-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The latest snapshot has some very experimental code that needs HEAVY
testing, in particular the following:
- complete rework of SSL setup in smtpd.conf
- introduce mandatory client certificate verification
- introduce mandatory serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/13 12:10, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>
> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
>
On 09/09/13 13:47, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 12:10:16PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
>> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
>> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
>> PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT !
>>
the dust ;-)
> I plan on backporting the packages from Debian unstable to Ubuntu via a
> PPA over the next few days. I'll send out a follow up email once that's
> done.
>
Awesome !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOr
y address NOT in blacklist and
# for any domain BUT foobar.org
#
accept from ! for ! domain foobar.org relay
Voila, let us know how it goes for you
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are sub
dealing with
"listen" starting tomorrow and hopefully they'll be swappable by the time
we release 5.4.1
Gilles
2013/9/15 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> On 2013-09-09 12:10, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
>
nt until I get feedback that things did not break.
Thanks !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
Ohai,
Eric and I were interviewed by the BSDnow folks to talk about OpenSMTPD
on their show. The link is there:
http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2013-09-18_mx_with_ttx
I'm sharing in case you're interested ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www
efault action (deliver to ...,
relay ...):
table myvmap { gilles = gil...@poolp.org }
accept from any for domain opensmtpd.org virtual
3- forward-only
===
It is now possibly to accept mail for a domain but make it mandatory for
users to relay mails through ~/.forward:
a
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40:25AM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> >The documentation has not yet been updated, I'm working at it right now
> >as it's quite an invasive change to the man page. All of t
the man page updates, I'm back in business with the latest snapshot.
>
> Again, a remarkable project. Thanks!
>
Thanks :)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@op
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:19:48PM +0200, gilles wrote:
> User gilles has just rebuilt a portable snapshot, available from:
>
> http://www.OpenSMTPD.org/archives/opensmtpd-201309241818p1.tar.gz
>
> Checksum:
>
> SHA256 (opensmtpd-
Sorry for the delay, I forgot about your mail :-)
Does it still happen if you add domain to the tcpserv macro in your pf.conf ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
OHAI !
Today is CONFIG PR0N !? day
Please share your config files in this thread ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:50:27PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> OHAI !
>
> Today is CONFIG PR0N !? day
>
> Please share your config files in this thread ;-)
>
pki mx1.poolp.org certificate "/etc/ssl/mx1.poolp.org.crt"
pki mx1.poolp.org key "/etc/ss
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:06:22PM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
>
> Le 3 oct. 2013 ? 16:54, Gilles Chehade a ?crit :
>
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:50:27PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >> OHAI !
> >>
> >> Today is CONFIG PR0N !? day
> >>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:18:24PM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Le 3 oct. 2013 ? 17:12, Gilles Chehade a ?crit :
>
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:06:22PM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 3 oct. 2013 ? 16:54, Gilles Chehade a ?crit :
> >>
> &g
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:50:27PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> OHAI !
>
> Today is CONFIG PR0N !? day
>
> Please share your config files in this thread ;-)
>
smtpd.conf:
pki mx1.prism.mx certificate "/etc/ssl/mx1.prism.mx.crt"
pki mx1.prism.mx key "/etc/s
it goes:
> smtpd: table_create: backend "mysql" does not exist
>
> The configuration line was:
> table vusers "mysql:/etc/mail/virtual-users.sql"
>
OpenSMTPD 5.4.1, to be released mid-November, will have experimental
support for mys
ins.conf
> for i in domains/*; do
> name=$(basename "$i")
> echo table "$name" file:$(readlink -f "$i") >> domains.conf
> echo accept from any for domain "$name" virtual "<$name>"
> forward-only &
user=vmail, method=maildir,
> delay=0s, stat=Delivered
>
> In both case, I only get one delivery when I expected two in the second case.
> Is there a way to achieve this kinda of split distribution?
>
What version are you using ?
