > Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside > From: Scott Nicholas <scott.nicho...@scottn.us> > Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 2:41 pm > To: Chris Bennett <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> > Cc: ed...@petti

Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

On Dec 21, 2017 2:58 PM, "Chris Bennett" <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> wrote: > Original Message > Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside > From: ed...@pettijohn-web.com > Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 1:42 pm

Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:52:33PM -0700, Chris Bennett wrote: > > > IP: 104.217.196.248/29 > > > Gateway: 104.217.196.249 > > > Netmask: 255.255.255.248 > > > > > > > What is your network interface? > > > > I have two, em0 and em1 > > em0: > inet 104.217.196.248 255.255.255.248 > > And I

Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

> Original Message > Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside > From: "Chris Bennett" <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> > Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 1:52 pm > To: ed...@pettijohn-web.com > Cc: misc@openbsd.org &

Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

> Original Message > Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside > From: ed...@pettijohn-web.com > Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 1:42 pm > To: Chris Bennett <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > > >

Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

On Dec 21, 2017 12:57 PM, Chris Bennett wrote: > > OK, I've not had this setup before and I can't get it > to work. I am not sure what to move or which commands > to use to investigate. I.E. I don't know how to > interpret what I see from them. > > I got this

Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside

OK, I've not had this setup before and I can't get it to work. I am not sure what to move or which commands to use to investigate. I.E. I don't know how to interpret what I see from them. I got this from support: I have checked the prefix routing and I dont see any issue with networking. You

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

e main issue is with the IPMI (from ATEN) is it uses iKVM.jar which is > not supported for a lot of OS-ses. > > Regards > > Robert > > true. VMD+alpine+x11vnc runs in probably very old/crappy hardware, dunno if will run the jar though. in the past i preferred HP servers with iLO re

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

> Original Message > Subject: Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed. > From: "Alceu R. de Freitas Jr." <glasswal...@yahoo.com.br> > Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 11:04 am > To: misc@openbsd.org > > > I'm a bit late to answer, but may

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

gin for firefox on linux. That seems to work with older SuperMicro machines without much issues. Also the bundled IPMIviewer for linux works fine. The main issue is with the IPMI (from ATEN) is it uses iKVM.jar which is not supported for a lot of OS-ses. Regards Robert

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

d also try running linux in vm with icedtea-Web plugin for firefox on linux. That seems to work with older SuperMicro machines without much issues. Also the bundled IPMIviewer for linux works fine. The main issue is with the IPMI (from ATEN) is it uses iKVM.jar which is not supported for a lot o

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

Yepp. I have bios0: Supermicro X10DRT-PT With latest IPMI firmware and have html5. > 21 dec. 2017 kl. 12:00 skrev kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net>: > > >> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 12:16, Maxim Bourmistrov <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> >> написал(а): >> >>

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

, в 0:03, Chris Bennett <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> >>> написал(а): >>> >>> I found a new server that uses IPMI and offers using it >>> to setup your own custom OS. So I bought in. >>> >>> Damn thing requires Java. >>> They offered me

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

Even X10 can be upgraded to get in html5. > 21 dec. 2017 kl. 06:50 skrev kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net>: > > >> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 0:03, Chris Bennett <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> >> написал(а): >> >> I found a new server that uses IPMI and o

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

We manage to deal with all our servers using the IPMI serial console redirect. You might need to set it up in the BIOS once, although we've not had to do that in ages. You do have to create the IPMI remote login/password, but you need that anyway if you're trying to use the web/java console

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 0:03, Chris Bennett <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> > написал(а): > > I found a new server that uses IPMI and offers using it > to setup your own custom OS. So I bought in. > > Damn thing requires Java. > They offered me some pretty wo

Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

NO, Just download ipmiview from SM and use the build in viewer and all is OK The power can still be managed with the web site. IPMI vire requires java.exe on your PC but rund independently of any browser T -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org

IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.

I found a new server that uses IPMI and offers using it to setup your own custom OS. So I bought in. Damn thing requires Java. They offered me some pretty worthless advice on using Java. I'm screwed into having to use Windows 7. I've tried the Firefox ESR 32bit that supports Java. Nope. Opera

Re: ipmi driver broken

> From: Ted Unangst > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 8:50 PM > > i'm afraid i won't make a very good ipmi maintainer, but i think i applied the > patch in the right spot. Cool, thanks; much appreciated.

