Just saw this discussion.
I've heard the same things. I have a few autographed lobby cards which are
fun to have and not especially valuable otherwise so if you're not buying
them for investment purposes or re-sale then I guess it's moot.
Mine have Ray Milland's autographs and I like the cards.
ands, of "cast signed" posters stinking up
> the joint, you can't really fault buyers for being a little leery of even the
> real thing.
>
> --Peter
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 6/23/12, channinglylethomson wrote:
>
> From: channinglylethomson
>
I think it depends entirely on the authenticity of the autograph, the signer,
and the invididual poster involved.
We had a Fred Astaire signed half sheet from TOP HAT and the signature
definitely did not devalue that poster.
But I think mopoers who have advised against this have a point.
Sig
ic Art
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Sunday, 24 June 2012 4:06 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Autographs on Movie Posters
At 01:01 PM 6/23/2012, dreamfact...@hollywooddreamfactory.com wrote:
> >cool jeff and Rich !!! - I think the issue with Prowse was that he
> simply wore the
>
At 01:01 PM 6/23/2012, dreamfact...@hollywooddreamfactory.com wrote:
>cool jeff and Rich !!! - I think the issue with Prowse was that he
simply wore the
vader costume and dist have speaking parts or was on screen other
then in costume...
on SW, like Dave I think the autograph to have would be
into a trite poster form in
order to sell tickets at the Boxoffice.. I love it... i want some
popcorn now and a movie.. :)
>
> Original Message
>From: jmeyer...@hotmail.com
>To: dreamfact...@hollywooddreamfactory.com
>Subject: RE: [MOPO] Autographs on Movie Posters
>Date: S
I only have a small number of autographed posters in my collection
one is a 1sh from Inferno (1953) that I had Rhonda Fleming sign for
me when I was one of the many sponsors for Cinevegas Film Festival in 2004.
all the rest are Harryhausen posters that I had Ray sign for me in
1990 or 91 at a
OPO] Autographs on Movie Posters
>Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:46:02 +0100
>
>>I'd actually be curious to know how many times restorers have been
>asked to remove Prowse, Mayhew and Anthony Daniels' signatures from
>Star Wars posters.
>>
>>Didn't someone pos
ze the experienceTo me as a
>> dealer and a collector a signed piece in any form far exceeds just a
>> commonoff the shelf itemthat gos accross the board// letters and
>> signed clothing its all Good and its history of the celebrity and of
>> the art...
>>
ned clothing its all Good and its history of the celebrity and of
>> the art...
>> who ever started the idea that autographs do not embellish the
>> posters worth should really consider what memorabilia is all about
>> and has meant from the getgo kindest regards, Tom
>>&
ery of even the real thing.
--Peter
--- On Sat, 6/23/12, channinglylethomson wrote:
From: channinglylethomson
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Autographs on Movie Posters
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Saturday, June 23, 2012, 10:50 AM
Good point, Tom. I generally agree with you that an autog
ould really consider what memorabilia is all about
> and has meant from the getgo kindest regards, Tom
>>
>>
>> Original Message
>> From: rixpost...@aol.com
>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Autographs on Movie Posters
>> Dat
RV.AMERICAN.EDU
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] Autographs on Movie Posters
>Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:48:07 -0400
>
>>
>>From my earliest years of collecting movie posters, it was a common
>belief
>>among collectors and dealers alike that probably stars' autographs
>on movi
>From my earliest years of collecting movie posters, it was a common belief
among collectors and dealers alike that probably stars' autographs on movie
posters or lobby cards definitely de-valued the piece. In fact, on many
occasions restorers would be requested to remove the autograph whe
14 matches
Mail list logo
