On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:43:05PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:01:40PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:18:42PM +0100, Miod Vallat wrote:
SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
would you like
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:18:42PM +0100, Miod Vallat wrote:
SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
would you like ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh?
Now that you've brought it up, I would really like a
ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh TCP stack. Just make sure
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:01:40PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:18:42PM +0100, Miod Vallat wrote:
SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
would you like ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh?
Now that you've brought it up, I would really like a
Jacob Meuser wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
Nonsense, as long as you can plug in some plutonium, things should be
fine.
Are you tellin' me this sucker is nuclear?
...Mr. Fusion? ;)
-Nix Fan.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:43:05PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:01:40PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:18:42PM +0100, Miod Vallat wrote:
SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
would you like
Nonsense, as long as you can plug in some plutonium, things should be
fine.
Are you tellin' me this sucker is nuclear?
...Mr. Fusion? ;)
Not until there's a Chorus about it.
Miod
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:15:41 +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:05 PM, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/02/2008, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/19/08, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
something as good as FireEngine,
I'm following this thread with quite some amusement, but one thing is
not in the least clear to me: why do you think you want something as
good as FireEngine. Heck, even under the assumption FireEngine is
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:52 AM, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
would you like ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh?
Now that you've brought it up, I would really like a
ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh TCP stack. Just make
SO now do you want FireEngine? Or rather SMPng networking? Or
would you like ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh?
Now that you've brought it up, I would really like a
ReallyHyperFastZoomStreamCyberWoosh TCP stack. Just make sure it
doesn't require 1.2Jigawatts of power and have interesting
On Feb 20, 2008 12:52 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:47:54 +0530
Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 2:59 AM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:50 AM, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:11:34 +0530
Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 12:52 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:47:54 +0530
Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 2:59 AM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17 13:38]:
Wouldn't it be nice to have a high performance networking stack?
yeah.
guess what we have?
exactly that.
(which doesn't mean it could be even faster)
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17 13:38]:
Wouldn't it be nice to have a high performance networking stack?
yeah.
guess what we have?
exactly that.
(which doesn't mean it could be even faster)
Pardon if I sound
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 13:12]:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17 13:38]:
Wouldn't it be nice to have a high performance networking stack?
yeah.
guess what we have?
exactly that.
could you please stop this shit and continue the conversation privately?
People registered at misc know well why they are using obsd. We don't
need this discussion.
2008/2/20, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 13:12]:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM,
Touchi!
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
On Feb 20, 2008 5:52 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 13:12]:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17 13:38]:
Wouldn't it be nice to have a high performance
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 14:07]:
On Feb 20, 2008 5:52 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 13:12]:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 14:07]:
(not that now I can do anything about it, all's lost for me)
Could you please read http://research.sun.com/minds/2007-0710/
yeah, i did, lots of marketing blubber, lots of bla bla, lots of vague
indications, nothing
On 2008/02/20 14:14, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 14:07]:
On Feb 20, 2008 5:52 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't your computer running on 100 years old technology called
electricity?
But that 100 year old technology used to be DC
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
But that 100 year old technology used to be DC earlier, then it was
converted to AC because of its inherent benefits.
way over a hundred years ago, yes (except for some small irrelevant
isles like parts of new york if memory
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 13:14, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 14:07]:
On Feb 20, 2008 5:52 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 13:12]:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
isn't your computer running on 100 years old technology called
electricity?
But that 100 year old technology used to be DC earlier, then it was
converted to AC because of its inherent benefits.
Similarly, wouldn't it have been beneficial
On 02/20/08 15:00, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
But that 100 year old technology used to be DC earlier, then it was
converted to AC because of its inherent benefits.
Marketing blurb.
way over a hundred years ago, yes (except for some
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:05 PM, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/02/2008, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17 13:38]:
Wouldn't it be nice to have a high
On 20/02/2008, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17 13:38]:
Wouldn't it be nice to have a high performance networking stack?
yeah.
guess what we have?
exactly
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:42:38AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
You're an idiot.
[..]
Think about it.
Idiots don't think.
If you didn't knew it - you're even bigger idiot, than I am.
could_not_resist
Oh, but they do! They are just not very successful. ;-)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
You claim that the thread is already polluted far beyond your feeble
efforts to further such.
So you agree that you are polluting the list.
Then you are a troll.
On Feb
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:33:12 +0530
Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just led me to ponder, what is OpenBSD's ultimate goal?
What, exactly, is yours?
I've read thru this thread and you are remarkably obscure
about your intentions, but it seems to me that OBSD somehow
does not fit
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
The suggestion about installing packages into /whatever is fine if
stated as a suggestion and/or question. I do not agree, but still I
think the question is valid. However, adding It doesn't need any
funding to fix this. makes
On Feb 19, 2008 5:16 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:33:12 +0530
Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just led me to ponder, what is OpenBSD's ultimate goal?
What, exactly, is yours?