This is strange because it is exactly what we do for
On 10/15/13 10:09, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Le 15 oct. 2013 ` 09:59, Gilles Chehade a icrit :
>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:27:40PM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Before being able to post my CONFIG PR0N, I need to finish it. And
it's ready,
On 10/15/13 10:33, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Le 15 oct. 2013 ` 10:14, Gilles Chehade a icrit :
>
>> can you also mail me full config and full tables, something might be missing
>> for me to troubleshoot
>>
> ### CONFIG
> listen on all
>
> table trustnet { 127.0.0
.
>
I suspect the problem comes from 216.146.32.0/255.255.254.0, can you try
to replace with 216.146.32.0/23 and see if the "inet_net_pton" warning
goes away in logs ?
> I am using OpenBSD v5.3 wit OpenSMTPd 5.3. Should I upgrade it to 5.3.3 to
> resolve it?
>
forgot to CC: misc@
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gilles Chehade
Date: 2013/10/17
Subject: Re: Sending to Hotmail, Yahoo etc
To: Simon Brock
Woops, I accidentally deleted this mail from my real mail account and just
bumped into it on my gmail account ;-)
Answers inlined and a
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Simon Brock wrote:
> Gilles
> Thanks for the reply -- have trimmed out some bit and answered your questions.
>
> [...]
>
> > This is very likely to get you blacklisted very fast, you're essentially
> > telling OpenSMTPD
As a side note, I'd totally advise you to join our IRC channel, it's way easier
to discuss and ask/answer this by direct exchange than by mail :-)
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:20:35PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Simon Brock wrote:
> >
x27;s not a single information
that we could possibly use to figure out what the issue is and help you.
Nope there's just bitching about a leak you experience with an operating
system we must guess, with an opensmtpd version we must guess, on a proc
we must guess... and we have to hurry becaus
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:51:58PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Eric Faurot wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:31:49PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > >
>
> [...]
>
> You have got to be kidding.
>
As for th
local alias deliver to mda "procmail -f -"
accept tagged CLAM from any for domain virtual deliver to
mda "procmail -f -"
accept tagged CLAM for any relay
accept for any relay via smtp://127.0.0.1:10026
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:56:37PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > I've never seen such a crap bug report, there's not a single information
> > that we could possibly use to figure out what the issue
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:48:31PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> >
> > Providing mail.log + smtpd -dv -T , helps us get things fixed
> > faster, and they can be enabled / disabled at runtime through sm
Somehow the vusers lookup goes wrong and my config is not working.
> Do you know what I might be missing?
>
Can you run 'smtpd -dv -T lookup -T expand -T rules' and provide output log
as you reproduce the issue ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
knows how to speak smtp and that will forward back
the mail to a configured smtp server after analysis. We used that and it
was as simple to setup as dkim-proxy, we used the exact same config.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:01:36PM -, Michiel van Es wrote:
> On Wed, October 23, 2013 12:50 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 07:42:41AM -, Michiel van Es wrote:
> >>
> >> The config would be like this then right?
> >>
>
AM_OUT
accept tagged CLAM_IN for domain virtual deliver to mda
"procmail -f -"
accept tagged CLAM_OUT for any relay
accept from local for any relay via smtp://127.0.0.1:10026 # will reinject in
CLAM_IN
accept from any for any relay via smtp://127.0.0.1:10028 # will reinject in
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:40:40PM -, Michiel van Es wrote:
> On Wed, October 23, 2013 1:12 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:03:32PM -, Michiel van Es wrote:
> >>
> >> I have it working.
> >> For people who want to use this:
>
On 10/25/13 14:23, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Gilles Chehade <mailto:gil...@poolp.org>> wrote:
>
> > - do not leak imsg structure in lookup process
> > - do not leak imsg structure in smtp process
>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:46:31PM +0200, gilles wrote:
> User gilles has just rebuilt a master snapshot, available from:
>
> http://www.OpenSMTPD.org/archives/opensmtpd-201310251943.tar.gz
>
> [...]
>
>
> Summary of changes since last snapshot
Hi,
I don't know if all package maintainers are following our bug tracker so
I'm taking this on list.
Denis Fateyev has opened a ticket on our bug tracker [1] because the
substitution does not match his needs on Fedora.
