On 27.05.2014 07:33, Alan Corey wrote:
Mostly so when I switch to a different application, maybe on a
different page of the FVWM desktop, it isn't sitting there swapped
out
and it's responsive. I've usually got 20 or more applications open at
once (most just RXVT windows) and reboot about once
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:04:54AM +0200, bodie wrote:
Setting swappiness to 0 helps more, but then why is that parameter here
at all?
Why Linux is swapping most used pages even as there's plenty of free
RAM and cache is
total mystery.
because it is doing exactly what you asked it to
On 27.05.2014 08:10, Brett Lymn wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:04:54AM +0200, bodie wrote:
Setting swappiness to 0 helps more, but then why is that parameter
here
at all?
Why Linux is swapping most used pages even as there's plenty of free
RAM and cache is
total mystery.
because it is
hmm, on Tue, May 27, 2014 at 07:14:49AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek said that
block size is between 4096 and 65536, fragment size between 512 and
block size. Both are powers of 2, and block size can be 1, 2, 4, or 8
times fragments size. For media files -b 65536 -i 65536 is fine.
If you still
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:06:10AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Tue, May 27, 2014 at 07:14:49AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek said that
block size is between 4096 and 65536, fragment size between 512 and
block size. Both are powers of 2, and block size can be 1, 2, 4, or 8
times fragments
Does pf have specific rules for voip, may be example of working pf_rule
with voip?
Because for «standart rules» i have problems with voip.
set skip on lo
match out on pppoe0 from { em1:network } nat-to (pppoe0)
block
pass out
pass in on { em1 }
- after hanging up, the line near 3 minutes
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 01:59:07PM +0400, Швецов Михаил wrote:
Does pf have specific rules for voip, may be example of working pf_rule with
voip?
Because for «standart rules» i have problems with voip.
set skip on lo
match out on pppoe0 from { em1:network } nat-to (pppoe0)
block
Hi!
It is most unlikely the issue of pf or its rules. Simply because your
issues are related to SIP (busy issue) and RTP/phone (voice volume).
Pf does not have any SIP ALG built-in so can't affect VoIP.
I'd like to suggest you to check busy issue with your VoIP provider or
to check out different
Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2014, 14:15 +0400 schrieb Dmitry Petrakoff:
It is most unlikely the issue of pf or its rules. Simply because your
issues are related to SIP (busy issue) and RTP/phone (voice volume).
Pf does not have any SIP ALG built-in so can't affect VoIP.
Well that is not completely
Em 27-05-2014 02:26, bodie escreveu:
On 27.05.2014 07:09, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 27-05-2014 01:22, bodie escreveu:
Why do you think that it's good idea to allow users install 3rd party
packages
without need for root privileges?
Users can compile and run whatever they want in their
Tue, 27 May 2014 13:59:07 +0400
Швецов Михаил mv...@ya.ru wrote:
Does pf have specific rules for voip, may be example of working
pf_rule with voip?
Because for «standart rules» i have problems with voip.
set skip on lo
match out on pppoe0 from { em1:network } nat-to (pppoe0)
block
It's just like Homebrew. But, with no sudo.
Em terça-feira, 27 de maio de 2014, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com escreveu:
Em 27-05-2014 02:26, bodie escreveu:
On 27.05.2014 07:09, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 27-05-2014 01:22, bodie escreveu:
Why do you think that it's good
Sorry, that was exactly I meant ( OT probably ):
The first issue with late hang-up most likely means, that calee hung up and his
UAC sent SIP BYE within existing dialog. For some reasons either UAS on
caller's side or intermediate SIP proxy discarded that BYE. There could be the
same issue with
Em 27-05-2014 13:18, Eric Lalonde escreveu:
On a multi-user production system this is unattractive from this
system administrator's point of view. On a single-user system this is
redundant because the ports system already exists, and you have the
priveledge to install whatever you want.
So you
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 01:59:07PM +0400, wrote:
Does pf have specific rules for voip, may be example of working
pf_rule with voip?
Because for «standart rules» i have problems with voip.
set skip on lo
match out on pppoe0 from { em1:network } nat-to (pppoe0)
Hi,
I have relatively busy npppd pptp server, and it logs a lot of output
into /var/log/messages.
How can I move npppd and pipex log messages into separate file?
Thank you in advance,
--
Marko Cupać
OK, I got it booting. In a fairly useless config, but ...
Booting from a -current amd64 cd55.iso cd-rom, I (E)dited the MBR so
that the OpenBSD 'A6' partition started on sector 2048, and was 500MB
in size.
I accepted the auto configured disklabel (i.e. all space in 'a') and
installed w/o
Hi,
i habe a little problem with authdaemond.
cat /var/log/maillog
May 27 21:12:30 2-2-2-2 postfix/smtps/smtpd[6446]: Anonymous TLS
connection established from 1-1-1-1-di.dum.di[1.1.1.1]: TLSv1 with
cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)
May 27 21:12:30 2-2-2-2 postfix/smtps/smtpd[6446]:
On 2014/05/27 13:59, Швецов Михаил wrote:
Does pf have specific rules for voip, may be example of working pf_rule with
voip?
Because for «standart rules» i have problems with voip.
set skip on lo
match out on pppoe0 from { em1:network } nat-to (pppoe0)
block
pass out
pass in on
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
It just workstm for me, no special setup needed, no static-port or anything,
just a standard nat-to rule. This is with various devices; snom and gigaset
hardware phones, softclient on android, pjsua on OpenBSD.
But
Using tcpdump -n -ttt -r /var/log/pflog I have a log entry with
[len16asnlen69] at the end. The packet was from port 65500 to 161.
What is len16asnlen69 ?
For the past three months our small academic lab has used LDAP server
from the base of OpenBSD to authenticate users. All our computing nodes
and desktops run RedHat Linux while file servers run FreeNAS. Getting
them to authenticate users using OpenBSD LDAP directory server was a
breeze. Today I
22 matches
Mail list logo