My ultimate goal is to have an OS which would give me;
Mayuresh Kathe ha scritto:
On Feb 19, 2008 5:16 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:33:12 +0530
Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just led me to ponder, what is OpenBSD's ultimate goal?
What, exactly, is yours?
My
William Boshuck ha scritto:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:16:08AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
... I've NEVER got any of the code for FREE,
Yes, you did. The code is free. The CDs are not.
Maybe Mr.Mayuresh Kathe, dont know anoncvs[1].
By a 4.2 release, we can download a bootable
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:12:46AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Fair No.
It is like dead fish after 4 days.
Actually, what was private in that message?
You don't have to wonder, what. Any correspondence, which hasn't been sent
to the public, is private - and needs the agreement of the party
Fair No.
It is like dead fish after 4 days.
Actually, what was private in that message?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zbigniew Baniewski
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:01 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: What is our
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zbigniew Baniewski
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:20 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:12:46AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Fair No.
It is like dead fish after 4 days
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zbigniew Baniewski
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:20 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:12:46AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Fair
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:52:35AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
I may be an oaf, but it is with FULL REALIZATION THAT I AM
SENDING THIS TO
THE LIST
MY PURPOSE IN DOING SO IS TO PAINT YOU WITH SOMEHTING
RESEMBLING YOUR TRUE
COLORS.
Is it fair? Some
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:37:33AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
You mean that the proponents of threads are overyly emotional?
If the sides are calling each other with terms like idiot -
or something
similar - do you really find it as non-emotional?
How
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:52:35AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
I may be an oaf, but it is with FULL REALIZATION THAT I AM SENDING THIS TO
THE LIST
MY PURPOSE IN DOING SO IS TO PAINT YOU WITH SOMEHTING RESEMBLING YOUR TRUE
COLORS.
Is it fair? Some day, someone other will forward _your_
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:42:13AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
If you mean it is now my private property, then I am free to do with it as I
please.
Otherwise, if it should be kept private, maybe it should be kept private.
Why should a discussion of threads be souch an emotional one?
Do
On Feb 19, 2008 4:50 AM, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the reason I've been gathering good C developers, so that they
could either;
1. take up complex projects like FireEngine/DTrace,
2. write replacements for as many GNU tools/utilities as possible,
3. be a landing stage for
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:39:50AM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
The suggestion about installing packages into /whatever is fine if
stated as a suggestion and/or question. I do not agree, but still I
think the question
On Feb 20, 2008 2:59 AM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:50 AM, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the reason I've been gathering good C developers, so that they
could either;
1. take up complex projects like FireEngine/DTrace,
2. write replacements for
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:47:54 +0530
Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 2:59 AM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:50 AM, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the reason I've been gathering good C developers, so that they
could either;
On 18 Feb 2008 at 10:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 7:57 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually what Ted has done was utterly disastrous, he knows his
own
code well enough to have completed it.
BTW, you are as big an oaf as Richard Stallman, you keep
What shit are you talking about?
On Feb 18, 2008 2:01 PM, System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Feb 2008 at 10:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 7:57 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually what Ted has done was utterly disastrous, he knows his
Come on guys, calm down, just stay what you are currently.
Just do your job.
Make OpenBSD the best router/firewall/server OS ever, you have the right
features for that now,
and I hope you will extend it in the nearest future.
And do not listen to those trolls.
Thank you all for what you do
Hey folks,
i have been writing software about 6 year since i finnished my
university course. OpenBSD has always been impressive to my eyes.
Since correctness/security is conditio sine qua non, i disagree as a
group of developer has it as goal. Goal should be performance,
portability usability.
Not lies; we have a 5000 emails thread to prove that.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:35:55AM +0059, Han Boetes wrote:
Lies
chefren wrote:
... Richard Stallman stopped [coding] doing so long time ago...
B) Richard Stallman puts users first, =like you!=, Richard Stallman
=believes= users
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Also, we don't get to use his code for FREE, I suppose most of the
users *buy* CD sets.
If only they did. A miniscule percentage of the user community buys
CD's, and the sales are dropping. The vast majority of users
If there were no downloads, there would be less users who donate. I'd
dare to claim some people have just downloaded and donated instead of
buying the CD - in my case it makes sense since I can afford very little
and the production of CDs would eat some of that little. I miss the
stickers, though.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
I for one buy CDs every year, year after year.
Best,
~Mayuresh
The CD sets you buy must be different than the ones I buy; mine don't
come with a ballot for voting on features.
Please proxy vote for me and check [ ]
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Higgs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008 16:54
An: openbsd misc
Cc: OpenBSD-Misc
Betreff: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
On Feb 17, 2008 7:36 AM, openbsd misc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht
On Feb 17, 2008 11:23 PM, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are talking about nebulous features that are over hyped and
under proven. One needs a problem first before fixing it. You are
putting it the wrong way around by saying hey I'd like a super duper
faster tcp/ip stack
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:07:06PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
By this, I mean, developers *are* working on improving the features
currently offered by OpenBSD. In general people work on things which
they will find the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:42:38AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
You're an idiot.