We will be making changes to the configure script but I want to make
sure all
c/smtpd.conf` (
> http://packages.debian.org/en/sid/amd64/opensmtpd/filelist )
> They don't have the problem we are discussing because they have everything
> in `/etc`. If they decide to change configuration directory, they face the
> same issue.
>
>
>
> > If you
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 07:47:28PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> >
> > Upstream we do not really have a strong opinion and we'll do whatever
> > makes it
> > easier for most maint
Hi,
OpenSMTPD supports authenticating users from a credentials table:
table foobar { gilles = $2a$bleh$zetztzetzetzet... }
listen on 0.0.0.0 [...] auth
On OpenBSD, the password is generated using the `encrypt` utility, which
is available part of the base system.
On other systems
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:23:38PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > > - do not leak imsg structure in lookup process
> > > - do not leak imsg structure in smtp process
> > >
> >
&
s many ways to view the archives
> (RSS, NNTP, HTML-frames, HTML-blog-like).
>
gmane works nicely yes, that's where I read the archives
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:12:40PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Bump -- gilles? Has any behavior been explicitly defined or should I go
> hunting in the source?
Yes, the behaviour is defined:
smtpctl operating in "sendmail" mode should follow sysexits.h so that it
can be
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:21:09PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > As for smtpd, it's simpler: it shouldn't terminate unless it explicitely
> > is terminated by root somehow. If it has terminated for
hi,
we have upgraded our main server to OpenBSD 5.4, this is just a mail to
check that the mailing list still works ;-)
Gilles
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
at do to... not much besides trying to understand if they
blocked your domain or IP address. if it's the domain, you're out
of luck; if it's the IP address, you can request a new one from your
provider and make sure your trafic is clean from now on to avoid
your domain reputation b
User gilles has just rebuilt a master snapshot, available from:
http://www.OpenSMTPD.org/archives/opensmtpd-201311071822.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-201311071822.tar.gz) =
a84985ab3ac8dbae0d2c07327f31571b0622b8da530bd80d8779432f5f63a990
A summary of the content of
ng to implement it
> on some platforms.
> I hope contribute to the project soon.
>
Hi,
Nice to hear :-p
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsub
usion from the last few months.
Very soon, we will release 5.4.1, which will be our first stable release
for 5.4.
When OpenBSD will tag 5.5, we will not rush to tag OpenSMTPD 5.5 but simply
ship our latest known stable 5.4.x, this way no more bastard versions.
Gilles
2013/11/8 Joel Carnat
&
very
envelope id obtained with smtpctl show queue.
We will release OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 very soon, this issue will be gone
> My smtp's port is open i can use telnet on it.
> Thanks for your patience. I hope my English isn't so bad :)
>
> Best Regards
>
> Cordialement
itted to OpenBSD, the website should pick it up soon
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
ing smtpd and scheduling all the envelopes.
>
Can you run with smtpd -dv -T mda ?
This will provide more logging regarding what happens at the mda level
> My smtpd.conf:
>
> # $OpenBSD: smtpd.conf,v 1.6 2013/01/26 09:38:25 gilles Exp $
>
> pki coiloptic.org certificate &q
o not wait to test if you are
technically able to test as soon as today ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
se try the latest git, or apply this patch:
> https://github.com/poolpOrg/OpenSMTPD/commit/8a11fdb22d3ccf638ebb7281d0f0673363e02cfb
>
published new snapshot
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
OHAI,
It's config pr0n time again, feel free to share your configuration files
on this thread ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a
>> size_t m1_len = strlen(m1.domain);
> >> size_t m2_len = strlen(m2.domain);
> >>
> >> if (m1_len < m2_len - 1)
> >> return 0;
> >> if (strcasecmp(&m1.domain[m1_len - m2_len + 1], &m2.domain[1]))
>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:03:28PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you open a ticket for a feature request on our bug tracker ?
>
> This is certainly a feature that can be merged, however it won't be part of
> the upcoming major release ;-)
&g
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:03:28PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you open a ticket for a feature request on our bug tracker ?
>
> This is certainly a feature that can be merged, however it won't be part of
> the upcoming major release ;-)
>
oh fuck
Hi,
We have setup our latest release on a machine and we are currently doing
a bit of stress testing.