Re: ipmi driver broken

> From: Theo de Raadt > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 8:41 PM > > If you want it working, you will need to get it fixed. On all > machines, so that we can renable it. I definitely don't want to be one of those entitled people demanding work from developers without providing anything that you

Re: ipmi driver broken

Paul B. Henson wrote: > After applying this and installing the resulting kernel, ipmi worked > fine. I skipped 6.0, but just updated my boxes to 6.1, and see the same > ipmi failures. It looks like this fix hasn't been applied, the code in > head is still missing this line. I appl

Re: ipmi driver broken

> Anyway, thanks for the thoughts; but I do still want a working ipmi :). > No biggie to add one line and recompile the kernel, but it would be nice > to get fixed. It's still disabled by default out of the box, you have to > explicitly reconfigure your kernel to enable it. If you wan

Re: ipmi driver broken

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:31:34PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > My understanding is that ipmi driver used by ipmitool is disabled > intensionally due to the security problems. IPMI pose a grave security > risk. IPMI on the SP is available whether or not the openbsd driver i

Re: ipmi driver broken

Paul B. Henson wrote: > I noticed back when I upgraded to 5.9 the ipmi driver stopped working, > it just said: > > ipmi0: get header fails > ipmi0: no SDRs IPMI disabled > > I found the following post at the time which appeared to point out the > issue and suggest a

ipmi driver broken

I noticed back when I upgraded to 5.9 the ipmi driver stopped working, it just said: ipmi0: get header fails ipmi0: no SDRs IPMI disabled I found the following post at the time which appeared to point out the issue and suggest a fix: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/fix-for-quot-ipmi0

no SDRs IPMI disabled?

I just installed 5.9 on a Supermicro X11SSL-F board, and tried to enable the ipmi driver. During boot, it shows: ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 2.0 interface KCS iobase 0xca2/2 spacing 1 iic0: skipping sensors to avoid ipmi0 interactions ipmi0: get header fails ipmi0: no SDRs IPMI disabled ipmi

Supermicro X8SIL-F ipmi and lm issue

Hi, I observe strange behavior with Supermicro X8SIL-F. Latest BIOS and IPMI firmware. Only one FAN is present (CPU FAN). After some time of normal work IPMI start to report errors with one (or more) fans (low speed or not present). 'systat sensors' shows wrong or missing data for same fan. I

Re: Supermicro X8SIL-F ipmi and lm issue

Atanas Vladimirov bsdbg.net> writes: > I observe strange behavior with Supermicro X8SIL-F. Latest BIOS and IPMI > firmware. > Only one FAN is present (CPU FAN). > After some time of normal work IPMI start to report errors with one (or > more) fans (low speed or not present).

Re: Keyboard through IPMI lag/skipping keys

Replying on-list to an off-list email. Are you suggesting that I run a 9pin serial port to the machine for console admin? That is one option, and if you can do it, it's a simple and pretty trustworthy way to do things, whereas the embedded system handling IPMI is...not great ;-) However that's

Re: Keyboard through IPMI lag/skipping keys

On 10/22/14 12:18, Stuart Henderson wrote: Since OpenBSD doesn't have dual serial+tty consoles, you won't see much on the monitor after rebooting with that in boot.conf - if you need to skip this, hold ctrl down during boot (specifically, it needs to be down at the point where the boot loader

Re: Keyboard through IPMI lag/skipping keys

Thanks for the reply. I am actually on the latest version. Like I said I do not have this problem with windows or centos linux. Subject: Re: Keyboard through IPMI lag/skipping keys From: m...@alumni.chalmers.se Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 07:47:47 +0200 CC: misc@openbsd.org To: flas

Re: Keyboard through IPMI lag/skipping keys

On 2014-10-13, Justin Winch flas...@hotmail.com wrote: I have a very irritating problem with the keyboard lag through IPMI on a supermicro X9DRT. If i install centos I do not have the lag/missed keystrokes and also I do not have this problem with any of my other hardware running openbsd