[..]
Think about it.
Idiots don't think.
If you didn't knew it - you're even bigger idiot, than I am.
Thanks for conversation.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:12:09AM -0500, David Higgs wrote:
Does the -B option to pkg_add do exactly this? Or YOU could do the
equivalent and tell ./configure to install to a different base
directory. This doesn't need any funding either.
Nope, -B is mostly for chroot and flashdist-like
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
I noticed, that default path, where software from binary pkg and ports
gets unpacked, is /usr/local hierarchy - unfortunately, it's also the
traditional default of every individual source *.tar.gz package - such
way
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
... why don't you and rest of the team, led by Theo take a
concious decision to stop downloads?
OpenBSD is introduced (e.g., on the main web page) by three,
adjectives. It might be worthwhile to grasp the first of
those before
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:16:08AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
... I've NEVER got any of the code for FREE,
Yes, you did. The code is free. The CDs are not.
Mayuresh Kathe
On Feb 17, 2008 5:50 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
OpenBSD is an OS with amazing security and stability, but
it has too
few modern features.
H related?
thats exactly my point, our mindset has become that security
diversion.
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 10:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
Your logic is flawed.
So is your ability to understand English based sentences.
Go get a life
Dead billy goat or dead nanny goat?
which are you?
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
Are you as weird as your writing suggests.
Do you get
I think therefore I am.
I think you are a billy goat, therefore you are.
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
There you go again, disconnected
seem to like.
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
There you go again, disconnected from reality.
Please don't even try to think.
On Feb 19
.
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
Tony, you are really weird, stop polluting the mailing list with all
of your useless garbage.
If you want to have
: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
You are an Oaf, you don't realise that you are sending all these
useless emails to the list where its not needed, while *I* on the
other hand have been only sending mails to you.
Thats why I say
By this, I mean, developers *are* working on improving the features
currently offered by OpenBSD. In general people work on things which
they will find the most useful first. Sometimes this matches up with
what you want, other times it doesn't.
Are they willing to take a suggestions from the
On Feb 17, 2008 11:23 PM, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me take a stab of responding to this...
Thanks for responding...
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 05:33:12PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Hi,
NOTE: No intention to behave like a troll.
I've been following the
Zbigniew Baniewski ha scritto:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:52:34PM +0100, raven wrote:
Raven, learn to write understandable English first, then try to reply
to my mails.
I will try, thanks for a suggestion, english not is my mother tongue.
But, you still dumb.
I can see
Hi,
It gets stranger.
How is a bare bones code ever going to be useful to a non developing user?
Its useful to them only when its part of an overall system.
And that overall system in a really usable state is only available via
CDs which need to be purchased.
aehm, hello ? I do buy the cd's,
Jussi Peltola ha scritto:
For each message in this thread that I consider insulting (10 so far), I
will donate 1 euro to OpenBSD to compensate for lost developer time
reading such messages. Being a student my budget can't take more, but at
least I try to be grateful.
Keep up the good work
Actually what Ted has done was utterly disastrous, he knows his own
code well enough to have completed it.
BTW, you are as big an oaf as Richard Stallman, you keep ranting about
how you've put in your blood, sweat and tears, but forget to
understand the point that without us users you are
To the majority on this list -- my apologies if I end up feeding this
troll instead of making him 'go away'. to the OP -- this is why you got
absolutely NO answer from the devs. and now for the archives in the
hopes that at least some of the future would be posters will research
before
On Feb 18, 2008 1:52 AM, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 1:16 AM, David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008 1:53 PM, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its good to know that Ted did indeed try to
On Feb 18, 2008 2:25 AM, Kenneth R Westerback [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:23:44AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008 11:23 PM, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me take a stab of responding to this...
Thanks for responding...
On Sun, Feb
On Feb 18, 2008 2:22 AM, raven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe ha scritto:
Raven, learn to write understandable English first, then try to reply
to my mails.
I will try, thanks for a suggestion, english not is my mother tongue.
But, you still dumb.
English isn't my native
Lies
chefren wrote:
... Richard Stallman stopped [coding] doing so long time ago...
B) Richard Stallman puts users first, =like you!=, Richard Stallman
=believes= users are more important than coders so coders should be
enslaved by the users. Which is plain STUPID since without coders
On Feb 18, 2008 7:57 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually what Ted has done was utterly disastrous, he knows his own
code well enough to have completed it.
BTW, you are as big an oaf as Richard Stallman, you keep ranting about
how you've put in your blood, sweat and
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:20:22PM -0500, System Administrator wrote:
To the majority on this list -- my apologies if I end up feeding this
troll instead of making him 'go away'. to the OP -- this is why you got
absolutely NO answer from the devs. and now for the archives in the
hopes that
On Feb 18, 2008 1:55 AM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
think a generally usable 64/128 bit file system,
you have that much porn that you need a 128bit fs?
Ya I do :)
83 matches
Mail list logo