If you are willing to help and have some machines available to send some
traffic... please send some mails to:
disc...@test.opensmtpd.org
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
be a DNS issue on your side ?
definitely not a problem on our side, there's still mail arriving as I'm
writing this
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
I'll have a look at these tomorrow, thanks
2013/11/22 Philippe Lelédy
> Le 22/11/13 18:22, Philippe Lelédy a écrit :
>
>
> -3- I have a S/MIME certificate in my UA, but lacks ca file, so I get:
>
> debug: lka: X509 verify: unable to get local issuer certificate
> smtp-in: Client certificate ve
ohai,
there was apparently a problem with the list, mails were not forwarded
to everyone.
this seems to have been caused by the mlmmj daemon that had crashed,
please let me know if you realize you don't receive mails anymore.
I'll be monitoring for a while
--
Gilles Cheh
listen line that states:
listen on all port submission tls-require verify auth
this way your submission port will use tls-require and verify the
certificate before the user even gets a chance to authenticate
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
fter this major
release ;-)
Please reply to this thread so I can easily update the testing file !
If everything is good, release will probably take place this week-end
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you ar
able example.org { one => localuser1, two => localuser2 }
>
> accept from any for domain "example.org" virtual deliver
> to lmtp "/var/dovecot/lmtp"
>
> accept from source 192.168.1.200/32 for any relay
>
> accept for local alias deliver to mbox
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:57:47AM +0100, Philippe Lel?dy wrote:
> Le 27/11/13 11:12, Gilles Chehade a icrit :
> >Hi,
> >
> >The latest snapshots are what we're going to release in a few days.
>
> I still find that man pages should be improved.
>
Yes, like ot
any chance you could pass by our irc channel today ?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:52:17AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:20:50PM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> > I'm running the latest snapshot and everything has been running smoothly
> > until
; > information.
> >
> > Here is the list of the bounced messages:
> >
> > 253
> >
> >
> >
>
> - End forwarded message -
>
> --
> Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
Please be aware we have a wiki on github and I will take time converting
it into a FAQ if people take time filling it in :-)
Gilles
On 12/03/13 18:33, edwin wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 08:15 AM, Philippe Lelidy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a long struggle with OpenSMTPD and doveco
hi,
we would like three or four people to step up, preferably package
maintainers so we can have them double check that our release tarballs
build on their systems correctly.
please contact me by mail or join #opensmtpd @ freenode
Thanks !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
d.org/report.html
Security bugs should be reported directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and Charles Longeau.
Subject: Announce: OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 released
OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 has just been release
and we're so excited the release note was included twice in the same mail ;-)
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:23:09PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 has just been released.
>
> OpenSMTPD is a FREE implementation of the SMTP protocol with some common
> extensions. I
Starting with new releases, starting smtpd -h will display version and usage
2013/12/6 Richard Kernahan
> Hi (or Ohai)
>
> I don't see a version number for smtpd anywhere. Perhaps I'm missing
> something?
>
> It would be useful for reporting problems, and knowing which version was the
> last to
> Try2 (working, but I prefer only certain IP address can access my mail
> service)
> accept for domain virtual deliver to mbox
>
> As you can see, it's related to the "from ." setting. Anyone has same
> problem?
>
Try replacing:
-
> As you see, only the user is sent, not the full adress, making LMP
> unusable in multidomain environment, as I yet explained.
>
Did you try to relay via lmtp instead of deliver to lmtp ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
as I try to send a
> mail, OpenSMTPd simply quits.
>
Your use is correct, this shouldn't happen :-/
It works fine here, I'll try to find a way to reproduce and send you a
diff with a fix by tomorrow.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
here with some of the alias & virtual tables populated
> might make understanding exactly what it can do a lot clearer.
>
Problem is man power, the more we spend on writing examples, the less
we spend on writing code. I encourage all users to fill the wiki on
Github so that we can then incorporate the examples into a FAQ, but
for now we only document the individual features in the man pages and
show small examples.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
reproduced, I'll have a fix shortly
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 01:20:11PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 04:01:01AM +0100, Michael Strauss wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can someone please enlighten me with OpenSMTPD? How is "verify&quo
es smtpd run the entire ruleset over the new
> destination address from the start, does it continue to run the
> ruleset from the current line (i.e. earlier rules aren't checked) or
> is there some other auto-magic that forwards it to the right
> destination?