Keyboard through IPMI lag/skipping keys

I have a very irritating problem with the keyboard lag through IPMI on a supermicro X9DRT. If i install centos I do not have the lag/missed keystrokes and also I do not have this problem with any of my other hardware running openbsd. Some keystrokes dont get logged others are logged twice

Re: Keyboard through IPMI lag/skipping keys

Tried upgrade to a newer IPMI firmware? On 13 okt 2014, at 02:11, Justin Winch flas...@hotmail.com wrote: I have a very irritating problem with the keyboard lag through IPMI on a supermicro X9DRT. If i install centos I do not have the lag/missed keystrokes and also I do not have

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

On 2013-11-24, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: Back on topic to my actual problem, it looks like the IPMI SOL com2 is actually using IRQ 10 rather than 5, which both linux and freebsd detect: [2.324044] 00:0e: ttyS2 at I/O 0x3e8 (irq = 10) is a 16550A uart2: 16550 or compatible port

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

On 2013-11-24, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: erase ^?, werase 1234567890123456 16 chars, because of the 16 byte buffer in the uart. com2 at isa0 port 0x3e8/8 irq 5: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo ^^ when enough chars have been sent to fill the

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:09:33PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: How come freebsd dynamically detects the correct irq, but openbsd has it hardcoded? linux and freebsd kernels use acpi to configure isa serial ports, openbsd uses static allocations. Ah, ok; now that I know what's going

IPMI SOL serial console wedges

I've got a supermicro X9SCL-F board with ipmi support, and I'm trying to use it for the serial console. It shows up as a third com port. After booting the latest install cd, I run the usual stty com2 115200 and set tty com2, and then boot. The kernel messages show up fine, and then the output just

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 09:54:41AM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: in the bios, you can set the onboard serial ports irq to some higher value. that way, the ipmi console will become com0. (not tried on that board, only on newer supermicros that dont have the serial port on the outside

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:40:31PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 09:54:41AM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: in the bios, you can set the onboard serial ports irq to some higher value. that way, the ipmi console will become com0. (not tried on that board, only

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Jiri B wrote: Supermicro IPMI is crap. Use normal serial console and add a power strip which you can manage via ethernet to poweroff/power cycle the server. Well, I can't say it's the greatest implementation ever, but arguably it doesn't seem much

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

Supermicro IPMI is crap. Use normal serial console and add a power strip which you can manage via ethernet to poweroff/power cycle the server. Well, I can't say it's the greatest implementation ever, but arguably it doesn't seem much worse than on my Sun or IBM servers. http

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

crap, but at least there was some attempt to provide isolation. Actually, my supermicro boxes have a separate dedicated IPMI ethernet port. Only some, not all, supermicro boards use that stupid bridged design that shares a single port for both the primary system ethernet and IPMI ethernet

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

, if I unplug the ipmi virtual cd, I see that: [...] It looks like as soon as userspace touches the console, it freezes up. Well, it turns out the IPMI SOL com2 uses irq 10 for whatever reason rather than irq 5. Both linux and freebsd successfully detect this: [2.324044] 00:0e: ttyS2 at I/O

Re: IPMI SOL serial console wedges

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 04:10:23PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote: I suppose the installer kernel could be fixed the same way, but at least for this initial install it's not worth it, I'll just install with the kvm head, fix the installed kernel, and then go serial from there. Actually, it

ipmi(4) and acpi(4) - ACPI IPMI Operation Region

hi there. i saw there was (again) question about ipmi(4) being disabled while acpi(4) is running. fyi, there is a new thingy which allows IPMI run on top of ACPI - ACPI IPMI Operation Region. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff543825%28v=vs.85%29.aspx http

Re: Advice on adding com2 to (amd64) GENERIC; enabling easier IPMI SOL with SuperMicro boards

On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote: I guess you missed the subsequent put back yesterday. :) Guilty as charged. [...] com2 renumbers any other pci attached com ports from the likes of puc. I suppose for those running tools such as conserver, this would mean

Re: Advice on adding com2 to (amd64) GENERIC; enabling easier IPMI SOL with SuperMicro boards

Out of curiosity, after seeing the commit and subsequent backing out of this change, what'd be the expected issues with enabling com2 that require more thought? Regards, Rogier On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 02:06, Rogier