>
Quite simple a
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:13:27PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> reproduced, I'll have a fix shortly
>
The following diff should fix your issue, can you confirm ?
diff --git a/smtpd/to.c b/smtpd/to.c
index 2ae2272..5ec44c3 100644
--- a/smtpd/to.c
+++ b/smtpd/to.c
@@ -41
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > * Support for authenticating users from a credentials table
>
>
> I might be just too used to snapshots, but hasn't this feature
m,port=587,starttls,auth=secrets:pw,mx]
> | debug: bounce: enough sessions running
> |_
>
> The mail seems to be silently dropped. How to configure a warning
> message for example to postmaster@localhost in such a case?
>
> Thank you,
>
>
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 09:52:18PM +0100, Michael Strauss wrote:
> Hi Gilles...
>
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:30:01 +0100, you wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 08:26:41PM +0100, Michael Strauss wrote:
> > > if a relay server rejects my mail in SMTP dialog, it's g
been decided yet and my idea to have a temporary
csprng() call was causing problems for us when merging to OpenBSD.
By renaming back to arc4random() we no longer have this difference
between openbsd's tree, master and portable.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
pf group.
>
We do support this, however we don't recursively lookup tables yet, so:
{ 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, 192.168.2.0/24 } will work
{ local, } won't
> Many thanks
>
> John Cox
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensm
omain does not accept
mail for all system users. The virtual mapping has to know about every
single recipient for a domain.
Real-life example, take opensmtpd.org:
table aliases { root = gilles }
accept for domain opensmtpd.org alias deliver to mbox
If you send mail to e...@opensmtpd.org i
ow and then we
could incorporate them into a nice FAQ.
You could start going though our archives, there aren't many mails, then
start adding new question/answers as they come.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail b
r the regular user account, such as
> > m.janssen maurice
> >
> > I prefer to keep these separate, because I'd like to use the same
> > virtual users for some other virtual domains as well.
> >
> > Is this possible?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
12131550p1/mk/smtpd'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/mock/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensmtpd-201312131550p1/mk'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/mock/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensmtpd-201312131550p1'
>
e[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/mock/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensmtpd-201312131550p1/mk'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/mock/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensmtpd-201312131550p1'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> --
>
> Perhaps related
is opened.
> @@ -501,11 +494,6 @@
> .Xr smtpd 8
> will automatically select the name that matches its source address
> when connected to the remote server.
> -The
> -.Ic hostname
> -and
> -.Ic hostnames
> -parameters are mutually exclusive.
> .El
> .Pp
&
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:19:26PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 2013-12-13 15:51, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> > User gilles has just rebuilt a portable snapshot, available from:
> >
> > http://www.OpenSMTPD.org/archives/opensmtpd-201312131550p1.tar
00160
> 250-STARTTLS
> 250 HELP
> help
> 214- This is OpenSMTPD
> 214- To report bugs in the implementation, please contact b...@openbsd.org
> 214- with full details
> 214 End of HELP info
>
> Best regards.
>
Hm, what is it that bothers you about HELP ?
It looks corre
are your listener with a hostnames table and declare a pki entry for
every domain that should be supported by SNI:
pki foo.bar ...
pki bar.baz ...
listen on [...] tls hostnames { foo.bar, bar.baz }
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOr
marthost.example.net pki
> smarthost.example.net verify"
>
> from any smart_relay
>
>
> And if so (a) how can I get quotes into a macro and (b) can I use
> other macros inside a macro?
>
No, the macro will expand to a STRING and therefore not respect the
syntax
--
re information to help troubleshooting.
We can't rule out a problem on our side but retrieving wrong MX records
seems very unlikely.
Can you show us output from dig/drill + logs from smtpd -dv as you relay
mail ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
s.
>
> Any ideas?
>
I don't think you can do this at the moment without relying on a custom
MDA that will pass dovecot the %{rcpt} token
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because
401 - 500 of 1305 matches
Mail list logo