Re: Advice on adding com2 to (amd64) GENERIC; enabling easier IPMI SOL with SuperMicro boards

On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 01:16, Rogier Krieger wrote: Out of curiosity, after seeing the commit and subsequent backing out of this change, what'd be the expected issues with enabling com2 that require more thought? I guess you missed the subsequent put back yesterday. :) The main issue was

Re: Advice on adding com2 to (amd64) GENERIC; enabling easier IPMI SOL with SuperMicro boards

On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 02:06, Rogier Krieger wrote: The GENERIC kernel config has commented out com2 (at isa0, addr 0x3e8, irq 5) and I assume this is not without reason. I've been unable to find that reason in source changes, but perhaps someone here knows. On i386, it is present. I am

Advice on adding com2 to (amd64) GENERIC; enabling easier IPMI SOL with SuperMicro boards

Dear list, in an attempt to save on serial cabling for our machines, I'm trying to see if IPMI Serial over Lan (SOL) works as advertised. For our Dell boxes, things seem to work, but our SuperMicro boards (X7SPA-HF and X8ST3-F) require extra work. The latter seem to insist on using com2 (i.e

IPMI local access

Hi, I've seen BMC local access seems impossible: http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg93376.html Is it really impossible or did I missed some point ? Is there a reason for not implementing a local driver as /usr/src/sys/dev/ipmi.c seems to contain all the code needed to interact with

Re: using ipmi locally under openbsd

Hi! Thanks for the quick and clear relpy! Actually it isn't a problem, i could just boot this computer once up with some other os and configure appropriate settings into ipmi and use it from there again with OpenBSD, i just wanted to be sure that i didnt miss something obvious. Thanks again

Re: using ipmi locally under openbsd

ipmi(4) doesn't support the interface needed for local access with ipmitool/freeipmi etc. On 2010-07-19, Imre Oolberg i...@auul.pri.ee wrote: Hallo! First of all, I am not a seasoned ipmi user, i rather resently found out about this possibility to control computers. I would like to ask how

using ipmi locally under openbsd

Hallo! First of all, I am not a seasoned ipmi user, i rather resently found out about this possibility to control computers. I would like to ask how to use ipmitool to control local computer's ipmi facilities from within OpenBSD. This computer is IBM System x3550 M2 and here is where i stand 1

Is SOL redirection on OpenBSD IPMI kernel enable is possible with Winbond WPCM450 BMC?

plenty of sensors reading. I continue to play with the IPMI/BMC and got the packages impitool for my OpenBSD box and configure the access and all to that test box good. I can even have a nice shell to the IMPI over TCP on that box too. I can do changes for the TCP, do power cycle, reboot, monitoring

HP IPMI

Hi, I have a HP (Compaq) ProLiant DL380 G5 which, according to dmesg, incorporates IPMI. # grep IPMI /var/run/dmesg.boot Hewlett-Packard IPMI rev 0x00 at pci16 dev 4 function 6 not configured # pcidump -v 1:4:6 Domain /dev/pci: 1:4:6: Hewlett-Packard IPMI 0x: Vendor ID: 103c

Re: HP IPMI

On 2009-12-17, Pete Vickers p...@systemnet.no wrote: Is the IPMI abstraction (mentioned in ipmi(4)) such that support for additional devices is little more than adding PCI vendor/product id to the attach code? or is a proprietary interface ? You probably just have to enable the driver, I

ipmi support on a Dell PowerEdge SC1425

... isn't working, at least not for me. Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0: http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=dsc1425 And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=112993650617151w=2

Re: ipmi support on a Dell PowerEdge SC1425

/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=dsc1425 And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=112993650617151w=2 but under my amd64 install of 4.4 I get 'not configured'. My current theory is that I've done something dumb

Re: ipmi support on a Dell PowerEdge SC1425

Dave Wilson wrote: ... isn't working, at least not for me. Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0: http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=dsc1425 And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support: http://marc.info/?l

Re: Dell R200 ipmi

The Dell Poweredge R200 has a ipmi board but ipmi at mainbus0 not configured Is there some new stuff in current to support the ipmi on R200 ? especially the watchdog feature. Or patch waiting to be tested ? Thank for the information. I enabled ipmi in the kernel with config. A related

Re: Dell R200 ipmi

On 2008-10-06, Jean-Girard Pailloncy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Dell Poweredge R200 has a ipmi board but ipmi at mainbus0 not configured Is there some new stuff in current to support the ipmi on R200 ? especially the watchdog feature. Or patch waiting to be tested ? ipmi is compiled

Dell R200 ipmi

Hi, The Dell Poweredge R200 has a ipmi board but ipmi at mainbus0 not configured Is there some new stuff in current to support the ipmi on R200 ? especially the watchdog feature. Or patch waiting to be tested ? JG

Re: ipmi not working on poweredge 2850

to turn it on in your kernel, using the config binary. config -e -f /bsd enable ipmi quit And you're all set (after a reboot). Ciao, Ariane Thanks, that was excactly what i was searching for. Regards, Joerg -- Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Joerg Streckfuss, Phone: +49 40 808077-631 DFN-CERT

ipmi not working on poweredge 2850

) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 7 (PXB2) acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus 8 (VPR1) acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus 9 (PXC1) acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus 11 (PXC2) acpiprt11 at acpi0: bus 14 (PICH) acpicpu0 at acpi0 bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xb000! 0xcb000/0x2200 0xec000/0x4000! ipmi at mainbus0 not configured cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0

Re: ipmi not working on poweredge 2850

hw.sensors.ami0.drive0=online (sd0), OK /snip the dmesg says that impi is not configured. Is there a way to turn it on? Heh, I happen to have played alot with that recently :P You only have to turn it on in your kernel, using the config binary. config -e -f /bsd enable ipmi quit And you're

Re: ilo (ipmi) and serial console redirection

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, holger glaess wrote: of cause , i try to setup com2 but the system says at bootpromt com port is not aviable , but if the kernel already loaded the com port is aviable. there is no setting options at the bios to change the com port from the ipmi board. Doesn't

Re: ilo (ipmi) and serial console redirection

Markus Hennecke wrote: Doesn't the bootloader number the com ports from zero on? AFAIR I could set the bootloader on a DL 385 to use the ILO com port via setting up com1 in boot.conf. This is a few month since I did that and I have no physical access to that machine now, so I can't look at it

Re: ilo (ipmi) and serial console redirection

hi of cause , i try to setup com2 but the system says at bootpromt com port is not aviable , but if the kernel already loaded the com port is aviable. there is no setting options at the bios to change the com port from the ipmi board. holger -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: Stijn [EMAIL

ilo (ipmi) and serial console redirection

hi i try to setup the last days the console redirection on al HP DL 145 G2 with ipmi board ( ilo standard ) the most works i see the post bios output and the first lines of der boot console of openbsd but there is a first error message that the com0 is not aviable and this ist true

IPMI

How I would disable the ipmi? I get this error on my system, /bsd: ipmi0: error code: ff when watchdog is running Thanks

Re: IPMI

On Nov 12, 2007 1:10 PM, Kleber Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How I would disable the ipmi? I get this error on my system, /bsd: ipmi0: error code: ff when watchdog is running Thanks Just boot with boot -c so you get into UKC. Then disable ipmi with 'disable ipmi'. You can also comment

Re: IPMI

Karl Sjodahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You can also comment it our in your config and build a new kernel if you want it to stay more permanantly. You can also use config -e to edit the kernel binary as described in the FAQ, http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#config, quicker than a

ipmi delay in 4.0 snapshot

Hello, I noticed that when booting a Sun Fire V20z with a recent 4.0 snapshot, the kernel hangs for about 17 seconds right after ipmi0 at mainbus0. The box boots successfully, and impi seems to be working fine. Not sure if the delay is normal or not; just wanted to report it. This happens with

Re: ipmi delay in 4.0 snapshot

Delay is normal. The communication with the BMC is quite slow and during the first boot it goes out and talks to all devices so it'll incur maximum penalty time wise. Subsequent reads and writes to the BMC are faster. Since this only happens upon boot I don't think it is that important. I did

Missing ipmi sensors on current

://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=115024220026846w=2 http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yesnumbers=5144 After rebooting with the new kernel the ipmi card which is a Tyan Taro M3289 is no longer being configured. This was working on 3.9, dmesg is available in linked post

  1   2   >